US Allies Flex Naval Muscles Near China
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Japan, a key United States treaty ally in Northeast Asia, conducted a naval exercise in the contested South China Sea with two NATO member states, the United Kingdom and Italy.
Newsweek has reached out to the Chinese Defense Ministry for comment by email.
Why It Matters
China's sovereignty claims over the South China Sea, which are based on what it calls "historic rights" and cover most of the waters, overlap with those of several neighboring countries.
The U.S. and its allies, including the Philippines, which has territorial disputes with China, have been carrying out naval war games in the South China Sea, exercising the freedom of navigation in international waters. Chinese warships often keep tabs on the allied exercises.
What To Know
The Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force said on Wednesday that a multilateral naval drill was held at an undisclosed location in the South China Sea on May 3 with the Royal Navy and the Italian Navy, strengthening cooperation to promote a "free and open" Indo-Pacific.
Participating ships were the Japanese frigate JS Yahagi, the British patrol ship HMS Spey, and the Italian frigate ITS Antonio Marceglia. The drill, which focused on maneuvering, aimed to enhance cooperation between the three navies and to improve Japan's capabilities.
The Japanese frigate JS "Yahagi," left, the British patrol ship HMS "Spey," middle, and the Italian frigate ITS "Antonio Marceglia" sail in formation in the South China Sea on May 3, 2025.
The Japanese frigate JS "Yahagi," left, the British patrol ship HMS "Spey," middle, and the Italian frigate ITS "Antonio Marceglia" sail in formation in the South China Sea on May 3, 2025.
Italian Navy
Official released photos show the three naval vessels sailed in formation, while no Chinese vessels, neither assigned to the country's navy, which is currently the largest in the world by hull count, nor attached to the powerful coast guard, were seen in the nearby waters.
Japan has long viewed the South China Sea issue as a legitimate concern of the international community. It has frequently dispatched its fleet of naval ships to the region, including the visit of a China-funded naval base in Cambodia by its two minesweeping vessels last month.
For the two European warships, the Spey is one of two Royal Navy vessels deployed to the Indo-Pacific region. It will soon be met with a naval strike group led by the British aircraft carrier HMS Prince of Wales in the region, which was deployed for an eight-month mission.
The Antonio Marceglia left Italy in January for an Indo-Pacific deployment. In late April, it monitored and surveilled "illicit activities" carried out by North Korean vessels, which are banned by the United Nations Security Council resolutions, in Japan's surrounding waters.
In late April, Italian Navy frigate ANTONIO MARCEGLIA conducted 2nd monitoring and surveillance activities against illicit maritime activities, including ship-to-ship transfers with DPRK vessels prohibited by UNSCRs.https://t.co/JqmhvIke5z#Italy pic.twitter.com/MeW3W6wYib — MOFA of Japan (@MofaJapan_en) May 2, 2025
What People Are Saying
The Japanese Foreign Ministry said: "Japan expresses serious concern over repeated actions in recent days that increase regional tensions in the South China Sea and urges de-escalation of the tensions."
British Foreign Secretary David Lammy said: "We are concerned by dangerous and destabilizing activities by China in the South China Sea. The U.K. and world economy depends on these trade routes being safe and secure."
Italian Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani said: "[G7 Foreign Ministers] reaffirmed that there is no legal basis for China's expansive maritime claims in the South China Sea, and they reiterated their opposition to China's militarization and coercive and intimidation activities in the South China Sea."
What Happens Next
It remains to be seen whether the British carrier strike group will carry out any war games when it reaches the South China Sea. China previously denounced naval activities carried out by foreign countries in the region for undermining its maritime rights and interests.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
14 minutes ago
- The Hill
US deadlines in Ukraine are a gift to Putin and Xi
President Trump's announcement this week of a shortened window of '10 to 12 days' for Russian President Vladimir Putin to reach a ceasefire agreement in Ukraine reflects a continued evolution in his rhetoric. His growing frustration with Moscow and his willingness to speak plainly about Russia's escalation send a signal that many in the U.S. and Europe have been waiting to hear. But while the shift in tone signals growing frustration, it has not translated into action. Russia reads the action as a continued pause in pressure, which it has used to intensify its offensive against Ukrainian homes and hospitals. Russian forces are now making their fastest territorial gains in more than a year, and their attacks are becoming more sophisticated. Swarm tactics using Iranian-designed Shahed drones, now mass-produced and adapted inside Russia with Chinese parts, are overwhelming Ukraine's air defenses at an alarming rate. In just one day last month, Russia launched 728 drones, decoys and missiles in a single coordinated wave. Ukrainian interceptors and radar crews are doing heroic work, but they are stretched to the limit. The U.S. has tools at its disposal that remain unused. For months, a bipartisan sanctions bill, co-authored by Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) and backed by 85 senators, a veto-proof majority, has been ready to move. The legislation would impose steep secondary tariffs on countries like China, India and Brazil that continue to buy Russian oil and gas, and would significantly raise the cost of doing business with Moscow. But in July, Senate leadership pulled the bill from consideration after President Trump suggested he would act if Russia failed to move toward peace within 50 days. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) said he would 'hold off' on advancing the bill, signaling that Congress would defer to Trump's timeline. House leaders followed suit. That decision was a mistake. While it is encouraging to see President Trump express increasing resolve, deferring congressional action in the hope that Putin will suddenly negotiate has only given Moscow more time and space to escalate. Every week of delay is a missed opportunity to tighten the financial pressure on Putin's war machine. And the clock is not just ticking in Ukraine. The broader contest involves China, too. Beijing's role in this war has become increasingly visible. Chinese companies are supplying entire weapons systems, not just components. Chinese-made drones and decoys are helping Russia saturate Ukrainian airspace. Chinese officials have even welcomed delegations from occupied Ukrainian territories and continue to sell heavy machinery to companies operating there. European officials report that China's foreign minister recently told the EU that Beijing does not want Russia to lose the war and fears that a Russian defeat would allow the U.S. to focus more squarely on Asia. Ukraine has responded accordingly. In early July, Kyiv arrested two Chinese nationals on espionage charges after they allegedly attempted to steal information about Ukraine's Neptune missile program. Days earlier, President Volodymyr Zelensky imposed sanctions on five Chinese firms accused of supporting the Russian war effort. These are not symbolic gestures, they are signs that Ukraine is increasingly realistic about the stakes and about China's alignment with Moscow. Support for Ukraine is not a distraction from U.S. competition with China. It is a critical part of it. Weakening Putin's military capacity weakens a key pillar of China's global strategy. And allowing Russia to continue its aggression without consequence would embolden Beijing's worst instincts from the Taiwan Strait to the South China Sea. To its credit, the Trump administration has begun voicing stronger concerns about Beijing's role. In the recently concluded round of trade talks, senior U.S. officials reportedly raised objections to China's purchase of sanctioned Russian oil and its sale of more than $15 billion worth of dual-use technology to Moscow. These are important warnings — but without follow-through, they risk being absorbed into the pattern of delay that Moscow and Beijing are already exploiting. The Graham-Blumenthal sanctions bill should move forward. It represents the most serious effort yet to impose real costs not only on Russia, but on the network of countries (especially China) helping it survive sanctions. It complements, rather than competes with, the administration's efforts to pressure Moscow. And it sends a message that the U.S. is serious about backing up its warnings with action. Countdowns can be useful. They create urgency. But urgency without follow-through is no substitute for strategy. What matters now is not how many days remain on the clock, but whether we are using each one to act. Jane Harman is a former nine-term congresswoman from California and former ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee, who most recently served as chair of the Commission on the National Defense Strategy. She is the author of 'Insanity Defense: Why Our Failure to Confront Hard National Security Problems Makes Us Less Safe.'
Business Insider
2 hours ago
- Business Insider
British Minister Badenoch's ‘Not Nigerian' remark sparks widespread backlash
A recent statement by British Business and Trade Secretary Kemi Badenoch declaring that she no longer considers herself Nigerian has drawn sharp criticism from both the Nigerian diaspora and political figures. Kemi Badenoch stated she no longer considers herself Nigerian, expressing full identification with the UK. Her comments sparked criticism from the Nigerian diaspora and political figures, highlighting the sensitivity of national identity. The debate raises broader issues about diaspora identity, cultural heritage, and perceptions of national belonging. Speaking on the Rosebud Podcast with Gyles Brandreth, Badenoch revealed that she hasn't renewed her Nigerian passport in over 20 years and now fully identifies with the United Kingdom, where she lives with her family. 'I'm Nigerian through ancestry, by birth, despite not being born there because of my parents, but by identity I'm not really, ' she said, adding that, 'I know the country very well, I have a lot of family there, and I am very interested in what happens there.' The comment struck a nerve in Nigeria, where national identity and diaspora pride remain deeply significant especially when expressed by someone of Nigerian heritage in such a prominent international role. As a beneficiary of automatic British citizenship by birth, Badenoch noted that she was one of the last individuals to receive this privilege before the policy was scrapped in 1981. For her, discovering her British citizenship was a game-changer. ' Home is where my now family is, and my now family is my children, it's my husband and my brother and his children, in-laws ' she emphasized, also considering the British Conservative party as an integral part of her extended family. Kemi Badenoch highlighted that her decision to relocate to the UK as a teenager was driven by her parents' concerns about Nigeria's unstable political and economic climate. "I think the reason I came back here was actually a very sad one, and it was that my parents thought: 'There's no future for you in this country,'" she said. Her remarks, including past claims about difficulty transmitting Nigerian citizenship to her children, have reignited debate over national identity, diaspora disconnection, and the cultural politics of belonging. Former Senator Shehu Sani Leads Political Firestorm The backlash to Kemi Badenoch's remarks intensified as prominent Nigerian voices, including former Senator Shehu Sani, publicly condemned her comments. 'If she has rejected Nigeria, she should at least return our name, ' Sani wrote on social media, referring to her Yoruba first name, Kemi. He questioned why Badenoch, who claimed she cannot transmit Nigerian citizenship to her children, would seek rights from a country she has disavowed. Badenoch made the citizenship claim during an earlier CNN interview, remarks that have since been widely countered. Sani responded sharply: ' Why should Kemi Badenoch be bothered about getting Nigerian citizenship for her offspring from a country she rebuked and rejected? She should just enjoy her adopted home and leave us alone in our father's home. ' In further posts, he accused Badenoch of projecting disdain for her heritage while benefiting from its cultural visibility. He also countered her claim about citizenship, noting that Nigeria's constitution does not bar women from passing on nationality to their children. He doubled down in subsequent posts, accusing Badenoch of projecting disdain for her heritage while benefitting from its visibility. ' Enjoy your adopted home and leave Nigeria alone, ' he wrote, reflecting frustration over her repeated efforts to distance herself from the country of her ancestry. Sani also challenged her claim about citizenship, noting that Nigeria's constitution does not discriminate against women in passing on nationality. You're right to question that phrasing. Since your original sentence is in the past tense, the refined version should maintain that. Here's the corrected version, keeping your tense and structure: Presidential aide, Dada Olusegun, also criticised the United Kingdom's Conservative Party leader, Kemi Badenoch, over her comments on Nigerian citizenship. Reacting to the claim in a post via his X handle, Olusegun accused Badenoch of deliberately misrepresenting Nigeria's laws. ' Aunty @KemiBadenoch, why do you continue to lie against your motherland? Why this continuous, dangerous, and desperate attempt to malign Nigeria? ' he wrote. He added: 'Chapter 3, Section 25(1)(c) of the 1999 Nigerian Constitution states that if the Nigerian woman is a citizen by birth, her children, whether born in Nigeria or abroad, are Nigerian citizens by descent, automatically under Section 25 of the Constitution. 'This holds regardless of the father's nationality. You do not need to apply for registration or naturalisation for her child to be a citizen. ' Legal Pushback Prominent human rights lawyer Femi Falana (SAN) echoed this constitutional clarification. According to Section 25 of Nigeria's 1999 Constitution, a child born to either a Nigerian father or mother is entitled to citizenship by birth. ' Badenoch's claim that her children can't obtain Nigerian citizenship because she's a woman is legally incorrect and misleading,' Falana said in a televised interview. He argued that such a statement reflects ignorance of Nigerian law and risks misinforming the public, especially those in the diaspora. A Divisive Pattern This is not the first time Badenoch has come under fire for comments on race, identity, or heritage. Her positions on issues ranging from colonialism to Black Lives Matter have frequently drawn criticism for catering to right-wing audiences. Her latest remarks have only deepened the divide. As diaspora voices grow louder and Nigerian officials demand greater respect from their global descendants, Badenoch faces increasing scrutiny, not only over what she said, but why she felt the need to say it at all.
Atlantic
2 hours ago
- Atlantic
This Is the News From TikTok
When he learned one night this summer that the United States had bombed Iran, the content creator Aaron Parnas responded right away, showing what's bad and what's good about using TikTok for news. Shortly after 7:46 p.m. ET on June 21, he saw Donald Trump's Truth Social post announcing the air strikes. At 7:52, according to a time stamp, Parnas uploaded to TikTok a minute-long video in which he looked into the camera; read out the president's post, which identified the suspected nuclear sites that the U.S. had targeted; and added a note of skepticism about whether Iran would heed Trump's call for peace. As traditional media outlets revealed more details that night, Parnas summarized their findings in nine more reports, some of which he recorded from a car. Parnas wasn't adding elaborate detail or original reporting. What he had to offer was speed—plus a deep understanding of how to reach people on TikTok, which may not seem an obvious or trustworthy source of news: The platform is owned by a Chinese company, ByteDance, which lawmakers in Washington, D.C., fear could be manipulated to promote Beijing's interests. TikTok's algorithm offers each user a personalized feed of short, grabby videos—an arrangement that seems unlikely to serve up holistic coverage of current events. Even so, according to a Pew Research Center poll from last fall, 17 percent of adults—and 39 percent of adults under 30—regularly get informed about current affairs on the app. Fewer than 1 percent of all TikTok accounts followed by Americans are traditional media outlets. Instead, users are relying not only on 'newsfluencer s' such as Parnas but also on skits reenacting the latest Supreme Court ruling, hype videos for political agendas, and other news-adjacent clips that are hard to describe to people who don't use TikTok. Last summer, after the first assassination attempt on Trump, one viral video fused clips of the bloody-eared Republican raising his fist with snippets of Joe Biden's well wishes. Simultaneously, Chappell Roan's ballad for the lovestruck, 'Casual,' played, hinting at a bromance. On my For You page in June, as U.S.-Iran tensions flared, I saw a string of videos known as 'edits'—minute-long music montages—on the general topic. One spliced together footage of zooming F-16s, Captain America intimidating his enemies in an elevator, and bald eagles staring ominously while AC/DC's 'Thunderstruck' blared. Skeptics might wonder: When people say they get their news from TikTok, what exactly are they learning? Frequent consumers of current-affairs content on TikTok insist that they can decipher what's going on in the world—that, even if they have to extrapolate facts from memes, the brevity and entertainment value compensate for a lack of factual detail. 'A lot of things are in simpler terms on TikTok,' Miles Maltbia, a 22-year-old cybersecurity analyst from Chicago, told me. 'That, and convenience, makes it the perfect place to get all my news from.' And as more and more users turn to TikTok for news, creators such as Parnas are finding ways to game the algorithm. Parnas, who is 26, is a lawyer by trade. He told me that he monitors every court case he deems significant with a legal tracker. He was immersed in politics at an early age. (His father, Lev Parnas, gained brief notoriety as an associate of Rudy Giuliani during Trump's first term. 'I love my dad,' Aaron Parnas has said. 'And I'm not my dad.') C-SPAN is on 'all day every day.' And he's enabled X and Truth Social notifications for posts from every member of Congress and major world leader. When he decides that his phone's alerts are newsworthy, he hits the record button. His rapid-reaction formula for news has made him a one-man media giant: He currently has 4.2 million followers on TikTok. He told me that his videos on the platform have reached more than 100 million American users in the past six months. His Substack newsletter also has the most subscriptions of any in the 'news' category, and he recently interviewed Senator Cory Booker, French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot, and this magazine's editor in chief. Still, Parnas's TikTok model relies heavily on reporting by other outlets. And Parnas's 24/7 information blitz may be jarring for those whose media-consumption habits are not already calibrated for TikTok. There's no 'Good evening' or 'Welcome.' But he's reaching an audience who other media don't: Many of his viewers, he thinks, are 'young people who don't watch the news and never have and never will.' He added, 'They just don't have the attention span to.' Ashley Acosta, a rising senior at the University of Pennsylvania, told me she liked the fact that Parnas is his own boss, outside the corporate media world. She contrasted him with outlets such as ABC, which recently fired the correspondent Terry Moran for an X post that called Trump a 'world-class hater.' Nick Parigi, a 24-year-old graduate of the University of Texas at Austin, also sees Parnas as a valuable news source. 'You're getting less propagandized,' he told me. 'It's not pushing an agenda.' Last year, Parnas explicitly supported Kamala Harris's presidential candidacy, but he prides himself on delivering basic information in a straightforward manner. 'I wish we would just go back to the fact-based, Walter Cronkite–style of reporting,' he told me. 'So that's what I do.' For Parnas to sound like the CBS News legend, you'd have to watch his TikToks at half speed. If Parnas is a genre-defining anchor, Jack Mac is the equivalent of a shock jock. A creator with 1.1 million followers, he uses the term 'jo urnalisming' to describe his work, which amounts to commenting on stories he finds interesting or amusing—such as a 'patriot' New York firefighter being suspended for letting young women ride in his firetruck. 'Do I think TikTok is the best source for news? No,' Olivia Stringfield, a 25-year-old from South Carolina who works in marketing, told me. But she's a fan of Mac because he offers 'a more glamorous way to get the news'—and a quick, convenient way. 'I don't have time to sit down and read the paper like my parents did,' Stringfield said. Robert Kozinets, a professor at the University of Southern California who has studied Gen Z's media consumption on TikTok, told me that users rarely seek out news. It finds them. 'The default position is: Algorithm, let the information flow over me,' he said. 'Load me up. I'll interrupt it when I see something interesting.' On a platform where little content is searched, creators dress up the news to make it algorithm friendly. The Washington Post is one established media brand that has leaned into the growing format of TikTok news skits. In one video about the Supreme Court, a Post staffer wearing a college-graduation robe wields a toolbox mallet as a gavel to channel Chief Justice John Roberts, and when she mimics him, her background turns into red curtains. 'South Carolina can cut off Medicaid funding for Planned Parenthood,' she says. Dave Jorgenson, who launched the Post 's TikTok channel in 2019, announced recently that he's leaving to set up his own online-video company —a testament to the demand for this new style of content. From the January 2025 issue: The 'mainstream media' has already lost The Post 's embrace of TikTok has been unusual for an outlet of the newspaper's stature. The prevalence of vibes-based content on the video platform raises obvious questions about truth and accuracy. Many users I spoke with trusted crowdsourced fact-checking to combat misinformation, via the comments section. I asked Maltbia, the analyst from Chicago, how he knows which comments to trust. 'I'll usually look at the ones that are the most liked,' he said. 'But if it still sounds a little shady to me, then I'll probably Google it.' Parnas defended the integrity of TikTok news. 'There's no more misinformation on TikTok than there is on Twitter, than there is on Fox News, than sometimes there is on CNN,' he told me. That claim is impossible to verify: TikTok's factual accuracy is under-researched. One assessment by the media watchdog NewsGuard found that 20 percent of TikTok's news search results contained misinformation—but no user I spoke with bothers with the app's search function. Whether TikTok will continue to gain popularity as a news outlet isn't yet clear. Citing fears of hostile foreign control over a major communications platform, Congress overwhelmingly passed legislation aimed at forcing TikTok's Chinese owners to sell. But Trump has now delayed implementation of the law three times since he took office. In the meantime, users of the platform keep stretching the definition of news. On TikTok, 'news is anything that's new,' Kozinets, the USC professor, told me. Entrepreneurial creators who care about current events will keep testing delivery formats to gain more eyeballs on the platform. And even if TikTok is sold or shuts down, similar apps are sure to fill any vacuum. The challenge of packaging news for distribution by a black-box algorithm seems here to stay.
