logo
Can A Chatbot Be Your Therapist? Casper's Neil Parikh Launches A New $93 Million Startup To Try

Can A Chatbot Be Your Therapist? Casper's Neil Parikh Launches A New $93 Million Startup To Try

Forbesa day ago
Daniel Cahn (left) and Neil Parikh (right), cofounders of Slingshot AI. courtesy of slingshot
N eil Parikh's first startup Casper made sleep easy—and even cool. The med school dropout used tech to help people buy mattresses with just a few clicks. Now he wants to make getting therapy just as simple.
After turning the sleep brand into a billion-dollar business, the Forbes Under 30 alum is back with a new venture: Slingshot AI, a startup building a chatbot designed to replicate the experience of talking to a therapist.
'I never really thought about therapy,' Parikh told Forbes . 'Then I found a therapist who changed my life.' That's how it clicked for the entrepreneur. While millions struggle with mental health issues, access to care is staggeringly limited. 'We realized there's over 10,000 people who want care for every therapist that's out there,' he said. 'There was an opportunity for AI to actually help people in a new way.'
On Tuesday, Slingshot officially launched its AI-powered therapy bot, called Ash, and announced a follow-on Series A round co-led by Radical Ventures and Forerunner Ventures, with participation from existing investors Andreessen Horowitz, Menlo Ventures and others. The round brings Slingshot's total funding to $93 million as it emerges from beta after being tested with more than 50,000 users.
Parikh founded the startup with Daniel Cahn, a machine learning engineer who previously worked on AI tools for mental health in the UK. Unlike general purpose models like ChatGPT—which pull data from the internet—Ash was developed in collaboration with clinicians and trained specifically on behavioral health data. It doesn't offer advice or try to diagnose, but is instead designed to guide users more through self-reflection, similar to how a therapist might prompt deeper thinking.
Andreessen Horowitz's a16z was quick to back the entrepreneur. Daisy Wolf, partner at the firm, said they'd been actively looking for a startup bringing AI into the mental health space, handing Slingshot a term sheet as soon as the team was ready to raise. 'They have the experience and know how to pull this off. They've been absolute magnets for talent, and the caliber of people they've been able to recruit has continued to blow us away,' Wolf said.
Parikh was 22 when he dropped out of medical school to build Casper. The company wasn't the first to sell mattresses online, but it was the first to become a household name with mattress-in-a-box convenience and a wellness-focused message that turned sleep into a lifestyle. Celebrity endorsements and subway ads helped build the brand amongst a younger audience. Parikh went all in and even co-authored a book on sleep.
Casper went public in 2020 at $12 a share—below its target range—and returned to private ownership two years later. He stepped down in 2021 and fully exited the board after the sale. Since then, he's invested in more than 150 startups, many tied to mental health.
Now back in the founder seat, he says building from the ground up is both daunting and exciting. 'Every part of this business is really challenging when you think about it. You have to build a large scale data set through partnerships. You have to build a team that knows how to train AI models. You actually have to learn how to train the models,' he said.
The burning question: Can a chatbot really compare to a human therapist?
Though the concept of AI therapy might seem experimental, early evidence suggests it could have real potential. At Dartmouth College, researchers developed and tested their own chatbot therapist called Therabot. In a trial of more than 100 people with mental health conditions, all improved. Those with depression saw a 51% symptom drop on average.
Nicholas Jacobson, one of the clinicians behind Therabot, said chatbots can offer several advantages over traditional care, including cost, convenience and 24/7 availability. Even individuals who had not previously responded to therapy saw significant improvement with Therabot. "A full caseload is about 26-and-a-half patients a week for a practicing therapist,' he said. 'They will see their patients generally once a week in outpatient settings for about 45 minutes.'
In that case, why not use the widely popular generative AI models like ChatGPT or Google's Gemini? While these models are incredibly advanced, they aren't designed specifically for mental health care, Jacobson said, and can be potentially harmful. At Dartmouth, this meant researchers had to build their own data from scratch. At Slingshot, it means partnering directly with clinicians—and using that $93 million to build a better data pipeline.
And, Parikh adds, general models can be somewhat of yes-men. 'You want them to appropriately push back on you. That's a core part of self growth.'
Courtesy of Slingshot
Still, not everyone is convinced chatbots can handle mental health responsibly. Critics have raised concerns about safety and privacy. Slingshot says it's proactively addressing these issues by working with a clinical advisory board. Ash, for example, redirects users experiencing a serious crisis to human professionals.
This time around, the serial entrepreneur (who's gone to plenty of therapy since) wants to keep the company lean and mission-driven. For its initial launch, Ash will be available for free to users, and Parikh imagines rolling out a subscription model priced similarly to Netflix. In the future, there may be avenues for Ash to be available via employers or insurance.
In the meantime, Parikh says he isn't trying to reinvent therapy, but hoping Ash might just help more people start it.
'Doing anything that nobody's done before means that you have to figure out a lot of new things,' he said. 'It's a lot of unknown nodes, but it's also cool because every day we get to wake up and get feedback from people who say this is incredible and their lives changed.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Amazon's AI-Powered AWS, Efficiency Gains, And Consumer Demand Fuel Bullish Q2 Outlook
Amazon's AI-Powered AWS, Efficiency Gains, And Consumer Demand Fuel Bullish Q2 Outlook

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Amazon's AI-Powered AWS, Efficiency Gains, And Consumer Demand Fuel Bullish Q2 Outlook

(NASDAQ:AMZN) is poised to potentially outperform market expectations in its July 31 second-quarter earnings report, driven by a combination of robust U.S. retail sales, advantageous foreign exchange rates, and accelerating demand for its artificial intelligence-related services through Amazon Web Services (AWS). Strong consumer spending and ongoing efficiency gains in its e-commerce operations are also contributing to a positive outlook for the tech giant. Reinforcing this positive sentiment, Bank of America Securities analyst Justin Post maintained (NASDAQ:AMZN) with a Buy rating and raised the price forecast from $248 to $265. Post raised its second-quarter estimates for the company, citing stronger-than-expected U.S. retail data, favorable foreign exchange (FX) movements, and rising AI-related demand via Anthropic. The analyst forecasted second-quarter revenue of $164 billion, exceeding Wall Street's consensus of $162 expects Amazon Web Services (AWS) to grow 16.5% year-over-year, slightly below the first-quarter's 16.9% but in line with Street projections of 17%. However, Post noted that robust AI demand and accelerating AWS infrastructure investments will drive growth reacceleration in the second half of the year. The analyst projects $17.8 billion in second-quarter profit, above the consensus estimate of $17.0 billion and the high end of Amazon's own guidance of $17.5 billion. Key drivers include resilient consumer spending, signs of acceleration in e-commerce trends, and FX benefits, especially with the euro up 5% year-over-year (Y/Y) and 8% quarter-over-quarter (Q/Q) against the dollar, potentially delivering a 130bps FX tailwind vs. the Street's modest 30bps estimate, he noted. In North America Retail, aggregated BAC credit/debit card data and Bloomberg Second Measure point to a 4-point acceleration in sales growth versus the first quarter, Post noted. The analyst said this sets the stage for Amazon to beat Street expectations by over 2% in the region. International Retail could benefit from FX trends, as the Street models only offer a modest boost. Amazon's guidance for the third quarter is expected to range between $169 billion and $174 billion (vs. Street at $172.8 billion) with GAAP EBIT projected between $14.0 billion and $18.0 billion (Street at $19.4 billion), Post noted. He suggested Amazon's historical conservatism could result in cautious guidance, but if second-quarter results show substantial upside, the third-quarter outlook could surprise higher. Post also highlighted reports of AWS job cuts, which may support margin expansion in the second half. The analyst estimates second-quarter AWS operating margins at 36.0%, slightly above the consensus of 35.3%, though down 3.5 points from the first quarter due to higher stock-based compensation. He further noted that AWS capex spending is scaling rapidly, up 38 points Y/Y, now accounting for 70% of Amazon's capex, signaling a ramp in infrastructure buildout that should alleviate previous supply constraints and support future growth. Post said positives that could boost investor confidence included solid second-quarter retail performance from resilient consumer demand, potential third-quarter boost from a longer Prime Day, retail margin leverage from hiring freezes and cost discipline, AWS revenue acceleration tied to increasing AI and chip demand and improved operating efficiency and tax savings from the Big Beautiful Bill, which could add $6.4 billion in incremental cash tax benefits between 2025–2027. Despite trading at 13.4 times 2026 EV/EBITDA, Amazon remains below its 10-year average of 16.5 times, the analyst said, suggesting potential for multiple expansion if growth momentum holds. Upcoming results from Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) may also influence sentiment ahead of Amazon's report, Post noted. Post projected second-quarter revenue of $163.92 billion and EPS of $1.40. Price Action: AMZN stock is trading higher by 0.26% to $228.05 at last check Wednesday. Photo via Shutterstock Latest Ratings for AMZN Date Firm Action From To Mar 2022 Deutsche Bank Initiates Coverage On Buy Feb 2022 Tigress Financial Maintains Buy Feb 2022 Credit Suisse Maintains Outperform View More Analyst Ratings for AMZN View the Latest Analyst Ratings Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? (AMZN): Free Stock Analysis Report This article Amazon's AI-Powered AWS, Efficiency Gains, And Consumer Demand Fuel Bullish Q2 Outlook originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Trump's AI Action Plan aims to block chip exports to China but lacks key details
Trump's AI Action Plan aims to block chip exports to China but lacks key details

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's AI Action Plan aims to block chip exports to China but lacks key details

The Trump administration wants its AI technology to be considered an industry leader both on home soil and abroad. But it also doesn't want the U.S.'s AI prowess to empower or embolden a foreign adversary. That's quite the balance to strike. If President Trump's AI Action Plan, which was released on Wednesday, is any indicator, the administration seems to still be figuring out the right course of action to achieve those goals. '​​America currently is the global leader on data center construction, computing hardware performance, and models,' the plan stated. 'It is imperative that the United States leverage this advantage into an enduring global alliance, while preventing our adversaries from free-riding on our innovation and investment.' The plan mentions strengthening AI chip export controls through 'creative approaches' followed by a pair of policy recommendations. The first calls on government organizations, including the Department of Commerce and National Security Council, to work with the AI industry on chip location verification features. The second is a recommendation to establish an effort to figure out enforcement for potential chip export restrictions; notably, it mentions that while the U.S. and allies impose export controls on major systems required for chip manufacturing, there isn't a focus on many of the component sub-systems — a hint at where the administration wants the DOC to direct its attention. The AI Action plan also talks about how the U.S. will need to find alignment in this area with its global allies. 'America must impose strong export controls on sensitive technologies,' the plan states. 'We should encourage partners and allies to follow U.S. controls, and not backfill. If they do, America should use tools such as the Foreign Direct Product Rule and secondary tariffs to achieve greater international alignment.' The AI Action plan never gets into detail on exactly how it will achieve Al global alliances, coordinate with allies on export chip restrictions, or work with U.S.-based AI companies on chip location verification features. Instead, the AI Action plans lay out what foundational building blocks are required for future sustainable AI chip export guidelines, as opposed to policies implemented on top of existing guidelines. The upshot: chip export restrictions are going to take more time. And there's ample evidence, beyond the AP Action plan, to suggest it will. For instance, the Trump administration has contradicted itself multiple times on its export restriction strategy in the past few months — including just last week. In July, the administration gave semiconductor firms, like Nvidia and AMD, the green light to start selling AI chips they had developed for China, just months after rolling out licensing restrictions on the same AI chips that effectively pulled Nvidia out of the Chinese market. The administration also formally rescinded the Biden administration's AI Diffusion Rule in May, just days before it was supposed to go into effect. The AI Diffusion rule put a cap on how much AI computing capacity some countries were allowed to buy. The Trump administration is expected to sign multiple executive orders July 23. Whether these will contain detailed plans on how it will reach its goals is unclear. While the AI Action Plan talks at length about figuring out how to expand the U.S. AI market globally, while maintaining dominance, it's light on the specifics. Any executive order regarding chip export restrictions will likely be about getting the proper government departments together to figure out a path forward, as opposed to formal guidelines, quite yet. Sign in to access your portfolio

Stacking Margins, Not Miles – The Growth Mindset Most Fleets Miss
Stacking Margins, Not Miles – The Growth Mindset Most Fleets Miss

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Stacking Margins, Not Miles – The Growth Mindset Most Fleets Miss

Too many carriers are chasing the wrong scoreboard. They measure success by the number of miles they run, the number of loads they book, or how many trucks they have on the road. But here's the truth: more miles don't mean more money—and more loads can sometimes mean more losses. Real growth in this business doesn't come from working harder. It comes from working smarter. From stacking margins, not miles. If your strategy is built on chasing volume, you're on a hamster wheel. You might be busy. You might even look successful from the outside. But your profit and loss statement will eventually expose the truth. You're not building a business—you're burning fuel, time, and energy just to stay afloat. This article is about rewiring your mindset. It's about getting off the volume treadmill and focusing on the one thing that actually builds wealth in trucking: profit per mile. Not gross. Not rate per mile alone. Not how many loads you touch. Margin. That's the game. Why Most Fleets Get It Wrong from the Start Let's be real—most carriers start their business with a hustle mentality. They get a truck, find a dispatcher or hit the load boards, and try to keep that truck moving 6 or 7 days a week. They think the more they move, the more they'll make. And for a little while, that seems true. But here's what happens next: The fuel bill eats up half the revenue The driver gets burned out The maintenance costs pile up One bad load puts you in the red You're cash-flow negative, even though you're 'busy' Why? Because the model was never built to scale. It was built to run. But running without margin is running toward a cliff. Let's Talk About What Margin Really Means Margin isn't just what's left over. It's the purpose behind every mile you run. And it comes down to three things: 1. What You Book It ForAre you just accepting loads because they're available? Or are you choosing freight that fits your lane strategy, customer base, and pricing power? 2. What It Costs to MoveMost carriers don't know their cost per mile down to the penny. If you don't know your baseline, you can't improve your margin. You're negotiating blind. 3. How Efficiently You OperateDeadhead, dwell time, driver turnover, empty miles between loads—all of that cuts into your margin. Tight systems build profit. Loose ones bleed cash. Here's the kicker: you can make more profit moving 1,200 miles a week with strong margins than someone moving 3,000 miles with weak ones. But you've got to change how you think. The Dangerous Trap of Volume Thinking Let me show you how volume thinking hurts growing carriers: You Take Any LoadYour dispatcher sees a $3,000 load and jumps on it. It looks good. But it's 1,500 miles. It burns 250 gallons of fuel. The rate looks high, but after fuel, driver pay, tolls, and lost repositioning miles, your profit margin is paper thin. You Don't Control the LaneWhen you chase spot freight in random markets, you lose all leverage. Now you're not just chasing a load—you're chasing a way out of that load's destination. You lose margin on both ends. You Grow Without SystemsYou add trucks because your revenue looks big, but you don't have a process to monitor each unit's margin. Now you've multiplied your overhead and made your problems bigger—not better. You Burn Out Your TeamLong miles, inefficient planning, poor rest cycles—your drivers leave or disengage. And turnover kills margin more than anything else. The Power of Stacking Margins Now let's flip the script. Let's talk about what stacking margins looks like: Intentional Lane PlanningYou focus on short to mid-haul freight in repeatable lanes. You know your top customers and top regions. You can forecast fuel, time, and detention risk. That allows you to price with purpose. Profitable Load CombinationsInstead of just looking at a load in isolation, you think like a chess player. You ask: What's my next move after this? Maybe a $900 short haul tees you up for a $1,700 local move that gets you home early. Together, they create a $2.60 per mile average and minimize deadhead. That's margin stacking. Driver-Centric PlanningYou design schedules around efficiency, rest, and repeatability. The driver stays engaged, your turnover stays low, and your cost per mile stays consistent. Margin isn't just financial—it's operational. Customer-Focused StrategyYou shift from 'how do I fill the truck?' to 'how do I solve a shipper's problem?' That shift opens the door to higher rates, less competition, and consistent volume. Margin follows value. Real-World Margin Play: Two Fleets, Two Outcomes Fleet A runs 5 trucks, 3,000 miles per week each. Their rate per mile averages $2.10. Their operating cost is $1.80 per mile. Revenue per truck: $6,300 Cost: $5,400 Profit per truck: $900 Fleet B runs 5 trucks, but only 2,000 miles per week. Their rate per mile averages $2.60. Their cost per mile is $1.70 because of fewer miles, better lanes, and tighter planning. Revenue per truck: $5,200 Cost: $3,400 Profit per truck: $1,800 Same size fleet. Lower miles. Double the profit. Which fleet would you rather run? How to Shift Your Strategy Toward Margin 1. Know Your True Cost Per MileNot just fuel. Include insurance, maintenance, payroll, IFTA, subscriptions, everything. Break it down monthly, then weekly. Then compare it to what you're booking. 2. Evaluate Every Load by Margin, Not Just GrossBefore you accept a load, ask: What's my estimated profit after costs? If you're just looking at top-line revenue, you're playing a losing game. 3. Use Tools to See the Full PictureTrack lane profitability. Monitor deadhead. Build dashboards that show your average loaded vs empty miles, gross revenue vs margin, profit per hour. The data tells the truth—if you know how to read it. 4. Train Your Team to Think Like You DoIf your dispatcher only thinks about 'what pays the most,' you've already lost. Train them to plan ahead, look for backhauls, and evaluate full-trip margin. Incentivize margin, not miles. 5. Build Long-Term Shipper RelationshipsWhen you serve a consistent customer, you reduce risk, improve planning, and stabilize your revenue. That gives you leverage and lets you focus on efficiency instead of scrambling. Final Word The mindset that built your business—grind, hustle, stay moving—is not the mindset that will grow your business. Scaling in trucking isn't about booking more loads. It's about booking smarter loads. Loads that protect your bottom line, maximize your assets, and let you breathe. Stacking miles keeps you busy. Stacking margins builds wealth. So stop asking how many loads you can run this week. Start asking how much profit you can generate per load. That shift alone will take your fleet from surviving to scaling—without burning out your trucks, your drivers, or yourself. Let's get to work. The post Stacking Margins, Not Miles – The Growth Mindset Most Fleets Miss appeared first on FreightWaves. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store