India Becomes Fourth "Most Equal" Country Globally: World Bank Report
Inequality in India has come down significantly between 2011-12 and 2022-23, making it the fourth-most equal country globally, according to a World Bank report.
This is in addition to a sharp decrease in extreme poverty, which has dropped from 16.2 per cent in 2011-12 to 2.3 per cent in 2022-23, an official release said quoting World Bank data.
The government attributed the reduction in inequality to various initiatives and schemes pursued during the last decade.
The only three countries which have a better Gini Index score, a measure of equality, are the Slovak Republic, Slovenia and Belarus.
India is much better placed than countries like China, the USA and the United Kingdom.
"...India's Gini Index stands at 25.5, making it the fourth most equal country in the world, after the Slovak Republic, Slovenia and Belarus," the statement said.
The Gini Index helps in understanding how equally income, wealth or consumption is distributed across households or individuals in a country. It ranges in value from 0 to 100.
A score of 0 means perfect equality, while a score of 100 means one person has all the income, wealth or consumption and others have none, hence absolute inequality. The higher the Gini Index, the more unequal a country is.
India's score is much lower than China's 35.7 and far lower than the United States, which stands at 41.8.
As per the World Bank's report, which has released the data for 167 countries, India falls into the "moderately low" inequality category, which includes Gini scores between 25 and 30.
India is only a fraction away from joining the "low inequality" group.
The government attributed this achievement to a sharp reduction in the poverty level in the last decade.
According to the World Bank report, 171 million Indians have been lifted out of extreme poverty over the past decade.
The share of people living on less than USD 2.15 a day, which was the global threshold for extreme poverty till June 2025, fell sharply from 16.2 per cent in 2011-12 to just 2.3 per cent in 2022-23.
Globally, just 30 countries fall into the "moderately low" inequality category, including several European countries with strong welfare systems.
These include Iceland, Norway, Finland, and Belgium. It also features growing economies like Poland and wealthy nations like the United Arab Emirates.
The release said India's journey towards a more equal society is reflected in its Gini Index over the years.
The index was measured at 28.8 in 2011 and reached 25.5 in 2022.
"This steady shift shows that India has made consistent progress in combining economic growth with social equity," it said.
It further said India's progress towards greater income equality is backed by a series of focused government initiatives.
These schemes aim to improve financial access, deliver welfare benefits efficiently, and support vulnerable and underrepresented groups.
"Together, they have helped bridge gaps, boost livelihoods, and ensure that growth reaches all sections of society," the release said.
It has cited schemes, like PM Jan Dhan Yojana, Direct Benefit Transfer, and Stand-Up India, among others, which have helped India in its progress towards greater income equality.
"India's path to income equality has been steady and focused. The Gini Index of 25.5 is not just a number. It reflects real change in people's lives. More families now have access to food, banking, healthcare, and jobs," the release said.
What sets India apart is its ability to balance economic reform with strong social protection, it said.
Targeted schemes like Jan Dhan, DBT, and Ayushman Bharat have helped close long-standing gaps," it said.
At the same time, programmes such as Stand-Up India and PM Vishwakarma Yojana are helping people create wealth and secure livelihoods on their own terms.
"As the world looks for models that combine growth with fairness, India's example stands out. Its experience shows that equality and development are not separate goals," the release said.
When supported by sound policy and inclusive intent, they move forward together, it added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
15 minutes ago
- Mint
Italys Bridge to Nowhere Shows Defense-Boom Risks
(Bloomberg Opinion) -- The defense boom in Europe is as close to a tech-style gold rush as the Old Continent can offer. Armaments stocks are outperforming Nvidia Corp., and defense-themed funds are amassing billions in anticipation of rising military spending in a more dangerous world. NATO allies have agreed to more than double defense spending goals to 5% of gross domestic product in the coming years. But with so many countries already struggling to stump up the billions needed to keep up in artificial intelligence, reindustrialization and the energy transition, where's the cash going to come from? With the notable exception of Germany, many European countries are already near the limit of investor and voter patience with borrowing and taxation. And good luck shrinking the welfare state. Italy, a serial defense under-spender with the second-highest debt ratio in the euro area, has one answer: Stretch the definition of 'defense' to breaking point. Officials are reportedly looking to reclassify a proposed €13.5 billion ($15.8 billion) bridge linking Sicily to the mainland as a defense investment. You almost have to applaud the chutzpah. This is a bridge that has been a field of political dreams for decades, if not centuries, and attracted plenty of criticism for its cost, lack of utility and riskiness. To say that this is about rearmament is tantamount to defense-washing a pet political project — one beloved by populist Matteo Salvini, who, ironically, is one of the most vocal critics of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. One MEP from the opposition Five Star Movement called the plan a 'mockery' of military spending. Of course, this isn't to say that only things that go bang should count as defense. NATO's 5% targets include 1.5% for infrastructure and interoperability. We live in a world of deadly drones, AI and cyberattacks — which require tools other than bullets. And governments want to make sure wide swathes of society benefit from military-spending spillovers, which means casting nets wider than usual. 'Defense is the new Keynesianism,' says Richard Aboulafia, managing director of consultancy AeroDynamic Advisory. Still, Italy's plan should set alarm bells ringing. Slapping the label 'defense' on national boondoggles would further exacerbate differences between European countries at a time when defense is already too fragmented. It would make Europe weaker, not stronger. It would also prove Goodhart's Law: When a number becomes a target, it ceases to be a useful measure. NATO's previous 2% targets already included some eyebrow-raising outlays on railways and firefighters, according to Der Spiegel. If this is how the 5% era is set to go, credibility will wither. Clearer definitions, better coordination and ultimately more leadership are needed to ensure the blurred lines between military and civil infrastructure don't vanish completely. The EUISS think tank recommends focusing on disruptive research and innovation via a European version of Darpa, the US Defense Department's advanced research projects agency, more measures to attract top scientific talent and putting more European funding to work. And the Bertelsmann Stiftung think tank also says that Germany's unique position as top spender means it should also step up when it comes to the framework for defense-related infrastructure. Nobody wants yet more box-ticking that stops money getting out the door, but voters deserve better than a defense twist on greenwashing. This isn't about preventing the real economy from getting some of the rewards of a defense boom, but ensuring those spillovers actually happen. Italy has other more positive examples of supporting a more defense-oriented Europe, such as Fincantieri SpA's plan to refocus some shipyards on just making warships. The defense boom is worth celebrating, but a bridge to nowhere isn't a good outcome. More From Bloomberg Opinion: This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners. Lionel Laurent is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist writing about the future of money and the future of Europe. Previously, he was a reporter for Reuters and Forbes. More stories like this are available on
Economic Times
21 minutes ago
- Economic Times
PSU banks trading below book value despite healthy ROE: Krishna Sanghavi
Despite healthy return ratios and minimal asset quality issues, several PSU banks are trading below book value, according to Krishna Sanghavi, CIO-Equity at Mahindra Manulife. This valuation anomaly comes at a time when the fund house is launching a dedicated BFSI sectoral fund, betting on India's demographic dividend and the ongoing financialization of savings in a formal economy. ADVERTISEMENT In this conversation, Sanghavi explains why BFSI offers both cyclical rebound potential in lending and secular growth in non-lending businesses, while discussing how the sector's composition has evolved dramatically—with banks' share of BFSI market cap shrinking from 85% to 57% over two decades, creating opportunities across insurance, AMCs, NBFCs, and capital market intermediaries. Edited excerpts from an interview: What's the core thesis behind launching a sectoral fund focused on BFSI at this market juncture? Are you betting on a cyclical rebound or a structural re-rating? BFSI is a core play on India's demographics, rising per capita income amidst the financialization of savings in a formal economy. Overall, we expect the penetration of different financial products to rise. More Indians are likely to enter higher income strata and can contribute to BFSI sectors' growth either as a saver or borrower (lending), investor (asset management or capital market or life insurance) or seeking protection (life insurance or general insurance). We see it as a combination of cyclical rebound (lending) in line with the economy and secular growth (non-lending businesses). Additionally, there are opportunities for earnings growth and valuations within the various micro-segments in BFSI. Banks, both private and PSUs, have healthy balance sheets and return ratios with minimal asset quality issues. Moreover, the Nifty Financial Services index underperformed the Nifty 500 index in four out of the last five calendar years. Valuations are reasonable and earnings outlook is also improving. The Nifty Financial Services index has already shown signs of revival, outperforming the broader Nifty 500 index by nearly 9.8% in the January to June 25 period. While liquidity has improved, we are yet to see improvement in deposit and credit growth, which could play out as the year progresses, supporting our positive views on the overall BFSI sector. ADVERTISEMENT Expect credit quality to remain good and steady growth to help BFSI maintain broad participation in the profit pool. BFSI is already one-third of India's market cap and profit pool. What's the incremental opportunity you see, and how differentiated can this fund be from existing diversified funds? Within BFSI, companies in sub-sectors such as lending, asset management, and wealth fund will thus be a standalone play on the BFSI theme, compared to our diversified funds where BFSI is only a part of the overall portfolio sectoral continuity of earnings from fund will thus be a standalone play on the BFSI theme compared to our diversified funds, where BFSI is only a part of the overall portfolio sectoral portfolio. ADVERTISEMENT While banking has been the traditional heavyweight, how are you looking at the broader spectrum—insurance, AMCs, fintechs, NBFCs? Which segments excite you the most today? As income levels rise, customers start shifting from savers to either borrowers or investors. This creates wider opportunities for those businesses. When we examine history, in March 2005, Banks constituted nearly 85% of the BFSI market capitalisation, now make up only 57% of the BFSI market capitalisation, while 2—Various from NBFCs and the remaining 20% from segment BFSI financial services companies has continued to rise with their strong earnings growth and news has kept on rising with their strong earnings growth and also newer listings. Each of these financial services segments brings in its own set of opportunities and challenges. Insurance companies have seen healthy growth, driven by rising penetration. Asset managers have seen rapid AUM growth in the last few years, thanks to rising incomes & shift towards investing, partly helped by strong market returns. On the fintech side, there have only been a couple of listings till now and a few others are expected to get listed soon. We believe these segments offer a reasonable growth opportunity. ADVERTISEMENT With valuations in private banks and NBFCs at or below long-term averages, do you see this as a compelling entry point or is it more about selective positioning? Yes, equity portfolio construct would always be about selective positioning based on stock specific criteria like growth, management and valuations. At times this gets impacted due to distortions of ownership or inclusion/exclusion in ETFs. Also, it is part of the investing cycles that at any point, some companies trade at higher or lower than long term average. Overall, we see a healthy environment with a supportive monetary policy on both lower rates as well as higher liquidity and this can help few lenders based on their asset liability mix. How do you perceive the growth opportunity in PSU bank stocks? The PSU banks have gone through a healthy consolidation (mergers), governance reforms & balance sheet improvement. The balance sheet has strengthened with higher capital adequacy, and the narrative on PSU stocks has improved due to diversification into retail lending and recoveries from corporate loans. Operationally, the digital rollout is helping and so is control over total employees. Higher capital would help them grow lending when the corporate capex cycle picks up. From a valuation perspective, quite a few PSU banks are trading below book value despite healthy ROA & ROE in FY25. ADVERTISEMENT Capital market intermediaries have become significant in BFSI's narrative and an investor favourite as well. Do you see them as consistent compounders? Capital market players have a good growth potential as India moves from being a nation of savers to a nation of investors. Rising per capita income as well as younger demography creates new customer segments who are looking at risk-return trade-offs on their investments. One advantage for these businesses is they don't require much capital for growth and hence a good execution led by digital distribution can help them grow sustainably at higher rates. The BFSI universe includes quite a few capital market intermediaries and we expect more investible opportunities from future listings. However, some of these businesses are cyclical and hence a focus on earning sustainability and valuations is a must. In between the two ends of banks and NBFCs, the tilt has largely been in favour of the latter in a rate cut cycle. But given the valuations for both, which one would you be more biased towards? The fact that banks may face margin pressure in a rate cut cycle and NBFCs may benefit is largely known. So, NBFCs have done well in the last year and now valuations for few NBFCs are higher relative to banks. Based on the investment timeframe being short or medium term, the rate cut cycle would start supporting the cost of funds for banks with a time-lag based on their liability franchise, maturity structure and rate cut on savings deposits. The CRR cut and easy liquidity too would help. India's insurance sector remains underpenetrated despite a decade of liberalization. What's the investment case for life vs general insurance at this stage? The outlook for the life insurance segment looks healthy at the moment given these companies faced VNB margin pressure in FY25 due to higher salience of ULIP sales in their mix. The product mix can be more balanced this year, aiding the margin growth. The general insurance segment is seeing slower growth on the motor segment while health insurance segment growth is strong though not very profitable. With the upcoming regulatory norms on expense management, the profitability of the general insurance sector could show improvement as insurers adhere to expense and commission caps. From the investor side, expected IFRS implementation in the next 2 years will help reduce the gap between accounting profits and VNB profits. Another regulatory support is the expected reduction in GST rate that can make insurance products more affordable. So, both Life & General insurance makes a good investment case from a longer term.
Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
PSU banks trading below book value despite healthy ROE: Krishna Sanghavi
Despite healthy return ratios and minimal asset quality issues, several PSU banks are trading below book value, according to Krishna Sanghavi , CIO-Equity at Mahindra Manulife. This valuation anomaly comes at a time when the fund house is launching a dedicated BFSI sectoral fund, betting on India's demographic dividend and the ongoing financialization of savings in a formal economy. In this conversation, Sanghavi explains why BFSI offers both cyclical rebound potential in lending and secular growth in non-lending businesses, while discussing how the sector's composition has evolved dramatically—with banks' share of BFSI market cap shrinking from 85% to 57% over two decades, creating opportunities across insurance, AMCs, NBFCs, and capital market intermediaries. Edited excerpts from an interview: What's the core thesis behind launching a sectoral fund focused on BFSI at this market juncture? Are you betting on a cyclical rebound or a structural re-rating? BFSI is a core play on India's demographics, rising per capita income amidst the financialization of savings in a formal economy. Overall, we expect the penetration of different financial products to rise. More Indians are likely to enter higher income strata and can contribute to BFSI sectors' growth either as a saver or borrower (lending), investor (asset management or capital market or life insurance) or seeking protection (life insurance or general insurance). We see it as a combination of cyclical rebound (lending) in line with the economy and secular growth (non-lending businesses). Additionally, there are opportunities for earnings growth and valuations within the various micro-segments in BFSI. Banks, both private and PSUs, have healthy balance sheets and return ratios with minimal asset quality issues. Moreover, the Nifty Financial Services index underperformed the Nifty 500 index in four out of the last five calendar years. Valuations are reasonable and earnings outlook is also improving. The Nifty Financial Services index has already shown signs of revival, outperforming the broader Nifty 500 index by nearly 9.8% in the January to June 25 period. While liquidity has improved, we are yet to see improvement in deposit and credit growth, which could play out as the year progresses, supporting our positive views on the overall BFSI sector. Expect credit quality to remain good and steady growth to help BFSI maintain broad participation in the profit pool. BFSI is already one-third of India's market cap and profit pool. What's the incremental opportunity you see, and how differentiated can this fund be from existing diversified funds? Within BFSI, companies in sub-sectors such as lending, asset management, and wealth fund will thus be a standalone play on the BFSI theme, compared to our diversified funds where BFSI is only a part of the overall portfolio sectoral continuity of earnings from fund will thus be a standalone play on the BFSI theme compared to our diversified funds, where BFSI is only a part of the overall portfolio sectoral portfolio. While banking has been the traditional heavyweight, how are you looking at the broader spectrum—insurance, AMCs, fintechs, NBFCs? Which segments excite you the most today? As income levels rise, customers start shifting from savers to either borrowers or investors. This creates wider opportunities for those businesses. When we examine history, in March 2005, Banks constituted nearly 85% of the BFSI market capitalisation, now make up only 57% of the BFSI market capitalisation, while 2—Various from NBFCs and the remaining 20% from segment BFSI financial services companies has continued to rise with their strong earnings growth and news has kept on rising with their strong earnings growth and also newer listings. Each of these financial services segments brings in its own set of opportunities and challenges. Insurance companies have seen healthy growth, driven by rising penetration. Asset managers have seen rapid AUM growth in the last few years, thanks to rising incomes & shift towards investing, partly helped by strong market returns. On the fintech side, there have only been a couple of listings till now and a few others are expected to get listed soon. We believe these segments offer a reasonable growth opportunity. With valuations in private banks and NBFCs at or below long-term averages, do you see this as a compelling entry point or is it more about selective positioning? Yes, equity portfolio construct would always be about selective positioning based on stock specific criteria like growth, management and valuations. At times this gets impacted due to distortions of ownership or inclusion/exclusion in ETFs. Also, it is part of the investing cycles that at any point, some companies trade at higher or lower than long term average. Overall, we see a healthy environment with a supportive monetary policy on both lower rates as well as higher liquidity and this can help few lenders based on their asset liability mix. How do you perceive the growth opportunity in PSU bank stocks? The PSU banks have gone through a healthy consolidation (mergers), governance reforms & balance sheet improvement. The balance sheet has strengthened with higher capital adequacy, and the narrative on PSU stocks has improved due to diversification into retail lending and recoveries from corporate loans. Operationally, the digital rollout is helping and so is control over total employees. Higher capital would help them grow lending when the corporate capex cycle picks up. From a valuation perspective, quite a few PSU banks are trading below book value despite healthy ROA & ROE in FY25. Capital market intermediaries have become significant in BFSI's narrative and an investor favourite as well. Do you see them as consistent compounders? Capital market players have a good growth potential as India moves from being a nation of savers to a nation of investors. Rising per capita income as well as younger demography creates new customer segments who are looking at risk-return trade-offs on their investments. One advantage for these businesses is they don't require much capital for growth and hence a good execution led by digital distribution can help them grow sustainably at higher rates. The BFSI universe includes quite a few capital market intermediaries and we expect more investible opportunities from future listings. However, some of these businesses are cyclical and hence a focus on earning sustainability and valuations is a must. In between the two ends of banks and NBFCs, the tilt has largely been in favour of the latter in a rate cut cycle. But given the valuations for both, which one would you be more biased towards? The fact that banks may face margin pressure in a rate cut cycle and NBFCs may benefit is largely known. So, NBFCs have done well in the last year and now valuations for few NBFCs are higher relative to banks. Based on the investment timeframe being short or medium term, the rate cut cycle would start supporting the cost of funds for banks with a time-lag based on their liability franchise, maturity structure and rate cut on savings deposits. The CRR cut and easy liquidity too would help. India's insurance sector remains underpenetrated despite a decade of liberalization. What's the investment case for life vs general insurance at this stage? The outlook for the life insurance segment looks healthy at the moment given these companies faced VNB margin pressure in FY25 due to higher salience of ULIP sales in their mix. The product mix can be more balanced this year, aiding the margin growth. The general insurance segment is seeing slower growth on the motor segment while health insurance segment growth is strong though not very profitable. With the upcoming regulatory norms on expense management, the profitability of the general insurance sector could show improvement as insurers adhere to expense and commission caps. From the investor side, expected IFRS implementation in the next 2 years will help reduce the gap between accounting profits and VNB profits. Another regulatory support is the expected reduction in GST rate that can make insurance products more affordable. So, both Life & General insurance makes a good investment case from a longer term.
