Margaret Atwood to Amitav Ghosh: 5 novelists sounding the alarm on planetary collapse
Celebrated annually on June 5, World Environment Day serves as an urgent call to reconsider our relationship with the planet. In an age where the climate crisis has moved from distant possibility to pressing reality, this day is a reminder of our profound entanglement with the natural world.
While tree-planting drives and sustainability campaigns are vital, literature offers an equally powerful yet often overlooked avenue for ecological engagement. Stories, poems, essays, and novels compel readers to reckon with environmental degradation, question the status quo, and reimagine humanity's place within the web of life.
We bring to you five authors who have used the written word as a catalyst for environmental consciousness.
(Source: Amazon.in)
Margaret Atwood's MaddAddam Trilogy (Oryx and Crake, The Year of the Flood, MaddAddam) is a harrowing exploration of a world ravaged by corporate greed, genetic engineering, and climate breakdown. A Booker Prize-nominated masterpiece, the trilogy interrogates the ethical ramifications of human interference in nature, blending speculative fiction with urgent ecological warnings.
Atwood's genius lies in her ability to mirror real-world environmental crises, including biodiversity loss, technological overreach, and societal collapse through a gripping narrative. Her work forces readers to confront a chilling question: if we continue on this path, will our future be one of survival or ruin?
Amitav Ghosh, Jnanpith Award laureate, has long critiqued modern literature's failure to engage meaningfully with climate change. In The Great Derangement: Climate Change and the Unthinkable, Ghosh argues that fiction has largely ignored the Anthropocene, treating environmental catastrophe as a peripheral concern rather than a central reality.
His novel Gun Island weaves mythology, migration, and ecological upheaval into a narrative that bridges past and present. Ghosh's work is a call to arms for writers and readers alike: storytelling must evolve to reflect the planetary emergency we face.
Rachel Carson's Silent Spring (1962) is often hailed as the foundational text of the modern environmental movement. With lyrical precision, Carson exposed the devastating effects of pesticides like DDT on ecosystems and human health. Her work was so impactful that it led to the banning of DDT in the U.S. and the creation of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
Posthumously awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom, Carson's legacy is a testament to the power of science communicated with moral clarity. Silent Spring remains a warning and an inspiration: when knowledge is paired with courage, systemic change is possible.
(Source: Amazon.in)
Bill McKibben's The End of Nature (1989) was among the first books to bring climate change to mainstream attention. A Right Livelihood Award and Gandhi Peace Award recipient, McKibben merges scientific rigor with philosophical introspection, arguing that humanity's domination of nature has reached a point of no return.
Barbara Kingsolver, a Pulitzer Prize finalist, masterfully intertwines personal and planetary crises in Flight Behavior. The novel uses the disrupted migration of monarch butterflies as a metaphor for climate change, set against the backdrop of rural America's socio-economic and religious tensions.
Kingsolver's brilliance lies in her humanization of ecological disaster—she shows how climate disruption is not an abstract future but a present reality, reshaping lives and communities. Her work is a poignant reminder that environmental justice is inseparable from social justice.
(The writer is an intern with The Indian Express.)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
a day ago
- Business Standard
Over 170 environmental agency staff sign dissent letter on Trump policies
A group of Environmental Protection Agency employees on Monday published a declaration of dissent from the agency's policies under the Trump administration, saying they undermine the EPA mission of protecting human health and the environment. More than 170 EPA employees put their names to the document, with about 100 more signing anonymously out of fear of retaliation, according to Jeremy Berg, a former editor-in-chief of Science magazine who is not an EPA employee but was among non-EPA scientists or academics to also sign. The latter figure includes 20 Nobel laureates. The letter represents rare public criticism from agency employees who could face blowback for speaking out against a weakening of funding and federal support for climate, environmental and health science. Scientists at the National Institutes of Health made a similar move earlier in June. "Since the Agency's founding in 1970, EPA has accomplished (its) mission by leveraging science, funding, and expert staff in service to the American people. Today, we stand together in dissent against the current administration's focus on harmful deregulation, mischaracterisation of previous EPA actions, and disregard for scientific expertise," the letter read. Agency spokespeople did not immediately respond Monday to messages seeking comment. Employees want the EPA get back to its mission I'm really sad. This agency, that was a superhero for me in my youth, we're not living up to our ideals under this administration. And I really want us to, said Amelia Hertzberg, an environmental protection specialist at the EPA who has been on administrative leave since February from the Office of Environmental Justice and External Civil Rights, while the administration works to close down her department. Hertzberg's work focused on the most vulnerable groups impacted by pollution: pregnant and nursing people, young children and babies, the elderly, people with preexisting and chronic health conditions and people living in communities exposed to higher levels of pollution. That wasn't supposed to be controversial, but it's become so in this political climate, she said. Americans should be able to drink their water and breathe their air without being poisoned. And if they aren't, then our government is failing, she said. Berg, who also directed the National Institute of General Medical Sciences at NIH from 2003-2011, said the dissent isn't motivated by partisan criticism. He said the employees hope it will help the EPA get back to the mission for which it was established which only matters if you breathe air and drink water". The letter outlines what the EPA employees see as five main concerns: undermining public trust; ignoring scientific consensus to benefit polluters; reversing EPA's progress in America's most vulnerable communities; dismantling the Office of Research and Development; and promoting a culture of fear, forcing staff to choose between their livelihood and well-being. EPA has cut funding and rolled back federal regulations Under Administrator Lee Zeldin, EPA has cut funding for environmental improvements in minority communities, vowed to roll back federal regulations that lower air pollution in national parks and tribal reservations, wants to undo a ban on a type of asbestos and proposed repealing rules that limit planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions from power plants fuelled by coal and natural gas. Zeldin began reorganising the EPA's research and development office as part of his push to slash their budget and gut their study of climate change and environmental justice. And he's seeking to roll back pollution rules that an Associated Press examination found were estimated to save 30,000 lives and $275 billion every year. People are going to die, said Carol Greider, a Nobel laureate and professor of molecular and cellular biology at the University of California, Santa Cruz, who also signed the letter. She described last week's East Coast heat wave as evidence of the ways people are feeling the effects of climate change. And if we don't have scientists at the EPA to understand how what we do that goes into the air affects our health, more people are going to die, she added. Berg said the declarations of dissent from both the NIH and EPA employees are noteworthy because they represent scientists speaking out as their careers are on the line. Even non-agency employees have to consider whether the government will withdraw research funding. Greider, asked about fears of repercussions or retaliation, said she's living the repercussions of everything. She regularly meets with graduate students who are worried about pursuing scientific careers as labs lose funding. It's a long-term problem if we aren't supporting the next generation of scientists, she said: "That's decades worth of loss.
India Gazette
2 days ago
- India Gazette
PM Modi praises contributions of Doctors and CAs in 123rd Mann ki Baat
New Delhi [India], June 29 (ANI): Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Sunday praised the invaluable contributions of both Doctors and Chartered Accountants (CAs) while addressing the country during the 123rd edition of the monthly program Mann ki Baat and called attention to how both professions are such 'pillars of society,' with one being protectors of health and other being guides of economic life. Acknowledging their importance ahead of July 1, which marks both National Doctors' Day and Chartered Accountants' Day, the Prime Minister said, 'On the 1st of July, the day after tomorrow, we honour two very important professions - Doctors and CAs. Both of them are such pillars of society, which make our lives better. Doctors are the protectors of our health and CAs (Chartered Accountants) are the guides of economic life. My best wishes to all the Doctors and Chartered Accountants.' Notably, the Prime Minister also drew attention to the importance of protecting and preserving the environment, as the country celebrated World Environment Day earlier, just as one would their health. 'This month, we all celebrated the 'World Environment Day'. I received thousands of your messages. Many people told me about those friends who had set out alone to save the environment and then the whole society joined them. This contribution of everyone is becoming a great strength for our earth,' the PM said. Highlighting various examples of people from across the country, he added, 'Ramesh Kharmale of Pune... knowing about his work will inspire you a lot. When people take rest at the end of the week, Ramesh ji and his family set out with a pickaxe and a spade. Do you know where to? Towards the hills of Junnar. Be it sunshine or a steep climb, their ascent does not stop. They clear bushes, dig trenches to retain water and sow seeds. They dug 70 trenches in just two months.' Talking about another initiative, the PM talked about Ahmedabad city of Gujarat, where the Municipal Corporation has started the 'Mission for Million Trees' campaign. The target is to plant lakhs of trees. A special aspect about this campaign is 'Sindoor Van'. He also dedicated the campaign to the soldiers who participated in Operation Sindoor. 'This forest is dedicated to the bravehearts of Operation Sindoor. Sindoor saplings are being planted in the memory of those brave people who have sacrificed everything for the country. Here, another campaign is being given a new impetus - 'Ek Ped Maa Ke Naam'. Under this campaign, crores of trees have been planted in the country. You too must take part in such campaigns going on in your village or city,' he said. While remembering the horrors of the emergency, the PM also played archival audio of former Prime Ministers Morarji Desai, Babu Jagjivan Ram and Atal Bihari Vajpayee, who described the Emergency as a time of constitutional murder, mass arrests, and the suppression of civil liberties and the press. The PM asserted that every citizen should remember the ones who fought 'bravely' against the Emergency and it also inspires us to stay 'vigilant' to 'safeguard' the Constitution. (ANI)
The Hindu
3 days ago
- The Hindu
Pinarayi Vijayan defends Minister V. Sivankutty on latter's walkout from Raj Bhavan
Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan has strongly defended Minister for General Education V. Sivankutty's decision to walk out of a Raj Bhavan event on June 19 in protest against the display of an image of saffron-flag holding Bharat Mata. The Minister has done nothing wrong, and he had no intention to disrespect the Governor, Mr. Vijayan said in a strongly-worded letter to Governor Rajendra Vishwanath Arlekar. Mr. Sivankutty has merely responded the way a Minister should on seeing a flag and symbol not mandated by the Constitution at an official function. His action is befitting of a Minister who has taken the oath of office under the Constitution, Mr. Vijayan said. Raj Bhavan's stance The Minister had walked out during the award distribution related to the Kerala State Bharat Scouts and Guides Rajya Puraskar. Raj Bhavan had termed the Minister's action 'a gross violation of protocol and a grave insult to the office of the Governor.' In his letter to the Governor, the Chief Minister added that only national symbols and flag mandated by the Constitution should be displayed at official functions at Raj Bhavan. Earlier in June, Agriculture Minister P. Prasad had skipped the World Environment Day celebrations at Raj Bhavan following the display of the Bharat Matha motif at the event. More recently, the State Cabinet had also drawn the Governor's attention to protocols governing ceremonial and officials functions at Raj Bhavan.
