Hezbollah chief says will not surrender under threat from Israel
leader Naim Qassem said Sunday his group would not surrender or lay down its weapons in response to Israeli threats, despite pressure on the Lebanese militants to disarm.
"This threat will not make us accept surrender," Qassem said in a televised speech to thousands of his supporters in the southern suburbs of Beirut, a Hezbollah stronghold, during the Shiite Muslim religious commemoration of Ashura.
Lebanese leaders who took office in the aftermath of a war between Israel and Hezbollah last year have repeatedly vowed a state monopoly on bearing arms while demanding Israel comply with a November ceasefire that ended the fighting.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Unsold Container Homes in National Capital Region - Prices You Won't Believe!
Shipping Container Homes | Search Ads
Search Now
Undo
Qassem, who succeeding longtime leader Hassan Nasrallah after Israel killed him in September, said the group's fighters would not abandon their arms and asserted that Israel's "aggression" must first stop.
His speech came as US envoy Tom Barrack was expected in Beirut on Monday.
Live Events
Lebanese authorities are due to deliver a response to Barrack's request for Iran-backed Hezbollah to be disarmed by the end of the year, according to a Lebanese official who spoke on condition of anonymity.
Lebanese authorities say they have been dismantling Hezbollah's military infrastructure in the south, near the Israeli border.
Israel has continued to strike Lebanon despite the November ceasefire, claiming to hit Hezbollah targets and accusing Beirut of not doing enough to disarm the group.
According to the ceasefire agreement, Hezbollah is to pull its fighters back north of the Litani river, some 30 kilometres (20 miles) from the Israeli frontier.
Israel was to withdraw its troops from all of Lebanon, but has kept them deployed in five points it deemed strategic.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
DU teachers seek withdrawal of draft UGC regulations and address academic concerns
New Delhi: Delhi University teachers have written to the President of India, Droupadi Murmu, and sought withdrawal of the Draft UGC Regulations, 2025, and resolution of long-pending academic and service-related issues. Delhi University Teachers' Association (DUTA) submitted the plea through the ministry of education, with support from nearly 2,000 faculty members. The President is the visitor to the university. DUTA president Prof AK Bhagi said the draft regulations must not be implemented without aligning them to the forthcoming 8th pay commission and wider consultations with academic stakeholders. Criticising the undergraduate curriculum framework under NEP 2020, he said, "Its rigid structure, excessive paper load and reduced credits for core subjects have diluted academic depth. Faculty members are overburdened with rising teaching and administrative responsibilities without corresponding recruitment or infrastructural expansion. Overcrowded classrooms and inadequate resources have worsened the learning environment." You Can Also Check: Delhi AQI | Weather in Delhi | Bank Holidays in Delhi | Public Holidays in Delhi Bhagi cautioned against allowing students to earn credits through online platforms like Swayam and massive open online courses, arguing it would erode academic standards and undermine classroom teaching. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo He also pointed to delays in admissions and the absence of a synchronised academic calendar that has disrupted the rhythm of teaching and learning. DUTA secretary Anil Kumar said that persistent gaps in staffing and funding had aggravated challenges under the NEP implementation. "No additional grants have been provided to meet growing academic and infrastructural demands," he added. The teachers' body urged the President and the ministry to ensure all reforms are guided by principles of equity, academic freedom and meaningful stakeholder engagement.
Time of India
43 minutes ago
- Time of India
Asim Munir fires back: Pakistan needed no China or Turkey, says India's ‘axis' claim is fiction, 'shoddy camp politics'
Pakistan's Army Chief Asim Munir didn't hold back. Standing before new officers at the National Defence University in Islamabad, he tore into India's claim that Pakistan leaned on China and Turkey during the May conflict. In his words, 'Insinuations regarding external support in Pakistan's successful Operation Bunyanum Marsoos are irresponsible and factually incorrect and reflect a chronic reluctance to acknowledge indigenous capability and institutional resilience developed over decades of strategic prudence.' He called India's attempt to drag other states into the fray a cheap trick. 'Naming other states as participants in the purely bilateral military conflagration is also a shoddy attempt at playing camp politics,' Munir said, brushing off talk of a bigger nexus as just spin. A blunt warning Munir didn't stop at a denial. He promised a punishing response to any future strike. 'Any attempt to target our population centres, military bases, economic hubs and ports will instantly invoke a deeply hurting and more than reciprocal response,' he said. For him, the battlefield isn't decided by imported gear or catchy headlines. It's grit and discipline that matter. Or as he put it, 'Wars are not won through media rhetoric, imported fancy hardware, or political sloganeering, but through faith, professional competence, operational clarity, institutional strength and national resolve.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Villas For Sale in Dubai Might Surprise You Dubai villas | search ads Get Deals Undo India's charge: A hidden 'unholy' axis India doesn't buy it. Lieutenant General Rahul R Singh, the Deputy Chief of Army Staff, laid out what he called the real picture. At a defence event in Delhi, he said, 'China is able to test its weapons against other weapons, so it's like a live lab available to them. Turkey also played an important role in providing the type of support it did.' According to Singh, China fed Pakistan live updates of Indian troop positions while Turkish drones filled the skies. His blunt verdict: India faced not one enemy, but three. How it began Operation Sindoor wasn't born in a vacuum. On 22 April, militants attacked tourists in Pahalgam, Kashmir. India blamed Pakistan. On 7 May, India struck back, hitting terrorist camps in Pakistan-held territory. What followed was four days of drones, missiles and artillery fire — some of the fiercest exchanges between the two since Kargil. It ended, officially, when both Director Generals of Military Operations agreed to stop on 10 May. India claims its strikes were so punishing that Pakistan had no choice but to sue for peace. Live Events Beijing keeps its distance Caught in the middle of the allegations, China plays it safe. When pressed, the Chinese foreign ministry said only, 'China and Pakistan are close neighbours enjoying traditional friendship. Defence and security cooperation is part of the normal cooperation between the two countries and does not target any third party.' Not exactly a denial, not quite an admission either. Behind the denials and threats is an old rivalry that refuses to stay quiet. Pakistan, once again describing itself as the region's 'net security provider,' still faces whispers about terror safe havens. India, meanwhile, is wary of an axis forming around its borders. For all the new weapons and fresh alliances, the script feels familiar. This clash might have ended with a handshake between the two Director Generals of Military Operations, but the story is far from over. Pakistan continues to deny any link to the Pahalgam attack, even as India says the safe havens remain. Munir's tough words fit the old script: Pakistan as the regional stabiliser, India as the aggressor. On India's side, the claim is simple — the battlefield is bigger than the Line of Control and so are the players. So the guns are silent, for now. But whether you believe Munir or Singh, there's one truth no one can deny: the next spark is never too far away.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Court records statement of Sajjan Kumar in 1984 riots case
New Delhi: A Delhi court on Monday recorded the statement of former Congress MP Sajjan Kumar in a 1984 anti-Sikh riots case related to violence in Janakpuri and Vikaspuri. The statement was recorded in the court of special judge Dig Vinay Singh. The court has listed the matter for hearing on July 29. Kumar, making his submissions through advocates Anil Kumar Sharma, Anuj Sharma and Apoorav Kumar Sharma, said that he was innocent. "There is not an iota of evidence against me," he said. "My lie detector test was conducted. I voluntarily participated to prove my innocence," he told the court. You Can Also Check: Delhi AQI | Weather in Delhi | Bank Holidays in Delhi | Public Holidays in Delhi Kumar said he was not named by any witness. However, decades later, his name came up. "The case against me is false and politically motivated," Kumar said. In Feb 2015, an SIT registered two FIRs against Kumar based on complaints of violence in Janakpuri and Vikaspuri during the anti-Sikh riots. In Janakpuri, two men — Sohan Singh and his son-in-law Avtar Singh — were killed on Nov 1, 1984. The second FIR was registered in the case of Gurcharan Singh, who was allegedly set ablaze on Nov 2, 1984, in Vikaspuri. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Why seniors are rushing to get this Internet box – here's why! Techno Mag Learn More Undo According to the complaint, Gurcharan, who sustained severe burns, remained bedridden for three decades. In Aug 2023, a Delhi court dropped the charges of murder and criminal conspiracy in both cases but charged Kumar with other offences in the chargesheet, including rioting with deadly weapons, promoting enmity between different groups, and attempting to commit culpable homicide. Further submitting before the court that he was not present at the spot, Kumar said anyone could have taken his name as he was the MP. "The investigating agency did not conduct a fair investigation. The aim was to implicate by introducing fresh and unsubstantiated allegations," said the former MP. Mentioning that he organised blood donation camps and peace marches to bring harmony to the area, Kumar said: "My lie detector test was conducted. I voluntarily participated to prove my innocence." Kumar said if he was present there, there would be no confusion regarding his identity. At present, he is lodged in Tihar Jail after Delhi High Court sentenced him to life imprisonment in 2018 in a case related to the killing of five Sikhs at Raj Nagar Part I in Palam Colony on Nov 1-2, 1984, and the burning down of a gurdwara in Raj Nagar Part II. On Aug 30 last year, a Delhi court ordered the framing of charges against Kumar in a case related to the killing of three Sikhs during the riots near Pul Bangash Gurdwara.
