logo
USAF Generals Downplay Calls For More Hardened Aircraft Shelters In Pacific Theater

USAF Generals Downplay Calls For More Hardened Aircraft Shelters In Pacific Theater

Yahoo05-03-2025
U.S. Air Force officials remain focused on the ability to disperse forces to far-flung operating locations as the primary means of reducing vulnerability to enemy attacks. They also continue to downplay any talk of doing more to physically harden existing bases. This is despite acknowledgments that large established facilities are still expected to play key roles in any future conflict and can no longer be considered sanctuaries. All of this comes amid an increasingly heated debate about whether the entire U.S. military should be investing in new hardened aircraft shelters and other similar infrastructure improvements, which TWZ has been following closely.
Air Force Gen. Kevin Schneider, head of Pacific Air Forces (PACAF), the service's top command in the Indo-Pacific region, spoke yesterday about current 'resilient' basing priorities during a panel discussion at the Air & Space Forces Association's (AFA) 2025 Warfare Symposium, at which TWZ was in attendance. The panel's main topic was Agile Combat Employment (ACE), a term that currently refers to a set of concepts for distributed and disaggregated operations centered heavily on short notice and otherwise irregular deployments, often to remote, austere, or otherwise non-traditional locales. The other branches of the U.S. military, especially the U.S. Marine Corps, have been developing similar new concepts of operations.
'So the Air Force wants to populate the Indo-Pacific with dispersed operating locations to support ACE. However, the Air Force also needs to invest heavily in resilient infrastructure at its main operating bases,' Heather 'Lucky' Penney, the panel's moderator, said as a lead in to a question. 'So, General Schneider, could you speak to what the Air Force is doing to balance the demand for resilient infrastructure while also building out ACE operating locations across the Indo-Pacific?'
Penney is currently a senior fellow at AFA's Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies and also an Air Force veteran who flew F-16s.
'It's different in the Indo-Pacific than it is in Europe. [We] do not have NATO. You have a couple of – five bilateral treaty partners. Two of them are Korea and Japan where we share basing,' Schneider said in response. 'We also have the joint force demands on our bases. And their are benefits to that, as well. I like having the Army on our bases, especially when they have Patriots [surface-to-air missile systems] and other capability that helps us defend.'
It's worth noting here that currently the U.S. Army is the lead service for providing air and missile defense for Air Force bases at home and abroad. There has been talk recently about the Air Force potentially taking a greater role in this regard. The Army has been facing its own struggles in meeting growing demand for ground-based air and missile defenses.
'So, we will have the need for bases, the main operating bases from which we operate,' the PACAF commander continued. 'The challenge becomes, at some point, we will need to move to austere locations. We will need to disaggregate the force. We will need to operate out of other locations, again, one for survivability, and two, again, to provide response options.'
Ensuring the continued viability of main operating bases and work related to ACE both 'cost money,' he said. The Air Force is then faced with the need to 'make internal trades' funding-wise, such as 'do we put that dollar towards, you know, fixing the infrastructure at Kadena [Air Base in Japan] or do we put that dollar towards restoring an airfield at Tinian,' according to Schneider.
What Gen. Schneider was referring to at the end here is the massive amount of work that has been done to reclaim North Field on the island of Tinian, a U.S. territory in the Western Pacific, since the end of 2023. North Field was originally built as a huge B-29 bomber base during World War II. It was the biggest active airbase anywhere in the world before being largely abandoned after the war ended. There has also been additional expansion of the available facilities at Tinian International Airport in recent years, ostensibly to improve its ability to serve as a divert location for U.S. military aircraft in the event that the critically strategic Andersen Air Force Base on nearby Guam is rendered unusable for any reason.
North Field is a prime example of the Air Force's current focus on ACE as the centerpiece of how it expects to fight in the future, especially in a high-end fight in the Pacific. The airfield's grid-like layout inherently presents additional targeting challenges for a potential adversary like China, as you can read about in more detail in TWZ's recent story on what has been happening over the past year or so on Tinian.
Guam has also seen significant military construction work in recent years, including to refurbish more of the World War II-era Northwest Field on the island to support ACE operations. Guam is now set to get a huge new air and missile defense architecture full of new surface-to-air missile launchers, radars, and other supporting facilities, as you can read more about here.
'These are the things that we need in our main operating bases. These are the things that we need to project power,' Gen. Schneider added, but did not explicitly mention hardened infrastructure. He also emphasized a desire to work more with regional allies and partners to 'gain greater access to those fields that are already in operating condition.'
Air Force Gen. James Hecker, another member of yesterday's ACE panel at the AFA Warfare Symposium, also stressed the continued importance of existing main operating bases. Hecker, who is head of U.S. Air Forces in Europe and Air Forces Africa (USAFE-AFAFRICA), as well as NATO's Allied Air Command, highlighted significant challenges his service faces in successfully executing large-scale dispersed operations in the future, as well.
'I have the opportunity to talk to the Ukrainian air chief once every two weeks, or so. And they've been very successful not getting their aircraft hit on the ground,' Hecker said. 'And I ask him, I said, 'How is that? What do you do?' And he goes, 'Well, we never take off and land at the same airfield. I'm like, okay, you know, that's pretty good. Keeps the Russians on their toes.'
'I got tons of airfields from tons of allies, and we have access to all of them. The problem is, I can only protect a few of them,' he continued. 'We can't have that layered [defensive] effect for thousands of airbases. There's just no way it's going to happen.'
However, Gen. Hecker warned that just dispersing forces to more bases will not be a solution in of itself, either.
'So, to go think you're going to land at another airfield and hang out there for a week with no defense, you're going to get schwacked. It's going to happen,' he said. 'You can only stay there for a little bit, and then you've got to get back to your main operating bases.'
'It's going to be much shorter operations. You know, we're not talking weeks anymore,' Hecker explained. 'We're talking days, and sometimes we're talking hours, if you want to be survivable. And then back at your main operating base, you've got the layered defense.'
Hecker called attention to how shrinking adversary kill chains are a key driving factor here, specifically highlighting Russia's efforts to reduce the total time it takes to complete a targeting cycle in operations in Ukraine. China's People's Liberation Army (PLA) has been doing the same, particularly with the help of a growing array of space-based surveillance assets. The time it takes from certain munitions like ballistic and hypersonic missiles to actually get to their targets after launch can also be very short.
'So it's really evolving the ACE concept,' the Air Force's top officer in Europe noted.
Realities like the ones Hecker outlined are exactly what has been driving increasing criticism of the Air Force's current focus on ACE, as well as the service's general approach to basing and base defense, including from members of Congress and outside experts.
Just in January, the Hudson Institute think tank in Washington, D.C., published a report warning that a lack of hardened and unhardened aircraft shelters, as well as other exposed infrastructure, at bases across the Pacific and elsewhere globally has left the U.S. military worryingly vulnerable. The report's authors assessed that just 10 missiles with warheads capable of scattering cluster munitions across areas 450 feet in diameter could be sufficient to neutralize all aircraft parked in the open and critical fuel storage facilities at key airbases like Marine Corps Air Station Iwakuni in Japan, Naval Support Facility Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean, or Langley Air Force Base in Virginia.
Another report that the Henry L. Stimson Center think tank published last December highlighted how Chinese missile strikes aimed just at cratering runways at bases in the Pacific could upend the U.S. military's ability to project airpower.
'While 'active defenses' such as air and missile defense systems are an important part of base and force protection, their high cost and limited numbers mean the U.S. will not be able to deploy enough of them to fully protect our bases,' a group of 13 Republican members of Congress wrote in an open letter to the Air Force back in May 2024. 'In order to complement active defenses and strengthen our bases, we must invest in 'passive defenses,' like hardened aircraft shelters… Robust passive defenses can help minimize the damage of missile attacks by increasing our forces' ability to withstand strikes, recover quickly, and effectively continue operations.'
'While hardened aircraft shelters do not provide complete protection from missile attacks, they do offer significantly more protection against submunitions than expedient shelters (relocatable steel shelters),' the letter's authors added. More shelters 'would also force China to use more force to destroy each aircraft, thereby increasing the resources required to attack our forces and, in turn, the survivability of our valuable air assets.'
Outside of the United States, especially in China, but also in Russia, North Korea, and many other countries, there has been a growing trend in the expansion of hardened and otherwise more robust airbase infrastructure.
Air Force officials have also pushed back more actively on the idea of investing in additional physical hardening in recent years.
'I'm not a big fan of hardening infrastructure,' Gen. Kenneth Wilsbach said at a roundtable at the Air and Space Forces Association's main annual symposium in 2023. 'The reason is because of the advent of precision-guided weapons… you saw what we did to the Iraqi Air Force and their hardened aircraft shelters. They're not so hard when you put a 2,000-pound bomb right through the roof.'
Wilsbach was commander of PACAF at the time and has since become head of Air Combat Command (ACC), which oversees the vast majority of the Air Force's tactical combat jets and intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) aircraft.
The comments yesterday from the Air Force's current top officers in the Indo-Pacific region and Europe highlighting the continued focus on ACE and the challenges with that strategy are only likely to further fuel the ongoing debate about building more hardened infrastructure to help ensure American forces can continue to project air power in future fights.
Contact the author: joe@twz.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Robots can't schmooze. Why extroverts may thrive in an AI-filled workplace.
Robots can't schmooze. Why extroverts may thrive in an AI-filled workplace.

Business Insider

time10 hours ago

  • Business Insider

Robots can't schmooze. Why extroverts may thrive in an AI-filled workplace.

The CEO and cofounder of the startup fileAI describes himself as an introvert who's been able to push himself to go beyond what he finds comfortable. That's part of being human, he said. "We have to adapt," Schneider, whose company helps companies use their unstructured data, told Business Insider. Some of his fellow introverts could soon have to embrace Schneider's can-do approach or risk being sidelined by their more outgoing peers. That's because as AI takes over more tasks, much of the work that remains could involve human interactions, workplace observers told BI. "The extraverted personality has potentially an advantage here," Schneider said,because certain tasks can't be offloaded as easily to computers. For instance, a sales team might use AI to help with data entry or analyze call transcripts, but ChatGPT can't wine and dine a potential client — at least for now. A greater emphasis on these human tasks could be worrisome news for introverts and, of course, a win for the glad-handers. Even when they're good at what they do, some extroverts are able to propel their careers with a frenzy of fist bumps and finger guns. "The personality hire might be the most safe in the face of AI because what they can do is read a room. They can stand out. They can be charming," Elizabeth Lotardo, a leadership consultant, told BI. At least for now, she said, people who can easily build relationships in the workplace and draw insights from colleagues could have an edge. "That is organizational currency that AI cannot replicate, generally," said Lotardo, author of the book "Leading Yourself." AI is already changing workplace communication Schneider, from fileAI, said he expects that interpersonal skills will become "super important" as AI absorbs even more of the tasks that are currently keeping workers busy. "You're going to need a lot less people doing these things that keep them on their laptops eight hours a day," he said. Some labor market observers warn that roles comprised of routine tasks face the greatest risk of automation, though some companies hope to have AI take on far more. AI might create a premium on human-to-human communication, yet it might also mean we become worse at it. Vanessa Druskat, an associate professor of organizational behavior and management at the University of New Hampshire's Paul College of Business and Economics, describes herself as an introvert. She said one worry she has is that when people use AI to interact less often with others and to create "nice, clean, empathetic emails or texts," the part of the brain that handles those responsibilities could begin to atrophy. "The way the brain works is it has kind of a use-it-or-lose-it capacity," Druskat said. If we outsource too many interactions to AI, she said, our own abilities are likely to weaken. Druskat said that her concerns for introverts are similar to what she worries about in general for her students. Those who are using AI to write their professional emails could lose the ability to determine the "appropriate emotion" for the close of a message, she said. "They're mental skills that we develop," said Druskat. How AI could help introverts thrive While Druskat sees risks in introverts losing some ability to communicate with others at work if they rely too much on AI, there can be a tangible boost for more reserved employees. Brian Smith is an organizational psychologist who runs a leadership advisory firm. He's seen AI supercharge the abilities of some of the quieter people on his team, who he said sometimes found it difficult to engage with others. Smith said team members have been able to query AI models to better understand the feedback they're getting from clients. That, in turn, he said, has enabled introverted team members to become more confident and "start to have better human conversations with the people that they were originally having difficulty with." Yet for all the help AI can give workers of all personality types, it can't do everything, said Schneider, from fileAI. For now, a bot won't be a big help, he said, if he has to talk to an investor in person. He still needs those interpersonal skills. "It can upskill me, and it can sort of give me the playbook, but at the end of the day, I'm going to be standing there, and I'm going to have to deliver," Schneider said.

Robots can't schmooze. Why extroverts may thrive in an AI-filled workplace.
Robots can't schmooze. Why extroverts may thrive in an AI-filled workplace.

Business Insider

time10 hours ago

  • Business Insider

Robots can't schmooze. Why extroverts may thrive in an AI-filled workplace.

Christian Schneider once had to psych himself up to talk to customers or make fundraising pitches to investors. The CEO and cofounder of the startup fileAI describes himself as an introvert who's been able to push himself to go beyond what he finds comfortable. That's part of being human, he said. "We have to adapt," Schneider, whose company helps companies use their unstructured data, told Business Insider. Some of his fellow introverts could soon have to embrace Schneider's can-do approach or risk being sidelined by their more outgoing peers. That's because as AI takes over more tasks, much of the work that remains could involve human interactions, workplace observers told BI. "The extraverted personality has potentially an advantage here," Schneider said, because certain tasks can't be offloaded as easily to computers. For instance, a sales team might use AI to help with data entry or analyze call transcripts, but ChatGPT can't wine and dine a potential client — at least for now. A greater emphasis on these human tasks could be worrisome news for introverts and, of course, a win for the glad-handers. Even when they're good at what they do, some extroverts are able to propel their careers with a frenzy of fist bumps and finger guns. "The personality hire might be the most safe in the face of AI because what they can do is read a room. They can stand out. They can be charming," Elizabeth Lotardo, a leadership consultant, told BI. At least for now, she said, people who can easily build relationships in the workplace and draw insights from colleagues could have an edge. "That is organizational currency that AI cannot replicate, generally," said Lotardo, author of the book "Leading Yourself." AI is already changing workplace communication Schneider, from fileAI, said he expects that interpersonal skills will become "super important" as AI absorbs even more of the tasks that are currently keeping workers busy. "You're going to need a lot less people doing these things that keep them on their laptops eight hours a day," he said. Some labor market observers warn that roles comprised of routine tasks face the greatest risk of automation, though some companies hope to have AI take on far more. AI might create a premium on human-to-human communication, yet it might also mean we become worse at it. Vanessa Druskat, an associate professor of organizational behavior and management at the University of New Hampshire's Paul College of Business and Economics, describes herself as an introvert. She said one worry she has is that when people use AI to interact less often with others and to create "nice, clean, empathetic emails or texts," the part of the brain that handles those responsibilities could begin to atrophy. "The way the brain works is it has kind of a use-it-or-lose-it capacity," Druskat said. If we outsource too many interactions to AI, she said, our own abilities are likely to weaken. Druskat said that her concerns for introverts are similar to what she worries about in general for her students. Those who are using AI to write their professional emails could lose the ability to determine the "appropriate emotion" for the close of a message, she said. "They're mental skills that we develop," said Druskat. How AI could help introverts thrive While Druskat sees risks in introverts losing some ability to communicate with others at work if they rely too much on AI, there can be a tangible boost for more reserved employees. Brian Smith is an organizational psychologist who runs a leadership advisory firm. He's seen AI supercharge the abilities of some of the quieter people on his team, who he said sometimes found it difficult to engage with others. Smith said team members have been able to query AI models to better understand the feedback they're getting from clients. That, in turn, he said, has enabled introverted team members to become more confident and "start to have better human conversations with the people that they were originally having difficulty with." Yet for all the help AI can give workers of all personality types, it can't do everything, said Schneider, from fileAI. For now, a bot won't be a big help, he said, if he has to talk to an investor in person. He still needs those interpersonal skills. "It can upskill me, and it can sort of give me the playbook, but at the end of the day, I'm going to be standing there, and I'm going to have to deliver," Schneider said.

Military clash between Thailand, Cambodia escalates at border
Military clash between Thailand, Cambodia escalates at border

UPI

timea day ago

  • UPI

Military clash between Thailand, Cambodia escalates at border

A crater is seen near homes at a residential area amid clashes along the disputed Thai-Cambodian border, in Surin Province, Thailand, on Saturday. Photo by Kaikungwon Duanjumroon/EPA July 26 (UPI) -- Cambodia and Thailand military forces on Saturday fought each other for the third day over contested border territory as the death toll rose to at least 32. The dead were 19 in Thailand, including 13 civilians, and 13 in Cambodia, with eight civilians, in the bloodiest fighting in more than a decade, The Guardian reported. Acting Thai Prime Minister warned the situation "could develop into war." "For now, it remains limited to clashes," he told reporters in Bangkok, and his nation was acting to "protect our land and the sovereignty of our nation." Fighting involving tanks began Thursday near Prasat Ta Muen Thom, an ancient temple claimed by both nations. Thailand also used F-16 jets. Weapons included cluster munitions, which are internationally prohibited though both nations haven't agreed to the Convention on Cluster Munitions. "Neither Thailand nor Cambodia appears to be paying attention to international humanitarian law at great expense to civilians," John Sifton, Asia advocacy director at Human Rights Watch, said in a news release Friday. "Diplomatic efforts underway need to prioritize protecting civilians and civilian infrastructure." On Friday, United Nations diplomats from both countries sought a cease-fire during an emergency meeting of the U.N. Security Council in New York. Cherdchai Chaivaivid, Thailand's envoy to the U.N., urged Cambodia to "immediately cease all hostilities and acts of aggression, and resume dialogue in good faith." The diplomat said his nation agreed "in principle" to the deal but said Cambodia was continuing "indiscriminate attacks on Thai territory." Cambodia's U.N. ambassador, Chhea Keo said "Cambodia asked for an immediate cease-fire -- unconditionally -- and we also call for the peaceful solution of the dispute," said Chea Keo, Cambodia's U.N. ambassador. "If this conflict escalates, the peace and stability of the entire Southeast Asia region will be at stake," Keo added. U.N. Secretary General Antonio Guterres urged both sides to exercise the "utmost restraint." "The United States is gravely concerned by reports of the escalating fighting along the Thailand-Cambodia border," a State Department press spokesperson said Thursday. "We are particularly alarmed by reports of harm to innocent civilians. We express our deepest condolences on the loss of life. We strongly urge the immediate cessation of attacks, protection of civilians, and peaceful settlement of disputes." On Saturday, President Donald Trump posted on Truth Social from Scotland that he "I just had a very good call with the Prime Minister of Cambodia, and informed him of my discussions with Thailand, and its Acting Prime Minister. Both Parties are looking for an immediate Ceasefire and Peace. They are also looking to get back to the 'Trading Table' with the United States, which we think is inappropriate to do until such time as the fighting STOPS. "They have a long and storied History and Culture. They will hopefully get along for many years to come. When all is done, and Peace is at hand, I look forward to concluding our Trading Agreements with both!" Malaysia, which heads the 10-member Southeast Asian Nations, or ASEAN, offered to mediate. China has also expressed concern about the situation, which worsened on Saturday. Cambodia's Ministry of Defense accused Thailand of "unprovoked and premeditated act of aggression" on -- firing five heavy artillery shells in Pursat Province on the southern edge of the shared border. Thailand said Cambodia attacked in neighboring Trat Province but their naval forces pushed back "the incursion" early Saturday. Trat, bordering the Gulf of Thailand and the Pacific Ocean, includes numerous islands with white-sand beaches and coral reefs. Tensions have escalated since May when a Cambodian soldier was killed in an exchange with gunfire. Then last week, Thai soldiers were injured by new landmines. Cambodia has denied putting them there. Thailand recalled its ambassador from Cambodia and said it would expel Cambodia's diplomat in Bangkok. At least 138,000 people have been evacuated from Thailand's borders. Cambodia said more than 23,000 people were moved from near the border. Thaksin Shinawatra, the former Thai prime minister, visited evacuees at a shelter in Ubon Ratchathani Province on Saturday morning. Cambodia has a population of 17.4 million and Thailand has 71.7 million residents. Vietnam borders both nations.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store