logo
Madras High Court suo motu impleads Mata Amritanandamayi Math in forest case

Madras High Court suo motu impleads Mata Amritanandamayi Math in forest case

The Hindua day ago
The Madras High Court has suo motu impleaded Mata Amritanandamayi Math as one of the respondents to a case related to alleged erection of a two-kilometre-long electric fence, disturbing the movement of elephants, on the Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham campus in Ettimadai situated at the foothills of the Bouluvampatty ranges of the Western Ghats in Coimbatore district.
A special Division Bench of Justices N. Sathish Kumar and D. Bharatha Chakravarthy directed the High Court Registry to issue notice, returnable by June 25, to the Math. The court felt it essential to hear the institution and ascertain if any of the conditions imposed by the Directorate of Town and Country Planning (DTCP) and the Forest Department had been violated by it.
The direction was issued on a petition filed by forest activist M. Siva through his counsel M. Purushothaman. Responding to the petition, Coimbatore Collector G. Pavankumar told the court that the Math had submitted an application on April 3, 2023 for changing the use of 12.622 hectares of land from agricultural purposes to educational purpose in the revenue records.
Since the deemed university campus run by the Math bordered with the reserve forests, necessary remarks were called for from the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests (Head of Forest Force) before taking a call on the application. On January 18, 2024, the PCCF submitted a list of 17 conditions under which the Math's request for change of classification of lands could be considered.
Thereafter, the DTCP granted permission to the Math by directing it to follow all the 17 conditions scrupulously. One of the conditions required the maintenance of a buffer zone of 150 metres along the reserve forests boundary for free movement of wildlife, particularly elephants. The other condition stated that wild animals passing through applicant's land, for food and water, should not be disturbed.
The applicant was also instructed that fencing, if any, around its land must be erected only as per the Tamil Nadu Power Fences (Registration and Regulation) Rules, 2023 and that there should not be continuous barrier to block free movement of wild migratory animals. The Math was also asked to report movement of elephants to the nearby forest office and not drive them away.
'In order to ascertain whether any of the conditions have been violated and since no decision can be taken without affording an opportunity of hearing to the said private institution, Mata Amritanandamayi Math... is suo motu impleaded as the 67th respondent in the writ petition,' the Divsion Bench ordered.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

SC opens up staff jobs for OBC and SC/ST blocs, 'omits' EWS
SC opens up staff jobs for OBC and SC/ST blocs, 'omits' EWS

Time of India

time7 hours ago

  • Time of India

SC opens up staff jobs for OBC and SC/ST blocs, 'omits' EWS

Supreme Court (AI-generated image) NEW DELHI: CJI B R Gavai, second from the Dalit community to head the judiciary, has amended the Supreme Court Officers and Servant (Conditions of Service and Conduct) Rules, 1961, to provide for reservations to SCs, STs, OBCs, physically challenged, ex-servicemen and dependents of freedom fighters in direct recruitments to subordinate staff of the apex court. Rule 4A of the Act, amended and substituted on the CJI's instructions, has been gazetted through a notification issued on July 3. However, it omits reservation for candidates belonging to the economically weaker section (EWS), which was introduced by Parliament through Constitution (103rd Amendment) Act, 2019. The substituted Section 4A, as gazetted, reads: "Reservation in direct recruitment to various categories of posts specified in the Schedule, for the candidates belonging to SCs, STs, OBCs, Physically Challenged, Ex-servicemen and dependant of Freedom Fighters shall be in accordance with the Rules, orders, and Notifications issued from time to time by the Government of India in respect of posts carrying the pay scale corresponding to the pay scale prescribed for the post specified in the Schedule, subject to such modification, variation or exception as the Chief Justice may, from time to time, specify. " The 103rd Constitutional Amendment Act introduced Articles 15(6) and 16(6) to give effect to 10% reservation for EWS in govt jobs and admissions to govt and govt-aided educational institutions. It received Presidential assent on Jan 12, 2019. The constitutional validity of EWS quota was challenged in Supreme Court by more than 20 petitions, mainly on the ground that it exceeded the 50% ceiling on quota imposed by SC in its Indra Sawhney judgment in 1992. A five-judge bench led by then CJI U U Lalit on Nov 7, 2022, by three to two majority, declared that Parliament's decision to provide quota for EWS category was constitutionally valid. The majority view was shared by Justices Dinesh Maheswari, Bela M Trivedi and J B Pardiwala, while Justices Lalit and S R Bhat ruled that EWS quota was illegal. On Dec 6, 2022, NGO 'Society for the Rights of Backward Communities' filed a petition seeking review of the Nov 7 judgment. A five-judge bench led by then CJI D Y Chandrachud on May 9, 2023 dismissed the review petition, thus giving judicial impregnability to the validity of the EWS quota.

Opposition Moves SC Over Bihar Voter List Revision; EC Says No Rule Change Amid Row Over Ad
Opposition Moves SC Over Bihar Voter List Revision; EC Says No Rule Change Amid Row Over Ad

News18

time10 hours ago

  • News18

Opposition Moves SC Over Bihar Voter List Revision; EC Says No Rule Change Amid Row Over Ad

Last Updated: INDIA bloc parties have been opposing the provision whereby voters whose names were included in the electoral roll after 2003 are required to submit birth documents Opposition parties have intensified their criticism of the special intensive revision of electoral rolls in poll-bound Bihar, with TMC MP Mahua Moitra and RJD's Manoj Jha moving the Supreme Court seeking to quash the EC order claiming that it violated the Constitution. Besides Moitra and Jha, several NGOs have also petitioned the court against the special intensive revision (SIR), even as the Election Commission (EC) issued a statement on Sunday saying it has not changed its instructions on the revision process. This came after several social media posts, including one by Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge, cited an advertisement by the EC published in newspapers to suggest that showing documents is not necessary. The Congress and other INDIA bloc parties have been opposing the provision whereby voters whose names were included in the electoral roll after 2003 are required to submit documents related to birth. 'Why are people who have been voting in election after election being asked to show their documents for voting ?" Kharge said in a post on X. 'When the pressure from the opposition, the public and civil society increased, the Election Commission hurriedly published these advertisements today, which state that now only a form needs to be filled and showing documents is not necessary." WHAT DID THE EC SAY? In a statement, the EC made it clear that while voters were required to 'submit their documents anytime before July 25, 2025", those who failed to do so would get an opportunity 'during the Claims & Objections period also". The poll body also urged people to 'beware of statements being made by a few persons, who without reading the SIR order dated 24 June 2025… are attempting to confuse the public with their incorrect and misleading statements". WHAT DID THE PETITIONERS SAY? Moitra, who moved the SC seeking quashing of the June 24 EC order under which special intensive revision (SIR) is being conducted, alleged that it violates several provisions of the Constitution and the Representation of People (RP) Act, 1950. In her plea, she submitted that if not set aside, it can lead to large-scale disenfranchisement of eligible voters in the country, thereby undermining democracy and free and fair elections. 'The present writ petition has been filed in public interest under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking setting aside of order dated 24.06.2025 issued by Election Commission of India under which SIR of electoral rolls in Bihar is being conducted in violation of Articles 14, 19(1)(a), 21, 325, 328 of the Constitution and provisions of Representation of People (RP) Act, 1950 and Registration of Electors (RER) Rules, 1960…," her plea stated. Moitra sought a direction from the apex court to restrain the EC from issuing similar orders for SIR of electoral rolls in other states. 'They have now introduced it to deprive the bonafide young electorate of Bihar, where elections are slated to be held shortly. Later, they will target Bengal, where elections are due in 2026," Moitra told news agency PTI. Jha, meanwhile, alleged in his plea that the EC order violated Articles 14, 21, 325 and 326 of the Constitution of India. He stated that the impugned order 'is a tool of institutionalised disenfranchisement and it is being used to justify aggressive and opaque revisions of electoral rolls that disproportionately target Muslim, Dalit and poor migrant communities, as such, they are not random patterns but it is engineered exclusions". A similar plea has also been filed by the NGO, Association of Democratic Reforms, through advocate Prashant Bhushan. Several other civil society organisations like PUCL and activists like Yogendra Yadav have approached the top court against the EC's direction. While the opposition has been questioning the timing and intent of the exercise, the BJP has defended it. Leader of Opposition in the West Bengal assembly Suvendu Adhikari, however, welcomed the SIR and said such an exercise should also be conducted in the TMC-ruled state. The last such revision in Bihar was conducted in 2003. According to the EC, the exercise was necessitated by rapid urbanisation, frequent migration, young citizens becoming eligible to vote, non-reporting of deaths, and inclusion of the names of foreign illegal immigrants. top videos View all The EC said it will scrupulously adhere to the constitutional and legal provisions as laid down in Article 326 of the Constitution and Section 16 of the Representation of the People Act, 1950, in carrying out the revision. (With PTI inputs) First Published: July 06, 2025, 23:20 IST

Govt staff suspended for smoking in office
Govt staff suspended for smoking in office

Time of India

time11 hours ago

  • Time of India

Govt staff suspended for smoking in office

Ranchi: Acting on chief minister Hemant Soren's directive, the West Singhbhum district administration on Sunday suspended a 'Jan-sevak', Jagmohan Soren, for smoking inside his office while on duty. Reacting to a video on social media that had gone viral, Soren, tagging West Singhbhum DC's official handle on X, directed him to take strict action. Soon, West Singhbhum DC tweeted, "Respected Sir, as per instructions, for the indecent act displayed in the video at the govt office, 'jan sevak' (public servant) Jagmohan Soren has been suspended with immediate effect under Clause 9 (a) of the Jharkhand Govt Servant (Classification, Control, and Appeal) Rules-2016. The deputy development commissioner has been directed to initiate formal disciplinary action. " The suspended official was posted at the Jagannathpur block office.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store