Govt staff suspended for smoking in office
Reacting to a video on social media that had gone viral, Soren, tagging West Singhbhum DC's official handle on X, directed him to take strict action.
Soon, West Singhbhum DC tweeted, "Respected Sir, as per instructions, for the indecent act displayed in the video at the govt office, 'jan sevak' (public servant) Jagmohan Soren has been suspended with immediate effect under Clause 9 (a) of the Jharkhand Govt Servant (Classification, Control, and Appeal) Rules-2016. The deputy development commissioner has been directed to initiate formal disciplinary action.
"
The suspended official was posted at the Jagannathpur block office.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
4 hours ago
- The Hindu
Madhya Pradesh High Court notice to State govt. over recently notified promotion rules
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has issued a notice to the State Government over the rules for the promotion of government employees notified last month. A Division Bench of acting Chief Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva and Justice Vinay Saraf on Monday (July 7, 2025) issued the notice while hearing a batch of petitions filed by various government employees who have challenged the constitutional legality of the Madhya Pradesh Public Service Promotion Rules, 2025. The State Government, on June 17, had approved the rules that had been pending for about nine years, with Chief Minister Mohan Yadav saying that the interests of employees from all categories, including the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, were taken care of while framing the rules. The petitioners also sought an interim stay on the Rules. However, the Court has sought the government's response, asking it to clear its stance on the matter before the next hearing, scheduled for July 15. The court also asked the government to clarify the differences between the fresh rules and the existing rules notified in 2002. The provisions under the new rules include 20% reservation for the ST and 16% for the SC communities, while the employees from the two communities will also be eligible for promotions based on merit. Multiple petitions have challenged the provision of reservation in the new rules, citing that the matter of reservation in promotions, made in the 2002 rules, is currently pending in the Supreme Court. Cabinet Minister Kailash Vijayvargiya, who had briefed the media about the decision taken at a Cabinet meeting, had said that the rules had been made after consultations with the Law Department on various decisions of the Supreme Court and the High Court so that the process of promotions does not face any legal hurdles.
India Gazette
7 hours ago
- India Gazette
AIBA urges PM Modi to ensure lifelong housing for former PMs, CJIs, and Lok Sabha speakers
New Delhi [India], July 7 (ANI): The All India Bar Association (AIBA) has urged Prime Minister Narendra Modi to initiate legislation that guarantees lifelong government accommodation to former Prime Ministers, former Speakers of the Lok Sabha, and former Chief Justices of India (CJIs), according to the official statement. This appeal was formally made through a detailed letter written by Adish C Aggarwala, Senior Advocate and Chairman of AIBA. According to an official statement, Aggarwala expressed concern over recent developments, highlighting the housing struggles faced by retired Chief Justice DY Chandrachud. Although the Supreme Court Judges (Amendment) Rules, 2022, provide retired CJIs with rent-free housing for up to six months, Chandrachud reportedly had difficulty finding suitable private accommodation in Delhi. Consequently, he requested an extension to remain in his official residence. According to the official statement, the government accommodated this request in good faith, yet it inadvertently caused a delay in the handover of the designated bungalow to Justice Sanjiv Khanna. Even now, more than a month into his tenure, the current Chief Justice of India, Justice BR Gavai, has not moved into the residence. In the letter, Aggarwala--who previously served as President of the Supreme Court Bar Association and Vice Chairman of the Bar Council of India--advocated for a dignified and lasting solution, according to the release. He argued that similar to the privileges granted to the President and Vice-President, lifelong housing should be offered to individuals who have served in the highest positions across the three pillars of Indian democracy: the Legislature, Executive, and Judiciary. In an official statement, he cited examples of previous CJIs whose terms were exceptionally brief--some lasting just 29 or 36 days--due to the seniority-based appointment system. Despite the short tenures, these individuals shoulder immense responsibility in safeguarding the Constitution and its values. According to the release, the letter emphasised that, unlike the fixed-term appointments of other top offices, the unpredictable and often truncated nature of judicial service necessitates a stable post-retirement arrangement. In a statement, Aggarwala's appeal concluded with strong praise for Prime Minister Modi's leadership and a call to preserve and honour India's democratic institutions by supporting those who have upheld them. Such a move, he suggested, would not only resolve a practical concern but also represent a collective tribute to the distinguished roles these officials have played. (ANI)
Time of India
7 hours ago
- Time of India
Remove encroachments from temple properties: HC
Madurai: Madras high court has directed the authorities to take steps to remove encroachments from properties belonging to temples in Pudukottai district. The court was hearing a public interest litigation filed in 2019 by A Radhakrishnan. The petitioner stated that land parcels belonging to the temples under the control of the Hindu religious and charitable endowments (HR and CE) department were encroached upon in Pudukottai district. He submitted a representation to the authorities seeking the removal of the encroachments from the properties. However, no action was taken. Hence, the petitioner moved court. A division bench of justice S M Subramaniam and justice A D Maria Clete observed that the competent authorities under the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act are bound to initiate action against the encroachments and protect the same for the benefit of the concerned temple. Since the Act contemplates several procedures to be followed to recover temple properties from the hands of the encroachers, all such procedures are to be followed without causing any undue delay. Hence, the judges directed the authorities to initiate all appropriate action to protect the temple authorities by removing the encroachers and utilising the properties for the benefit of the temples and devotees as contemplated under the provisions of the Act and Rules. The petitioner is at liberty to give a fresh representation to the competent authorities providing all details enabling them to initiate appropriate action, the judges observed and disposed of the petition.
