Trump's Senior Moments Are Getting Worse
The president's absurdist, abhorrent political persona is endlessly mockable — as Saturday Night Live or any late-night host can attest — but it's also a key component of his increasingly authoritarian politics, and his presentation only seems to be getting worse.
Trump is the oldest man to assume the presidency in the history of the United States. The man he succeeded, former President Joe Biden, had to abandon his reelection bid over widespread concern — and a wealth of evidence — that he was too old to hold the nation's highest office. Biden's apparent decline dominated the summer of 2024 and has continued to be a story into Trump's second term in office. Meanwhile, Trump's innumerable gaffes and otherwise troubling behavior — like when he cut a town hall event short to play music videos and sway onstage less than a month before the election — were largely written off as Trump being Trump.
The 2024 election cycle was defined not only by Trump's scorched-earth comeback to the White House, but by a heated Democratic Party debate over Biden's age and physical decline, the gerontocracy that has entrenched itself in power, and the duty of care those surrounding a leader in decline have to advise that leader not to try to hold onto their office at the expense of their constituents.
In the case of Trump, the president is not, today, the same man who first assumed office in 2017. He has new health issues, less self control, stronger authoritarian impulses, and visibly looser skin. His clear physical aging has been accompanied by a string of gaffes and senior moments that can no longer be excused by the trappings of his public persona.
If the standard — as Trump has himself stressed repeatedly in reference to Biden — is that a president's cognitive decline is a disqualifier and a potential liability, it's worth taking a look at the man currently sitting behind the Resolute Desk and some of his more egregious senior moments in his second term as president.
Trump told false story about his uncle teaching the Unabomber
Remember when Biden told that insane story about fighting Corn Pop (who was a 'bad dude') and it produced a whole news cycle about how the aging president could be losing it? Well this should have been Trump's 'Corn Pop' moment.
Earlier this month, while addressing attendees at a Pennsylvania energy summit, Trump told a bizarre story about his uncle, former Massachusetts Institute of Technology professor John Trump.
'[Ted] Kaczynski was one of his students,' Trump claimed, referring to the prodigal mathematician turned hermit and serial mass murder known as the 'Unabomber.'
'That's a smart man. Kaczynski was one of his students. Do you know who Kaczynski was?' Trump said. 'There's very little difference between a madman and a genius. But Kaczynski, I said, 'What kind of a student was he, Uncle John?' — Dr. John Trump. He said 'seriously good,' he said he'd go around correcting everybody. But it didn't work out so well for him.'
Basically nothing about this story — outside of Trump's uncle being an MIT professor — was true.
Kaczynski was not a student at MIT. Ever. He got his undergraduate degree at Harvard, and completed his masters and doctorate at the University of Michigan. John Trump died in 1985, more than a decade before Kaczynski was caught and identified as the Unabomber. It's extremely unlikely John Trump would have known him, and there is no reason Trump would have asked his uncle about Kaczynski.
Trump said he was surprised Jerome Powell, whom he appointed, was appointed
Trump built a career on firing people. He loves it, it gives him a thrill. There's one man in D.C. he apparently cannot fire: Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell. And it's driving him up the walls.
Powell was appointed to his position as Fed chair in 2018 by Donald Trump, and ushered the American economy through the turmoil of the Covid-19 pandemic, and a subsequent period of persistent inflation that battered consumers. Despite the Fed having mostly gotten a handle on inflation, Trump has been publicly fuming (and threatening to fire) Powell for months now over his refusal to cut down interest rates — partially in response to Trump's inflationary tariffs and pinball economic policies.
Earlier this month, Trump complained that Powell was 'a terrible fed chair.'
'I'm surprised he was appointed, I was surprised, frankly, that Biden put him in and extended him,' he added.
Biden did reappoint Powell — but it was Trump who initially appointed him. At this point, though, it seems that blaming his predecessor is so reflexive for Trump that he's erased his own appointments from his memory.
Trump dumped on his own trade deal
During his first term, Trump regularly made a point of criticizing the North American Free Trade Agreement and exalted his own negotiations of a new United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement as the work of a diplomatic and economic genius. Until he forgot about it.
'I look at some of these agreements, I'd read them at night, and I'd say, 'Who would ever sign a thing like this?'' Trump said of past economic trade deals in North America during his tariff frenzy in the spring. 'So the tariffs will go forward, yes, and we're gonna make up a lot of territory. All we want is reciprocal. We want reciprocity.'
Other nations best beware. Negotiating a trade deal with the White House in order to avoid a punishing tariff regime may be only a temporary solution, as the president may soon forget he even signed it.
Trump called the prime minister of Japan 'Mr. Japan'
There are very basic expectations to being a head of state. One is remembering the names of your international counterparts, even if only for a few minutes in front of a camera.
Should you forget, say, the name of Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, the conventions of the English language provide several alternatives that would allow one to avoid outing yourself and forgetful or ignorant. The 'prime minister of Japan' or 'prime minister' would likely suffice. Not — as Trump chose to blurt out — 'Mr. Japan.'
'Dear Mr. Japan: Here's the story,' Trump said during a June interview with Fox News on his proposed deadlines for tariff deals with foreign governments. 'You're going to pay a 25 percent tariff on your cars.'
The Trump administration ultimately did figure out whom they needed to address their letter to, and struck a deal with the Japanese government to avoid the implementation of ruinous tariffs.
Trump said he's going to spend time in Florida when asked about detainees in Alligator Alcatraz
During a press conference following his visit to a Florida detention center built deep in the Everglades — a location chosen for its outright hostility to human life — Trump was asked by a reporter how long he expected detainees to be held in the center before being deported.
The president instead responded with a bizarre rant about how he would be spending plenty of time in Florida, how much he loved the state, and how nice it was for the reporter to think of him.
'This is my home state. I love it. I love your government. I love all the people around, these are all friends of mine,' Trump said. 'I feel very comfortable in the state. I'll spend a lot of time here.'
The president added that he had a 'very nice little place, nice little cottage,' in Palm Beach — a reference to his Mar-a-Lago luxury golf club. He then bemoaned that many people were leaving cities like New York to come to places like Palm Beach and states like Florida.
'But thank you very much. I'll be here as much as I can — very nice question,' he concluded, leaving the actual question unanswered and the room confused.
Trump rambles about trophy wives and yachts during West Point commencement
During a commencement address at the West Point, Trump advised graduates of the prestigious military college not to marry a trophy wife.
In the middle of a bizarre tangent about William Levitt — a man who made boatloads of cash pioneering the American suburb — Trump lamented that Levitt's second marriage didn't work out so well.
'Could you say a trophy wife? I guess we can say a trophy wife. It didn't work out too well,' the president rambled, perhaps amid a series of flashbacks to his own marriages. 'But it doesn't work out too well, I must tell you. A lot of trophy wives, [it] doesn't work out, but it made him happy for a little while, at least.'
'But he found a new wife,' Trump continued. 'He sold his little boat. You got a big yacht. He had one of the biggest yachts anywhere in the world. He moved for time to Monte Carlo, and he led a good life.'
Trump told the same story during a separate commencement speech at the University of Alabama, discussing Levitt's marital disappointments and advising graduates that they 'have to know when your 'momentum time' is up — I call it 'momentum time.''
Unfortunately, for both the young and the elderly, taking one's own advice can often be the hardest lesson to learn.
More from Rolling Stone
Israel Seizes Aid Flotilla Bringing Baby Formula, Medicine to Gaza
Oklahoma's Trump-Loving, Bible-Thumping Superintendent Faces Porn Probe
The Democratic Party's Brand Is Cooked
Best of Rolling Stone
The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign
Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal
The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The winners and losers in US-EU trade deal
The US and EU have struck what is being billed as the largest trade deal in history, after talks in Scotland. It actually resembles the framework for an agreement rather than a full trade deal, with details still unclear. But the headline figures announced by President Donald Trump and EU chief Ursula von der Leyen do offer clues about which sectors and groups could be hit hardest or have most to gain. Follow reaction live Trump - winner After promising new trade deals with dozens of countries, Trump has just landed the biggest of them all. It looks to most commentators that the EU has given up more, with instant analysis by Capital Economics suggesting a 0.5% knock to GDP. There will also be tens of billions of dollars pouring into US coffers in import taxes. But the glowing headlines for Trump may not last long if a slew of economic data due later this week show that his radical reshaping of the US economy is backfiring. Figures on inflation, jobs, growth and consumer confidence will give a clearer picture on whether Trump's tariffs are delivering pain or gain. US consumers - loser Ordinary Americans are already aggrieved at the increased cost of living and this deal could add to the burden by hiking prices on EU goods. While not as steep as it could have been, the hurdle represented by a 15% tariff rate is still significant, and it is far more pronounced than the obstacles that existed before Trump returned to office. Tariffs are taxes charged on goods bought from other countries. Typically, they are a percentage of a product's value. So, a 15% tariff means that a $100 product imported to the US from the EU will have a $15 dollar tax added on top - taking the total cost to the importer to $115. Companies who bring foreign goods into the US have to pay the tax to the government, and they often pass some or all of the extra cost on to customers. Markets - winner Stock markets in Asia and Europe rose on Monday after news emerged of the deal framework. Under the framework, the US will levy a 15% tariff on goods imported from the EU. While this rate is significant, it is less than what it could have been and at least offers certainty for investors. The agreement is "clearly market-friendly, and should put further upside potential into the euro", Chris Weston at Pepperstone, an Australian broker, told AFP. European solidarity - loser The deal will need to be signed off by all 27 members of the EU, each of which have differing interests and levels of reliance on the export of goods to the US. While some members have given the agreement a cautious welcome, others have been critical - hinting at divisions within the bloc, which is also trying to respond to other crises such as the ongoing war in Ukraine. A big Trump win but not total defeat for Brussels French Prime Minister Francois Bayrou commented: "It is a dark day when an alliance of free peoples, brought together to affirm their common values and to defend their common interests, resigns itself to submission." He was joined by at least two other French government ministers as well as Viktor Orban, the Hungarian leader, who said that Trump "ate von der Leyen for breakfast". Carmakers in Germany - loser The tariff faced by importers bringing EU cars to the US has been nearly halved, from the rate of 27.5% that was imposed by Trump in April to a new rate of 15%. Cars are one of the EU's top exports to the US. And as the largest manufacturer of cars in the EU - thanks to VW, Mercedes and BMW - Germany will have been watching closely. Its leader, Friedrich Merz, has welcomed the new pact, while admitting that he would have welcomed a "further easing of transatlantic trade". That downbeat sentiment was echoed by the German carmaking trade body, the VDA, which warned that even a rate of 15% would "cost the German automotive industry billions annually". Carmakers in the US - winner Trump is trying to boost US vehicle production. American carmakers received a boost when they learned that the EU was dropping its own tariff on US-made cars from 10% to 2.5%. Theoretically that could result in more American cars being bought in Europe. That could be good for US sales overseas, but the pact is not all good news when it comes to domestic sales. That is down to the complex way that American cars are put together. Many of them are actually assembled abroad - in Canada and Mexico - and Trump subjects them to a tariff of 25% when they are brought into the US. That compares with a lower tariff rate of 15% on EU vehicles. So US car makers may now fear being undercut by European manufacturers. EU pharmaceuticals - loser There is confusion around the tariff rate that will be levied on European-made drugs being bought in the US. The EU wants drugs to be subject to the lowest rate possible, to benefit sales. Trump said pharmaceuticals were not covered by the deal announced on Sunday, under which the rate on a number of products was lowered to 15%. But von der Leyen said they were included, and a White House source confirmed the same to the BBC. Either scenario will represent disappointment for European pharma, which initially hoped for a total tariffs exemption. The industry currently enjoys high exposure to the US marketplace thanks to products like Ozempic, a star type-2 diabetes drug made in Denmark. This has been highlighted in Ireland, where opposition parties have pointed out the importance of the industry and criticised the damaging effect of uncertainty. Ireland 'not celebrating' Trump's EU deal US energy - winner Trump said the EU will purchase $750bn (£558bn, €638bn) in US energy, in addition to increasing overall investment in the US by $600bn. "We will replace Russian gas and oil with significant purchases of US LNG [liquified natural gas], oil and nuclear fuels," said Von der Leyen. This will deepen links between European energy security and the US at a time when it has been pivoting away from importing Russian gas since its full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Aviation industry in EU and US - winner Von der Leyen said that some "strategic products" will not attract any tariffs, including aircraft and plane parts, certain chemicals and some agricultural products. That means firms making components for aeroplanes will have friction-free trade between the huge trading blocs. She added that the EU still hoped to get more "zero-for-zero" agreements, notably for wines and spirits, in the coming days. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Miami Herald
10 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Social Security quietly backtracks on unpopular benefit change
The Social Security Administration made a big announcement recently, but it was not popular. The announcement was intended to save the government money and improve efficiency - a big focus for the Trump administration, which came into office and made creating the Department of Government Efficiency its top priority. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Over half a million Social Security benefit recipients were slated to be impacted by the shift, but it has drawn many objections, including from lawmakers who have expressed serious concern about its impact. In light of all this pushback, Social Security has now quietly backtracked. The change isn't going to happen starting September 30, 2025, after all. Here's more about the proposed benefit change, along with insight into why it was scrapped. Social Security had planned to revolutionize the benefits delivery process as part of its efforts to enhance efficiency. Specifically, the intent was for paper checks to be stopped permanently beginning September 30, 2025. Lawmakers have long desired to make this change, and there has officially been a rule requiring electronic delivery of benefits for well over a decade since 2011. However, no one in the past took decisive action to stop sending paper checks. Related: Social Security's 2026 COLA will be good news for older Americans The White House wanted to be the administration that put an end to physical checks. A July 2025 notice posted on the Social Security Administration's website stated: "Starting September 30, 2025, the Social Security Administration (SSA) will no longer issue paper checks for benefit payments. This change is part of a broader government-wide initiative to modernize payment systems and enhance service delivery." The announcement about shifting to paper checks outlined some of the reasons why the Social Security Administration made this plan, including: Improving speed and efficiency, as direct deposits are quickerCost savings, because sending out a paper check costs the government $0.50, while it's possible for the government to make a direct deposit of a Social Security check for just $0.15Better security, since paper checks are 16 times more likely to be stolen Because of these benefits, the government said that Social Security recipients would have two options for receiving payments after September - direct deposit or a Direct Express card. Related: AARP CEO shares blunt 9-word warning about Social Security While there were clearly some good reasons for shifting away from paper checks, the decision was also a very unpopular one. The reason: There was serious concern that people who most need their benefits would lose access because they are unbanked or underbanked. Some Social Security recipients face barriers to opening bank accounts. These include being unable to afford account fees, being ineligible due to previously overdrafting or other problems, or lacking a government-issued ID needed to open an account. Senator Elizabeth Warren was a vocal critic of the plan to switch, commenting on a press call, "There are about 600,000 Americans who still receive their paper checks - it's a small fraction of people who receive Social Security payments, but it's a population that often needs checks through paper." More on retirement: Dave Ramsey offers urgent thoughts about MedicareJean Chatzky shares major statement on Social SecurityTony Robbins has blunt words on IRAs,401(k)s Warren met with Social Security Commissioner Frank Bisignano, and after that meeting, the Administration backtracked on the change. Warren announced on July 23 that Commissioner Bisignano had agreed to keep sending out physical checks to those who need them, and an SSA spokesperson confirmed this to both CBS MoneyWatch and Kiplinger. While the Administration has agreed to cancel the unpopular change, it will still be pushing people to switch to electronic means of receiving payments by communicating about the benefits of making the change and explaining how to do it. The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.


The Hill
10 minutes ago
- The Hill
Live updates: Trump, UK prime minister to meet at start of big week for economy
President Trump will meet with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer for 'wide-ranging talks' on Monday in Scotland. Fresh off Trump's trade deal with the European Union, announced Sunday, Trump and Starmer are expected to discuss implementation of the U.S.-U.K. trade deal, agreed to in May, the prime minister's office said Sunday. The struggle to reach a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas, along with the hunger crisis in Gaza, as well as the war in Ukraine, are also on the table. Trump's five-day visit to Scotland is a mix of business — trade talk ahead of Thursday's White House deadline for tariff deals — and pleasure, with the president taking in his golf courses. In Stockholm on Monday, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent starts the next round of trade meetings with China. Looking even beyond tariffs, a flurry of economic activity this week makes it a significant one. The Federal Reserve announces its next interest rate decision on Wednesday. Between Tuesday and Thursday, the government will release consumer confidence insights, second-quarter GDP data, details on job openings, and the Fed's preferred inflation measure, the PCE index.