
T20 Champions League set to return after ICC green light, first match could be in September 2026: Report
The first edition of the T20 Champions League was held in 2008 and continued until 2014, when ESPN Star reportedly cut its losses after paying an inflated rights fee of around $1 billion. Cricket Australia, the BCCI and Cricket South Africa were partners in the event, but several other T20 leagues have emerged globally since the last edition.
The report notes that one of the biggest challenges for the revived Champions League will be determining which clubs players will represent. It estimates that the world's top T20 players now participate in at least two and, in some cases, four or five different leagues each year. The ICC and partner countries will need to decide which teams these players will represent, and how the finances of the new league will be split.
Meanwhile, lobbying is reportedly underway for a parallel concept involving a circuit of T20 tournaments hosted globally and bankrolled by Saudi Arabia. However, the report notes that Saudi Arabia's future role could also include serving as a potential host for the Champions League.
An earlier report by The Cricketer revealed that the Champions League could be revived under a new name—World Club Championship—in 2026. The league is expected to follow a similar structure to the original CLT20, with title-winning teams from T20 leagues worldwide, including the IPL, BBL, PSL, SA20, and The Hundred, competing against each other.
The report suggests that the BCCI and ECB are on board with the idea, and ICC Chairman Jay Shah has also lent his support to the revived T20 competition.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


News18
40 minutes ago
- News18
Not Sachin Tendulkar! Harry Brook Declares England Batter As 'Best Of All Time'
Last Updated: Harry Brook called Joe Root the 'best Test batter of all time,' even though Brook recently replaced Root as the top Test batter in ICC rankings. Ending all media comparisons in one swipe, Harry Brook declared Joe Root as the 'best Test batter of all time' on Monday (July 21). Brook, who replaced Root as the number one Test batter in the ICC men's rankings recently, said he was still 'not in the same league' as the senior Englishman and would rather he be at the top. Root, over the past couple of years, has made a strong case for himself as the greatest English batter. With more than 2500 runs to his name since 2023, he has gone past Alastair Cook's tally of 12472 Test runs. He's now only 120 runs away from leapfrogging Rahul Dravid, Jacques Kallis and Ricky Ponting to become the second-highest run-scorer in the history of the format, which will leave only Sachin Tendulkar ahead of him. 'Everybody wants to be number one, don't they?" Brook said about the rankings and comparisons in a press conference. 'Him probably more than anybody else. He's a phenomenal player. I'm not in the same league as him, so I'll happily let him have it. He's played for 12-13 years or however long he's played. In my opinion, he's the best Test batter of all time, so I'll let him have that one for now," he added. Brook and Root have been among England's best batters in the Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy so far, helping the hosts take a 2-1 lead. However, their biggest examination would be the fourth Test on a Manchester surface, which is likely to be of most help for bowlers so far. Meanwhile, England have included bowling all-rounder Liam Dawson in their playing 11 for the injured Shoaib Bashir. Brook seemed pleased with the 35-year-old's return to Test cricket after eight years. 'He's a wily old fox, very experienced. He's a very skillful cricketer as well. He's played everywhere, played against everyone. . . Hopefully he can land it in the foot-holes and create a bit of spice out of there and some opportunities to take wickets. He's obviously a very good batter as well, he's got nearly 20 First-Class hundreds. That's adding to our strength in batting. He's a good bloke, he's willing to always fight for the team. He's very competitive and it's good to have him here," Brook said. view comments First Published: July 21, 2025, 23:31 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.


Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
IND vs ENG: Unlucky or preventable? Questions raise over Indian players' fitness in England
A week after the Lord's Test, the BCCI, through a press release, shared three things about all-rounder Nitish Reddy – he had a left-knee injury, he was flying home and the team had wished him speedy recovery. Few hours later, at the start of India's first full outdoor training session at Manchester, pacer Akash Deep was giving a fitness test and was watched by an anxious bunch of coaches and national selection committee chairman Ajit Agarkar. Akash Deep didn't bowl at the nets on Monday and is unlikely to play the crucial fourth Test of the India-England series that the home team leads 2-1. Injuries to both Akash Deep and Reddy, after just two back-to-back Tests, haven't gone down well with the team management. After the Lord's Test, players had been asked to improve their fitness and wheels have already started moving to put in place a proper protocol for assessing the pre-tour fitness of players. Going ahead, especially for a long tour, the information about niggles and injuries a player is carrying needs to be put on the table. The new leadership group is keen to have a transparent and robust fitness regime since these sudden and frequent breakdowns are impacting the team's plans and potentially the final result of Tests and the series. Former Team India trainer Ramji Srinivasan, who was the Head Strength and Conditioning Coach with the 2011 World Cup winning team, says there is scope of improving the system. 'I would definitely say it is very unfortunate these things happened in the middle of the tour. I think better precautionary measures could have been taken by the support staff,' he says. 'There needs to be predictability about non-match injuries. There should be protocols in place – testing and assessment prior to the tour.' At present at the National Cricket Academy, the destination for all wounded cricketers, there are protocols in place but don't seem to be working and that has put a spanner in the planning. After Birmingham, where Akash Deep took 6 wickets, India seemed to have cracked their pace combination. But the optimism didn't even last one full Test. In the middle of the Lord's Test, Akash Deep would walk gingerly out of the field, holding his hip. Mohammed Siraj, at the press conference, did comment on his pace partner's fitness. 'Akash Deep's groin has some issues, so he has to be with the physio. He bowled in the morning but I don't have any feedback from the physio yet,' he said. Akash Deep had a niggle at the start of the tour – coach Gautam Gambhir had said this at the press conference – and that was why Delhi pacer Harshit Rana was called as a back-up. The Bengal pacer sat out for the first Test and only after a scan was done, he was declared match-fit. Rana was sent home. Now, another pacer has been flown in. Today Haryana pacer Anshul Kamboj trained with the team. At Manchester, with the pitch looking damp from a distance and a heavy cloud cover over-head, the conditions seem ideal to unleash the best of Indian pacers. But it could well be an untested and debutant making the cut. Kamboj can get into the team, in case the team management chose him over Prasidh Krishna, who hasn't been able to control his length on this tour. The Indian team also might have liked to have Nitish in the mix at Manchester. At Lord's, the pace all-rounder got the important breakthrough, bowled 17 overs and also had a promising partnership with Ravindra Jadeja. For a management keen on a long batting line-up, Nitish was their ideal man. Nitish is an intriguing case. Was he Test-series ready when he landed in England? All through the IPL, the all-rounder bowled just 5 overs. Daniel Vettori, the coach at SRH where Nitish plays, during the IPL had explained how it was because of injuries he was being under-bowled. 'He brought a side-strain into the tournament, which obviously he has had throughout. That is the reason he missed a lot of cricket prior to that and then it was just a slow, meticulous build-up,' Vettori said. Was it the load of 17 overs being too much on the body of a player with a history of injuries? Expert trainers say that modern science can actually predict injuries but the assessment has to be scientific and the players also need to be honest about their first fitness. 'There are various reasons for a player's breakdown. It could be the wrong movement pattern, muscle overload but take away suppleness, lack of athletic training, and workload management. It could also be the case of a player concealing fitness (concerns),' says an expert on condition of anonymity. But despite these many reasons, the potential injuries to players can be predicted. 'All joints, all muscles have to be tested for strength and power and other things. There is equipment available in the market to do the fitness testing. These are things that should be etched in stone and part of protocol before a series.' Along with the injuries that can be controlled are the ones that can't be. India, as luck would have it, have players who got wounded on the field. Just when it seemed that left-arm pacer Arshdeep Singh would finally get a game, he got injured and got ruled out of the Test. This was confirmed by the BCCI in its press release. It was while stopping a ball in follow-through in the nets that resulted in him getting a cut and subsequently stitches. The pitch and conditions would have aided Arshdeep's swing but for the fourth straight Test he will be on drinks duty. Today at the nets, Rishabh Pant too seemed to have recovered from the hit he took on the index finger at Lord's. He was the keeper when the slip-cordon was taking catches. Once in a while he would show pain when holding a sharp catch but would continue to train. Meanwhile, in the spin-net was the perpetual picture of the tour – left-arm wrist spinner Kuldeep Yadav constantly testing batsmen. Will he finally get a Test? Him getting into the team for the Manchester Test would be an irony. This would be the case of 'horses not for courses'. Kuldeep should have played at Lord's but was sitting out. He should be sitting out in Manchester but because of injuries and multiple combination complications he might just play.


India.com
2 hours ago
- India.com
Supreme Court Rejects BCCI And BYJUS Promoters Appeals Against NCLAT Order On Insolvency Withdrawal
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday dismissed pleas filed by the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) and Byju's co-founder Riju Raveendran challenging a NCLAT Chennai order which denied the withdrawal of insolvency proceedings initiated by the BCCI. A bench comprising Justices JB Pardiwala and R Mahadevan refused to interfere with the NCLAT's April 17 order. On April 17, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) had set aside the appeals filed by BCCI and Byju's Riju Ravindran seeking withdrawal of insolvency proceedings against Byju's. NCLAT had held that any application to withdraw the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against Think & Learn Pvt. Ltd. (the company running Byju's) requires the support of 90 per cent of its Committee of Creditors (CoC). They had challenged in NCLAT, the order passed by the Bengaluru bench of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), which had on February 10, directed to place their settlement offer before the new Committee of Creditors (CoC), in which US-based Glas Trust, the trustee for lenders to which Byju's owes $1.2 billion, is a member. Filing the appeal in the top court, BCCI and Ravindran have sought a withdrawal of the insolvency proceedings saying they have entered into a settlement of Rs 158 crore, and this was done much before the constitution of CoC. Meanwhile, reacting to the Supreme Court's order, Counsel of BYJU'S Founders said in a statement, "It is disappointing that the Hon'ble Supreme Court did not rule in favour of the termination of BYJU's bankruptcy. The termination would have benefitted millions of students who are being deprived of BYJU'S learning system, and thousands of employees." "We are examining the implications of today's order and will decide the future course of action after due consideration. BYJU'S Founders will not stop their efforts to terminate the company's bankruptcy and remain confident that eventually justice will be found through the courts." the statement added.