Several social media platforms yet to share online safety plans with regulator
Speaking to the Irish Examiner, Online safety commissioner Niamh Hodnett said the platforms that Coimisiún na Meán must regulate carry 'different risks'.
Ms Hodnett also hinted that investigations may soon be forthcoming into some of the big tech giants with European headquarters in Ireland.
'There's been extensive engagement with these platforms since [last year],' she said.
'If the supervisory team come to the view they've reached a dead end or the end of the road in relation to supervisory dialogue, and the behaviours haven't changed, then the matter gets escalated to the enforcement team, who then open the matter for investigation.'
In July, the second part of Coimisiún na Meán's Online Safety Code comes into force.
It obliges YouTube, TikTok, Pinterest, Reddit, Tumblr, Facebook, Instagram, Udemy, LinkedIn, and X (formerly Twitter) to take specific actions to combat harmful content such as cyber bullying, the promotion of eating disorders, and promotion of self-harm and suicide.
They must also introduce age verification checks to ensure those under the age of 18 cannot view pornography or extreme violence on their platforms.
The regulator has not been prescriptive on what form this age verification should take, but said it must be robust and ticking a box to say you are overage would not be sufficient.
Previously, its executive chair Jeremy Godfrey told the Irish Examiner that a requirement for a person to show their passport and then a selfie to verify they are the person on the ID could be described as a 'gold standard'.
Sanctions for breaches of the code can run into the tens or hundreds of millions of euro.
X, Reddit, and Tumblr have taken separate judicial reviews in the High Court against the Online Safety Code.
While Reddit and Tumblr failed in these bids, X's case is set to be heard in June, just a month before the code is set to apply to the site.
'In relation to the three platforms in question, no we haven't had sight of what exactly their proposed plans are but nor do we have communication that they're absolutely not going to do it,' she said.
Ms Hodnett added there is no 'indicative timeline' for it launching investigations into particular firms if they believe it to be breaching its obligations but said that discussions with these platforms are ongoing.
'We said what's key for us is getting the behavioural change, rather than the big fines,' she said.
'But, of course, if we're not seeing the behavioural change, we will have to resort to investigation and enforcement. Again, not prejudging anything.'
Read More
Government urged to support bill forcing social media firms to turn off 'addictive' algorithms for children
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
15 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Will tech giants finally take online safety for children seriously?
The wild west of social media self-regulation has come to an end, but the battles that will define this new era have only just begun after a very busy week in this hotly contested space. Last Monday, the second part of Ireland's regulator Coimisiún na Mean's Online Safety Code came into force. It came after a nine-month lead in time for companies to prepare its systems for the code aimed at keeping people, particularly children, safe online. This Part B of the nascent code means that the video-sharing platforms under its remit that allow pornography, like X, must use effective age assurance controls to make sure children can't watch it. In other words, the Elon Musk-owned platform formerly known as Twitter must make sure people are aged 18 or over to view porn that is available on it. There are other aspects to it too including prohibiting and sharing of content harmful to children such as content promoting eating disorders, self-harm or suicide, cyberbullying, hate speech, and extreme violence. Critics have claimed parts of the code are too vague and don't provide clear enough timelines to take action against those in breach. These same critics say it will be on the regulator to show it has the teeth to hold platforms to account. In theory, X or any of the other firms to which it applies like Meta and Youtube could face heavy penalties if they don't adhere to it. €20m or 10% of turnover, whichever is greater, can come in fines for breaches of the code. The latter percentage figure could run into billions of euro for some firms. But, just because the code came into force on Monday, it didn't mean things had changed overnight. Fine Gael TD Keira Keogh, who chairs the Oireachtas Children's Committee, said the following day that children could still set up accounts which 'opens a doorway to unlimited inappropriate, disturbing and damaging content'. 'Parents are understandably frustrated that as of now, nothing has changed and their kids are still at risk of being exposed to all that is sinister in the world of social media,' she said. Given the availability and proliferation of the kinds of nasty content people have become used to on social media feeds, advocates had stressed how much firms shouldn't be let avoid their obligations any longer now Coimisiún na Meán had its powers in place. 'Platforms have benefited from a substantial nine-month implementation period since the Code's publication in October 2024, allowing them more than enough time to develop robust age verification systems other than self-declaration, stringent content controls to prevent child exposure to harmful material, and clear and easy-to-use reporting systems,' charity CyberSafeKids said. It appears that the regulator agreed. No age checks On Wednesday, Coimisiún na Meán wrote to X seeking an explanation as to why there were still no age checks to watch pornography and asking them for an explanation as to how they were complying with their obligations by Friday. 'Platforms have had nine months to come into compliance with Part B of the Code,' it said. 'We expect platforms to comply with their legal obligations. Non-compliance is a serious matter which can lead to sanctions including significant financial penalties.' The regulator also said it would take further action if there is evidence of non-compliance with the Online Safety Code. 'We are continuing to review all of the designated video-sharing platforms to assess their compliance with the Code and will take any further supervisory, investigative or enforcement action required,' it added. The pressure on X and other platforms isn't just coming from Ireland. Across Europe, regulators are trying to get to grips with regulating this kind of content online. In the UK, its Online Safety Act sets out children's codes which came into force on Friday that will see some services, including pornographic websites, starting to check the age of UK users. Again, non compliance can see a fine of 10% of turnover, or even its executives jailed. From Friday, anyone trying to access pornographic content in the UK would've been met with a new check on their age before they could access that site, as platforms clearly got the UK's message. On the other hand, concerns have been raised over a wider restriction on content deemed 'unsuitable' and whether that amounts to censorship online. At home, the Irish regulator's work also fits in with wider European legislation, namely the Digital Services Act, and investigations from the European Commission into major platforms. It's all very complex, but our Online Safety Code sits with the Digital Services Act and the EU's laws on terrorist content online. All together, they're supposed to allow regulators to hold the social media companies to account in a variety of ways. In the UK, Reddit and Bluesky introduced age checks in advance of the new rules coming into force there too showing that platforms are clearly hearing the obligations they now face. Picture: Anatoliy Babiy Under the Digital Services Act, for example, the European Commission recently opened formal proceedings against sites including Pornhub and XVideos while member states also grouped together to take action against smaller pornographic platforms. The Commission said these major sites hadn't put in appropriate age verification tools to safeguard minors. An in-depth investigation is now under way. Curiously timed as it fell within the same week as Ireland's and the UK's safety codes came into force, X did publish the methods it will use to check users ages, which include the use of a live selfie with an AI used to determine age or using someone's email address to estimate their age. 'We are required by regulations including the UK's Online Safety Act, the Irish Online Safety Code and the European Union Digital Services Act, to verify your age for access to certain types of content,' X said on its website. In Ireland, the regulator prescribes that age checks must be robust, effective and protect privacy and it's understood it will be considering X's proposals in this regard. Even in lieu of that, age verification on X appeared to have already come into force as access to such content became restricted over the weekend. Things are changing and changing quickly. Charities working in this space have said that while the legislative obligations on platforms are now clearly present where they hadn't been before, enforcement will be key. In a statement to the Irish Examiner, CyberSafeKids said: 'What we expect to see over the next 12-24 months is tech companies finally stepping up and accepting responsibility and accountability to ensure children are not accessing platforms that were not designed for them in the first place and that they're shielded from the kinds of harmful content they contain. It is still early to fully assess how aggressively and effectively Coimisiún na Meán will act on enforcement; initial results suggest continued and predictable heel-dragging from the large social media providers, so proactive monitoring and swift intervention are now key for the integrity of the Code. It said that if companies continue to drag their heels, the regulator must act firmly to impose quick and substantial financial penalties for non-compliance. Meanwhile, online safety coordinator at the Children's Rights Alliance Noeline Blackwell said given Coimisiún na Meán had opted for a principles-based approach, we will be very reliant on the regulator to be proactive to ensure companies meet their obligations. 'Its Commissioners will need to ensure that they have the people, the expertise, the finances that they need and they will then need to have the will to follow up with the companies,' she said. 'We believe that it is extremely urgent that platforms are scrutinised for compliance and taken to task if they do not comply. 'The real urgency with these regulations is that every day, every hour that the appropriate safeguards are missing is an hour, a day that children active on these platforms are at risk of harm from all the issues that the Code is meant to protect them from. That's the whole point of the legislation. 'It's not a game between the regulator and any or all of the platforms. It's a real threat to children when these systems are not in place.' Read More Social media aimed at kids is driven by profit, not safety
Irish Daily Mirror
2 days ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
Son of '90s singer jailed for 10 years after message identified famous dad
A 30-year-old drug dealer was put behind bars for 10 years after police tracked him down due to his famous dad. A team of specialist investigators identified him from messages about his musician father. An associate within their drug network even sent him a picture of his famous dad and made comments which confirmed their relationship. Thomas Hooton, the son of The Farm lead singer Peter Hooton, has been jailed and sentenced to 10 years and eight months for the supply of cocaine, ketamine, cannabis and heroin. The 30-year-old drug dealer, who had previously pleaded guilty to conspiring to supply drugs, was using the name "Ownraptor" and quickly became a trusted broker of multi-million-pound drug deals. Thomas also wrote in messages that he was driving a black Audi A3 and his "arl fella", meaning his dad, had arranged the insurance. Thomas was sentenced at Liverpool Crown Court on Friday. On the back of his arrest by Merseyside's Organised Crime Partnership in April this year, Thomas made the decision to plead guilty. Peter Hooton at a festival in 2016 (Image: West Lothian Courier) He had been using the messaging service EncroChat to broker his drug deals, which reportedly had the street value of an estimated £1.3 million (€1.49 million). Police were also able to detect that he had been using more than 40 names for contact and had also set up a county lines supply that covered Scotland, north-east and the south of England. A spokesperson for the National Crime Agency said: "At the very minimum, Hooton was involved in the supply of 42.5kg of cannabis, 3.25kg of heroin, 10kg of cocaine and 1kg of ketamine." They added: "His messages said he was in possession of around £400,000 (€458,000) and owed £258,000 (€295,000)." The offences which led to his arrest were reportedly between March 26 and June 4 five years ago. Detective Chief Inspector Lynsay Armbruster said: "It's clear Hooton was involved in organised crime for a long time before he was charged. His criminal and geographical reach will have taken considerable time to establish. His drug supply operations were on an almost daily basis, they were sustained and spanned the UK working with high level criminals." EncroChat was deactivated in 2020 by a European investigation team. The Mirror has reached out to Peter Hooton for a comment. Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest news from the Irish Mirror direct to your inbox: Sign up here.
The Irish Sun
3 days ago
- The Irish Sun
Crackdown on dodgy streaming as 100s of sites used for watching Hollywood films and sport for free BLOCKED for all Brits
HUNDREDS of illegal streaming sites have reportedly been blocked for viewers in the UK - and will be impossible to access even with a virtual private network (VPN). Piracy sites with servers in the UK were blocked earlier this month by Cloudflare, an internet infrastructure giant that acts as the middleman between websites and their visitors, Advertisement 2 The company uses geo-blocking, meaning the websites are simply unavailable in the UK Credit: Getty Those visiting the pirate streaming sites are expected to be met with Cloudflare's Error HTTP 451 - a block reserved for law-breaking websites only. Pirate streaming sites are already blocked by most internet service providers in the UK, such as BT, Virgin Media and Sky. People can sometimes evade restrictions by using a VPN - a service which keeps your internet activities private. But due to a recent legal order, Cloudflare has reportedly blocked access to up to 200 pirate streaming websites. Advertisement READ MORE ON STREAMING And this block cannot be bypassed with a simple VPN. Cloudflare is the company connecting web users to their desired websites - which means they can step in and block access at any time. The company uses geo-blocking, meaning the websites are simply unavailable in the UK. While the sites were barred earlier this month, the legal case calling for their blocking may have started as early as February 2024, TechRadar reported. Advertisement Most read in Tech A private law firm delivered a court order to Google, requesting to block 14 piracy sites, according to the Watch as police seize wads of cash from illegal streaming kingpin who made £1 million However, estimates that as many as 200 pirate domains could be affected. It forms part of a European crackdown on piracy. In May, French streaming giant Canal+ scored a legal victory when a landmark ruling ordered five popular VPN providers to block access to over 200 illegal sports streaming sites. Advertisement 2 Pirate streaming sites are already blocked by most internet service providers in the UK, such as BT, Virgin Media and Sky Credit: Getty
