INS Tamal, India's last imported warship, to join Navy in Russia on July 1
's Russian-manufactured guided missile frigate
INS Tamal
will be commissioned into the force at Russia's coastal city of Kaaliningrad on July 1.
The ship has 26 per cent indigenous components, including the BrahMos long-range cruise missile for targeting both at sea and land, officials said.
INS Tamal would be the eighth
Krivak class frigates
to be inducted from Russia over the past two decades.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Dementia and Memory Issues Have Been Linked To a Common Habit. Do You Do It?
gofitlifeguide
Click Here
Undo
The warship has been built at
Yantar shipyard
in
Kaliningrad
, and is the last such platform to be inducted from a foreign source, the officials said.
The commissioning ceremony will be presided over by Vice Admiral Sanjay J Singh, Flag Officer Commanding-in-Chief of the Western Naval Command. Several high-ranking Indian and Russian defence officials will attend the event.
Live Events
INS Tamal is the second ship of the Tushil Class, which are the upgraded versions of their predecessors,
Talwar
and Teg classes.
India, as part of the broader contract for Tushil class, is also building two similar frigates called the INS Triput class at
Goa Shipyard Ltd
with transfer of technology and design assistance from the Russian side.
By the conclusion of this series of ships, Indian Navy will be operating 10 ships with similar capabilities and commonality in equipment, weapon and sensor fit over four different classes, the officials said.
Tamal's construction was closely overseen by an Indian team of specialists from the Warship Overseeing Team stationed at Kaliningrad.
At the Naval headquarters, the project was steered by the Directorate of Ship Production under the Controller of Warship Production and Acquisition.
The ship has significant upgrades in its arsenal in comparison to its predecessors, such as vertical launched surface-to-air missiles, improved 100 MM gun, heavyweight torpedoes, urgent-attack anti-submarine rockets, and a host of surveillance and fire control radars and systems.
The combat capability of the ship is augmented by a host of network-centric warfare capabilities and advanced electronic warfare suite, Navy Spokesperson Commander Vivek Madhwal said.
"Tamal punches well above its weight with a very high tonnage to firepower ratio, extended endurance, and a top speed in excess of 30 knots," he said.
The crew, comprising over 250 personnel, has undergone rigorous ashore as well as afloat training in extremely challenging winter conditions of St.Petersburg and Kaliningrad, he said.
Tamal has successively completed extensive sea trials undertaken over three months.
The ship's name, Tamal, symbolises the mythical sword used for combat by Indra, the king of the gods.
The ship's mascot is inspired by the congruence of the 'Jambavant' -- the immortal bear king of Indian mythology and the Russian national animal, the Eurasian brown bear.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
23 minutes ago
- NDTV
Jailed Russian Dissidents Call For Mass Prisoner Release As Part Of Ukraine Peace Deal
London: Eleven jailed Russian dissidents have written to world leaders appealing for a mass release of Russian political prisoners and Ukrainian civilians held by Russia - some 10,000 people in total, they say - as part of any peace deal between Moscow and Kyiv. In the letter, published via Reuters, the dissidents said that alongside prisoners of war, thousands of Ukrainian civilian "hostages" were being held by Russia, mostly in Russian-held areas of Ukraine. Talks in May and June on ending Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine made no progress towards a ceasefire, despite a pledge by U.S. President Donald Trump to end the war, but the two sides have exchanged captured soldiers and war dead. "We call on both sides of the negotiations between Russia and Ukraine to immediately conduct an exchange of prisoners of war and civilians according to the formula 'all for all', including Ukrainian civilian hostages," the letter said. Among the signatories was Alexei Gorinov, 63, who in 2022 became the first person to go to prison under laws passed shortly after the Ukraine invasion that made it a crime to spread "false information" about the armed forces. The youngest to sign was Darya Kozyreva, 19, who was sentenced in April to two years and eight months in prison for using graffiti and 19th-century poetry to protest against the war in Ukraine. They placed themselves alongside thousands of Ukrainians who, according to human rights groups, have been detained by Russia, mostly in Russian-controlled regions of Ukraine. "There are at least 10,000 of us - Russian political prisoners and Ukrainian civilian hostages. We are all punished for one thing - for taking a civic stance," they wrote. Moscow has not commented on the alleged figure. The dissidents called for "the immediate and unconditional release of sick political prisoners who are dying in Russian prisons" in their statement, which was backed by a message from Russian Nobel Peace Prize winner Dmitry Muratov. Muratov's message and the letter urged leaders in Russia, Ukraine, the European Union, the United States and elsewhere to act. RUSSIA'S PEACE TERMS At the peace talks in Istanbul last month, Russia handed Ukraine a memorandum proposing "a mutual amnesty of 'political prisoners' and release of detained civilians" as a possible condition for a ceasefire in the three-and-a-half-year conflict. Asked about the status of the proposal and how many people it would cover, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said on Thursday: "We don't publicly discuss the... content of the memorandum, which we haven't even discussed with the Ukrainian side yet. We believe that discussion through the media can only harm the process." The proposal was part of a wider package of Russian demands that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy described as an ultimatum. They include a halt to all Ukrainian troop movements except for withdrawals, and end to call-ups, foreign weapons supplies and martial law as well as the holding of new presidential and parliamentary elections. No date has yet been set for further talks. Describing their experience, the dissidents wrote: "The concepts of justice and fairness are absent in Russia today; anyone who dares to think critically can end up behind bars." Defendants in political cases had no chance of a fair hearing and were never acquitted, they said. Once in prison, their lives were in danger and they were at risk of denunciations from other inmates - something that led, in Gorinov's case, to an additional three-year sentence. The other signatories were sociologist Boris Kagarlitsky, self-described anarchist Azat Miftakhov, poet Artem Kamardin and activists Anna Arkhipova, Vladimir Domnin, Dmitry Pchelintsev, Andrei Trofimov, Ilya Shakursky and Alexander Shestun. The Kremlin says cases are a matter for the courts and the prison service and Russia needs to apply its laws firmly to deter what it sees as subversive, Western-backed activity. Elena Filina, an exiled opposition politician who helped gather the signatures from inmates scattered across Russia's vast penal system, told Reuters the prisoners felt the peace talks may provide their last chance to be free. "If peace agreements are signed without taking into account their amnesty, exchange or any other way of release, the window of opportunity will slam shut for a long time."
NDTV
25 minutes ago
- NDTV
Explained: How Farm Goods Are Holding Up US-India Trade Deal
US and India trade negotiators were pushing on Wednesday to finalise a tariff-reducing deal ahead of President Donald Trump's July 9 negotiating deadline, but disagreements over US dairy and agriculture remained unresolved. Why are farm goods imports sensitive in India? Agriculture and its allied areas contribute just 16% to India's $3.9 trillion economy, but sustain nearly half of the country's 1.4 billion population. As farmers remain the most powerful voting bloc, Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government was forced into a rare retreat four years ago when it tried to push through controversial farm laws. The prospect of cheaper imports from the United States threatens to drive down local prices, handing the opposition a fresh opportunity to attack the government. New Delhi has traditionally kept agriculture out of Free Trade Agreements with other nations. Granting market access to the US could force India to extend similar concessions to other trading partners. How do Indian and US farms compare? The average Indian farm comprises just 1.08 hectares, compared to 187 hectares in the United States. In dairy, the average herd size in India is two to three animals per farmer, compared to hundreds in the United States. This difference makes it difficult for small Indian farmers to compete with their US counterparts. Farming in India remains largely unmechanised because small, fragmented land holdings leave little room for large machinery. In many regions, farmers rely on techniques passed down through generations, a sharp contrast to US farms, where cutting-edge equipment and AI-driven technologies have raised productivity. Which products is US lobbying for? Why is India resisting? The United States is pressing India to open its markets to a wide range of American products, including dairy, poultry, corn, soybeans, rice, wheat, ethanol, citrus fruits, almonds, pecans, apples, grapes, canned peaches, chocolates, cookies, and frozen French fries. While India is willing to grant greater access to US dry fruits and apples, it is holding back on allowing imports of corn, soybeans, wheat, and dairy products. India does not allow genetically modified (GM) food crops, while most US corn and soybean production is GM-based. Dairy remains a sensitive issue in India, where cultural and dietary preferences strongly influence food choices. Indian consumers are particularly concerned that cattle in the US are often fed with animal by-products, a practice that conflicts with Indian food habits. Why does India oppose US ethanol for bleeding with gasoline? A key aim of India's Ethanol Blended Petrol (EBP) program is to cut dependence on energy imports by blending domestically-produced ethanol with gasoline. Significant investments by domestic companies mean that India is now close to achieving its ambitious target of blending 20% ethanol. Importing ethanol would undermine those companies. The EBP also helps manage surpluses of rice, sugarcane, and corn by diverting them to ethanol production. Allowing imports of US ethanol would be a serious setback for India's emerging distillery sector.
Time of India
27 minutes ago
- Time of India
The Big Beautiful Bill's quiet revolution: Dismantling the federal role in education
While President Donald Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' has drawn noisy debate over taxes and immigration, its most transformative, and potentially divisive, legacy may unfold far from the public gaze: Inside America's classrooms. Formally known as the American Prosperity and Freedom Act, the bill runs 940 pages deep. Nestled in its dense legal language is a radical reimagination of how education is funded, who controls it, and what it's meant to teach. More than a fiscal realignment, the bill signals a cultural and institutional recalibration, a blueprint not just for cutting costs, but for shrinking the federal government's role in shaping educational equity and intellectual freedom. Defunding the foundation At the heart of the legislation lies a nearly 20% cut to discretionary funding for the US Department of Education over five years. This is no administrative trimming. Critical lifelines such as Title I grants, designed to level the playing field for students in low-income districts, and IDEA funds supporting students with disabilities face sharp reductions. In real terms, that means fewer teachers, larger class sizes, shuttered after-school programmes, and thinner support for special education. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Hörspezialisten toben: Dieses 89 €-Gerät geht viral Top Trending News Today Mehr erfahren Undo For under-resourced schools already walking a fiscal tightrope, this isn't reform. It's a retreat. And for districts that rely heavily on federal aid to supplement inadequate state budgets, the message is clear: you're on your own. Choice or abandonment? The bill also elevates a longstanding conservative goal, school choice, by creating a federal tax credit scholarship programme. Under the guise of parental empowerment, the initiative incentivizes donations to private school tuition, effectively subsidizing elite alternatives while siphoning funds from the public system. To supporters, this is freedom in action, a mechanism to spark competition and elevate standards. But critics see something far more corrosive: A public school exodus that accelerates segregation, weakens accountability, and hollows out the very system meant to serve all students. If left unchecked, it could reshape education into a two-tiered model, one privately buoyed and publicly neglected. The return of debt-driven futures Perhaps no provision has sparked more alarm among recent graduates than the rollback of Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) and the rollback of income-driven repayment schemes. In their place: Increased reliance on private lenders and corporate partnerships to manage student loans. This pivot represents not just a policy shift but a moral disinvestment in those who choose public service, teachers, social workers, and rural doctors. With no promise of debt relief, many will opt out before they even begin. The future will be more indebted, more risk-averse, and less willing to serve. A curriculum draped in red, white, and blue Education, under Trump's bill, isn't just an economic tool; it's a cultural battlefield. Echoing the rhetoric of the 1776 Commission, the bill allocates $500 million toward 'American Values Curriculum Grants,' with an explicit directive: teach US history through a lens of national pride and exceptionalism. What does that mean in practice? A potential erasure of systemic critique, reduced engagement with marginalized histories, and teacher training programs aligned with ideological litmus tests. Supporters hail it as a corrective to 'anti-American bias.' Detractors warn it edges dangerously close to state-sponsored historical revisionism, where patriotism comes at the cost of intellectual honesty. Knowledge under siege The bill's impact on higher education is equally profound. While STEM fields tied to defence and industry are protected, social sciences and environmental research face a 12% funding cut. This selective pruning risks reorienting universities around military-industrial priorities, undermining the pursuit of knowledge that challenges, questions, and enriches democratic society. PhD programs in climate change, sociology, or public health, already vulnerable, may contract or vanish entirely. The academy's capacity to interrogate power, inequality, or the planet's fragility is quietly being starved. Federal hands off, private hands in Across its many chapters, the Big Beautiful Bill weaves a consistent theme: Less federal protection, more market intervention. Public institutions are pushed toward privatized models. Equity-based funding is exchanged for performance-based incentives. Ideological coherence replaces pedagogical complexity. This isn't merely conservative tinkering. It's the architectural undoing of federal involvement in public education, with consequences that will play out over decades, not news cycles. The fight ahead Already, civil rights organizations are preparing lawsuits to challenge the legality of voucher programmes that may breach public education mandates. States reliant on Title I and IDEA funds are lobbying for carve-outs and concessions. But the scaffolding has shifted. What was once a federal promise, that no child's future would be determined by their ZIP code or income bracket, is now being recast as a local gamble and a parental responsibility. Education reimagined, but for whom? Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' may never draw the fiery protests of immigration bans or the coverage of Supreme Court appointments. But it represents something arguably more enduring: A generational redesign of the American education system, not by consensus, but by calculation. What we're witnessing is not just defunding or deregulating, but a deliberate redefinition of what education is for, who it belongs to, and whose history it must teach. For all its patriotism, the bill risks betraying the most essential American promise, that education, in a democracy, is not a privilege. It is a right. Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.
