Every Cyber Attack Facing America
- Everybody knows how technology can make our lives better or a little easier, but it can go the other way too.
- Soon, it will actually be impossible for a human being to tell if the face that they're looking at is real.
And that's a very scary new reality.
- Today, we're talking about future tech threats, including AI deepfakes, cyber attacks on electrical grids, quantum computers, and a lot more.
This is "Incognito Mode."
[gentle music] [keyboard clanking] One of the doomsday scenarios that experts have worried about for decades is a major cyber attack on the US electrical grid.
Now, Andy, you've written a literal book about cyber attacks on electrical grids and the hackers behind them.
Tell us about that.
- As with so many of these different kind of future threats, we've already seen it play out in Ukraine, which is so often the canary in the coal mine because it is so targeted by Russian hackers.
And in fact, we've seen one specific group of Russian hackers called Sandworm cause blackouts three times in Ukraine, the only hacker-induced blackouts in history.
The first one of these was in 2015.
These Russian state-sponsored hackers broke into a collection of electrical utilities in Western Ukraine and turned off the power for a quarter million Ukrainian civilians.
Then they did it again the next year in the capital this time, in Kyiv.
In that case, they used this kind of automated tool known as Crash Override, or Industroyer.
It was essentially kind of blackout-inducing bots that could open circuit breakers with kind of automated speed.
Now, in both of those first two blackouts in Ukraine, the power outage only lasted a few hours.
But in the second of those two attacks, we did also see this troubling tactic, which was that the Sandworm hackers actually tried to disable a piece of safety equipment called the protective relay.
They intended it that when the Ukrainian engineers tried to turn the power back on, they might have overloaded lines to cause them to burn or exploded the transformer, and that would've been a kind of physical destruction of grid equipment that could have led to outages of weeks or a month.
And that only actually failed because of a tiny misconfiguration in the hacker's malware.
And in the midst of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine starting in 2022, they haven't stopped attacking the Ukrainian power grid both physically and with cyber attacks, and in one case they succeeded in causing a blackout in the midst of an airstrike, in the midst of missiles raining down on the city that was blacked out.
- So, the US grid, as I understand it, it's not just one centralized local grid.
The United States is enormous, so we've got the East, we've got the West, and we've got Texas, which is its own thing for some reason.
And then within those we have all these utility companies that connect to these grids.
So, we're talking about a bunch of different entities.
How complicated would it be to kind of target even one of these regions in the United States?
- Well, I think that causing like a massive blackout across the whole region in the US would be quite difficult.
The cyber attacks we've seen so far in Ukraine are relatively localized.
You know, the idea of like this kind of nightmare scenario of blacking out the entire eastern seaboard for a month, I don't think we've ever seen a hacker group capable of doing that.
Not to say that it's not technically possible somehow, but what we have seen that's very worrying is this one group of Chinese state-sponsored hackers called Volt Typhoon gaining access to electric utility networks in the US across the entire country.
And it seems that they're trying to pre-position to be ready for some date in the future when they might choose to pull the trigger and cause blackouts perhaps in many simultaneous cyber attacks.
And of course, the date that we have to guess that they're preparing to do that would be on the eve of the invasion of Taiwan that Xi Jinping, the Chinese head of state, has said he wants the Chinese military to be ready for by 2027.
That could be a kind of tactic in the Chinese playbook to delay an American response to that invasion, or perhaps more specifically, to cut power to US military bases that would hamper our military response to that actual invasion of Taiwan.
I have sometimes thought like the threat of a power grid attack has become overblown because it's kind of like the quintessential cyber nightmare.
So, at one point I even did ask an NSA official, "Are you actually scared of a cyber attack on the grid?"
And he said that he absolutely was because of this notion that the electric grid underlies every system that we have come to rely on, GPS, internet, water, all of it depends on electricity.
It is in some ways like the fundamental lowest layer of the tech stack of America, - And this is one of the reasons why cyber attacks on electrical grids kind of loom large in the cybersecurity mind, is that this is a hack that can potentially cause physical damage in the real world that then makes the attack much more consequential.
- Right.
If the power turns off for a few hours, I think we have backup systems, we have natural disasters that cause that.
We're ready to bounce back.
If transformers are destroyed, however, these are custom pieces of equipment that are hard to replace.
We may not be ready for a long timescale of outage against an actual malicious adversary that's still there in the network, still trying to cause more damage.
We saw how difficult it was, for instance, for Spain and Portugal to turn the power back on across an entire country.
Well, imagine if you're trying to perform that recovery while an active adversary is also trying to sabotage every step you take to recover.
- Terrifying.
[gentle music] Hey, it's me.
Don't recognize me?
How about now?
AI-generated deepfakes are everywhere on the internet.
You've probably laughed at ones of politicians or celebrities, but did you know these tools can be used for nefarious purposes against you?
What in your reporting have you seen deepfakes being used for?
- Well, we've already seen deepfakes being used for two of the most lucrative form of cyber crime that we know about.
One is what people call business email compromise, where a hacker is kind of impersonate someone inside a company and trick the executives into sending money where they shouldn't.
We've seen one company tricked into sending $25 million to a hacker who impersonated an employee.
The other is romance scams, or other kinds of what people call pig butchering, where a victim is tricked into sending sometimes millions of dollars to a fake crypto investment.
I've seen listings on black markets where crypto scammers are selling each other deepfake tools to be able to impersonate someone's face, and both of these are already making tens of billions of dollars in revenue a year, truly two of the biggest categories of cyber crime in existence, and both of them are going to be absolutely supercharged by deepfakes.
- Most of the nefarious uses of deepfakes involve scams, people trying to steal people's money.
Deepfakes used by scammers can be put together quickly and they don't have a lot of resources to put into them sometimes, but they can also be used in geopolitical settings, fake news on steroids.
[speaking in foreign language] The producers of fake news are able to put a lot of resources into making sure something looks reliable and it makes it really hard to detect when something's actually fake.
Unless you're a digital forensics expert, detecting fake news can be really difficult.
The technology is just rapidly improving.
It's becoming pretty commonplace to be able to get access to these tools.
You don't have to be a specialized hacker or anything to get them.
You can just kind of download these tools and use them for whatever means you want to.
- Definitely, and I think the real time deepfake video tools that I've seen are not seamless, they're quite detectable for like a not super gullible human being today, but I think what we're talking about is a very near future where these tools are only going to improve and soon it will actually be impossible for a human being to tell if the face that they're looking at is real, and that's a very scary new reality.
- You know, one of the ways people protect themselves from traditional scams, even before deepfakes, is you're just familiar with what a phishing email looks like and you learn to look out for it, but at some point the fakes become so good, you can't tell what's real and what's fake.
- I think we're used to telling people too as a safeguard, "Yeah, if you can't tell if this text is fraudulent, then get somebody on a call.
If that doesn't work, you get somebody on a video."
When none of that works, then we have to come up with new protocols, like, you know, do you have some sort of secret code word?
Do you check if somebody can remember your last conversation?
You know, all of these things, we'll have to kind of figure them out in this new deepfake future.
- AI has really taken all the headlines as this big emerging technology and all the potential threats around it.
Another emerging technology is quantum computing that's continuing to evolve.
One of the things that security experts kind of worry about with regards to quantum computing is that it could just break all encryption.
What have you seen about this?
- Right, well, this is what some people call Q Day, like, this perhaps near future doomsday scenario where quantum computing becomes powerful enough to break these crypto systems that we have built an entire society on.
It turns out that there are some kind of post-quantum crypto systems that can't be broken even by quantum computers.
So, Google, for instance, has been very vocal about switching to post-quantum crypto.
Signal, the encrypted messaging app, has also switched to post-quantum crypto, and that ought to be reassuring.
But the troubling thing is just how many systems out there may not be using post-quantum crypto, and when quantum computing suddenly appears, they can just all be broken and all of our secrets will be accessible and it'll be like that moment in "Sneakers" when like suddenly the entire internet is decryptable.
- Anybody wanna shut down the Federal Reserve?
- For instance, Bitcoin we know doesn't use post-quantum crypto.
If a quantum computer arrived today, it seems like somebody would be able to steal hundreds of billions of dollars.
Bitcoin would probably go to zero immediately, and that's only gonna be fixed when the entire Bitcoin community decides to adopt new crypto technologies and implement them across the network, which is a really big undertaking and may not happen in time.
- The issue with quantum computers is that they're just much faster at breaking encryption than a traditional computer.
While a traditional computer can take over a hundred million years to break certain types of strong encryption, a quantum computer can do it in just a few hours.
WIRED's Amit Katwala recently interviewed several experts about the coming quantum apocalypse.
According to one survey, experts believe Q Day is gonna arrive by 2035, if not sooner, and some think there's a 15% chance it's already happened.
Now, if Q Day does actually arrive, that means everything from military intelligence secrets to access to critical infrastructure to your own private data and messages could all be exposed.
It's not just the end of privacy as we know it, it's the end of any control over all the systems that we use every day.
Experts kind of compare this to Y2K when, if you don't remember, Y2K is when the computer systems use two digits to denote the date zero zero, and everybody was worried that everything would break because the computers would think it's 1900 instead of the year 2000.
Now, Y2K has kind of become a joke because everybody pitched in and fixed the problem before it was actually a catastrophic issue.
- Midnight has come in Russia, there's no Y2K problem at all.
- And in this case, it's the same kind of situation where we need a bunch of different systems, many thousands I'm sure is an understatement.
- Well, exactly.
I think talking about it like Y2K is part of why I've always kind of dismissed this, like, "Oh, it's some problem for the nerds.
They'll deal with it in time."
But the thing about Y2K was that we knew exactly when it was gonna happen.
This doomsday, we don't know when the deadline is, and in fact, there's some adversary out there building a quantum computer.
They know perhaps when they're gonna have one, and we don't.
And we also don't know if somebody may have actually even now built a quantum computer in secret and have the ability to crack all of these crypto systems and access secrets that we can't even imagine.
- There's basically two categories when we're talking about quantum computers breaking encryption, it's keeping of secrets and managing access to systems.
If the encryption is broken, then you can't keep anything secret and you can't keep anyone out of any system.
- And to your point, they would also be able to mess with things, take control of all of the digital systems that control the power grid or air traffic control.
It's really hard to imagine the level of actual havoc that they could wreak.
And really, like, some other countries could be storing all of this encrypted data that's traveling across the internet and just keeping it and waiting for the day when Q Day arrives and they have this computer capable of cracking all of that.
- Yeah, absolutely.
You make a great point that the data that's already been stolen is not gonna be updated alongside those systems, and so all of those secrets could still be cracked.
- We really can't move to post-quantum crypto systems fast enough.
- One of the systems we don't really think about, because it's just everywhere and we take it for granted, is GPS.
If it goes down, things get bad really quickly.
And it's not just the navigation app on your phone.
It's trains, airplanes, boats, all types of systems that people rely on, and it could really cause major disruptions.
GPS is just one of several global navigation satellite systems, or GNSS, that are used around the world.
Europe has Galileo, Russia has GLONASS, China has BeiDou, but the US is really reliant on GPS alone.
The US' reliance on GPS makes it particularly vulnerable because the government hasn't created any backup systems like they have in other countries.
It's used by transportation systems, emergency services, financial institutions.
Basically everything runs on GPS and you might not even know it.
- We've seen, for instance, in the war in Ukraine that Russian and Ukrainian soldiers have been using GPS jamming and spoofing to try to disrupt each other's drones and prevent drone attacks.
But in those cases, we've also seen collateral damage.
Those jamming devices are like very blunt instruments.
They send out their radio jamming in all directions in a wide range.
We've seen them affect civilian aircraft even, and I believe our colleague Matt Burgess has written about how civilian aircraft have had to be rerouted, sent back to the airport of their origin because of GPS jamming in the Ukraine war.
- Yeah, so this is something that's already happening on a small scale, but there's the potential, if there's a major war between the US and China, where these systems could be disrupted on a much bigger scale.
It's not just spoofing and jamming attacks that we have to worry about.
There's also attacks on the actual satellites themselves.
We know some countries have developed satellite technology to take out or disrupt satellites in orbit.
The fact that countries are carrying out these kinds of attacks shows just how valuable GPS is and how vulnerable it can be.
- Yeah, I remember in this science fiction book from 10 years ago now called "Ghost Fleet," they posit this future war with China where the first shot of that war would be China destroying all of the US' satellites.
That is plausible.
We've seen China and Russia demonstrate the ability to destroy satellites.
China has shown that it can use a satellite to grapple onto another one and pull it out of orbit.
These sound like science fictional threats, but they are practical.
And we've never really thought about what our country would look like if all of GPS were suddenly disrupted.
- If you've used generative AI tools like ChatGPT, you know how powerful they are.
They give you the ability to write an essay in seconds, or create a business plan on something you might not even know anything about.
The same for writing code.
Programmers everywhere are already using generative AI to write code that they're deploying in the world.
But the same goes for hackers.
- AI for so many people is a kind of glorified productivity tool, and it seems like it is that for now for hackers too.
Chinese hackers are using generative AI to write better phishing emails in perfect English now.
They are almost certainly writing malicious code with AI too, because all software developers are using AI to write code, but that's not like truly autonomous hacking bots out there somewhere on the internet, which is the scary future thing we're talking about.
But I think that's coming.
At some point, we will see fully autonomous hacking agents, and I think we may even see a future where AI is able to automatically find zero-day secret vulnerabilities in code and exploit it immediately, and that's quite scary.
- These tools can be used by hackers in a couple of different ways.
One, they can write code that somebody who isn't really skilled wouldn't have any ability to do.
More and more people could become hackers.
So, you have these script kiddies writing tools in large language models and deploying that code with unknown consequences.
Then we get to the professional level where both the good guys and the bad guys are using these tools.
You have white hat hackers using them to find zero-days, or secret vulnerabilities in code nobody's been able to patch.
AI can be really useful for protecting these systems, but you also have black hat hackers.
They can use it to write malicious code that they might not otherwise be able to create and deploy that code in more sophisticated ways.
- We've talked for a long time about the problem of zero-days, this idea of a secret vulnerability in a piece of software where the company that makes that software has had essentially zero days to fix it.
AI is going to be able to find those zero-days in an autonomous way at some point.
- As these technologies advance, you can imagine a future where there is an AI that you can point it at a certain system and say, "Go hack that system and it'll go in," and it'll analyze the code that it's seeing, find vulnerabilities in real time, write malicious code in real time, and then gain further access into those systems, be able to exfiltrate data and just kind of cause all the havoc that hackers can already, but much more efficiently, much quicker, and maybe on a much bigger scale.
- I think the real issue though is that defenders definitely need to be using AI or they're gonna be left behind.
- Things aren't necessarily gonna become instantly more secure or less secure one way or the other.
We report on systems getting hacked almost every day here at WIRED, and so that reality is gonna still be there, it's just the question of will the teams defending against this stuff be adopting it effectively as well as the malicious hackers?
And we just don't know how that's all gonna play out.
If you've ever been in a natural disaster and the cell networks go down, you know just how helpless and stranded you feel.
Now, imagine that's happening to everybody everywhere.
We're just not ready for our cell networks to go down.
In addition to natural disasters, there've been several cyber attacks on cell phone networks in various countries around the world.
There's also been repressive regimes that have taken the cell phone networks down on purpose to quell protests.
- We've seen a cyber attack launched against Ukraine's cellular provider Kyivstar in December of 2023, turn off cellular service to millions of Ukrainians.
This was the Russian hacker group Sandworm trying to disrupt the communication systems for the whole populace of the country.
And we've also seen governments purposefully turn off cellular access in Myanmar and India and Iran, sometimes for a week at a time, just as a way to quell descent.
We've never seen this happen in the US, but I think we can easily imagine that it's possible, either with insider access or from an external threat.
And we've also seen it just happen because of natural disasters and terrorist attacks in the US where there's a crisis and everyone overwhelms the network, just trying to reach loved ones or emergency service providers.
And one of the solutions that people have been talking about is like a kind of peer-to-peer mesh radio, like, I think you've been looking into this.
- Yeah, we've been looking into this type of technology that's called Meshtastic.
So, actually I have one of the devices here, and it looks like a little pager, if you remember those, but it's basically just a radio, a circuit board, and an antenna.
These devices come in a bunch of different forms.
Some of them look like the old Blackberry devices.
They have actual keyboards, some of them have touch screens.
Some of them are really simple with just like a 3D printed case like this one.
Basically, all the devices work the same.
Meshtastic is a radio-based mesh network that uses long range radio to send encrypted messages between devices across distances of up to 200 miles.
Meshtastic is an open source software project.
It's not maintained by any one company, and pretty much anybody can get involved with the Meshtastic community.
Unlike cell phones that connect to a tower to communicate, Meshtastic is a peer-to-peer network, meaning that each device communicates with other devices in the area.
You're able to use this without cellular service, without wifi.
You can connect it to your phone, so you can text straight from there.
And the device itself is what's sending the message, and it's really low bandwidth, so you can't really send much information, but the good thing is that it's really not reliant on any centralized system like a cell network.
- And the cool thing about it is that you don't have to be within line of sight of the recipient of the message, you just have to be in line of sight of some other Meshtastic radio so that you can connect to the whole mesh, and then that message gets passed around among all these peers until it reaches the intended recipients.
That's the cool thing about it, I guess, is that like the more of these radios connect to the network, the more powerful it becomes.
- It's still really early days for this.
There's not that many people who have a Meshtastic device compared to, say, a cell phone, of course, but if you live in a city, there's a good chance you're gonna have some type of Meshtastic network already set up and you're gonna be able to communicate with each other.
- It does seem like this is maybe the first step in creating a system that would survive a larger disruption of centralized cellular service.
- Meshtastic is real useful during, say, natural disasters when the phone lines are down, but can also be useful if you're just an area with poor cell coverage, like out for a hike.
Meshtastic can't replace your cell phone altogether, but it's gonna work when a cell phone isn't.
This has been "Incognito Mode."
[futuristic musical tones]
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
22 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Russia is pouring money into its war machine — but it's still struggling to create new, advanced systems
Russia is spending record amounts on defense. But it's falling behind in building the advanced, modern military it needs for future wars, according to a new report. Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine triggered sweeping sanctions that not only damaged its ability to procure advanced technology but also weakened its military-scientific base, wrote Mathieu Boulègue, a consulting fellow in the Russia and Eurasia program at London-based Chatham House, in a report published on Monday. "This damage, in turn, affects the rate of military innovation and R&D. More importantly, it determines how the Kremlin will wage war in the future," wrote Boulègue, a specialist in Eurasian security and defense issues. Russia is set to spend 6.3% of its GDP on defense this year — a post-Cold War high. However, the country's military-industrial complex has been "degraded" by trade restrictions and the demands of wartime production, according to Boulègue. "Russia's ability to produce military hardware has been severely impacted, and its ability to innovate and adopt modern military technology constrained as a result of these challenges," he added. With sanctions cutting off access to critical imports, Russia has been left scrambling to replace advanced components with inferior stand-ins. As early as August 2022, Russian state-owned carrier Aeroflot began stripping spare parts from working aircraft due to sanctions-induced supply shortages. In October, Russia filmed its troops using a Soviet howitzer, showing its military stockpiles were under strain. Boulègue assessed that the state of Russia's military-industrial complex is one of regression, not progress. "Russia will likely have to simplify and slow its military production, accept reduced quality of outputs and manage a form of 'innovation stagnation' in its research and development," he wrote, referring to Russia's state armament programme from 2025 to 2034. As a result, Russia's pathway to military innovation is likely to remain incremental — built on small tweaks to old systems rather than genuine breakthroughs. "Innovation generally takes the form of integrating technological solutions directly into proven, older-generation systems — which in turn makes them 'modern,'" Boulègue wrote. Russia's military sector has adopted a "retain-and-adapt" approach because military production is no longer innovation-led. "In other words, Russia 'innovates' through 'smart adaptation' under technical and economical constraints that have a negative, cumulative effect at the tactical level," he added. In the short term, Russia's military-industrial complex will likely keep producing systems that are "good enough" to pose a clear and constant threat to Ukraine, NATO, and the West. But its long-term ability to compete with advanced military powers is eroding. The stresses on Russia's military-industry complex also mean the broader economy is under increasing strain, despite initial signs of wartime growth. "The war economy brings 'good' macroeconomic results, but is causing real-world problems such as increased inflation, decreasing wages and purchasing power, and a liquidity crisis in the banking sector," wrote Boulègue. Russia's economy has shown signs of fatigue recently. Manufacturing activity contracted sharply in June as weak demand and a strong ruble affected exports and jobs. Low oil prices are also hitting the country's all-important oil and gas sector. Meanwhile, a demographic crisis and competition for labor with the military are also hurting the economy in the long and short term.
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Can U.S.-Made Shahed Clones Compete In Drone Wars?
New footage shows mass production of Shahed drones at a Russian facility in Alabuga, Tartarstan Russian state media via Twitter On July 20th,Russian state television showed new footage from the giant drone factory which makes Iranian-designed Shahed-136s, revealing the sheer scale of production. The facility in Alabuga a thousand miles East of Moscow has ramped up production roughly tenfold in the last year, enough for more than 700 attack drones to be launched in one night. That could rise to 2,000 Shaheds a night by the end of the year, according to Major General Christian Freuding of Germany's Situation Center for Ukraine. Now plans are afoot for the U.S. to launch drone barrages of its own, with the Pentagon unveiling a new type of weapon apparently in response to a presidential request. But is the Pentagon ready to compete with Russia in launching mass drone attacks? Tactical "Tomahawk" Block IV cruise missile,, the U.S. choice for precision long range attack. US NAVY/AFP via Getty Images Traditionally the U.S. military has favored sophisticated, highly capable weapons like the Tomahawk cruise missile. This is a 20-foot-long weapon flying under 300 feet to avoid radar at around 500 mph and, delivering a 1,000-pound warhead to targets around 1,000 miles away. It has led to attack in many recent operations, including strikes on the Houthis in Yemen earlier this year. In the latest U.S. Navy budget, a batch of 40 Tomahawks cost $1.9 million each. That is not a lot of missiles in the arsenal, especially considering that many may not reach their targets. On 12th July, Russian launched 26 Kh-101 cruise missiles at Ukraine, along with a number of other missiles and hundreds of drones. 25 of those 26 missiles were shot down by air defenses. The Shahed has a similar range and accuracy to the Tomahawk, but flies at a quarter of the speed and carries a tenth as much explosive. A high proportion of the drones were shot down in July 12th too – over 90% -- but as these cost around $35k each they look like a much more cost-effective way of hitting a target. Especially if a 1,00-pound warhead is not needed. President Trump remarked on the need for a U.S. equivalent of the Shahed at a Business Roundtable in Qatar in May, saying: The new LUCAS attack drone U.S. DoD 'We're coming up with a new system of drones because drones are really … drones really seem to be taking over that war… I asked one of the companies, I said, I want a lot of drones and in the case of Iran, they make a good drone and they make them for $35,000, $40,000. So I said to this company, I want to see. They came in two weeks later with a drone that cost $41 million. I said, that's not what I'm talking about, $41 million. I'm talking about something for $35,000, $40,000, where you send thousands of them up and that's a great way -- and they're very good too and fast and deadly, horrible, actually, when you look at what's happening with Russia and Ukraine .' (My emphasis) Part of this speech was quoted on a signboard in front of the new Low-Cost Uncrewed Combat Attack System (LUCAS) displayed in the Pentagon courtyard at an event attended by Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth last week. LUCAS looks very much like a Shahed clone, and is billed as ' designed to rival Iran's widely used Shahed-136 loitering munition, in a push to expand affordable airpower options for modern battlefields .' But the new drone may not be all that it seems. A Weapon, Or Just A Target? LUCAS is made by Arizona contractor SpektreWorks and LUCAS looks very much like a version of their FLM-136, a copy of the Shahed-136 made for 'threat emulation'. In other words it was designed as an aerial target for U.S. forces to get realistic practice shooting down Shaheds. Norma Jean Dougherty, aka Marilyn Monroe, assembling target drones in 1945 U.S. Army The U.S has been using target drones for decades. In WWII an Army photographer captured one Norma Jean Dougherty (later to become famous as Marilyn Monroe) on the assembly line for RadioPlane OQ-3 target drones. Generations of target drones followed, including the Teledyne Ryan Firebee, successfully converted into a reconnaissance drone in the Vietnam War. It is obvious why the military would want a drone target representing a Shahed. The U.S. Navy came under attack from a variety of similar drones launched by the Houthis in the Red Sea recently and needs to practice the best ways to tackle them. However the requirement for a target drone is not the same as for an attack drone. The specifications of the FLM-136 show that while it is an excellent substitute for shooting practice, it does not have quite the performance the real thing. U.S. LUCAS attack drone on display week U.S. DoD The FLM-136 has the same size and speed as the Shahed-136 but weighs about half as much as and carries half the payload. Its range of around 500 miles is less than half that of the Shahed. What we do not know is the unit cost of the FLM-136, which is a key metric. It is possible that it really has been procured for the desired '$35,000, $40,000' but this would be remarkably low by Pentagon standards. Previous small drones have been known to cost more than their weight in gold, and the BQM-167 Skeeter, the Air Force's reusable jet-powered drone, costs $1.7 million each. Presumably the LUCAS is at least less than '$41 million,' or a Tomahawk cruise missile. But without seeing numbers we cannot know for sure. Return To The Age Of The Jet Bomb A series of images showing the trajectory of a JB-2 buzz bomb during take off in the desert, USA, ... More circa 1945-1950. (Photo by Frederic Lewis/) Getty Images Back in WWII, the U.S. was big on the idea of reverse-engineering enemy weapons and producing them at scale. The Republic-Ford JB-2 'Loon' was a direct copy of the German V-1 'Doodlebug' which carried out the same roles as the Shahed does now. 'JB' was short for 'Jet Bomb'. V-1s had caused tremendous damage in Europe. The plan was to use JB-2s to bombard Japan into submission with thousands of JB-2s with no risk of losing aircraft, launching them from the decks of aircraft carriers from where they could hit any part of Japanese territory. The military initially ordered 1,000 JB-2, with the same number to be made each month. The project was canceled when Japan surrendered while the first weapons were still on their way to the Pacific. Palmer Luckey, founder of Anduril, has said that he wants to see a return to the mass-production approach of WWII and 'bring mass to the fight.' This means vast numbers of Anduril's low-cost Barracuda cruise missile/drones and other weapons rather than a handful of Tomahawks. But Anduril products were not apparent at the Pentagon event. Whether the Pentagon is serious about this approach, or whether they just wanted to show the Secretary of Defence that the U.S. could make something that looks like the Shaheds the President asked for, is another matter. Meanwhile Ukraine is producing its own low-cost, long-range attack drones and plans to hit Rusia with 30,000 this year. These include a mix of sophisticated types and ultra-low-cost designs with bodies fashioned from plastic pipe. The drone arms race is well under way, and the U.S. is starting from behind.
an hour ago
Zelenskyy faces major anti-corruption protests as Ukraine prepares for Russia talks
LONDON -- Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is facing protests across the country after signing a controversial bill on Tuesday that critics say will neuter the independence of two prominent anti-corruption bodies. As Ukrainian and Russian delegations prepare to meet in Istanbul, Turkey, for a new round of ceasefire talks, Zelenskyy and his allies are facing a groundswell of opposition at home. On Tuesday, Zelenskyy signed a controversial law passed by parliament that will bring the Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU) and its partner organization, the Specialised Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAPO), under the direct control of the Prosecutor General's Office (PGO). Both bodies were set up in the aftermath of Ukraine's pro-Western Maidan Revolution in 2014, with the intention of rooting out systemic corruption and helping Kyiv reform its democratic system with an eye on European Union accession. The passing of the new legislation this week prompted protests in Kyiv and other major cities across Ukraine, with demonstrators even violating the nighttime curfew imposed as a guard against nightly Russian drone and missile strikes. A spokesperson for the European Commission warned the move could undermine Ukraine's potential bid to join the EU. Kyiv's European funding, they added, is "conditional on progress on transparency, judicial reform and democratic government." Transparency International's Ukraine branch, meanwhile, said the move represented a "massive setback in anti-corruption reform" and a "direct threat to Ukraine's path to the EU." The passage of the bill followed dozens of raids on NABU employees by officers from the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) and the PGO on Monday. Officers also began inspecting the handling of state secrets at SAPO. Zelenskyy and his supporters have framed the measures as necessary to root out Russian infiltration and influence within Ukraine's anti-corruption bodies. "The anti-corruption infrastructure will work," Zelenskyy wrote on Telegram late on Tuesday. "Only without Russian influences -- everything needs to be cleansed of this. And there should be more justice." "Of course, NABU and SAPO will work. And it is important that the Prosecutor General is determined to ensure that in Ukraine the inevitability of punishment for those who go against the law is really ensured," he added. "And this is what is really needed for Ukraine. The cases that were pending must be investigated." "For years, officials who fled Ukraine have been living peacefully abroad for some reason -- in very nice countries and without legal consequences," Zelenskyy continued. "This is abnormal. There is no rational explanation why criminal proceedings worth billions have been 'hanging' for years. And there is no explanation why the Russians can still get the information they need." "It is important that there is an inevitability of punishment and that society really sees this," the president wrote. The bill was passed by the Ukrainian parliament -- the Rada -- by 263 representatives, having quickly moved through committee. Thirteen MPs voted against, 13 abstained and 35 did not vote. It was supported in parliament by members of Zelenskyy's Servant of the People party, as well as former Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko's Batkivshchyna party. The Opposition Platform – For Life party, which is widely considered pro-Russian and has had several representatives accused of treason during the war, also backed the measure. Oleksandr Merezhko, a member of Zelenskyy's party and the chair of the parliament's foreign affairs committee, told ABC News he backed the legislation though admitted he had "some doubts" about its content. "I trust the president," Merezkho said. "In such cases I normally also trust the decision of the committee." Merezhko said his concerns were over "what consequences it might have from the perspective of the negotiations with the EU on our membership." European counterparts, Merezhko continued, "are worried and they are asking questions. I think that we need better communication with our European partners on that issue." "There might be some sensitive aspects which need clear explanation to our partners by the president," he added. "I'm personally in favor of the independence of the anti-corruption bodies. But I'm also in favor of the true rule of law of the state in Ukraine." Zelenskyy's decision to sign the divisive bill has piqued concern of an anti-democratic power grab by the president and his inner circle -- chief among them Andriy Yermak, the head of the presidential office. A former Ukrainian official, who asked not to be identified for fear of reprisal, told ABC News, "We are not losing the war because the West did not give us enough weapons. We are losing the war because of corruption, lack of professional management and because many do not see why they should fight for Zelenskyy's autocracy." "Yermak is just a good implementor of Zelenskyy's will," the former official added. Vitaliy Shabunin, a prominent Ukrainian anti-corruption activist who previously headed the first Public Oversight Council at NABU, said the bill will allow the prosecutor general -- who is appointed by the president -- to "shut down all investigations involving the president's friends." Kyiv Mayor Vitali Klitschko -- who has repeatedly clashed with Zelenskyy's administration during Russia's full-scale war -- joined protesters in the capital on Tuesday. The new measure, he wrote on Telegram, "definitely does not bring Ukraine closer to the European Union. It certainly does not bring it closer to democracy, the rule of law, and legality -- to those values for which our soldiers are dying today in a bloody struggle against the aggressor." Proponents of the bill "are dragging Ukraine faster and faster into authoritarianism," the mayor added, "hiding behind the war, destroying anti-corruption bodies, local self-government, silencing activists and journalists." "Yes, there are many questions about the independence, impartiality, and adherence to legal procedures by all law enforcement agencies," Klitschko continued. "But the system needs to be changed, not turned into a bulldog of the authorities." "And we must not forget that sooner or later, all actions will have to be accounted for -- both politically and legally," the mayor wrote.
