logo
Nearly 27kg of cocaine seized at Changi Airport, 5 women arrested

Nearly 27kg of cocaine seized at Changi Airport, 5 women arrested

CNA2 days ago
SINGAPORE: Five foreign women have been arrested for suspected drug trafficking offences involving almost 27kg of cocaine in the transit area of Changi Airport Terminal 4, the Central Narcotics Bureau (CNB) said on Thursday (Jul 31).
They were arrested on Tuesday afternoon following an exchange of intelligence between CNB and the Narcotics Bureau of the Hong Kong Police Force (HKNB).
CNB officers had spotted two of the suspects exchanging luggage and acted quickly to arrest all five of them, who are aged between 21 and 48.
After searching their belongings, a total of about 26.9kg of cocaine and 10g of cannabis were recovered. The seized cocaine was found hidden within stuffed toys.
Senior Assistant Commissioner and CNB covering director Sng Chern Hong thanked HKNB for sharing intelligence.
"We stand ready to work with our close counterparts to disrupt drug syndicates and their operations. Those who attempt to traffic drugs through Singapore will be stopped and dealt with in accordance with the law," he said.
"Singapore is not a transit point for drug smugglers and we will not allow our travel hubs to be misused for criminal activity. This operation demonstrates our firm, zero tolerance stance against drugs."
Those convicted of trafficking more than 30g of cocaine may face the death penalty.
Investigations into the drug activities of those arrested are ongoing, CNB added.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Commentary: Why we need to be wary of AI as an enabler of terrorism
Commentary: Why we need to be wary of AI as an enabler of terrorism

CNA

time2 hours ago

  • CNA

Commentary: Why we need to be wary of AI as an enabler of terrorism

SINGAPORE: Terrorism presents a persistent danger to Singapore. The latest Singapore Terrorism Threat Assessment Report, released on Tuesday (Jul 29), attributed this threat to a 'volatile global landscape' fuelled by global developments such as the Gaza conflict and a growing range of extremist ideologies, some of which have already manifested in Singapore. The continued risk should not come as a surprise, nor should the growing influence of technology and digital platforms in enabling terror threats. But what stood out in this year's report was the emergence of innovations in artificial intelligence as a factor in the growing complexity of the local and global terrorist threat. Not that this was surprising either, given the rapid development and adoption of AI. But we are only beginning to see the impact of AI on everything from jobs and education to the way we form human connections – and its emerging role in terrorism is concerning. The Internal Security Department (ISD) said that new technology like AI and 3D printing have thus far not been proven to have been used in any terror attack plot in Singapore, but they have featured in the self-radicalisation of local youths. A 17-year-old Islamic State supporter detained in September 2024, for example had used an AI chatbot to generate a bai'ah or pledge of allegiance to ISIS, as well as a declaration of armed jihad against non-Muslims to inspire other Muslims in Singapore to engage in armed violence. In another case, a 17-year-old supporter of far-right extremist ideologies detained in March this year had searched for instructions on an AI chatbot on how to produce ammunition, and considered 3D-printing his own firearms as part of his plans to conduct attacks locally. ISD said that, given the increased sophistication and ease of access to these and other emerging technologies, potential terror activities and plots in the future can be expected to feature such technologies going forward. EVOLVING TACTICS AND TECHNIQUES There are a number of ways that new and evolving technology like AI can be harnessed by terrorist organisations to advance their aims. First, in accelerating radicalisation and recruitment. AI has been used to generate disinformation at a scale and speed much faster than what could be achieved by manual means alone. Many extremists misappropriate, misinterpret or manipulate religious prophecies or social narratives to suit their ideologies and win more supporters to their cause. In that vein, AI would be able to make such efforts, which bear significant similarities to disinformation operations, more effective and efficient. AI-powered chatbots tap into our human need for companionship, but have also been shown to be easily manipulated. Isolated individuals may find seemingly empathetic connections and be nudged toward extremist ideology. Another risk is how AI could be deployed by terror organisations in ever more innovative ways to create chaos and confusion. A recent investigation by the BBC unearthed evidence that identities of British public sector workers had been cloned using AI by a Russian-linked disinformation campaign. For example, an emergency medical adviser in the UK had his voice faked in a video campaign spreading fear ahead of Poland's presidential election earlier this year. In the recent Israel-Iran conflict, AI-driven disinformation such as fake videos and images showing the purported prowess and success of both sides were shared widely in the online space, with the aim of bolstering support for each side's campaign. Third, AI could be used by radicalised individuals to generate and suggest plans and strategies to conduct terror attacks, which would be especially appealing to younger, more vulnerable individuals who may not have been exposed to formal training or direct contact with terror organisations. Combined with existing trends such as using AI to produce deepfake videos, and the other tactics detailed in the report, these present a complex and complicated environment that can only increase the chances of terrorism threats permeating across the world. WHAT CAN BE DONE While the report makes clear that there is currently no specific intelligence of an imminent terrorist attack against Singapore, it is important to not take such relative peace for granted. All eight Singaporeans dealt with under the country's Internal Security Act since last July were self-radicalised by extremist materials they found online. ISD said that such platforms have accelerated the time taken between individuals' first encounter with terrorist and radical elements, and their subscription to violent extremist ideologies. Statistics show that the time taken for self-radicalisation for cases detected in Singapore has essentially halved from 24 months prior to 2015, to an average of 12 months between 2021 and 2025. Some cases took mere weeks. In particular, the vulnerability of the youth to radicalisation remains a pressing concern. Much of ISD's prescribed efforts to counter the risk of terrorism and violent extremism are focused on enhancing counter-terrorism capabilities, beefing up border security, and working with social and education agencies to address the threat early. However, given the potential for emerging and evolving technologies such as AI to be used by terrorist organisations to enable and enhance their efforts and operations, equal emphasis should be placed on identifying such threats as early as possible. This will require close collaboration between the government and security agencies and technology counterparts in the private sector, while also ensuring the people are educated and kept up to date on such threats as soon as they are detected, whether at home or abroad.

Man arrested for allegedly shoplifting twice at Changi Airport
Man arrested for allegedly shoplifting twice at Changi Airport

Straits Times

time8 hours ago

  • Straits Times

Man arrested for allegedly shoplifting twice at Changi Airport

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox The man was arrested on July 24 when he was in Changi Airport while in transit for another flight. SINGAPORE - An 82-year-old Australian man was arrested for allegedly stealing two boxes of perfumes at Changi Airport Terminal 1 . In a statement on Aug 1 , the police said they were alerted to a case of shop theft at about 9.30am on M arch 18 in the airport terminal's transit area. A box of perfume valued at $149 was found to be missing from a display shelf at The Shilla Cosmetics and Perfumes o utlet. Officers from the Airport Police Division were able to identify the man through closed-circuit television footage. He was seen allegedly leaving the store with the unpaid item earlier on March 18, though he had already left Singapore. Investigations found that that the man had also allegedly taken an other box of the same perfume from the same outlet , without paying for it, on March 13 . He had also left Singapore on that occasion. The man was arrested on July 24 when he was in Changi Airport while in transit for another flight. He is slated to be charged on Aug 4 . Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Tech Reporting suspected advanced cyber attacks will provide a defence framework: Shanmugam Business Singapore's US tariff rate stays at 10%, but the Republic is not out of the woods yet Asia Asia-Pacific economies welcome new US tariff rates, but concerns over extent of full impact remain Business ST explains: How Trump tariffs could affect Singapore SMEs, jobs and markets Asia Indonesia's Mount Lewotobi Laki-laki erupts Singapore Thundery showers expected on most days in first half of August Singapore Synapxe chief executive, MND deputy secretary to become new perm secs on Sept 1 Singapore 5 women face capital charges after they were allegedly found with nearly 27kg of cocaine in S'pore If found guilty of theft in dwelling , he faces a jail term of up to seven years, a fine, or both. In their statement, the police said that they take a serious view of shop theft cases, and offenders should not think that they can evade capture by quickly boarding an outbound flight.

Billion-dollar money laundering case: 4 law firms linked to seized properties named, 2 more identified and reprimanded
Billion-dollar money laundering case: 4 law firms linked to seized properties named, 2 more identified and reprimanded

CNA

time9 hours ago

  • CNA

Billion-dollar money laundering case: 4 law firms linked to seized properties named, 2 more identified and reprimanded

SINGAPORE: Four law firms that breached their anti-money laundering obligations over the purchase of properties in the S$3 billion (US$2.2 billion) money laundering case have been named, following the conclusion of investigations into their cases. In an update on Friday (Aug 1), the Ministry of Law (MinLaw) said it had completed the regulatory action related to the four law firms - Anthony Law Corporation, Fortis Law Corporation, Legal Solutions LLC and Malkin & Maxwell LLP. As such, MinLaw added it was now able to furnish more details on their conveyancing of the real estate properties seized as part of the anti-money laundering operation in August 2023. Conveyancing refers to the legal process of transferring the ownership of a property from one person to another. Their penalties were previously made known on Jul 15, but MinLaw then did not name the four firms. It then said 24 law practices were involved in investigations by Singapore's director of legal services (DLS) Sarala Kumari Subramaniam, supported by MinLaw, and 11 of the probes had been concluded. As of Jul 31, 13 of the 24 law practices had been dealt with, the ministry said on Friday. Two more law firms - William Poh & Louis Lim, now known as Louis Lim & Partners, and Templars Law LLC were also named, as inquiries and regulatory action had concluded, it added. With 13 of the probes having concluded, MinLaw also identified five lawyers involved in the conveyancing of the seized real estate properties. They are: Mr Tan Chau Chuang, Mr Andrew Wong Wei Kiat, Mr Tan Tse Chia Patrick, Mr Ee Tian Huat Patrick and Mr Poh Tian Hock William. All have been referred to the Law Society to "consider if there are grounds for further professional disciplinary action against these lawyers". MinLaw previously said on Jul 15 that one lawyer had been referred to the Law Society for disciplinary action, without naming the individual. While a Law Society spokesperson then confirmed that the lawyer had been referred to it for disciplinary action, it was unable to reveal the identities of those involved. "As the referral relates to disciplinary matters, such proceedings are confidential," it then said. ENFORCEMENT ACTION TAKEN All law practices and lawyers are subject to anti-money laundering obligations under the Legal Profession Act 1966. These include performing an adequate analysis of the risks of money laundering in relation to each client and performing customer due diligence measures that are in line with a client's risk profile. Lawyers and law firms also have to file a suspicious transaction report with the police if they have reasonable grounds to suspect that a client might be engaged in money laundering. Expanding on the enforcement action taken, the ministry said Anthony Law Corporation had acted for nine clients to convey 25 properties valued at around S$135 million in total. According to MinLaw, its breaches included inadequate scrutiny of the transactions, which was not commensurate with the clients' and transactions' money laundering risks. "Anthony Law Corporation did not corroborate or verify the clients' explanations for why the transactions were being funded by seemingly unrelated third parties, even though these were red flags," it said. The firm also failed to comply with documentation requirements. If a law practice or lawyer decides to continue to act for the client despite suspicions of money laundering, they must substantiate and document the reasons for this and adopt commensurate risk mitigation measures, including enhanced customer due diligence and monitoring measures. However, while Anthony Law retained and continued to undertake transactions for some of these clients despite filing suspicious transaction reports against them, it did not substantiate or document its reasons for why it had considered it appropriate to do so, said MinLaw. The firm was ordered to pay a financial penalty of S$100,000. One of its lawyers, Mr Tan Chau Chuang, has since been referred to the Law Society. Fortis Law Corporation acted for 16 clients to convey 55 properties valued at around S$398.7 million in total. The firm did not conduct checks to verify the clients' claims that the payments for the transactions were indeed from legitimate remittance companies, said MinLaw. As a result, it was handed a financial penalty of S$30,000 and two lawyers - Mr Wong and Mr Tan Tse Chia Patrick - were referred to the Law Society. Mr Wong is no longer practising with Fortis Law. Both Anthony Law and Fortis Law have paid the financial penalty, MinLaw noted. Legal Solutions LLC, the third firm to receive a financial penalty, acted for two clients to convey 20 properties valued at around S$117 million in total. 'It did not adequately document the details of its analysis of the clients' money-laundering risks,' said the ministry. "It also did not perform all the required enhanced customer due diligence measures after it filed a suspicious transaction report, such as documenting its internal discussions on, and reasons for, retaining the clients despite filing the suspicious transaction report." Legal Solutions has been ordered by Ms Subramaniam to pay a financial penalty of S$70,000, while a lawyer, Mr Ee, has been referred to the Law Society. He no longer practices at the firm. Meanwhile, Malkin & Maxwell LLP has been reprimanded to remind it to be mindful of its anti-money laundering obligations and responsibilities. MinLaw said it was taken into consideration that the firm had acted for one client to convey one property valued at around S$40 million. Inquiries revealed that while Malkin & Maxwell conducted checks into the client's source of funds, its independent checks were "not sufficiently in-depth". Instead, it relied unduly on checks that it assumed third parties would have done on its client. William Poh & Louis Lim and Templars Law LLC were also reprimanded by Ms Subramaniam to remind them to be mindful of their anti-money laundering obligations and responsibilities. Mr Poh, a lawyer who previously worked at William Poh & Louis Lim before joining Templars Law, has been referred to the Law Society. According to MinLaw, Mr Poh was the managing partner and sole partner-in-charge of conveyancing matters at William Poh & Louis Lim until around May 2023. During his time at the firm, he commenced transactions for six clients to convey 32 properties valued at around S$246.7 million in total. Twenty-six of those property transactions concluded while Mr Poh was practising with William Poh & Louis Lim, said MinLaw. The lawyer later left the firm in or around May 2023 to join Templars Law, and his previous firm amended its name to Louis Lim & Partners after his departure. Mr Poh brought the remaining six property transactions to Templars Law and concluded the transactions soon after in June 2023, said MinLaw. Some of the breaches observed by Ms Subramaniam included not obtaining certain documents as part of customer due diligence, not adequately scrutinising the clients' and transactions' money-laundering risks and not applying commensurate risk mitigation measures. HOW REFERRALS TO THE LAW SOCIETY ARE HANDLED A lawyer who breaches his or her anti-money laundering obligations is liable, among other things, to face disciplinary proceedings. 'Lawyers whom the director of legal services has referred to the Law Society will be subject to the disciplinary proceedings process and framework in the Legal Profession Act,' said MinLaw. Under this framework, each lawyer's case will undergo further fact-finding by the relevant committee or tribunal to assess if there have been breaches, and if so, the lawyer's individual culpability and any appropriate disciplinary action and penalties against him or her. This disciplinary process is separate from the director of legal services' inquiries and enforcement actions against the law practices. 'We urge the public to refrain from speculating or sharing unverified information while the process is ongoing,' said MinLaw. The billion-dollar money-laundering case involved millions of dollars earned over the years from an illicit gambling ring with Southeast Asian bases, and that was aimed at punters in China. Investigations into the transnational case date back to 2021 and culminated in islandwide police raids in August 2023. Singapore police seized luxury cars, watches, jewellery, designer goods, cryptocurrency and cash. More than 150 properties were also seized, including homes in Singapore's most upmarket neighbourhoods. The fees that Anthony Law, Fortis Law, Legal Solutions, Malkin & Maxwell, William Poh & Louis Lim and Templars Law collected in total from acting for their clients for these property transactions ranged from S$15,000 to around S$170,000, said MinLaw. "In imposing the financial penalties, alongside other regulatory measures that include following up with these law practices on their remedial measures to strengthen compliance with anti-money laundering obligations, the DLS aims to ensure that law practices in Singapore observe their anti-money laundering obligations and keep Singapore a clean and money-laundering-free business- and financial-hub," it added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store