Glenville-Emmons moving forward with $24.4M bond referendum in August
Improvements would include a secure elementary entrance, upgraded Career and Technical Education spaces, ADA accessibility updates, asbestos removal and repairs to HVAC, roofing and water systems, according to a press release.
The bond proposal represents priorities shared by community members during and after the failed 2023 referendum, the district stated.
"This plan is different because it reflects the current sentiments and priorities of our community," said school board Chairwoman Tabitha Page. "While the previous referendum in 2023 was based on community feedback at that time, we have shifted our focus to addressing deferred maintenance projects and making the most of our existing facilities. This is a more practical and affordable path forward that still meets our students' needs."
She said the referendum reflects the core values of their rural community, including responsibility, stewardship and a deep commitment to one another.
"As a board, we are dedicated to ensuring that our schools remain strong, safe and equipped to provide high-quality education for generations to come," she said.
A press release states the improvements focus on three key areas:
—Healthy and safe learning environments with better air quality, upgraded HVAC, ADA accessibility, lead remediation in water systems, asbestos abatement and a safer, more secure entrance at the elementary school.
—Relevant, updated classrooms that support hands-on learning in Career and Technical Education (CTE), agriculture and the trades, reflecting careers and life skills valued in the community.
—A sustainable investment that protects our existing schools and strengthens the district's ability to serve students into the future.
The proposal was reviewed and approved by the Minnesota Department of Education, and copies of the state's review and comment summary are available from the district upon request.
The district will host open house and building tours ahead of the referendum, where attendees will hear a presentation on the referendum and get a facility tour highlighting key concerns and project scope areas. They will also have the opportunity to ask questions of district leadership.
These are scheduled for 5:30 to 7 p.m. July 10, July 24 and Aug. 6. The July 10 and Aug. 6 dates will be at Glenville-Emmons Elementary School, while the July 24 date will be at the high school.
The district also has a referendum website at https://bit.ly/ge-ref25 with more information about the project scope and tax impact.
Early voting begins June 27 and runs through Aug. 11.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time Business News
2 days ago
- Time Business News
Mercato Vending Machines Compared: 3000 vs 4000 vs 5000
Looking for a snack vending machine that combines sleek design, high capacity, and smart features? The Mercato Vending line by USI offers three standout models—Mercato 3000, Mercato 4000, and Mercato 5000—each tailored for different location sizes and product needs. Whether you manage a high-traffic corporate building or a university campus, there's a Mercato unit that meets your vending goals. Below, we'll break down what sets each model apart, highlight core features, and help you choose the best fit. Why Choose Mercato Vending Machines? Mercato Vending machines are engineered for performance, flexibility, and user experience. Designed with ADA compliance, energy-efficient LED lighting, optional touchscreen interfaces, and robust security, these machines aren't just vending units—they're smart business tools. Here are three models that define the Mercato line: 🔹 Mercato 3000: Compact Powerhouse for Medium-Traffic Locations View Full Product Details » Price: CAD $7,590 CAD $7,590 Width: 3-wide configuration 3-wide configuration Capacity: Up to 36 selections / 360 items Up to 36 selections / 360 items Use Case: Mid-size offices, small retail lobbies Mid-size offices, small retail lobbies Smart Features: iVend® sensor, MDB payment compatibility, backlit braille keypad iVend® sensor, MDB payment compatibility, backlit braille keypad Optional Add-ons: 7' touchscreen, Delivery Assist, custom graphics This model shines where space is limited but reliability and flexibility are still non-negotiable. Read : Tips for Choosing the Right Hollow Fiber Spinning Machine 🔹 Mercato 4000: High-Volume Vending with Smart Upgrades Explore Mercato 4000 Specs » Price: CAD $8,229 CAD $8,229 Width: 4-wide 4-wide Capacity: Up to 52 selections / 423 items Up to 52 selections / 423 items Use Case: Corporate campuses, hospitals, busy retail zones Corporate campuses, hospitals, busy retail zones Smart Features: Enhanced LED display, motor pairing, full sales tracking Enhanced LED display, motor pairing, full sales tracking Optional Add-ons: Touchscreen interface, satellite pairing With the perfect balance of style and functionality, the 4000 brings power and polish to your vending fleet. 🔹 Mercato 5000: Maximum Capacity Meets Maximum Performance Compare with Mercato 5000 » Price: CAD $8,699 CAD $8,699 Width: 5-wide 5-wide Capacity: Up to 65 selections / 528 items Up to 65 selections / 528 items Use Case: Airports, large venues, industrial sites Airports, large venues, industrial sites Smart Features: Advanced accounting tools, satellite unit pairing, ADA delivery assist Advanced accounting tools, satellite unit pairing, ADA delivery assist Optional Add-ons:iCart FLEX touchscreen, inDEX Tool, custom colors The 5000 is your go-to model for maximum throughput and a modern buying experience. 🔍 Mercato Vending Machine Comparison Table Feature Mercato 3000 Mercato 4000 Mercato 5000 Price (CAD) $7,590 $8,229 $8,699 Width 3-wide 4-wide 5-wide Selections Up to 36 Up to 52 Up to 65 Total Capacity 360 items 423 items 528 items Touchscreen Option Yes Yes Yes (FLEX Controller) Satellite Capable Yes Yes Yes Best For Midsize Offices Busy Buildings High-Traffic Locations 📍 Availability Across the Greater Toronto Area Red Seal Vending proudly serves businesses across the GTA, including Toronto, Mississauga, Brampton, Vaughan, Scarborough, and surrounding regions. Our expert technicians also offer custom configuration, delivery, and ongoing service support for all Mercato vending units. Looking to place an order or request a quote? Contact us today at 1-800-334-6289. ❓ Frequently Asked Questions About Mercato Vending Machines Q: Which Mercato model is best for a high school or college campus? A: The Mercato 4000 offers an ideal balance of capacity and footprint for busy student environments. Q: Can I customize the machine's exterior with my branding? A: Yes. All Mercato vending units offer optional custom graphics and color options. Q: Do these machines support cashless payments? A: Absolutely. All three models support MDB-compatible devices, including debit/credit cards and mobile wallets. Q: What warranty is included? A: Each machine includes a 2-year manufacturer's warranty through USI. Q: Do you offer installation and setup support? A: Yes, Red Seal Vending offers full setup and service throughout the GTA. 📢 Ready to Upgrade Your Vending Setup? Whether you're replacing an aging machine or starting fresh, the Mercato vending line delivers the capacity, technology, and reliability your location needs. 👉Explore Our Full Product Range Now 📞Call 1-800-334-6289 or contact us online to speak with a vending specialist. TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Los Angeles Times
2 days ago
- Los Angeles Times
Letters to the Editor: It's always been an uphill battle to secure disability rights. Under Trump, it's ‘scary'
To the editor: The 1990 Americans With Disabilities Act did truly help those with disabilities ('The Americans With Disabilities Act changed my life. Now my generation needs to fight for it,' July 26). As a special education teacher and disabilities services provider starting in the 1970s, I have seen an uphill battle in providing and promoting civil rights for the disabled. At that time, those students with 'observable' disabilities were sometimes given meager consideration. Those with 'hidden' conditions such as learning disabilities, autism and a myriad of other cognitive and psychological disorders were never addressed. In 1973, the Rehabilitation Act added several sections that advocated for the disabled, and in 1975, the Education for All Handicapped Children Act was implemented. These were important moves that supported the disability rights movement. In my 43 years in disability education, I have witnessed and celebrated disabled individuals flourishing because of the reasonable accommodations and equal access that the ADA and its precursors mandated. With education and Medicare funding on the chopping block, and our current president openly mocking the disabled, it's become scary. The fight continues. Judy Marks, Los Angeles .. To the editor: My life and the lives of thousands of other disabled people have been positively affected by all the inalienable rights written in the ADA. The bill allowed our community to thrive in schools with individualized education programs and student inclusion. We were given equal opportunities in the workplace with accessible modifications. We had greater freedom with more outdoor access thanks to added curb cuts and building entrances and exits that accommodate the disabled. I live in an apartment building for independent-living residents. Many depend on in-home supportive services for their independence. What will become of these services under this administration? Weakening the ADA would be a backward step. Why would the most powerful country in the world choose to go backward? Julie Inman, Irvine .. To the editor: My heart goes out to those who truly need the assistance that has been afforded by the ADA. However, too many small businesses have been the targets of 'gotcha' lawsuits stemming from abuse of this law. Many of those filing these 'gotcha' suits have only one goal in mind: enriching themselves. Loopholes in the ADA must be fixed, or these frivolous and expensive lawsuits will continue to harm California and its small businesses. Senate Bill 84 aims to address these abuses. It is essential that the reform legislation receives a fair hearing, answering the pleas of many small-business owners across the state. Barry E. Zanck, Newport Beach
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Aon fired employee with ADHD who wanted to work in the office full time, lawsuit alleges
This story was originally published on HR Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily HR Dive newsletter. Dive Brief: Professional services firm Aon allegedly fired an employee because she has attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder, after she requested and received an accommodation to work in the office, according to a July 23 lawsuit. Per the complaint in Gomez v. Aon Private Risk Management Insurance Agency, Inc., the employee worked as an account specialist. She alleged that a recruiter told her she could work in the office full time to accommodate her ADHD, but after she was hired, she was allegedly informed the role was mostly remote and full-time in-office work wasn't possible. Because of her ADHD, the employee had trouble performing and learning effectively, she alleged. She emailed her manager, who allegedly told her this may not be a 'fit environment' for her, and placed her on a performance improvement plan. She formally requested an accommodation but was fired shortly after the request was approved and she began working in the office, the lawsuit said. Dive Insight: The employee filed her claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act, alleging she experienced discrimination and harassment and was ultimately fired due to her ADHD. She also claimed she was initially denied a reasonable accommodation and retaliated against because she asked for one. Aon did not respond to a request for a comment. Compliance issues surrounding reasonable accommodation are always evolving, even as the ADA marks its 35th anniversary. Remote work, or 'telework,' stands out as an example, although the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has long recognized it as a reasonable accommodation, according to an EEOC guidance. While the Aon lawsuit offers a twist — the employee alleged she was discriminated against because she requested an accommodation to work in the office, not remotely — the best practices for staying ADA compliant are the same. One critical step is for the employer and the employee to engage in an 'interactive process,' so the employer can understand why an accommodation is needed and what alternatives are possible if the request poses an undue hardship, the EEOC explains. A $22.1 million jury award in July 2024 against Wells Fargo shows how costly it can be to deny a request without engaging in an interactive process or fully exploring the issues. In the Wells Fargo case, a director asked for an accommodation to work from home because his impairment required frequent and quick access to a restroom. His managers allegedly eliminated his role before the matter was resolved. The judge determined there was a dispute over whether Wells Fargo engaged in 'genuine discourse' about the employee's request and said it would have to be resolved by a jury. Employers should also keep in mind that, while allowing an employee to change work locations can be a reasonable accommodation, they may have to modify a work rule or policy for this to happen, EEOC's guidance points out. This issue arose a few years ago, when three City of Berkeley, California, commission members asked to attend meetings remotely from their homes to accommodate their disabilities. The city said they could, but allegedly only if they publicly listed their home address as a meeting place and let the public inside to attend, ostensibly because of a state rule. The U.S. Department of Justice sued Berkeley for violating the ADA. Under the settlement, the city changed its policy to allow the requirements to be waived for disability-related concerns. In the Aon case, the employee said she explained to her manager that her ADHD kept her from performing to her full potential because she was working from home. She twice asked for an accommodation to work in the office full time, but the requests were denied, and she was allegedly told the policy only allowed her to work in the office one day a week. She then submitted a formal request and submitted medical documentation. Although the request was approved, and her performance allegedly improved, she was still fired, the lawsuit said. Recommended Reading The ADA at 30: A landmark civil rights law that still has room to grow Sign in to access your portfolio
