Trump threatens to sue WSJ over story on alleged 2003 letter to Epstein
The Journal story, which quickly reverberated around the US capital, says the note to Epstein bearing Trump's signature was part of a collection of notes for Epstein's 50th birthday in 2003. The newspaper says it reviewed the letter but did not print an image.
'The editor of The Wall Street Journal... was told directly by (White House Press Secretary) Karoline Leavitt, and by President Trump, that the letter was a FAKE,' Trump wrote in a post on his Truth Social network.
'Instead, they are going with a false, malicious, and defamatory story anyway,' he said.
'President Trump will be suing The Wall Street Journal, NewsCorp, and Mr. (Rupert) Murdoch, shortly. The press has to learn to be truthful, and not rely on sources that probably don't even exist.'
The alleged letter — which Trump denies writing — is raunchy, as were others in the collection, the Journal reported. It contains several lines of typewritten text, contained in an outline of a naked woman drawn with a marker.
'The future president's signature is a squiggly 'Donald' below her waist, mimicking pubic hair,' the Journal reported.
The letter concludes: 'Happy Birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret.'
Trump denied writing the letter or drawing the figure, telling the Journal: 'This is not me. This is a fake thing.'
'I don't draw pictures of women,' he said. 'It's not my language. It's not my words.'
Murdoch, who controls the NewsCorp media empire, was in Trump's suite Sunday at MetLife Stadium outside New York City for the FIFA Club World Cup final.
The Republican president was already facing a firestorm over his past relationship with Epstein, and claims that his administration is covering up lurid details of Epstein's crimes to protect rich and powerful figures.
Epstein died by suicide in a New York prison in 2019 — during Trump's first term — after being charged with sex trafficking in a scheme where he allegedly groomed young and underage women for sexual abuse by the rich and powerful.
The Trump-supporting far-right has long latched on to the scandal, claiming the existence of a still-secret list of Epstein's powerful clients and that the late financier was in fact murdered in his cell as part of a cover-up.
Trump supporters expected the Republican to answer their questions on his return to office this January but now find themselves being told the conspiracy theories are false.
The Justice Department and FBI said in a memo made public earlier this month there is no evidence that the disgraced financier kept a 'client list' or was blackmailing powerful figures.
They also dismissed the claim that Epstein was murdered in jail, confirming his suicide, and said they would not be releasing any more information on the probe.
Then, on Thursday, several US media outlets reported that a federal prosecutor who handled Epstein's case, who is the daughter of a prominent Trump critic, was abruptly fired.
Maurene Comey, whose father is former FBI Director James Comey, was dismissed Wednesday from her position as an assistant US attorney in Manhattan, several major US outlets reported.
Comey also prosecuted Ghislaine Maxwell, the only former Epstein associate who has been criminally charged in connection with his activities.
Maxwell is the person who compiled the leather-bound book of letters for Epstein in 2003, the Journal reported.
'The WSJ should be ashamed for publishing it. Where is this letter? Would you be shocked to learn they never showed it to us before publishing it?' Vice President JD Vance wrote on X.
Meanwhile, Democratic lawmaker Pat Ryan wrote: 'I think we now know EXACTLY why Donald Trump refuses to release the Epstein files.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
4 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
US House Republicans pass Trump's $9bln funding cut to media, foreign aid
The Republican-controlled US House of Representatives early on Friday passed President Donald Trump's $9 billion funding cut to public media and foreign aid, sending it to the White House to be signed into law. The chamber voted 216 to 213 in favor of the funding cut package, altered by the Senate this week to exclude cuts of about $400 million in funds for the global PEPFAR HIV/AIDS prevention program. Only two House Republicans voted against the cut, Representatives Brian Fitzpatrick from Pennsylvania and Mike Turner from Ohio, along with Democrats. 'We are taking one small step to cut wasteful spending, but one giant leap towards fiscal sanity,' said Representative Aaron Bean, a Florida Republican, advocating for a similar spending cut package from the White House every month. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries countered that the funding cut 'undermines our ability to keep our people safe here and to project America's soft power all over the globe,' and argued rural Americans' access to emergency information on public radio will be diminished. The funding vote was delayed for hours amid Republican disagreements about other legislation, and calls from some members of the party for more government transparency about the deceased convicted sex offender and disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein. To satisfy the Epstein-related concerns without holding up the funding cut bill any longer, Republicans on the House Rules committee introduced a resolution that calls for the release of Epstein documents by the U.S. attorney general within 30 days. 'It's a sound, good-faith resolution that ensures protections for victims and innocent witnesses,' said Representative Virginia Foxx from North Carolina, the Republican leader of the rules committee. But the top Democrat on the rules panel, Representative Jim McGovern from Massachusetts, blasted the resolution as a 'glorified press release' because it lacks an enforcement mechanism to make the Justice Department comply. When the chamber finally voted on the funding cut, it was the second close House vote on Trump's request to claw back the funds previously approved by Democrats and his fellow Republicans in Congress. In June, four Republicans joined Democrats to vote against an earlier version of the rescissions package, which passed 214-212. House Republicans felt extra pressure to pass the Senate version as Trump's administration would have been forced to spend the money if Congress did not approve the cuts by Friday. The $9 billion cut amounts to roughly one-tenth of 1 percent of the $6.8 trillion federal budget. Republicans say the foreign aid funds previously went to programs they deem wasteful, and they say the $1 billion in public media funding supports radio stations and PBS television that are biased against conservative viewpoints. Predawn senate vote In a 51-48 Senate vote before dawn on Thursday, only two Republicans, Senators Susan Collins from Maine and Lisa Murkowski from Alaska, voted against the funding cut. Both questioned why Congress -- constitutionally responsible for the power of the purse -- was taking direction from the executive branch to slash funding. 'There's a good reason I think that we haven't seen a successful rescissions package before the Senate in almost 33 years,' Murkowski said in a Senate floor speech this week, 'It's because we've recognized that, 'Hey, that's our role here.' ' Funding cuts are regularly approved with bipartisan support in Congress through the appropriations process. But Democratic leaders this week warned this one-party cut could damage the necessary bipartisanship to pass funding bills. Funding bills require bipartisan support to reach the necessary 60-vote threshold for government funding legislation to pass the Senate, but a recissions package only requires a simple majority in both congressional chambers to pass. Trump administration officials have promised to send more rescissions requests to Congress if the foreign aid and broadcasting package succeeds. This week's funding clawback represents only a tiny portion of all the funds approved by Congress that the Trump administration has held up while it has pursued sweeping cuts. Democratic lawmakers say the administration has blocked more than $425 billion of spending approved by Congress since Trump's second term began in January. After the measure cleared the Senate, the White House's Office of Management and Budget Director Russ Vought said more such spending-cut requests are 'likely' to be made by the Trump administration. Murkowski, Collins and some Democratic appropriators also condemned a Thursday comment Vought made to reporters at a Christian Science Monitor breakfast, where he said the 'appropriations process has to be less bipartisan.' 'The best way for us to counter what has been said by the OMB director is to continue to work in a bipartisan way,' Collins, who chairs the Senate appropriations committee, said as her committee debated government funding for the next fiscal year.
Arab News
4 hours ago
- Arab News
US designates Pakistani group's offshoot as ‘terrorist' over Kashmir attack
WASHINGTON: The US government designated The Resistance Front, considered an offshoot of the Pakistani extremist group Lashkar-e-Taiba, as a 'foreign terrorist organization' over the April 22 militant attack in India-administered Kashmir that killed 26 people, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on Thursday. The Resistance Front, also known as Kashmir Resistance, initially took responsibility for the attack in Pahalgam before denying it days later. Lashkar-e-Taiba, listed as a 'foreign terrorist organization' by the United States, is a group accused of plotting attacks in India and in the West, including the three-day deadly assault on Mumbai in November 2008. TRF's designation by Washington as a 'foreign terrorist organization' and 'specially designated global terrorist' enforced President Donald Trump's 'call for justice for the Pahalgam attack,' Rubio said in a statement. Rubio called TRF, which emerged in 2019, a 'front and proxy' for Lashkar-e-Taiba. It is considered an offshoot of Lashkar-e-Taiba, according to the South Asia Terrorism Portal, a Delhi-based think tank. The attack sparked heavy fighting between nuclear-armed Asian neighbors India and Pakistan in the latest escalation of a decades-old rivalry. New Delhi blamed the attack on Pakistan, which denied responsibility while calling for a neutral investigation. Washington condemned the attack but did not directly blame Islamabad. Michael Kugelman, a Washington-based South Asia analyst and writer for Foreign Policy magazine, said in designating TRF, 'Washington is flagging its concern about the terrorist attack that provoked the recent India-Pakistan conflict, and siding with New Delhi's view that the group is linked to Lashkar-e-Taiba.' He added: 'This can be a shot in the arm for a US-India relationship looking to rebound after a few tough months.' On May 7, Indian jets bombed sites across the border that New Delhi described as 'terrorist infrastructure,' setting off an exchange of attacks between the two countries by fighter jets, missiles, drones, and artillery that killed dozens until a ceasefire on May 10. The ceasefire was first announced by Trump on social media after Washington held talks with both sides, but India has differed with Trump's claims that it resulted from his intervention and his threats to sever trade talks. India's position has been that New Delhi and Islamabad must resolve their problems directly and with no outside involvement. India is an increasingly important US partner in Washington's effort to counter China's rising influence in Asia, while Pakistan is a US ally. Both Hindu-majority India and Islamic Pakistan claim Muslim-majority Kashmir in full while ruling only parts of the Himalayan territory, over which they have also fought wars.
Al Arabiya
7 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Trump threatens to sue WSJ over story on alleged 2003 letter to Epstein
US President Donald Trump on Thursday threatened to sue The Wall Street Journal after it published a story about an alleged off-color letter written by him to the late disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein that featured a drawing of a naked woman. The Journal story, which quickly reverberated around the US capital, says the note to Epstein bearing Trump's signature was part of a collection of notes for Epstein's 50th birthday in 2003. The newspaper says it reviewed the letter but did not print an image. 'The editor of The Wall Street Journal... was told directly by (White House Press Secretary) Karoline Leavitt, and by President Trump, that the letter was a FAKE,' Trump wrote in a post on his Truth Social network. 'Instead, they are going with a false, malicious, and defamatory story anyway,' he said. 'President Trump will be suing The Wall Street Journal, NewsCorp, and Mr. (Rupert) Murdoch, shortly. The press has to learn to be truthful, and not rely on sources that probably don't even exist.' The alleged letter — which Trump denies writing — is raunchy, as were others in the collection, the Journal reported. It contains several lines of typewritten text, contained in an outline of a naked woman drawn with a marker. 'The future president's signature is a squiggly 'Donald' below her waist, mimicking pubic hair,' the Journal reported. The letter concludes: 'Happy Birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret.' Trump denied writing the letter or drawing the figure, telling the Journal: 'This is not me. This is a fake thing.' 'I don't draw pictures of women,' he said. 'It's not my language. It's not my words.' Murdoch, who controls the NewsCorp media empire, was in Trump's suite Sunday at MetLife Stadium outside New York City for the FIFA Club World Cup final. The Republican president was already facing a firestorm over his past relationship with Epstein, and claims that his administration is covering up lurid details of Epstein's crimes to protect rich and powerful figures. Epstein died by suicide in a New York prison in 2019 — during Trump's first term — after being charged with sex trafficking in a scheme where he allegedly groomed young and underage women for sexual abuse by the rich and powerful. The Trump-supporting far-right has long latched on to the scandal, claiming the existence of a still-secret list of Epstein's powerful clients and that the late financier was in fact murdered in his cell as part of a cover-up. Trump supporters expected the Republican to answer their questions on his return to office this January but now find themselves being told the conspiracy theories are false. The Justice Department and FBI said in a memo made public earlier this month there is no evidence that the disgraced financier kept a 'client list' or was blackmailing powerful figures. They also dismissed the claim that Epstein was murdered in jail, confirming his suicide, and said they would not be releasing any more information on the probe. Then, on Thursday, several US media outlets reported that a federal prosecutor who handled Epstein's case, who is the daughter of a prominent Trump critic, was abruptly fired. Maurene Comey, whose father is former FBI Director James Comey, was dismissed Wednesday from her position as an assistant US attorney in Manhattan, several major US outlets reported. Comey also prosecuted Ghislaine Maxwell, the only former Epstein associate who has been criminally charged in connection with his activities. Maxwell is the person who compiled the leather-bound book of letters for Epstein in 2003, the Journal reported. 'The WSJ should be ashamed for publishing it. Where is this letter? Would you be shocked to learn they never showed it to us before publishing it?' Vice President JD Vance wrote on X. Meanwhile, Democratic lawmaker Pat Ryan wrote: 'I think we now know EXACTLY why Donald Trump refuses to release the Epstein files.'
