North Carolina is getting older
North Carolina was one of only 10 states in the country where the number of people under the age of 18 grew between 2020 and 2024, according to new Census data.
At the same time, it was also one of the states with the fastest-growing population of people 65 years or older.
Why it matters: America's older population is growing while its younger cohort is shrinking, a trend that presents big policy and economic challenges, Axios' Alex Fitzpatrick writes.
Having more older Americans means we'll need more care workers, for instance.
Driving the news: The U.S. population aged 65 and up grew by 13% between 2020 and 2024, the Census Bureau says, while the number of those under 18 fell by 1.7%.
The U.S. median age hit a new record high of 39.1 in 2024, up from 38.5 in 2020.
In North Carolina, the median age increased from 38.9 to 39.2 between 2020 and 2024, The News & Observer noted.
State of play: In North Carolina, the population aged 65 and up grew by 15.1% between 2020 and 2024, while the number of those under 18 grew by 1.7%.
The state's budget office projects North Carolina's older adult population will double by 2040.
Yes, but: The share of young North Carolinians is also expected to continue to rise.
By 2030, North Carolina will have 607,000 pre-school age children, an increase of 3.8%, according to state data, due to a larger cohort of women in their prime childbearing years.
By 2060, the state will have 746,000 pre-school age children — a 23% increase from today.
Between the lines: The birth rate has fallen significantly in North Carolina over the past two decades.
At the same time, the state has become an attractive place for retirees, and Brunswick, Dare and Orange counties had the largest growth in their older population, according to Carolina Demography.
Stunning stat: Still, North Carolina's demographics are younger than many states. There are now 11 states with more older adults than children, up from only three in 2020.
They include Maine, Vermont, Florida, Delaware, Hawai'i, Montana, New Hampshire, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island and West Virginia.
What they're saying: The gap between children and older adults "is narrowing as baby boomers continue to age into their retirement years," Lauren Bowers, chief of the Census Bureau's Population Estimates Branch, said in a statement accompanying the new data.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
4 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Map Shows States Americans Are Moving From and To
With declining births and slower immigration following the Trump administration's strict deportation policies, domestic migration is bound to become an increasingly more important driver of U.S. population change, a recent study found. Florida and Texas, which have both been among the fastest-growing states in the nation for years, know what a positive impact a booming population can have on the local economy and job market, as well as what happens when this demographic explosion starts to wane. This year's State of the Nation's Housing report, released earlier this week by the Joint Center for Housing Studies (JCHS) of Harvard University, found that the movement of Americans across the country has declined in 2024 all across the country, including in the states that are traditionally the most popular among movers. Last year, according to researchers, the nation reported the lowest rates of household mobility on record since the 1970s. According to the latest Current Population Survey, about 8.3 percent of households (10.9 million) reported moving over the past year, a rate unchanged from a year earlier and down from 9.8 percent (12.6 million) before the pandemic, in 2019. In the same year, the homeowner mobility rate dropped to an all-time low of 3.1 percent, down from 3.7 percent in 2023 and 4.3 percent in 2019. That means U.S. homeowners made 24 percent fewer moves last year than in 2019, before the pandemic unleashed a surge of remote workers relocating from large, busy metropolises to smaller, more affordable towns. The South was the main beneficiary of this influx of people relocating to cheaper, more livable parts of the nation, with Florida and Texas adding hundreds of thousands of new residents over the past five years. The rate of domestic migration in Florida increased from 6.5 in 2019 to 8.1 in 2020, 11.4 in 2021, and reached a peak of 14.2 in 2022. In 2023, it fell to 8.2, and in 2024, it plunged to 2.7. In Texas, the rate increased from 4.2 in 2019 to 5.6 in 2020, 6.7 in 2021, 7.4 in 2022, and 6.3 in 2023, only to fall to 2.8 in 2024. While domestic migration remained the main source of population growth last year for 11 states, primarily in the South, net gains from migration fell in several of these states. In North Carolina, domestic migration decreased by 17 percent from the previous year, while in Tennessee, it decreased by 20 percent. Not only has in-migration-the process of relocating permanently to another part of one's home country-slowed down in the states that were most benefiting from it over the past five years, but out-migration from states that were hemorrhaging residents also slowed down last year. The number of residents moving out of California, for example, dropped by 30 percent in 2024, from −344,000 in 2023 to −240,000 in 2024. New York, another state where out-migration has surpassed in-migration in recent years, lost 121,000 people on net to interstate migration in 2024, about 30 percent fewer than in 2023 (−177,000) and 60 percent fewer than in 2022 (−296,000). Since 2019, the cost of homeownership has skyrocketed nationwide, including in states that previously offered more affordable options. The median sale price of a typical U.S. home was $313,000 in the first quarter of 2019, according to data from the U.S. Census Bureau; in the first quarter of 2024, it had surged to $426,800. As of the first quarter of 2025, $416,900. Mortgage rates have also gone through the roof since 2019. If historically low monthly payments during the pandemic spurred a homebuying frenzy nationwide, rates lingering around the 7 percent mark are now hindering demand, pushing buyers to the sidelines. The result is that packing up and moving to another state has become a trickier operation for many Americans, considering the overall cost of purchasing a new property. On top of that, return-to-office orders from companies that had been pressured to offer remote working options during the pandemic are now forcing many employees to go back to the same busy metros they had left. According to the JCHS study, last year there was a slowdown in moves out of urban centers across the U.S., which had accelerated during the pandemic. Net moves from dense urban counties, such as those in New York City, researchers found, fell for the third consecutive year in 2024, down 17 percent from the previous year. At the same time, net moves into suburban counties fell 16 percent year-over-year, while gains in smaller metros and non-metro counties declined by 12 percent and 31 percent, respectively, over the past year; however, these remain higher than pre-pandemic levels. Related Articles Map Shows States With the Best Major Airports in the Shows 10 Housing Markets Where Buyers Have More PowerMap Shows Most Expensive Home Sales Across USMap Shows Which States Will Feel Hottest Today 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
8 minutes ago
'This Week' Transcript 6-29-25: Sen. Lindsey Graham & Rep. Hakeem Jeffries
A rush transcript of "This Week with George Stephanopoulos" airing on Sunday, June 29, 2025 on ABC News is below. This copy may not be in its final form, may be updated and may contain minor transcription errors. For previous show transcripts, visit the "This Week" transcript archive. (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) ZOHRAN MAMDANI, DEMOCRATIC MAYORAL CANDIDATE FOR NEW YORK: Together, New York, we have renewed our democracy. We have given our cities permission to believe again. In our New York, the power belongs to the people. (END VIDEO CLIP) JONATHAN KARL, ABC "THIS WEEK" CO- ANCHOR: That was 33-year-old Democratic socialist Zohan Mamdani, who shocked the political world with his victory in the New York Democratic primary for mayor. I'm joined now by House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries of New York. Let -- let's start with the big news, Leader Jeffries, out of your home town. Mamdani won a big victory. Have you endorsed him yet? REP. HAKEEM JEFFRIES - HOUSE MINORITY LEADER, (D) NEW YORK: I have not. We had a conversation on Wednesday morning where I congratulated him on the campaign that he ran, a campaign that clearly was relentlessly focused on the high cost of living in New York City and the economy. He out worked, he out communicated and he out organized the opposition. And that's clearly why he was successful. KARL: So, what's holding you back from endorsing him right now? JEFFRIES: Well, we don't really know each other well. Our districts don't overlap. I have never had a substantive conversation with him. And so, that's the next step in terms of this process, to be able to sit down, which we agreed to do, in central Brooklyn, discuss his vision for moving the city forward and addressing the issues that are important to the communities that I represent. A very diverse district that I represent in Brooklyn, including many African Americans, many Jewish Americans, many Caribbean Americans who are dealing with a lot of challenges in the city and want to make sure that the next mayor of the city of New York, whoever that may be, is prepared to tackle them. KARL: Mamdani calls himself a Democratic socialist. He proposed, obviously, big tax increases, free mass transit, free bus fares, government run grocery stores. Is this the kind of progressive socialism it is -- we're going to see as the future of the Democratic Party or is this unique to New York City? JEFFRIES: I think that one of the things we've been clear about from the very beginning as House Democrats is that we need to relentlessly focus on addressing the high cost of living in the United States of America. This country is far to expensive for working class Americans, for middle class Americans, for all those who aspire to be part of the middle class. Imagine a country where every single, hard-working American taxpayer can afford to live the good life, work hard, play by the rules, have a good paying job, good health care, be able to afford a home, educate your children, go on vacation every now and then, and one day retire with grace and dignity. The good life. The American dream. That is not accessible to everyone. And so I think it will continue to be important for all of us on the Democratic side to address relentlessly the issue of the lack of affordability in this country. Donald Trump promised to lower costs on day one. Costs haven't gone down. They're going up. In fact, the guy is crashing the economy in real time and posing these reckless Trump tariffs that are going to increase costs by thousands of dollars a year. And he may even drive us toward a recession. KARL: You mentioned the diversity of your district, including a lot of Jewish constituents. Mamdani has made comments that some have said veer towards anti-Semitism. His initial statement after October 7th, he criticized the Israeli government but didn't criticize Hamas. He defended the use of the word globalize -- or the phrase 'globalize intifada.' And he even said that the Israeli prime minister, Netanyahu, should be arrested -- or he would if he were mayor, he would arrest Netanyahu if he visited New York City. Do these things concern you? JEFFRIES: Globalizing the intifada by way of example is not an acceptable phrasing. He's going to have to clarify his position on that as he moves forward. With respect to the Jewish communities that I represent, I think our nominee is going to have to convince folks that he is prepared to aggressively address the rise in anti-Semitism in the city of New York, which has been an unacceptable development. And any mayor, whether you're a Democratic mayor, a Republican mayor, an independent mayor, has got to commit to the safety and well-being of all of the people of the city of New York. And when there are moments of crisis and a rise in anti-Jewish hate, that's a threshold, of course, that needs to be crossed. With respect to the African American and Caribbean American communities that I represent, it's going to be important for our nominee to articulate the case for dramatically and decisively addressing the rise in gentrification and the housing displacement that threatens to continue to wipe out low and moderate income, black and Latino communities in New York City. It's an unacceptable phenomenon. And the next mayor of the city of New York has to be able to articulate a clear plan and commitment to address these concerns for the people that I represent and folks all across the great city of New York. KARL: All right, let's turn to developments here in Washington. The Supreme Court (INAUDIBLE) decision empowering Donald Trump by limiting the power of judges to stop his executive orders or to freeze his executive orders. How big a deal is this? This was really the one way -- the one restraint on his actions that's been effective so far. JEFFRIES: Well, it was an unfortunate decision from a procedural standpoint as it relates to what should have been a very clear case. If there is any instance where nationwide injunctions are appropriate, it would be in a -- in a manner like what we've just experienced in terms of birthright citizenship, which is clearly a part of the Constitution. If you are born as a child in the United States of American, you are a citizen. So, it was a procedural setback that was quite unfortunate, and it was a reckless decision, in my view. However, in terms of the fight judicially to protect birthright citizenship, that remains alive and well. And we're just going to have to intensify our efforts now in district court after district court or to get a class action certified on behalf of people who may be adversely impacted by this reckless Trump executive order. KARL: And -- and you were at the briefing, the classified briefing, Friday on Iran and on the U.S. air strikes. Did you get satisfactory answers and do you have a sense now, was the program really -- I mean the president says obliterated, but -- but what did you learn? JEFFRIES: Well, let's be clear, Iran is a sworn enemy of the United States of America, as well as our allies in the Middle East, like Israel and Jordan. And we can never allow Iran to be a nuclear capable power. That said, there are a lot of questions that remain unanswered, in my view, as it relates to the actions that the Trump administration took relative to Iran. Why did they not seek the congressional authorization required by the Constitution for this type of preemptive strike? I still haven't seen facts presented to us as a Congress to justify that step, and I certainly haven't seen facts to justify the statement that Donald Trump made that Iran's nuclear program has been completely and totally obliterated. We also need the case to be made by the administration to the American people as to how to best accomplish the objective of preventing Iran from becoming nuclear capable. Why did they abandon the aggressive diplomacy that was successful under the Obama administration, and what is their plan to stop us from getting into another failed Middle Eastern war. A lot of questions that need to be answered. And those answers haven't been compelling to date. KARL: All right, a lot of questions for sure. Leader Jeffries, thank you for joining us. JEFFRIES: Thank you. KARL: Up next, the roundtable's take on what the New York mayor's race could mean for Democrats nationwide and how the Justice Department forced out the president of the University of Virginia over DEI policies. We're back in a moment.
CNBC
an hour ago
- CNBC
How much Americans have in their 401(k)s at every income level
It's not uncommon for Americans to feel like they're not saving enough for retirement — no matter their age or income level. But earning a higher salary can help you save more, as long as you increase your contributions along with your income. So it may not be surprising that workers with higher incomes tend to have higher 401(k) balances, according to newly released data from asset management firm Vanguard. The median balance of defined contribution plans — which are employer-sponsored retirement plans like 401(k)s or 403(b)s — among workers making between $100,000 and $149,999 is nearly double what workers making $50,000 to $74,999 have invested, per Vanguard. The firm examined data from nearly 5 million participants across its defined contribution plans. Here's how much workers have in their retirement savings plans at each income level. Notably, the average balances are significantly higher than the median balances. The median is often a more representative figure, however, because averages can be skewed if a small number of participants have significantly higher or lower amounts invested. And keep in mind these figures only represent savings held in Vanguard defined contribution plans. Investors may have additional retirement accounts with other plan providers or separate brokerage accounts. Despite ongoing macroeconomic uncertainty like stubbornly high prices and recession fears, many Americans have prioritized their long-term financial goals through retirement account contributions. "There has been persistent, year-over-year progress in retirement savings behaviors," David Stinnett, head of strategic retirement consulting at Vanguard, told CNBC Make It in an email. "Seemingly regardless of market and economic conditions, we find that workers are getting started saving earlier, saving more of their paycheck, and investing their savings in age-appropriate asset allocations more consistently." Regardless of income, one factor that has helped boost savers' balances is automatic enrollment. Employees with 10 or more years of tenure who were automatically enrolled in their company's retirement plan had median account balances roughly 60% higher than those who had to opt-in to contributions, the same Vanguard study found. The median balance among auto-enrolled investors with at least 10 years of service was $192,372 in 2024, compared with $121,094 for voluntary enrollees. "We're encouraged by how employers design their 401(k) plans to make it easy for workers to save and invest for retirement, and automatic enrollment is a big part of that," Stinnett said.
