Freed British-Israeli hostage accuses Starmer of ‘moral failure' over move to recognise Palestine
Emily Damari, 29, who was released in January, said the prime minister was 'not standing on the right side of history' and should be ashamed.
Her criticism came as lawyers representing British families of hostages held in Gaza by Hamas warned the UK government's intention to recognise a Palestinian state risked disincentivising the release of captives.
Starmer said on Tuesday that the UK would recognise a Palestinian state in September unless the Israeli government abided by a ceasefire and committed to a two-state solution to the conflict.
The UK government also said Hamas must release all hostages immediately, disarm, sign up to a ceasefire and accept it would play no role in the government of Gaza.
In a post on Instagram, Damari said: 'Prime Minister Starmer is not standing on the right side of history. Had he been in power during World War II, would he have advocated recognition for Nazi control of occupied countries like Holland, France or Poland?
'This is not diplomacy – it is a moral failure. Shame on you, prime minister.
'As a dual British-Israeli citizen who survived 471 days in Hamas captivity, I am deeply saddened by Prime Minister Starmer's decision to recognise Palestinian statehood. This move does not advance peace – it risks rewarding terror. It sends a dangerous message: that violence earns legitimacy.'
Damari was shot in the leg and hand when she was dragged from her home in the kibbutz Kfar Aza on 7 October. She was taken from the safe room of her house with her friends Ziv and Gali Berman, twin brothers who are still being held in Gaza.
Since her release as part of a ceasefire deal, Damari has campaigned for the release of about 20 hostages believed to be still alive and for the bodies of about 30 dead hostages to be returned to their families.
In a separate statement, Adam Rose and Adam Wagner, who have represented relatives of hostages who are either British or have close British ties since 7 October 2023, said the UK had made the hostages a 'bargaining chip'. They said: 'The risk is that Hamas will continue to refuse a ceasefire because if it agrees to one this would make UK recognition less likely.'
The families they represented had asked Starmer to 'confirm, unambiguously, that Hamas will not be rewarded and that the UK will not take any substantive steps until all the hostages are free'.
They added: 'For almost two years, the British hostage families have encouraged the UK to use any leverage it has to help secure the release of their loved ones. They have sat in 10 Downing Street with successive prime ministers and foreign secretaries who have looked them in the eyes and promised the UK will do everything in its power to secure the immediate and unconditional release of their loved ones, whose detention is unambiguously a war crime.
'We are concerned that the UK's proposal risks delaying the release of the hostages. This is because the UK has said that it will recognise a Palestinian state unless Israel agrees a ceasefire. But the risk is that Hamas will continue to refuse a ceasefire because if it agrees to one this would make UK recognition less likely.
'The families are therefore deeply concerned that the UK's approach risks disincentivising Hamas from releasing the hostages. This risks doing exactly what the prime minister's statement says the UK will not do: reward Hamas for its heinous and illegal acts.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
2 minutes ago
- Spectator
The Charity Commission's laughable approach to radical Islam
It's taken me a while, but I've finally realised the purpose of the Charity Commission. I'd always thought its role was to regulate charities – to check that they comply with their charitable aims (and with the law) and then to take action if they don't. But it's finally dawned on me that the real purpose of the Charity Commission is satire. Once you realise that the Charity Commission exists in fact to satirise how pathetically weak we are in the face of radical Islam then everything falls into place – especially its otherwise inexplicably pathetic response to the hate preaching that is commonplace in mosques up and down the country. On Wednesday, the Charity Commission issued a press release over its action in response to two mosques which it found had promoted 'inflammatory and divisive' language. Let's look at one of them, the Mosque and Islamic Centre of Brent. As the Commission put it yesterday, it 'opened a case after concerns were raised in the media about speeches held at the charity's premises. The sermons were promoted on the speaker's social media channel.' In November and December 2023 Sheikh Babikir Ahmed Babikir gave a series of sermons in which he said that 'any Muslim who speaks against the Palestinians, any Muslim who stands against even Hamas, you are a hypocrite.' In another sermon he compared the proscribed terrorist organisation with Nelson Mandela, saying he was 'shocked' when asked about Hamas at a meeting: 'I said to the person that was asking me, 'what did you used to think of Mandela?' … Yesterday he was a terrorist but tomorrow he's the best leader in the world.' Discussing the 'Gaza mujahideen' in a sermon on 29 December 2023, he said: 'These are people whom Allah has chosen, Allah has empowered. They make their own weapons, with the least they have, with all the difficulties in front of them, and they are managing to destroy the most hardest, advanced weapon man be proud of… Your job and my job is to support them and to help them.' As for Zionists: they plot to 'control the world' by manipulating banks, media organisations and regimes. They are in league with the Dajjal – which in Islamic theology is an evil false prophet like the Antichrist: 'Zionism is like a political party, preparing for the Dajjal to come to rule the world, and their main function is to make sure that all the organs of states across the world and the national and international bodies will be in their hold. They hold the media, they hold all the financial institutions, they control a lot of the political regimes around the world and once they have that they will try to control the world.' In another sermon he said that Zionists bribe UK politicians to 'use their false narrative and fabricated stories to push their agenda.' They are, he said, 'soldiers of the devil'. Videos of his sermons were then posted on YouTube. On Wednesday, over 18 months after its investigation began, the Charity Commission found that 'of five speeches given at the charity's premises in November and December 2023, four included inflammatory and divisive content, two contained content that could reasonably be interpreted as encouraging support of Hamas, a proscribed organisation, and one could be reasonably interpreted as discouraging worshippers from engaging with democratic processes.' You don't say. Let me hazard a guess that it took you all of a second to reach that same conclusion about the sermons. But for the Charity Commission, that was 18 months' work. And that's not even the most ludicrous aspect of all this. Wielding its big stick in response, to ensure that charities don't spread hate (or, if we are being technical, don't 'have effective policies in place to manage risks related to speakers at the charity', as the Commission put it), the Commission sanctioned the Mosque and Islamic Centre of Brent and another mosque, Central Oxford Mosque Society, which it said posted 'graphic cartoons…just three days after the attack on Israel on 7 October 2023. The Commission considered that the sharing of these cartoons could create community tensions in the context of the conflict in the Middle East.' The sanction for both? An official warning. Not just any warning, oh no, but an official one. That's them told. Pathetic doesn't even come close. Which is how I've realised what's really going on. I refuse to believe that sentient, intelligent humans can seriously think that the way to deal with radical Islamic preachers and the mosques that host them is to tell them they've been naughty and ask them not to do it again. So it simply has to be satire – and a rather brilliant one at that, since it unambiguously exposes how, as a nation, we refuse to act against the preachers who turn our freedoms against us and who use the platforms we give them to spread their poison. Well done, Charity Commission. Superb work.
The Guardian
3 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Schwartz Media journalists banned from 7am podcast after Gaza episode prompts negative comments
Schwartz Media, publisher of the Saturday Paper, the Monthly and the Quarterly Essay, recently sold its 7am podcast to Solstice Media, with the promise its stable of journalists would still appear on the popular show. But just a month out from the deal, the Schwartz journalists have been told they can no longer talk on the podcast. The first episode published by the new owners was about Palestinians who were killed as they waited for aid, and a later Gaza-related episode interviewed the executive officer at the Jewish Council of Australia, Sarah Schwartz (no relation). All appeared well asSchwartz journalists continued to make appearances on the podcast in July. But some listener comments critical of Schwartz's coverage of the Israel-Gaza war were posted on 7am's social media pages. Following the discovery of the public comments writers were told by Schwartz they can no longer go on the podcast and talk about their reporting – a big loss to the podcast, which has always showcased the insights of the stable. Some of the posts Weekly Beast saw included: 'So glad you're moving away from them. Report on Palestine please'; 'Night and fucking day' and 'so glad you guys have gone independent and are now going to cover the genocide properly'. Schwartz Media's chief executive and editor-in-chief, Erik Jensen, confirmed the direction to the writers and told Weekly Beast the decision had nothing to do with the journalism on 7am, 'which continues to be excellent'. 'It was made in response to offensive material that was left unmoderated on the show's socials.' Solstice Media is rapidly expanding, this week buying up travel magazine Australian Traveller to add to its stable of South Australian and Queensland editions of InDaily, SA Life and the New Daily. It will come as no surprise to anyone that the ABC's purpose is to produce content across TV, radio and online. But each managing director delivers his or her own 'new strategic direction': this week was Hugh Marks' turn. His big reveal? 'We must be a content-led organisation'. Top of the agenda at an all-staff town hall was a set of 'refreshed ABC values', complete with colour-coded charts with four unique emojis: Aim High, Think Differently, Take Ownership and Deliver Together. 'In living these values, we always demonstrate respect, honesty and a commitment to diversity and inclusion.' Some of the journalists in the room or on Zoom rolled their eyes at the corporate jargon; others were so bamboozled by the buzzwords they tuned out. But to be fair to Marks, the presentation was far from former MD Michelle Guthrie's Google-style of management, which included a session in which attendees were asked to sit in a ring, select a plastic toy from the centre of the group that most represented how they felt and speak 'through' it. There was some joy at Ultimo, however, and it was the recent success of triple j's Hottest 100 of Australian Songs, a journey through 50 years of Australian music. The event saw 3.13m live stream starts on triple j and Double J on Saturday, in addition to those listening to the countdown on broadcast. There were over 50m views across Triple J's TikTok, Instagram and YouTube channels and more than 1.3m reads of ABC articles. Marks was delighted. He said he lives in Paddington and he could hear the Hottest 100 parties as he walked around. He suggested TV should be involved next time. The audio chief, Ben Latimer, said the Hottest 100 was an 'incredible example of what we do well' and signalled the ABC will do more projects like it in the future. But back to the ABC values. Marks said: 'When we do make mistakes, let's own them quickly' in what was interpreted as a nod to the disastrous decision to sack broadcaster Antoinette Lattouf. Later, during questions, Marks conceded management failed and processes were not followed in that case. The direction to aim for quality and 'break more stories' irked reporters, who told Weekly Beast there isn't a day they aren't focused on that very task. Two years after the Nine newspapers published the controversial Red Alert series – in which an expert panel asserted Australia faced 'the threat of war with China within three years' – Chris Uhlmann is presenting a Sky News program which appears to have a similar theme. The 'exclusive one-hour special event' is called The War Cabinet and asks: is Australia ready for war? 'Set in an immersive war cabinet environment, Uhlmann convenes a distinguished panel of former ministers, military leaders, and defence specialists to investigate if Australia is ready to defend itself and support our allies in a time of growing tensions in our region and across the world,' the blurb says. Former ministers Alexander Downer and Joel Fitzgibbon and the former secretary of the Department of Home Affairs Michael Pezzullo have been assembled to discuss, among other things, China's increasing militarisation. Back in 2023, Paul Keating was so incensed by the Red Alert series he called it 'the most egregious and provocative news presentation of any newspaper I have witnessed in over 50 years of active public life'. The former Nine and ABC political correspondent even has two alumni from the Red Alert series: the executive director of the Australian Strategic Policy Institute, Peter Jennings, and the retired major general Mick Ryan. Sign up to Weekly Beast Amanda Meade's weekly diary on the latest in Australian media, free every Friday after newsletter promotion The Australian Jewish News published a correction and apology on its social media pages this week after a news alert incorrectly named a reporter from The Australian in connection with an arson arrest Instead of reporting the correct name of a man police had alleged was linked to the Adass Israel Synagogue arson, the AJN named young journalist Mohammad Alfares, who had written the report. 'Earlier today, we published a breaking news alert on our social media channels about an arrest connected to the Adass Israel Synagogue arson,' AJN said. 'In taking the information from an update from The Australian's website, we made a grievous error in wrongly taking the name of The Australian's journalist, Mohammad Alfares, and including it in the post as the arrested party. 'The post was removed as soon as we realised our mistake. We sincerely regret this error and the upset that it has caused for Mr Alfares and The Australian.' We told you last week that ABC Middle East correspondent Matt Doran had warned that Palestinian journalists working with Australia's national broadcaster barely had the strength to hold a camera due to starvation. His report came on the same day as a joint statement from BBC News, Reuters, AFP and AP which said 'it is essential that adequate food supplies reach the people' in Gaza and urged Israeli authorities to allow journalists in and out of the region. At the aforementioned ABC town hall on Tuesday, the news director, Justin Stevens, was asked by journalists why the ABC didn't join the other news organisations in making that statement. He replied the ABC wasn't aware of it at the time but would be looking for opportunities to do so. Following the robust questioning at the meeting, a statement was issued by Stevens on Thursday that said the ABC is 'deeply concerned' about the health and safety of stringers in Palestine. 'We're now seeing the effects of food shortages on journalists we work with, which our correspondents have reported on: The hunger crisis inside Gaza will affect the news you see about the war. 'The ABC calls on Israel to again allow international journalists to report independently from Gaza, to allow all journalists to move in and out of Gaza and to ensure journalists in Gaza are safe.' In May the Norwegian royal house announced Princess Ingrid Alexandra will move to Australia to study at the University of Sydney, where she will live on campus while studying for a bachelor of arts. The 21-year-old is second in line to Norway's throne after her father, the crown prince and heir apparent. The Murdoch press wasted no time publishing paparazzi shots of her before the university semester had even begun. The Daily Telegraph framed Alexandra in an editorial as an anti-Meghan Markle figure, a 'truly normal and relatable royal'. The shot of the princess carrying a bottle of wine made the front page on Friday with the headline 'Heir to the throne of Norway kicks up her heels in Sydney'. At the angle was the same: her 'tipple of choice was a $16 Italian prosecco'. 'She rocked the classic Aussie winter uniform – a minimalist navy cardigan and low-waisted, white baggy jeans,' their piece said. 'Her long brown hair was styled in an effortless middle part, and she classed up the look with a pair of gold hoop earrings.' Which was a better description than the one offered by the Daily Mail: 'Her mousy blonde locks were tucked behind her ears and fell voluminously around her shoulders.'
South Wales Guardian
21 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
British steelmakers boosted by change to EU tariffs
The EU has agreed to more than double the UK's tariff-free quota for certain steel products in a move the Government described as a 'direct win' from Sir Keir Starmer's deal with the bloc earlier this year. At May's UK-EU summit, Sir Keir and European Commission President Ursula Von Der Leyen agreed to restore Britain's steel quotas to historic levels after they were slashed in March. Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said the announcement was 'yet another positive step forward for the UK steel sector' that would give producers 'certainty'. The agreement comes at a difficult time for the industry, which continues to face 25% tariffs on exports to the US. An agreement with President Donald Trump to effectively reduce those tariffs to zero is yet to come into effect, but Britain has been protected from the 50% tariff Mr Trump imposed on steel from the rest of the world last month. UK Steel director general Gareth Stace said Friday's change was 'excellent news' for the sector that had been 'plagued by problems' in exporting steel to the EU. He added: 'The quota will restore historic trade flows and is good news for both UK steelmakers and their EU customers.' The decision means the UK can export 27,000 tonnes of 'category 17' steel – which includes angles and sections of steel – to the EU each quarter without paying tariffs. The figure had been cut to 10,000 tonnes after the EU introduced a cap intended to prevent a single exporter dominating the market. In total, the UK exports around 2.4 million tonnes of steel to the EU, worth nearly £3 billion and accounting for 75% of British steel exports. Ministers expect the change to help protect jobs in the industry, which has been a priority for the Labour Government since coming to power. In April, the Government used an almost unprecedented weekend recall of Parliament to take control of British Steel to prevent the shutdown of its blast furnaces and maintain the UK's primary steel-making capacity. British Steel's interim chief operating officer Lisa Coulson said: 'The removal of EU tariffs on British-made steel is a significant boost to our business. 'The EU is an important market to us, particularly for the products our highly skilled colleagues manufacture in Scunthorpe, Teesside, and Skinningrove.' But Conservative shadow business secretary Andrew Griffith described the quota as 'tiny' and 'embarrassing from a Government which has nothing to show on removing the US tariffs on steel which the PM claimed to have delivered back in May'. He added: 'It's a paltry return for giving up 12 years of fishing rights and tying the energy costs of every business to a higher cost EU emissions regime over which the UK will have no say. 'When Labour nationalised British Steel we said they had no plan. This government by press release shows we were right.'
