
British steelmakers boosted by change to EU tariffs
At May's UK-EU summit, Sir Keir and European Commission President Ursula Von Der Leyen agreed to restore Britain's steel quotas to historic levels after they were slashed in March.
Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said the announcement was 'yet another positive step forward for the UK steel sector' that would give producers 'certainty'.
The agreement comes at a difficult time for the industry, which continues to face 25% tariffs on exports to the US.
An agreement with President Donald Trump to effectively reduce those tariffs to zero is yet to come into effect, but Britain has been protected from the 50% tariff Mr Trump imposed on steel from the rest of the world last month.
UK Steel director general Gareth Stace said Friday's change was 'excellent news' for the sector that had been 'plagued by problems' in exporting steel to the EU.
He added: 'The quota will restore historic trade flows and is good news for both UK steelmakers and their EU customers.'
The decision means the UK can export 27,000 tonnes of 'category 17' steel – which includes angles and sections of steel – to the EU each quarter without paying tariffs.
The figure had been cut to 10,000 tonnes after the EU introduced a cap intended to prevent a single exporter dominating the market.
In total, the UK exports around 2.4 million tonnes of steel to the EU, worth nearly £3 billion and accounting for 75% of British steel exports.
Ministers expect the change to help protect jobs in the industry, which has been a priority for the Labour Government since coming to power.
In April, the Government used an almost unprecedented weekend recall of Parliament to take control of British Steel to prevent the shutdown of its blast furnaces and maintain the UK's primary steel-making capacity.
British Steel's interim chief operating officer Lisa Coulson said: 'The removal of EU tariffs on British-made steel is a significant boost to our business.
'The EU is an important market to us, particularly for the products our highly skilled colleagues manufacture in Scunthorpe, Teesside, and Skinningrove.'
But Conservative shadow business secretary Andrew Griffith described the quota as 'tiny' and 'embarrassing from a Government which has nothing to show on removing the US tariffs on steel which the PM claimed to have delivered back in May'.
He added: 'It's a paltry return for giving up 12 years of fishing rights and tying the energy costs of every business to a higher cost EU emissions regime over which the UK will have no say.
'When Labour nationalised British Steel we said they had no plan. This government by press release shows we were right.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Finextra
8 minutes ago
- Finextra
SmartSearch adds LSEG's World-Check One to screening data sources
SmartSearch, the UK's leading provider of digital compliance and anti-money laundering (AML) solutions, today announces the integration of LSEG's (London Stock Exchange Group) World-Check One solution into its watchlist screening offering. 0 The addition of LSEG as a data provider bolsters SmartSearch's data coverage, joining Dow Jones Watchlist to deliver comprehensive Watchlist screening for SmartSearch customers. Offering triple-bureau reliability, SmartSearch uses global data from Equifax, Experian and Transunion, combined with biometric and AI-driven technology to verify individuals and businesses instantly, determining if they are present on sanctions lists. The platform also then performs real-time screening for anyone who may not be illegal to do business with but who carries greater risk, such as Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs), Special Interest Persons (SIPs) and Relative or Close Associates (RCAs). This simplifies customer onboarding and ongoing monitoring of their status, as well as ensures compliance with Know Your Customer (KYC) and sanctions enforcement regulations. Making these checks as thorough and their results as well-informed as possible requires extensive data coverage and cutting-edge functionality, matching the sophisticated, ever-evolving methods used by financial criminals to carry out and conceal their illicit activities. The integration of LSEG's World-Check One solution will enhance existing SmartSearch watchlist screening and functionality by introducing comprehensive adverse media monitoring, advanced fuzzy matching for name variations, real-time monitoring capabilities, and access to data from over 100,000 reputable sources across 66 SIP categories. 'Businesses in regulated sectors face potentially unlimited fines and even jail time for non-compliance with AML regulation, as well as unwittingly becoming a cog in the financial crime machine if a criminal slips through the net - implicating the business in facilitating drug smuggling, human trafficking and even terrorism,' said Fraser Mitchell, Chief Product Officer at SmartSearch. 'We are dedicated to helping our clients avoid this fate, which is why we've added LSEG's World-Check One Solution to our watchlist screening offering. With market-leading data coverage, our clients can quickly and confidently verify prospective customers' identities when onboarding and monitor their status throughout the relationship, enabling them to grow their business and win customers through trusted identities.' 'Both LSEG and SmartSearch share a vision to ensure convenient compliance and frictionless customer journeys.' said Teodora Christova, Global Director of Partnerships at LSEG. 'Our World-Check One Solution combines global intelligence and human expertise with the latest technology. The integration with SmartSearch will help its customers uncover hidden risks and protect the people behind the statistics.'

Finextra
8 minutes ago
- Finextra
FCA's revamped returns put pressure on bureaux and the credit providers they serve.: By Cliff Bunting
In May 2025, the FCA introduced PS25/3, a new regulatory return for firms with permissions for credit broking, debt counselling, and credit information services. It replaces the returns process introduced in 2014, which the regulator had concluded was no longer delivering the level of clarity needed to monitor risk in the market. The updated return requires firms to report activity across five categories: permissions, business model, marketing, revenue, and staffing. This gives the FCA more direct visibility into how brokers and bureaux are operating and whether their actions align with the outcomes they are expected to support. While PS25/3 does not apply to credit providers, it is already influencing the way bureaux behave, including how they configure, price, and explain their services. That makes this a sensible moment for lenders to reassess whether their bureau data contracts still reflect what the business needs and how it operates. Why this affects data buyers The FCA has made clear that it wants a more consistent understanding of how regulated firms operate. For brokers and bureaux, that means connecting internal decisions across multiple areas of the business. For those that supply credit data services, it means explaining how each product, process, and dataset fits into the wider operation. This increased scrutiny has implications for their clients. Many credit providers are still using bureau contracts that haven't changed in years. Some terms were agreed around older product sets or inherited usage patterns. In other cases, volumes or decisioning logic have evolved without a formal review of the underlying data or licensing model. This is where issues tend to surface: FCA return section What's reported Where problems often occur Permissions Regulated activities Datasets don't match product permissions or customer types Business model Products and services offered Affordability models or coverage haven't been reviewed Marketing Targeting methods Risk data is used in early-stage activity without an audit Revenue Credit vs. non-credit income No clear link between data usage and income classification Staff Incentives and oversight Teams rely on data not covered by the current contract or policy These are operational gaps, not regulatory breaches. But as bureaux are required to document and explain their activity, the services they provide, and the clients using them, will come under greater internal and commercial review. Is your bureau setup still appropriate? For many credit providers, bureau data contracts remain largely unchanged since they were first negotiated. Product configurations and licence terms may have rolled forward year after year. In some cases, the rationale for specific data decisions is no longer clear internally. For firms that have expanded their product lines or added new use cases, these arrangements may no longer reflect actual requirements. This raises practical questions: Does our current bureau agreement match our products, permissions and customer base? Have we added use cases that were never reviewed with our data supplier? Are we still paying for services that no longer support risk, compliance, or commercial activity? Can we explain how the current setup came to be and who approved it? PS25/3 has made these questions more relevant, even for firms outside the scope of the return. As bureaux respond to regulatory expectations, the structure and pricing of their services will become more deliberate. Their clients should expect, and prepare for, the same. How firms are reassessing value through benchmarking Many credit providers are now using benchmarking as a way to review their bureau arrangements. This involves comparing contract pricing, product mix, and usage against others with similar requirements, helping teams identify whether existing terms still make commercial sense. In practice, this often supports clearer internal conversations between credit risk, procurement and compliance, especially where data usage spans multiple functions. Firms typically use benchmarking to: Compare bureau costs against peer usage Identify underused or outdated services Review whether pricing reflects actual volume and footprint Establish a clearer rationale for contract terms Support mid-term negotiations based on observed market practice This doesn't require a supplier change or formal audit. It's simply a method for understanding whether current data services match today's needs and whether the right commercial structure still supports internal decisions. Conclusion PS25/3 requires brokers and bureaux to take a more structured view of their activity. That will influence how they configure and deliver their services, including to credit providers who rely on their data. For those buying from bureaux, this is a good time to revisit the terms in place and the rationale behind them. If supplier behaviour is changing, there's value in being prepared, commercially and operationally, before it becomes a requirement to do so.


Daily Mail
9 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Labour is 'tinkering around the edges' with its £100m plans to crackdown on small boat migrant crossings, Tories warn
Labour has been accused of 'tinkering around the edges' with its plans to crackdown on small boat crossings. The Home Office has announced measures to get tough on smuggling gangs, despite more than 25,000 illegal arrivals so far this year – but the Tories branded them 'a series of gimmicks'. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper this weekend unveiled plans to introduce sentences of up to five years in prison for anyone who advertises small boat crossings or fake passports on social media. She said she would introduce a fast-track scheme to tackle the asylum backlog, with a new law to overhaul the appeals system, in a bid to get decisions on cases within weeks. And today, the Home Office has announced £100 million of extra funding to support the pilot of the new 'one in, one out' returns agreement between the UK and France. It will also pay for up to 300 more National Crime Agency officers and new technology and equipment to step up intelligence gathering on smuggling gangs. And there will be more overtime for immigration compliance and enforcement teams as well as funding for interventions in transit countries. The deal, agreed last month, means the UK will be able to send migrants back to France in exchange for asylum seekers with links to Britain. But Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp criticised the announcements. He told the Daily Mail last night: 'This weak Labour Government has come up with a series of gimmicks to grab headlines instead of fixing the issue. 'Tinkering around the edges which will make no real difference. 'There have been more than 25,000 illegal crossings so far this year, making it the worst year in history. 'Labour has failed and their laughable claim to smash the gangs lies in tatters. They have no serious plan, just excuses, while ruthless criminal gangs flood our borders with illegal immigrants.' A No 10 source hit back: 'The Tories focused on headlines and gimmickry, we're focused on what works. 'Through our returns deal with France, investment in a border security and speeding up returns, we're making steady progress.' Public anger over small boat crossings has focused on the issue of taxpayer-funded migrant hotels, which have been the centre of a series of protests in recent weeks including in London, Newcastle and Epping in Essex. Conservative shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick warned that 'the public's patience with the asylum hotels and with the whole issue of illegal migration has snapped'. In response, Dame Angela Eagle promised that the Government was 'doing the detailed work' to crack down on small boat crossings. Asked on Sky News what her message was to protesters, Dame Angela said: 'Anger doesn't get you anywhere. 'What we have to do is recognise the values we have in this country, the rule of law we have in this country, the work we're doing with the police to protect people. 'We will close asylum hotels by the end of the Parliament. We'll do it faster if we can.' Dame Angela also said: 'We are doing all we can to deal with the challenges that the police are facing on the streets to make sure that women and girls are safe, and in fact, that everybody is safe on our streets.' She had earlier told Times Radio: 'Those who are worried and demonstrating have an absolute right to do that, so long as they do it peacefully. 'People don't have a right to then have a pop at the police, which has been happening in some isolated cases outside hotels.' Referring to plans to let police seize devices from people suspected of facilitating people smuggling, Dame Angela said the Government does not 'want absolutely every phone'. She told Times Radio: 'But we do want the phones of the people that we think are organising and facilitating, and this extra money will enable us to do much quicker analytics of the phones that we seize. 'But of course, we've got to get the Border Security Bill on the statute book to give us those extra powers.' The Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill has cleared the Commons but must undergo further scrutiny in the Lords before it becomes law. Turning to social media creators who advertise illegal routes into the UK, Dame Angela said: 'We will stop anyone who comes to the UK where we've got evidence, and what happens is that the people smugglers are getting people to say how safe the journeys were and do adverts once they're in the UK. 'We will stop that, and we will also deal with other jurisdictions and ask them to help us deal with this as well, we could certainly do that in the EU with our colleagues in Germany, in France.' Where there is 'evidence that legal routes to visas are being misused', the Government will 'tighten up the rules to stop that abuse happening', the minister added. The National Crime Agency has 91 ongoing investigations into people smuggling networks affecting the UK, the agency's director general of operations Rob Jones said. But speaking on BBC Radio 4's Today programme, Mr Jenrick said: 'The public's patience with the asylum hotels and with the whole issue of illegal migration has snapped. 'This is an issue that is beyond party politics. 'It is causing immense harm to communities, and people's lives are being wrecked as a result of it, and we simply have to fix it. 'I respect those people who are peacefully protesting outside hotels this weekend, I understand why they feel so concerned. 'They're seeing their communities damaged, and I'm afraid there is increasing evidence of a serious link between illegal migration, migration generally, and crime, particularly sexual crime, against women and girls.'