Shark nets could be removed at Bondi Beach as NSW government considers trial
The NSW government has reportedly asked Waverley, Northern Beaches and Central Coast councils to each select a beach to trial the removal of shark nets this summer, The Daily Telegraph revealed.
Minister for the Illawarra and the South Coast Ryan Park on Sunday called it an opportunity for local councils to use technology, acknowledging 'widespread' issues with the nets.
'We know the problems with nets are widespread, in particular around getting other species of marine life caught in those areas. I know that's been a challenge in my own community,' Mr Park told reporters at a press conference on Sunday morning.
'There's an opportunity for local councils to do that, then with the support of other electronic devices and other information technology initiatives and innovations to try and reduce the ability for sharks to cause damage to humans.'
He said the government was working through evidence, but a decision on removing the nets was yet to be made.
'That'll be a decision that we take as a cabinet when we see fit, but it's certainly something that we are looking at,' Mr Park said.
'I know, as a coastal MP, fire and foremost, our priority is keeping our locals and our humans and our visitors safe in the water.'
Mr Park said feedback would be sought from local councils, who are 'in charge of essentially looking after our beaches and keeping our people safe'.
Over in Waverley, Bondi and Bronte are the only beaches that use shark nets, which could spell a major change for Sydney's most iconic beach.
Waverley Mayor Cr Will Nemesh said the council would only support removing the nets if there was a significant increase in other strategies to mitigate sharks.
'Waverley Council's position is clear: the safety of our community comes first,' Mr Nemesh said.
'Ultimately the decision around shark net removal will be a decision of the state government.'
A Waverley Council spokesperson said the removal of any shark nets would be conditional on significantly increasing the use of drones and SMART drumlines at the beaches, which would need to be resourced by the state government.
'Waverly Council's submissions on this have been consistent: that safety must come first before any changes in shark nets are made,' the spokesperson said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
SBS Australia
27 minutes ago
- SBS Australia
The ADF has 'ambitions to grow' but can it fix a 'terribly difficult' geo-strategic climate?
The Australian Defence Force (ADF) has reached its highest full-time personnel levels in 15 years as the federal government maintains "ambitions to grow" the number of recruits — though it still fell short of its target for that year. Data released on Monday shows the ADF's permanent workforce grew by 1,868 over the 2024–25 financial year, bringing the total number of full-time personnel to 61,189. Despite the growth, the defence force remains behind on its ambitious target to increase the permanent headcount to at least 69,000 by the early 2030s, a benchmark set by the Albanese government in response to escalating tensions in the Indo-Pacific. Defence Minister Richard Marles described the recruitment drive as "great news for the nation". "But as good as that news is, our challenge is not just about keeping the defence force at the numbers that we're at, as important as it is to steady the ship, we have ambitions to grow the defence force through the back-end of this decade and into the 2030s," he said on Monday. "We know there is a lot more to do," Marles said. Enrolments and retention rates are up While enrolments have risen significantly, and well ahead of the government's budget forecast of 59,373, the number has still fallen short of its annual recruitment target by approximately 1,000 members. In a positive sign for retention, the number of personnel leaving the service dropped by 7.9 per cent, marking the lowest exit rate in a decade. More than 75,000 people applied to join up over 2024-25, but enlistments totalled just 7,059, mostly due to stringent recruitment standards and long processing times. Defence Personnel Minister Matt Keogh said the application process period has decreased from "over a year" down to an average of some 260 days. "Importantly for our critical roles, those that we need to be accelerating, we're now getting that process down to around 150 days, and we'll keep working to make that work faster," he said on Monday. Keogh also acknowledged some eligibility requirements were relaxed in 2024, allowing more people to apply for the ADF. "We've done things like changing eligibility criteria, making sure that our policies weren't just knocking people out of the system for no really valid reason," he said. "In the 21st century, it was in no way appropriate that just because someone had endometriosis that they could not be a member of our defence force or that because they'd had acne or a significant broken bone in their past." The ADF also opened up to permanent residents from New Zealand last year, and to permanent residents from Canada, the United Kingdom and the United States from the start of this year. Keogh estimated there were over 500 current applications from these countries, as the government looks to increase its "most important capability". "We know that we've got terribly difficult geo-strategic circumstances that we face," he said. "What we've been getting about over the last three years is making sure that we deliver on that increase in our most important capability. That is our people." Over 300 different roles The ADF is recruiting personnel for over 300 different types of roles. "Not just the things that people think about in terms of front-line army infantry or fighter pilots, but the diesel mechanics, the cyber operators, the new intake that we'll be bringing on of space operators, those people that are going to be engaged in our nuclear propelled submarine force," Keogh said. Andrew Carr, an associate professor at the Australian National University's strategic and defence studies centre, said the ADF also has growing responsibilities domestically. "We've got a number of demands upon the ADF and a lot more of those are at home in terms of natural disasters, and supporting local governments through those crises," he told SBS News. "We are starting to see a lot more of these happening at the same time. And the scale of potential problems means you need a lot more people." A 'new era' for the ADF Carr said the ADF is navigating a "new era" as it adapts to contemporary challenges and expectations amid an "identity challenge". "Over the past few decades, the ADF has been a very small but very elite professional force, that's been its identity and what it's been required to do," he said. "But now we are transitioning to a world where we need the ADF to be large, and it's not going to be as elite. And that's a real identity challenge for the ADF." Carr said the growing numbers aren't a reflection of reduced standards but rather an adaptation to a "new era". "Hopefully, conflict in our region is decades away if it ever were to come, and the effort to deter regional tensions — whether that's with China or another neighbour — will be driven by people," he said. Maintaining strong relationships, particularly with the US and UK, will also be critical to stability in the Pacific, he said.
ABC News
40 minutes ago
- ABC News
Chinese national charged under foreign interference laws
The Australian Federal Police have charged a person with foreign interference, for the third time since new laws were introduced in 2018. The woman, a Chinese national and Australian permanent resident, faced the ACT Magistrates Court today accused of covertly gathering information about the Canberra branch of Buddhist association Guan Yin Citta. The Australian Federal Police (AFP) says it is the first time the laws have been used to lay charges relating to alleged community interference. The AFP alleged the woman had been engaging in covert or deceptive conduct since 2022. The group, which is attached to the Mahayana Buddhist tradition, has been outlawed in China, and its Australian leader was barred from entering China in 2017, but is free to practice in Australia. The woman is also accused of having tasked associates to help her collect information on behalf of or in collaboration with China, or to support the intelligence activities of China. Evidence provided by an AFP informant to the court alleged the woman had received money from Chinese-based financial institutions. Police said they believed the woman had been receiving "personal taskings" from a Chinese public security bureau office through an encrypted app, which was allegedly found on the woman's phone during a raid of her premises last week. The charge carries a maximum penalty of 15 years imprisonment. The court heard the woman's husband, who was believed to be in China, held the role of vice captain in a public security ministry in a Chinese province. The woman, who cannot be named due to a temporary court suppression order, has been charged with the Commonwealth offence of reckless foreign interference. Her lawyer, James Maher, said naming the woman could make her a target for reprisal action and limit her pathways of cooperation with AFP authorities. He also applied for the woman to be bailed, but that application was denied on grounds that the woman was a flight risk and may interfere with digital evidence and witnesses. The Commonwealth, which opposed the application, claimed there was no evidence to support the risks the woman had claimed.
News.com.au
40 minutes ago
- News.com.au
The truth behind the pro-Palestine march that brought Sydney to a halt
On Sunday afternoon, Sydneysiders from all walks of life gathered in the city to join a historic march across the Harbour Bridge, despite the fears and objections of NSW Police and Premier Chris Minns. Just days prior, police and authorities moved to hastily block the march from going ahead, going as far as taking event organisers, Palestine Action Group, to the Supreme Court. At 10am on Saturday, the march received the green-light from Justice Belinda Rigg who said arguments that the protest would cause disruption were not enough to stop it. 'It is in the nature of peaceful protests to cause disruption,' she said. At that stage, only 10,000 people were expected to show up. A number which drastically rose to 50,000 following the court proceedings. It wasn't until 1pm on Sunday that people realised the sheer scale of Sydney's March for Humanity. Looking around, I saw ordinary Australians, young and old, who like myself, had turned out in some of the worst weather of the year to demand an end to the growing humanitarian crisis within Gaza. These were men, women and children who stand beside you in day-to-day life. They were your colleagues, your friends, the people you catch the bus with and the parents you see at school drop-off. Parents marched with their children on their shoulders, hearts heavy with the unshakeable truth that in another life, it could be their little ones they were fighting to save. Our teenagers stood at the front lines, their voices trembling but fierce, carrying words that echoed far louder than their years. Elderly marchers walked slowly but steadfastly, faces lined with the memory of wars they thought they'd left behind. 'I'm too old to be protesting this sh*t', said the sign of one lone elderly man. 'My parents marched against the Vietnam War, now I march for the war in Palestine,' said another sign. Chants of 'We are all Palestinian' echoed across the masses, proving one simple point: We are all human. Police reported upwards of 90,000 people attended but anyone who was there knows it was more like 300,000. Acting Assistant Commissioner Adam Johnson told the media last night that he had 'never seen a more perilous situation' in his 35 years in the job, despite no arrests or injuries. It's not often a crowd of that size is able to be on their best behaviour like that, especially in the face of confusing instructions from police halfway through. At around 3pm protesters received a geo-targeted text messaging telling them the march needed to stop due to public safety and to await further instruction. At 3.20pm, police sent out another message asking everyone to stop walking north. 'As soon as the march has stopped, we will look at turning everyone around back towards the city BUT it needs to be done in a controlled way in stages to keep everyone safe,' it read. Due to the sheer number of people, diverting the original course when so many people had already made it across the bridge was tricky, but people handled it well and avoided crushing each other towards exit points. Instead, they patiently awaited the direction of police, some even snacking on sandwiches and cucumber sticks and striking up conversation with others around them. Others, offered ponchos and umbrellas to those who had gone without. We saw better behaviour from almost 300,000 people in a confined space than we often see from fans at NRL games. The march was endorsed by hundreds of organisations and individuals, most notably: Amnesty International Australia, NSW Greens, Jewish Council of Australia, Arab Council Australia, Julian Assange, Bob Carr, Craig Foster and NSW Nurses and Midwives Association. It did not suggest Australia turn its back on our Jewish community – many of whom stood proudly alongside their Palestinian friends yesterday. Rather, it suggested that ordinary Sydneysiders refused to stay quiet while thousands starve to death within the occupied Gaza Strip. The truth is, no matter where you are from, or what 'side' you agree with; innocent people are starving and being gunned down at aid points. Innocent civilians are displaced and thousands are dead. Politics aside – what makes these people any different from you and I? When did we stop caring about what happens to our fellow human beings? It's a concerning divide that has only appeared to deepen in recent years. But yesterday, offered a glimmer of hope for the future. This morning, the protest was the hot topic of conversation for Chris Minns and Opposition Leader Sussan Ley, who opposed the closing of the bridge in separate press conferences. But don't fear Chris and Sussan, Palestine Action Group has confirmed there are 'no plans for another pro-Palestine protest over the Sydney Harbour Bridge in future.'
