Action St. Louis mobilizes tornado relief at YMCA after the storm
It's been 18 days since the tornado hit and volunteers with Action St. Louis have mobilized at the YMCA in the city's O'Fallon Park neighborhood. A spokesperson for the grassroots organization says they'll continue to help storm victims pick up the pieces and move forward.
Action St. Louis didn't wait for funding or red tape. They moved when needed and are still here to meet the moment.
'This is the people response. We are a hub that is 100% people-powered,' spokesperson Aleidra Allen said. 'The night of the tornado, we put out a Google form to just start recruiting volunteers so we could be a service to our people and try to meet any immediate needs.'
What began as a pop-up site is now a full-scale community relief hub that's helping thousands.
Kehoe, White House offer differing status updates of federal disaster assistance for May 16 tornadoes
'At our hub, people can get various services around things like getting things boarded up, tarps, debris clean-up, and also things like home goods, cleaning supplies, paper towels, flashlights, hygiene items; they can also get nonperishable food, diapers,' Allen said.
Renee Lockett, whose home was destroyed by the tornado, says she's been living in her car for the past 18 days.
'I lost everything – my clothes, my food; practically everything I own,' Lockett said. 'I can't do nothing but get help and I'm ready to receive it and I'm grateful for it.'
Action St. Louis pointed Lockett to where she could seek temporary housing and additional help. The organization's work is far from over, though. They're calling on the public to keep the momentum going with donations, supplies, and time.
'We will be here and we will continue to show up until we feel that there is a sustainable plan in place to ensure that our people will get the long-term care that they need,' Allen said.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
a minute ago
- Forbes
OpenEvidence's Meteoric Rise Is Huge For Doctors
Medical research and science has never been easier to access. OpenEvidence has raised hundreds of millions of dollars. In its most recent funding round, it raised a $210 million Series B from prominent investors such as Google Ventures and Kleiner Perkins, bringing the company's valuation to nearly $3.5 billion. The company's goal is straightforward and incredibly ambitious: to collate the entire corpus of medical knowledge and research developments in a way that is easily accessible to physicians and thereby, improve health outcomes. The service is aiming to provide a similar 'touch and feel' as other generative AI services such as Chat GPT or Google's Gemini—except, its target audience is primarily doctors. Medical science is a rapidly evolving field with a perpetually expanding sea of knowledge, especially as research and development across the fields of disease, therapeutics and human sciences continue to grow. In fact, as Sequoia Capital notes, 'a new PubMed article [which is often the flagship resource for peer-reviewed science studies]The value of this type of technology is increasingly being recognized. The latest models for OpenAI's ChatGPT (GPT 4.1 and o3) have displayed incredible efficacy in taking command of medical knowledge; in May, the company published its work with HealthBench, proposing a rubric for model performance in healthcare and also indicating that GPT's latest models performed at par or even better than standard physician evaluations. Even Google's Gemini family of models has made significant progress in this space; its MedLM suite, for example, is a highly tuned model that can aid the entire healthcare workflow, ranging from answering medical questions to deciphering unstructured health data. Why is all of this important? There are a few different reasons. First and foremost, this technology is aiming to democratize medical knowledge in a way that is easy to access. Furthermore, it comes at a time when the healthcare system, and its respective workforce, is facing unprecedented headwinds. Studies have repeatedly indicated that physician burnout and attrition are incredibly concerning problems for health systems and organizations of all sizes; physicians simply do not have the bandwidth to fulfill all of their patient care duties in addition to the increasingly prevalent administrative, compliance and regulatory burdens placed on them. This also means that there is less time for professional development and continuing education. These technologies can serve as a major advantage to the physician workflow as they provide an opportunity to easily query, fact-check and understand the latest science that is involved with a condition. Carry this even further with tools such as OpenEvidence DeepConsult, which gives physicians access to PhD-level AI agents that can conduct medical research, or Gemini's foundation models that can rapidly decipher medical images, or even AI scribing technology that can rapidly generate patient-physician encounter notes, and soon, hours can be saved from a physician's daily workflow. This translates not only to millions of dollars saved annually in system costs, but also to more time available to spend with patients, improved access to care, and ultimately, increased efficacy and quality of care provided.
The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
Watch out, Google: Trump should move online in his fight against left-wing bias
Opinions on President Trump's budget cuts to institutions like the Department of Education, NPR and PBS tend to differ along partisan lines. But the intent behind these actions is clear: to dismantle longstanding ideological bias within publicly funded educational and media institutions. However, if the administration's objective is genuinely to root out institutional bias, its scope must extend beyond traditional media. Trump must also confront the digital giants — most notably, Google, whose influence over public discourse dwarfs that of any single news outlet or federal program. Google receives substantial financial benefit from federal contracts and partnerships. It has also repeatedly faced scrutiny for partisan behavior and the suppression of conservative voices. While some argue that it is the only realistic option for search, there are alternatives that offer a more balanced experience and directly address concerns about partisan filtering. In 2019, former Google engineer Zach Vorhies leaked more than 950 internal documents exposing ideological manipulation within the company. These documents, shared with the U.S. Department of Justice, revealed a troubling ecosystem of 'blacklists,' manual overrides and algorithmic demotions specifically targeting such right-leaning news sources as Newsmax and The Western Journal. Public perception echoes these concerns. A Pew Research Center survey revealed that 73 percent of Americans believe social media platforms and browsers censor political views. Among Republicans, the figure rose to a staggering 90 percent. While partisan suspicion alone is insufficient to prove systemic bias, academic research adds weight to the claim. Robert Epstein, a behavioral psychologist with credentials from Harvard and former editor-in-chief of Psychology Today, provided peer-reviewed findings to the U.S. Senate indicating that Google's search manipulation may have influenced up to 2.6 million votes in favor of Hillary Clinton during the 2016 election. Epstein's research reveals how subtle algorithmic biases in search results can profoundly influence voter behavior. In certain demographic groups, that swing can climb to an astonishing 80 percent. This influence is particularly dangerous in close elections, where even a small nudge — between 4 percent and 8 percent — could determine the winner. He emphasized that such influence operates below the threshold of awareness, undetectable by users and immune to oversight, making it one of the most powerful and least accountable forms of political persuasion in the digital age. To be clear, Epstein had no political motive behind his findings. He was a supporter of the Clinton campaign in the 2016 election, said he has never supported a conservative candidate, and has remained center-left throughout his life. More recent audits show the trend continues. In 2024, AllSides conducted a systematic review of Google's election-related search results and found that 65 percent were geographically mismatched. AllSides concluded that this misdirection not only limited access to localized, relevant information, it also diminished the digital presence of conservative voices. Yet despite these troubling findings, Google's footprint within the federal government continues to grow. In July 2025, the tech giant's public-sector arm secured a Department of Defense contract worth up to $200 million for artificial intelligence services. Google also participates in the Joint Warfighter Cloud Capability initiative, a $9 billion cloud infrastructure project shared with Amazon and Microsoft. Through the General Services Administration, Google supplies Workspace tools to numerous federal agencies under a contract projected to save $2 billion over three years. Collaborations with DARPA, NASA, and the Department of Energy further entrench Google within critical government operations. Google isn't the only search engine available, but it still dominates the market, accounting for roughly 90 percent of global usage. That said, there are meaningful alternatives worth considering. Luxxle, for example, is a privacy-focused search engine that gives users greater control over their data and the ideological slant of the content they see. Unlike Google, it doesn't track searches, monitor user behavior, or build consumer profiles. If the Trump administration truly aims to uphold ideological neutrality and preserve intellectual freedom, cutting off funding to biased government institutions is just the first step. The greater challenge lies in confronting powerful private entities like Google, which function as modern-day gatekeepers of public discourse.
Vox
2 hours ago
- Vox
Am I actually 'too sensitive'?
Everything could be going fine until one inconsequential comment, one offhand remark ruins your day. Your mother casually criticizes you. A coworker offers unsolicited feedback on a presentation. A friend asks for everyone's opinion on where to host their birthday dinner, except yours. The infraction rolls over and over in your mind: What did they mean by that? I'm an idiot, right? Why would they do that? Hours, days, even weeks can pass and, still, you can't seem to shake what is arguably a minor slight. You ask yourself, Am I being too sensitive? Well, are you? Mark Leary, professor emeritus of psychology and neuroscience at Duke University, says sometimes, seemingly insignificant snubs are effective at getting under our skin because they send a signal that we don't matter. 'It conveys that I don't have a whole lot of relational value to you,' he says. 'You don't value your connection with me, because if you did, you'd treat me better than this.' Certain people are more sensitive to these upsets than others, Leary says, while others can easily brush them off. Vox Culture Culture reflects society. Get our best explainers on everything from money to entertainment to what everyone is talking about online. Email (required) Sign Up By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. The eternally-sensitive among us are equipped with, essentially, more emotional information-tracking sensors, according to Kelly Guynes, a licensed clinical social worker and the clinical director at the DBT Center of Houston. 'The more 'sensors' you have,' she says, 'the more data you're getting, meaning you feel the world more deeply, more intensely.' As a result, you may be more emotionally reactive. A movie that a friend thinks is merely sad could leave you in tears. You can ruminate for hours about an eyeroll from an acquaintance at a party. 'The world keeps going and I'm getting hit and hit and hit, so I never have the time, or even have learned any skills, to bring myself back to a baseline.' Without effective coping strategies, a lifetime of mini-hurts can compound. 'Maybe one friend hasn't texted me back yet, and I'm ruminating about it, and then my coworker gives me some constructive criticism, and then the vet bill was way more expensive than I thought it was going to be,' Guynes says. 'The world keeps going and I'm getting hit and hit and hit, so I never have the time, or even have learned any skills, to bring myself back to a baseline.' Being more attuned to our emotions isn't necessarily a bad thing. But if you're constantly offended or walking around with hurt feelings, it may disrupt the ability to connect with others. Your triggers may be totally perplexing to those who aren't inside your head. So, why do some people have heightened emotional awareness? What can they do about it? The role of nature and nurture The degree to which someone is emotionally sensitive can be completely out of their control. Some people are genetically predisposed to bigger feelings and have an extremely sensitive temperament, Guynes says. As a baby, they may have been harder to soothe and more affected by light, sound, and people. They may grow up into highly sensitive people — a personality trait associated with greater emotional and environmental reactivity. They're more attuned to noises, smells, and temperature, as well as social cues. (There is an online self-assessment, developed by the psychologist who first began studying highly sensitive people, to determine where on the sensitivity scale you fall.) They probably have been told at one point or another to grow thicker skin or that they're overreacting, says Audrey Kao, a therapist and registered social worker. But life experiences also impact the way you interact with and perceive others. A history of neglect or trauma as a child and past experiences of rejection may cause someone to develop rejection sensitivity — the expectation and anxiety around being burned again in the future. When a friend makes a joke at your expense, these fears are activated, 'and any behavior that remotely resembles rejection is going to be perceived as rejection,' says Ozlem Ayduk, a psychology professor at University of California, Berkeley. The desire to matter Because value and acceptance are at the root of a sensitive person's hurt feelings, they may be overly motivated to make a good impression on everyone they encounter. Some people crave the approval of many, from strangers online to their closest confidants. Others are perfectly satisfied knowing they can't please everyone and only care about the opinions of a smaller group of treasured connections. The more someone yearns for acceptance from another person, 'the more you're going to have your antennas up for any indication that other people may not care,' Leary says. Therefore, your ego might be more easily bruised when the barista doesn't remember your name because it's important to your self-worth that you're significant to them. The reality is, we can't be adored by everyone. Instead, Leary says, it can be helpful to be more discerning about whose opinions really matter. How valued and accepted you believe you are influences your reactions to perceived social slights. When people feel valued and cared for, they're better able to brush off, for instance, snide remarks from their in-laws. 'But if you perceive that your relationships and connections in your life are tenuous,' Leary says, 'you're going to be a little bit more worried about indications that you're running out of connections with other people.' Those with low self-esteem might already feel undervalued and these comments only confirm their insecurities. 'We're going to take that comment more to heart,' Kao says, 'because it feels more personal.' How to be a little less sensitive If you suspect that your sensitivity is preventing you from having healthy relationships — because others are always upsetting you or you're afraid they might reject you — you may want to learn some strategies to blunt the pain. Because those sensitive to rejection are primed to see slights everywhere, they may jump to worst-case scenarios and, for lack of a better term, overreact, Ayduk says. But every social cue can't possibly be a sign of someone's negative feelings about you. If you believe every interaction is potentially threatening, you're way more likely to read it the wrong way, Ayduk says. Emotional and rejection sensitivity are sometimes self-fulfilling prophecies, Ayduk says. If your feelings are constantly hurt by benign comments, people might stop hanging out with you, only reinforcing your fears. Ayduk is currently studying whether it's possible to break this cycle with a little self-awareness. If you know that your sensitivity can actually push people away, can you change? 'I don't know the answer yet,' Ayduk says, 'but I think just knowing is probably not enough. But knowing and then learning some skills,' like not assuming the worst, may potentially help. Reality may not be as calamitous as the story you've drafted in your head. According to Ayduk and Leary, it's helpful to remind yourself that you have a tendency to jump to the worst possible conclusion: that your friend hates you, that your neighbor thinks you're rude, that acquaintance would rather do anything else than talk to you at a party. Reality may not be as calamitous as the story you've drafted in your head. 'Maybe my mom's just having a bad day, and she doesn't feel good,' Leary says. 'But when she snaps at me, I assume it has something to do with our relationship, and it may have nothing to do with that at all.' Then, ask yourself if the perceived wrongdoing is significant in the long run, Leary says. Is your mom's short temper fleeting or is it an indication of a larger issue in the relationship? Sure, she shouldn't have snapped, but maybe this is a rare occurrence. In which case, you may decide it's not worth bringing up your hurt feelings with her. 'This is not an effort to eliminate entirely your concerns,' Leary says. 'It's just a way to try to make sure that you're not over-blowing it [out of proportion] before you think about how you should respond.' Thinking through the significance of the rebuff allows you to slow down and take a considered approach if you do decide to say something. Airing your concerns like an adult features a few gold standards you've likely heard about by now: Use 'I' statements, calmly explain why you're hurt, invite the other person to weigh in. All that applies here, too. It's much better to say, 'I've noticed you snapped at me a few times over the past few days. Is there something I'm doing wrong?' rather than, 'Are you really going to lash out at me again? I'm done.' How the other person responds is on them. They might not have realized they hurt your feelings. They may also accuse you of overreacting. If they're a more distant relation — like an acquaintance or coworker — you might need to be more guarded around them in the future and try to move on, Kao says. For closer ties, the dismissal of your feelings can be incredibly deflating, she continues. 'It's fair game to say to them,' Kao says, ''That's really invalidating and it makes me feel like my feelings are unimportant and I need to feel like my feelings are important to you.''
