North Korea used student visas to send thousands of workers to Russia, Seoul says
North Korea likely used student visas to send a large number of workers as well as troops to Russia in 2024, South Korea 's intelligence agency has said.
The sanctioned east Asian country sent at least 'thousands of workers to construction sites in various parts of Russia' over the past year, the National Intelligence Service (NIS) said on Sunday, confirming a major influx of North Korean nationals being sent to Russia.
In a briefing, the NIS official said around 4,000 North Korean workers – each being paid a monthly stipend of approximately $800 (£645) – were already believed to be in Russia, The Korean Herald reported.
Both Moscow and Pyongyang have been accused of violating a UN Security Council Resolution, by using student visas and other gaps, which bans employment to North Korean labourers.
Under the UN Security Council Resolution 2375, the UN member nations are banned from issuing work permits to the labour force of North Korea. The resolution mandated all existing North Korean workers to return home by the end of December 2019.
South Korean lawmaker and former Seoul's ambassador to Russia, Wi Sung Lac, said Russia may be recruiting North Korean workers to fill gaps in the construction industry created by its prolonged aggression against Ukraine.
'I think North Korean workers may have been recruited to make up for the labour shortages after many were drafted for the war,' the Democratic Party of Korea representative said.
The latest round of North Korean workers dispatched to Russia was lesser than what was the scenario before the UN slapped sanctions on the hermit kingdom, he said. 'But now that there are sanctions, they are not supposed to be sending workers at all,' Mr Wi said.
Pyongyang sent roughly 11,000 soldiers to help with Vladimir Putin 's war effort in November last year, four months after Kyiv 's troops seized Russian territory in Kursk.
Last week, Ukrainian and Western officials said North Korean troops have been pulled back from the frontline amid devastating losses but Ukraine's president Volodymyr Zelensky on Saturday said they were back again on the frontline.
Kim Jong Un 's forces were not seen on the battlefield for around three weeks, Ukrainian special forces said.
The reports have been backed by South Korea's spy agency, which said the North Korean troops had been withdrawn from the war frontline around the middle of January, the National Intelligence Service said earlier last week.
But on Friday, Mr Zelensky said the Russian Army had "brought back in North Korean soldiers" who were carrying out "new assaults" in the region partially occupied by Ukraine.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ITV News
2 hours ago
- ITV News
Iran could begin enriching uranium in 'matter of months', head of UN nuclear watchdog says
The head of the UN's nuclear watchdog has said the US strikes on Iran fell short of causing fell short of causing total damage to its nuclear programme, and that Tehran could restart enriching uranium 'in a matter of months'. It contradicts US President Donald Trump 's claims that the US "completely and totally obliterated" Tehran's nuclear programme. Rafael Grossi's comments appear to support an early assessment from the Pentagon's Defence Intelligence Agency, first reported on by ITV News' US partner CNN. It suggested the United States ' strikes on key Iranian nuclear sites last week did not destroy the core components of its nuclear program, and likely only set it back by months. The 12-day conflict between Israel and Iran began earlier this month when Israel launched an unprecedented attack it said aimed at preventing Tehran developing a nuclear bomb. Iran has insisted its nuclear programme is for peaceful purposes. The US then struck three key Iranian nuclear sites before a ceasefire began. The extent of the damage to Tehran's nuclear program has been debated since. US military officials have provided some new information about the planning of the strikes in recent days, but offered no new evidence of their effectiveness against Iran's nuclear programme. Following classified briefings this week, Republican lawmakers acknowledged the US strikes may not have eliminated all of Iran's nuclear materials – but argued that this was never part of the military's mission. Asked about the different assessments, Grossi, director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), told CBS's 'Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan': 'This hourglass approach in weapons of mass destruction is not a good idea.' 'The capacities they have are there. They can have, you know, in a matter of months, I would say, a few cascades of centrifuges spinning and producing enriched uranium, or less than that. "But as I said, frankly speaking, one cannot claim that everything has disappeared and there is nothing there,' he told Brennan, according to a transcript released ahead of the broadcast. 'It is clear that there has been severe damage, but it's not total damage,' Grossi went on to say. 'Iran has the capacities there; industrial and technological capacities. So if they so wish, they will be able to start doing this again.' Grossi also told CBS News that the IAEA has resisted pressure to say whether Iran has nuclear weapons or was close to having weapons before the strikes. 'We didn't see a programme that was aiming in that direction (of nuclear weapons), but at the same time, they were not answering very, very important questions that were pending.' CNN has asked the White House for comment on Grossi's claims. Grossi stressed the need for the IAEA to be granted access to Iran, to assess nuclear activities. He said Iran had been disclosing information to the agency up until recent Israeli and US strikes, but that 'there were some things that they were not clarifying to us.' 'In this sensitive area of the number of centrifuges and the amount of material, we had perfect view,' he said. 'What I was concerned about is that there were other things that were not clear. For example, we had found traces of uranium in some places in Iran, which were not the normal declared facilities. And we were asking for years, why did we find these traces of enriched uranium in place x, y or z? And we were simply not getting credible answers.' The initial Pentagon assessment said Tehran may have moved some of the enriched uranium out of the sites before they were attacked, but Trump has insisted nothing was moved. 'It's logical to presume that when they announce that they are going to be taking protective measures, this could be part of it (moving the material). But, as I said, we don't know where this material could be, or if part of it could have been, you know, under the attack during those 12 days,' Grossi told Brennan. Meanwhile, Tehran has made moves towards withdrawing from international oversight over its nuclear programme. Iran's parliament passed a bill halting cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog, while the Foreign Minister, Abbas Araghchi, also said that the country could also rethink its membership of the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), which prohibits signatories from developing nuclear weapons.
Metro
4 hours ago
- Metro
Supersonic jet from West taken out in Russia's biggest ever barrage on Ukraine
Russia launched its biggest aerial attack on Ukraine overnight, part of an escalating bombing campaign that has dashed hopes for a ceasefire. One of the F-16 warplanes Ukraine received from its western partners to help fight Russia's invasion crashed after sustaining damage while shooting down air targets, killing the pilot. Russia fired a total of 537 aerial weapons at Ukraine, including 477 drones and decoys and 60 missiles, Ukraine's air force said. Of these, 249 were shot down and 226 were lost, having likely been electronically jammed. Yuriy Ihnat, head of communications for Ukraine's air force, said the onslaught was 'the most massive air strike' on the country, taking into account both drones and various types of missiles. The attack targeted regions across Ukraine, including western Ukraine, far from the frontline, and prompted NATO countries, including Poland, to scramble aircraft. Kherson regional governor Oleksandr Prokudin said one person died in a drone strike, and another was killed when a drone hit a car in the Kharkiv region, according to its governor, Oleh Syniehubov. Six people were wounded in Cherkasy, including a child, according to regional governor Ihor Taburets. In the Lviv region in the far west of Ukraine, a fire broke out at an industrial facility in the city of Drohobych after a drone attack, which also forced parts of the city to lose power. Russian President Vladimir Putin said days ago that Moscow was ready for a fresh round of direct peace talks in Istanbul, but the war shows no signs of abating. US-led international peace efforts have so far produced no breakthrough. Two recent rounds of talks between the Russian and Ukrainian delegations in Istanbul were brief and yielded no progress on reaching a settlement. Last night, German fighter jets were scrambled to intercept a Russian spy plane spotted over the Baltic Sea – the ninth time Germany has done so this year. Days ago, it was revealed that Putin lost four warplanes worth £37 million each despite stepping up their defences after Ukraine's Operation Spiderweb. More Trending A pair of Su-34 fighters were destroyed and two more damaged after an attack on on Marinovka military airfield in Volgograd. Ukraine used long-range drones to fly more than 200 miles to inflict the latest £148 million blow to Putin's aerial firepower. It came less than a month after Russia supposedly tightened its military air base security after 40-plus strategic bombers and spy planes were hit in Ukraine's Operation Spiderweb. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Which countries have reintroduced conscription in Europe? MORE: Putin stages deadly war games after NATO agrees to increase defence spending MORE: Donald Trump is already selling 'Daddy' T-shirts for £20
Daily Mirror
5 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Iran could begin enriching uranium for nuclear bomb 'within months' in WW3 fears
The head of the International Atomic Energy Agency said US strikes had not completely destroyed Iran's nuclear sites, as Donald Trump claimed, and that they could begin enriching uranium again soon Iran could start enriching uranium again - for a possible bomb - in 'a matter of months', the head of the UN's nuclear watchdog has said. Rafael Grossi, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), said the US strikes on three Iranian sites last weekend had caused severe but 'not total' damage, contradicting Donald Trump 's claim that Iran's nuclear facilities were 'totally obliterated'. 'Frankly speaking, one cannot claim that everything has disappeared and there is nothing there,' Grossi said. Israel attacked nuclear and military sites in Iran on June 13, claiming Iran was close to building a nuclear weapon. The US later joined the strikes, dropping bombs on three of Iran's nuclear facilities - Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan. On Saturday Grossi told CBS News that Tehran could have 'in a matter of months... a few cascades of centrifuges spinning and producing enriched uranium'. He added that Iran still possessed the 'industrial and technological capacities... so if they so wish, they will be able to start doing this again'. The IAEA is not the first body to suggest that Iran's nuclear abilities could still continue. A leaked preliminary Pentagon assessment also found the US strikes probably only set the programme back by months. US president Donald Trump responded furiously by declaring that Iran's nuclear sites were 'completely destroyed' and accused the media of 'an attempt to demean one of the most successful military strikes in history'. For now, Iran and Israel have agreed to a ceasefire, but Trump has said he would 'absolutely' consider bombing Iran again if intelligence found that it could enrich uranium to concerning levels. In a speech on Thursday, Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said the strikes had achieved nothing significant. But its foreign minister Abbas Araghchi said 'excessive and serious' damage was done. Iran's already-strained relationship with the IAEA was further challenged on Wednesday, when its parliament moved to suspend cooperation with the atomic watchdog, accusing the IAEA of siding with Israel and the US. On Friday, Araghchi said on X that 'Grossi's insistence on visiting the bombed sites under the pretext of safeguards is meaningless and possibly even malign in intent'. Israel and the US attacked Iran after the IAEA last month found Tehran to be in breach of its non-proliferation obligations for the first time in 20 years. Iran insists that its nuclear programme is peaceful, and for civilian use only. Despite the Iranian refusal to work with his organisation, Grossi said that he hoped he could still negotiate with Tehran. 'I have to sit down with Iran and look into this, because at the end of the day, this whole thing, after the military strikes, will have to have a long-lasting solution, which cannot be but a diplomatic one,' he said. Under a 2015 nuclear deal with world powers, Iran was not permitted to enrich uranium above 3.67% purity - the level required for fuel for commercial nuclear power plants - and was not allowed to carry out any enrichment at its Fordo plant for 15 years. However, Trump abandoned the agreement during his first term in 2018, saying it did too little to stop a pathway to a bomb, and reinstated US sanctions. Iran retaliated by increasingly breaching the restrictions - particularly those relating to enrichment. It resumed enrichment at Fordo in 2021 and had amassed enough 60%-enriched uranium to potentially make nine nuclear bombs, according to the IAEA.
