Global EV sales jump 24% in June though North American market struggles, research firm says
Still, EV sales in the United States were down 1% in the month and will struggle to pick up this year, after President Donald Trump's spending bill cut tax credits sooner than anticipated, Rho Motion's data manager Charles Lester said.
North America, also weighed by slowing sales in Canada, lagged for the first time behind the "rest of the world" countries, which include emerging markets in Southeast Asia and South and Central America, Lester said.
Global automakers face a 25% import tariff in the United States, the world's second-largest car market, causing many of them to withdraw their outlooks for 2025.
In Europe, incentives, opens new tab for retail and fleet buyers in key markets such as Germany and Spain, alongside a growing availability of cheap EVs, are expected to support electric car sales through the second half of the year.
While some of the most successful EVs in the small vehicle segment are produced by European carmakers such as Volkswagen (VOWG.DE), opens new tab and Renault (RENA.PA), opens new tab, those by Chinese brands including BYD (002594.SZ), opens new tab are taking up market share in the continent and driving growth in emerging markets, Lester said.
Global sales of battery-electric vehicles and plug-in hybrids rose to 1.8 million units in June, Rho Motion data showed.
Sales in China jumped 28% from the same month last year to 1.11 million vehicles.
Europe posted a 23% increase to about 390,000 units, while North American sales fell 9% to over 140,000.
Sales in the rest of the world surged 43% to exceed 140,000 vehicles.
"There's been reports over the last few months of a slowdown potentially in China" due to some cities running out of subsidies, Lester said.
"But overall, we'd expect in (the second half) for more subsidy amounts to be available," leading to a "big boost" in volumes towards the end of the year, he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
6 minutes ago
- Reuters
Volvo Cars Q2 operating profit falls as tariffs bite
STOCKHOLM, July 17 (Reuters) - Sweden-based Volvo Cars ( opens new tab reported a steep fall in second-quarter adjusted operating profit on Thursday and said demand remain under pressure as tariffs hits. Its quarterly operating profit excluding items affecting comparability fell to 2.9 billion Swedish crowns ($297.89 million) from 8.0 billion a year ago. ($1 = 9.7352 Swedish crowns)
The Guardian
6 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Tax on AI and crypto could fund climate action, says former Paris accords envoy
Governments should consider taxing artificial intelligence and cryptocurrencies to generate funds to deal with the climate crisis, one of the architects of the Paris agreement has said. Laurence Tubiana, the chief executive of the European Climate Foundation and a former French diplomat, is co-lead of the Global Solidarity Levies Task Force, an international initiative to find new sources of funds for climate action by taxing highly polluting activities including aviation and fossil fuel extraction. She said cryptocurrency should certainly be taxed, and levies on AI should be considered. 'That could be a first step – again, it's the same rationale [for AI as taxing cryptocurrency], because they use a lot of energy,' she said. 'Crypto seems to be something which is not regulated at all, and of course it's a concern, from the financial stability element.' The equivalent of Poland's annual energy consumption is expended each year just on generating bitcoin, one of the leading cryptocurrencies. AI also consumes vast resources, resulting in IT companies scrabbling to secure electricity supplies in locations around the world. Taxing AI could prove tricky, Tubiana conceded, as companies might try to shift the location of their datacentres. Although there was likely to be 'pushback' against taxing cryptocurrencies, particularly from the US, where Donald Trump is an enthusiastic supporter of the technology, she said central bankers had expressed an interest. 'Because we need to regulate it – it's organised crime sometimes, so you should look at where the money's coming from, and who is the user,' Tubiana said. The taskforce has assigned a group of experts to examine how this could be achieved. The taskforce has scored an early success in the form of an agreement among some countries to put new charges on business-class and first-class airline tickets, and private jets. France, Spain, Kenya, Barbados, Somalia, Benin, Sierra Leone, and Antigua and Barbuda were the first countries to sign up to the accord announced at the end of June. The French president, Emmanuel Macron, said: 'We have to mobilise more and more countries in order for these critical sectors which are benefiting from globalisation to contribute to the financing of this common effort [to combat the climate crisis]. I want to urge all possible countries to join this international framework because it's absolutely key, and it's part of our agenda.' Such taxes could raise €147bn (£127bn) a year, if the big economies joined in. The use of private jets increased by almost 50% between 2019 and 2023, and first- and business-class flying recovered more speedily than economy class after the Covid lockdowns. Polls suggest that charging premier-class passengers more would be a popular move. Tubiana said: 'When you have your car, you pay tax, and when you fly you don't pay tax, so there is an element of justice there that resonates.' Countries could impose such taxes without a global agreement, she added. 'The aviation tax is not that complicated, because it's really a sovereign decision.' A potential carbon tax on shipping is also still under discussion, after the International Maritime Organization agreed steps towards such a deal in April. A further meeting will take place in October, and Tubiana said she was 'reasonably optimistic' a new levy would be decided. The taskforce is also examining options such as a tax on buying shares in the stock market, which could raise as much as €105bn a year without distorting the market, according to research. Sign up to Down to Earth The planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essential after newsletter promotion Rebecca Newsom, the global political lead of Greenpeace International's Stop Drilling Start Paying campaign, urged the taskforce to go further and push for taxes on fossil fuel production. 'The obvious next step is to hold oil and gas corporations to account,' she said. 'As fossil fuel barons rake in obscene profits, and people are battered with increasingly violent floods, storms and wildfires, it's no surprise that eight out of 10 people support making them pay. Members of the Global Solidarity Levies Task Force and rich countries around the world should act upon this enormous public mandate.' Tubiana, who guided the Cop21 conference in 2015 at which the Paris agreement was signed, also expressed concern about the direction France was taking in international climate negotiations. Macron has mooted a delay to the European Commission's proposal of a 90% cut to greenhouse gas emissions by 2040, a target that is supposed to be confirmed by the EU parliament and member states in September before the Cop30 climate summit in Brazil in November. Tubiana said Macron's new-found hesitation over climate policy was 'a very sad story'. She warned that it would backfire and would reduce the chances of a strong outcome for Cop30, at which countries must set new emissions goals under the Paris agreement. 'How can we ask anybody to do something if we're not doing it, if we're not proving that we believe we can decarbonise the economy?' she said. 'I hope they will wake up to the bad signals they are giving. It's really not reasonable to think that delaying action will benefit the economy of France. We need innovation, we don't need to delay.'
Telegraph
6 minutes ago
- Telegraph
It's no longer a rip-off, but I'd still never give my money to St James's Place
The two questions I get asked the most, once people realise what I do for a living, are 'Do you think I should invest in crypto?' and 'Can you recommend any financial advisers?'. My answer to the first question is, of course, that cryptocurrency is not an investment – but if you fancy a flutter, go for it, or stick a tenner on the horses. Paying for financial advice is anathema to a financial journalist. Avid readers of The Telegraph are well-armed to tackle the major personal finance questions: how much to save into a pension; what to invest your Isa in; where to find the best mortgage and savings rates; and how to cut your tax bill. There are some areas where you must, under the City watchdog's rules, speak to a regulated financial adviser – equity release, transferring a defined benefit pension and so on. But for other decisions, many people, perhaps the majority, don't have the time or inclination to work everything out themselves. The more complicated your finances, the more likely you would benefit from some hand-holding. Tax advice, in particular, can be invaluable, and a good adviser can save a client thousands of pounds quite easily. Which brings us to St James's Place, Britain's biggest wealth manager. It claims to have more than one million customers, and manages a record £190bn. Its target is the 'mass affluent', those with decent pensions and savings, but not the mega-wealthy. However, for years, it has been dogged by claims that its fees were high and opaque. It also operated a controversial 'early withdrawal charge', which could be as high as 6pc. In countless articles, it defended this charge, and claimed it wasn't an exit penalty, but simply a way of recouping fees it would otherwise forgo. St James's Place also claimed the charges offered 'strong client value', and that customers understood it (which was total nonsense – I could barely get my head around it). The issue came to a head last year when the wealth manager was forced to set aside £426m for compensation when it discovered some clients had not been receiving annual reviews from their 'partners', the name for its army of self-employed advisers. Clearly, it needed to change. This week, St James's Place finally confirmed a new charging model from August 26 that splits out the costs of advice, the product (pensions, bonds, Isas and so on) and fund management. This should make it far easier to compare St James's Place with other wealth management firms. The exit charge has been abolished for new customers. It has also lowered its initial fee, the charge applied when you first become a client. Previously, customers paid a whopping 4.5pc of the wealth they were handing over, plus an ongoing charge of 0.5pc. This has been replaced with a tiered initial fee of 3pc on the first £250,000, 2pc on the next £250,000 and 1pc above £500,000. The ongoing charge has risen to 0.8pc. St James's Place says a new client with £400,000 to invest would pay £10,500 as an initial advice fee, plus around £3,000 each year for ongoing financial advice. Product and fund fees are charged on top. Under the old model, the same £400,000 in a pension would have been charged £18,000 initially (but spread over six years) plus £1,900 ongoing each year. While the new charges are roughly in line with the rest of the industry, it still feels like a huge chunk of change to be handing over. And remember, with the kind of percentage fees commonly used by wealth managers and stockbrokers, if your investment grows, you pay more in fees. This is despite the fact that in many cases, your wealth is being inflated by global markets, not the skill of an adviser or fund manager. St James's Place is also what is known as a 'restricted' adviser, meaning it will only ever recommend certain solutions or investments. A true independent financial adviser can, in theory, recommend anything under the sun. My financial needs are simple. A stocks and shares Isa filled with passive tracker funds that cost pennies per year, and a company pension where I put in as much as I can afford. Increasingly, the cost of investing is coming down. Brokers such as Interactive Investor charge fixed fees, which can be incredibly cheap depending on how much you have saved. But there will always be people who need more help. The Financial Conduct Authority has finally recognised this, and is changing its rules to allow pension and Isa providers to offer basic advice to help people avoid the biggest mistakes. Currently, DIY platforms have been too scared of compensation claims to give so much as a nudge to customers. If you do want fully-fledged advice or wealth management, make sure you wholly understand what you're paying for in pounds and pence. Ask how many reviews you will get, and whether you should be in passive funds rather than expensive active ones. Lastly, haggle on the fees. The more money you have, the harder you can squeeze.
