You're using plasters WRONG! First aid myth is triggering nasty infections, doctor warns
It's an age-old first aid adage that many swear by: It's important to let a wound breathe.
But now, a TV doctor has revealed 'airing out' a cut rather than covering it with a plaste can not only prevent healing, but also result in potentially serious infections and scarring.
Dr Zoe Williams, an NHS GP working in London and resident doctor for ITV 's This Morning, warned forgoing plasters for even a short while is one of the biggest mistakes you can make.
Even tiny cuts can get infected with germs and bacteria during everyday activities like showering or swimming, she said in a fresh alert.
In worst-case scenarios, these infections can spread to other areas of the body, and even trigger life-threatening sepsis.
The best way to treat a wound is to apply a plaster, which ensures it has a clean and moist environment, she advised.
'This is not only important for rapid healing, but also to minimise scarring.'
But she added that it is important to clean a graze before applying a plaster to the wound.
If you try and naturally 'air out' your wound it can prevent it from healing as well as cause infections and scarring Dr Zoe Williams warned
This can be done by washing your hands, rinsing the wound with clean water or wound spray and gently drying it with a clean cloth first.
Dr Williams' advice comes as a poll of 2,000 adults by the plaster company Elastoplast found 42 per cent believed the myth letting a wound breath is the best way for it to heal.
Only 14 per cent of respondents knew that keeping a cut moist would help it to repair faster.
The poll also found a third of the adults had touched a wound before washing the hands.
While it isn't clear if it is because of how they treated their wounds, the adults reported scarring (19 per cent), infections (17 per cent) and swelling (16 per cent).
The doctor recommended hydrocolloid plasters which can help the cut 'maintain a moist environment' and offer pain relief and longer wear.
But if you have an allergy to plasters you can still cover up your wound with dressing like a bandage or pad, which can be bought from pharmacies, she added.
The most common ways adults got cuts, grazes and injuries were indoor DIY work (39 per cent), hiking or walking (27 per cent), playing team sports (23 per cent) and cycling or mountain (19 per cent), the survey revealed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Nutrition: Apple really dey good for your health?
Dem dey tell us say one apple a day dey keep di doctor away, but dis fruit really get dat kain positive effect on our health? Di world love apple. Every year, na almost 100 million tonnes of apples dem dey produce globally. Dis fruits dey come in different colours and for long, don get reputation say e dey help us stay healthy. Di popular saying "an apple a day dey keep di doctor away" originate from one Welsh proverb wey dem write for 1866: "Eat an apple wen you dey go to bed and you go keep di doctor from earning im bread." But any truth dey dis longstanding saying? And shey apples dey especially healthy compared with oda fruits? First, make we tink about di nutrients wey apples contain. For one tin, dem be rich source of phytochemicals, including flavanols. Dis compounds don dey linked to plenti health benefits, like maintaining healthy weight and to lower your heart disease risk. Why apples dey so healthy Apples also contain various polyphenols, including anthocyanins, wey dey help give some apple peel im red colour and dey associated wit improved heart health. Anoda polyphenol wey you go find in apples na phloridzin. Dem find say e dey help control blood glucose. Lots of fibres also dey inside apples, mostly pectin, wey dey reduce di amount of low-density lipoproteins (LDLs) – di unhealthy form of cholesterol – in our blood. Pectin also dey lower di amount of sugar and fat wey dey absorb from food, help to stabilise our blood sugar levels. Dis nutrients wey dey inside apples be like dem dey offer health benefits. One 2017 review of five studies bin report say to dey eat apples dey associated wit 18% reduction in di risk of developing type 2 diabetes. Anoda review from 2022, wey analyse 18 studies, find say to dey eat more apples, or apple-derived foods like apple juice, fit reduce cholesterol, if you sustain di habit for more dan one week. To get healthy diet in general fit lower your risk of cancer by up to 40%, mostly thanks to bioactive compounds, phytochemicals, wey dey common in apples. Some studies don even link apple consumption to get lower risk of developing some certain cancers. To dey eat apples regularly dey associated wit plenti health benefits – and we know say dem dey full wit healthy compounds. But apples, dey specifically, any more effective dan oda plant-based foods for keeping di doctor away? "Apples no get much vitamin C, and dem no get no iron or calcium, but dem get so many oda ingredients wey dey promote health and do wonderful tins for di body," Janet Colson, professor of nutrition and food science for Middle Tennessee State University in di US tok. "Some researchers say apples get di 'second highest level of antioxidant power among all fruits" Apples contain compounds wey dey common to many fruits and vegetables, including those helpful polyphenols, Flavia Guzzo, associate professor of plant biology for University of Verona in Italy tok. Polyphenols be strong antioxidant molecules. Dem dey help to balance di ratio of antioxidants to free radicals in our bodies – free radicals dey highly reactive, potentially cell-damaging oxygen molecules. By keeping free radicals in check, we dey reduce our risk of developing diseases including cancer and heart disease through long-term inflammation. "Some researchers say apples get di 'second highest level of antioxidant power among all fruits" Apples contain compounds wey dey common to many fruits and vegetables, including those helpful polyphenols, Flavia Guzzo, associate professor of plant biology for di University of Verona in Italy tok. Some researchers say apples get di "second highest level of antioxidant power among all fruits". Apples also contain di polyphenol phloridzin, wey dey much less common within di oda fruits in your fruit bowl. Like pectin, phloridzin appears to lessen di amount of sugar wey dey absorb into our blood from food. Apples also be good source of phenolic compounds, wey be anoda form of phytochemical. E get one study wey find say pipo wey dey live in di US get around one fifth of dia total phenolic intake from apples. Research suggests say apple phenolic compounds dey associated wit lower risk of heart attack, cancer, asthma, diabetes and obesity. But no be just di powerful polyphenols and antioxidant punch wey dey make some scientists to recommend apples over oda fruit. In some papers, scientists dey recommend regular apple-eating sake of say di fruits dey simply so widely available. Wey mean say, to dey eat dem regularly na sometin wey dey relatively achievable for many pipo. E dey clear say apples get di potential to improve our health. But na quite a big claim to say to dey eat one every day go make us no go to see doctor. One 2015 study bin chook eye for dis exact question. Researchers bin analyse one survey of nearly 9,000 pipo, wey di participants tok wetin dem eat during one 24-hour period, wey dem tok say dey indicative of dia typical daily diet. Dey find say apple-eaters dey more likely dan apple-avoiders to keep di doctor away, however, dis result no dey statistically significant wen we wan take into account say apple-eaters dey more likely to be more educated and dey less likely to smoke. "Di main finding, no say much of di association between pipo wey dey regularly consume one apple a day and di likelihood to visit physician, na sake of say e dey complex," lead researcher Matthew Davis, adjunct associate professor of epidemiology for Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine in New Hampshire, US tok. "Pipo wey dey consume apples, based on our analyses, dey healthier in general." But dem also find say daily apple-eaters dey less likely to dey reliant on prescription medication – and dis na still one significant finding wen pesin adjust di socioeconomic differences between participants wey dey eat one apple per day and those wey no dey eat am. Therefore, di paper conclude say, one more key saying fit be say: "One apple a day go keep di pharmacist away." But Davis get issues wit di apple-a-day tok, and say anoda reason fit dey why im and im colleagues no find connection between daily apple consumption and to dey go see doctor. "Di underlying assumption na say you dey only visit di doctor wen you dey sick, but pipo dey visit di doctor for annual check-ups and oda prevention-type tins," e tok. Dis na why Davis also analyse di data around di likelihood of using prescription medication, too. "E mean say apples dey reduce di likelihood to get chronic illness," e tok. But ultimately, e say, apples alone no dey enough to stop your visit di GP, and say di most impactful tin na to get healthy diet overall. "Wey, really, be wetin di saying dey reason," e tok. Colson agree say di apple-a-day agree to regularly eating plant-based foods. Apples na good example sake of say dem dey so readily available, affordable and get long shelf-life. "Before fridges, you fit put apples for cellar and dem go last long time, and dem no dey attract mould," she tok. Oda studies don find health benefits wey relate to daily apple-eating – but only wen pipo dey consume more dan one per day. "Anoda study find say to dey eat three apples daily dey stimulate statistically significant weight loss" Inside one study wey dey publish for 2020, researchers bin split 40 participants (wey all get small elevated cholesterol levels) into two groups. One of those groups bin eat two apples per day while di oda get one apple drink wit similar calories. Di experiment bin last eight weeks and, apart from di apple products, di participants no make any oda changes to dia diets. Di researchers bin find say di apple-eaters get clinically significant lower level of cholesterol, at di end of di study. However, one weakness of dis study na im small size; 40 participants na relatively low sample size from which to draw any big conclusions. Anoda study bin find say to dey eat three apples daily dey stimulate statistically significant weight loss and improved blood glucose levels (wey bin no dey statistically significant wen e dey followed up) in 40 overweight women. As for how best to eat apples to get di greatest benefit from dem, Guzzo advise against removing di skin first. "We suppose dey eat di peel of apples, as dis na wia you go find most of di apple polyphenols," she tok. And ancient varieties dey preferable to new varieties of apple, Guzzo tok. For 2021, she and colleagues bin publish one paper wey dey look at di nutritional value of di Pom Prussian apple, one ancient apple from northern Italy, wey she find say dey richer in polyphenols dan more modern apple varieties. "Wen breeders select new varieties, dem dey look oda traits, including size and taste and robustness of di trees," she tok. "And wen dem select dis traits, rather dan polyphenol content, di variety become poorer [from a health point of view]." She tok say some polyphenols fit produce a bitter taste, and say sweeter varieties probably contain a lower proportion of dis compounds. As for colour, Guzzo tok say e no matter so much. Both di polyphenols wey dey cause apple skin to dey red or green dey both good for us. Ultimately, while to dey eat one apple a day fit no mean say you go visit di doctor less often, e fit impact your overall health or your reliance on long-term medication. But, as e always be di case, di bigger picture dey complicated. To dey eat one apple a day dey great, Guzzo tok – but only if dat na part of a diet wey dey rich in various oda plant-based foods, since dat na di key driver of good health.
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
This 10-year plan may be the last chance to save the NHS
The 10-year plan for the National Health Service that Sir Keir Starmer is expected to publish in the next few days is likely to be a somewhat incoherent document. From the advance publicity, it would seem to have a lot of disconnected ideas in it, some good, some not so good and some irrelevant. The government hopes that weight-loss drugs will offer the hope of a big advance against obesity-related illnesses – but this comes after new figures raised concerns about their safety. If large language models can speed up the development of new pharmaceuticals, so much the better. But we remain sceptical about whether supermarkets ought to be recruited into policing their customers' calorie intakes. What will decide the success or failure of the NHS over the next decade, however, will be the design of the structural reforms to the service. Wes Streeting, the health and social care secretary, has made a good start in two respects. He has welcomed private-sector providers to help deliver NHS services free at the point of need, and he has taken an axe to the central bureaucracy of NHS England. The test for the 10-year plan will be the extent to which it brings in further changes to incentives throughout the NHS so that it becomes responsive to patients. Sir Jim Mackey, the new chief executive of the NHS, says many of the right things. 'It feels like we've built mechanisms to keep the public away because it's an inconvenience,' he says in his first interview since taking up the post three months ago. He says of the current NHS: 'It takes forever. It costs a fortune. We need to 'de-layer it' because it's expensive, it slows decision-making down, it de-powers people who need to make decisions.' The sentiment is right, but again, some of his ideas seem better than others. We are not convinced that using patient satisfaction surveys to decide how much money NHS trusts receive is going to work. The evidence of reform under the last Labour government was that the mere existence of competition from private-sector providers had a dramatic effect on the performance of NHS units. Already, there are the very early signs that the extra resources put into the NHS are bearing fruit, less than 12 months after the change of government. Luke Tryl, the opinion pollster for More in Common, reported on BBC's Newsnight on Friday that people in focus groups are starting to report positive experiences of the NHS for the first time since the pandemic. 'If there is a bright spot for the government, it's the NHS,' he said. One of the biggest challenges for Sir Jim and Mr Streeting, however, is more political than structural. They have to send the starkest message to doctors: please do not go on strike; take responsibility; show leadership; it is up to you to make the NHS work, because if it cannot be turned round this time, then it probably is the end of this model of healthcare. Sir Jim appears to understand this. He says that his 'big worry' is that if the NHS cannot deliver a service that is better at listening to patients – the particular example he gave was maternity care – 'we'll lose the population; if we lose the population, we've lost the NHS; for me, it's straightforward: the two things are completely dependent on each other.' He is absolutely right. Universal healthcare free at the point of need is a noble idea, but it desperately needs Labour's reforms to work if it is to survive.
Scottish Sun
2 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
I had a stroke two years ago and STILL can't swallow – help!
Got a health-related problem? Send it to Zoe, email below ASK DR ZOE I had a stroke two years ago and STILL can't swallow – help! OUR resident specialist and NHS GP, Dr Zoe Williams, shares her expert advice. Today, Dr Zoe helps a reader who is suffering from total dysphagia and wants to know which treatments are available. Advertisement 2 Dr Zoe Williams helps Sun readers with their health concerns Credit: Olivia West 2 This week a reader still does not have the ability to swallow following a stroke two years ago Q) FOLLOWING a stroke two years ago at the age of 69, I have total dysphagia and have been peg tube fed since. Everything else is back to normal except the ability to swallow but despite doing all the exercises, given by the Speech and Language Therapy team, nothing has worked. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation therapy is private and expensive. Is there any other treatment available? A) Dysphagia is the inability to swallow, which is why you have been fed via a tube into the stomach. Advertisement I'm sorry to hear that you haven't seen improvement despite support from SALT. NMES aims to retrain the nerves and muscles, and SALT exercises increase effectiveness. But it lacks sufficient robust evidence at the moment to be rolled out. However, it can be used as part of clinical trials or audits. A newer NHS-supported treatment, pharyngeal electrical stimulation, targets the throat's pharynx region. It aims to 'rewire' nerve pathways. Clinical trials (eg, the PHADER study) show it improves swallowing safety and reduces aspiration risk in stroke patients. The NHS is also currently investigating transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) aimed to reactivate swallowing centres in the brain. Advertisement Other therapies include Botox if muscle stiffness is an issue and surgery to dilate the oesophagus. Do request a multidisciplinary reassessment (neurologist and SALT) to explore your options. And do ask about NHS trials. Send your questions for Dr Zoe to: health@
