Grandmother denies assaulting toddler who died after head injury
Kerry Ives, 46, and her husband Michael Ives, 47, are alleged to have been in the living room of their home in Flintshire, North Wales, with grandson Ethan Ives-Griffiths on August 14 2021 when he suffered a 'catastrophic' head injury, leading to his death two days later.
Giving evidence at Mold Crown Court on Wednesday, she was asked by Owen Edwards KC, defending: 'Did you assault Ethan on August 14?'
She replied: 'No.'
Ives also denied seeing, helping with or encouraging an assault on that date.
The grandmother, who wiped her eyes with a tissue at points during her evidence, described Ethan as a 'bubbly little child' and said he came to stay at their home in Garden City from about June 24 2021 for a few weeks, before going back to his mother – her daughter, Shannon Ives.
Shannon and Ethan then both came to stay at the house from July 16 until his death, the court heard.
Asked how her daughter behaved towards Ethan, she said: 'She used to smack him, up the head.'
After Mr Edwards asked in what circumstances that would happen, Ives said: 'He'd probably pissed her off, just by laughing at her if she told him off.'
She said on August 14 she noticed a red mark on Ethan's face after he had been in the bedroom with his mother.
Ives said she did not see Shannon hit Ethan that day, but was later reminded of her defence statement in which she said she saw Shannon strike her son to his head as they walked to the living room.
She told the court she was in the living room with her husband that evening, while Shannon was upstairs, when she turned and saw Michael Ives catching Ethan.
Ives said: 'Michael picked him back up and then he did it again so Michael lay him on the carpet.'
Asked how it looked, she said: 'It was horrible.'
She said she shouted for Shannon, who came down from upstairs and later called her other daughter, Nicole, over Facetime, the court heard.
The accused said: 'Nicole had gone through something similar with her son. I just needed some advice for what to do.'
She then rang an ambulance, but the court heard the time between Kerry Ives shouting for her daughter to come downstairs and phoning emergency services was 18 minutes.
Ives said: 'I was panicking. I didn't know what was going on.'
Kerry Ives, originally from Wolverhampton, accepted the way her husband carried Ethan, by his arm, in CCTV footage from August 4 2021, was 'cruel'.
She said: 'It wasn't nice.'
Ives said at the time she did not see her husband holding Ethan in that way and denied the footage showed her watching as Ethan was carried from a trampoline in the back garden.
She said: 'I was just staring, that's what I usually do, just stare and glaze.'
Asked what she would have done if she had seen her husband carrying the toddler like that, she said: 'I'd have told him to pack it in.'
She accepted she did see him lift Ethan over a railing by his arm in later footage which was shown to the court.
Gordon Cole KC, defending Shannon Ives, said: 'Do you regret how Michael treated Ethan?'
She said: 'Yes.'
When Mr Cole asked why she had not initially told the jury she had seen her husband carry Ethan like that, she said: 'I can't answer.'
She added: 'I'm not protecting him.'
Michael and Kerry Ives, of Kingsley Road, Garden City, deny murder, an alternative count of causing or allowing the death of a child, and cruelty to a person under 16.
Shannon Ives, of Nant Garmon, Mold, denies causing or allowing the death of a child and cruelty to a person under 16.
Click below to see the latest Wales headlines

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Man injured after being hit by car twice before vehicle abandoned
A man was hurt after being hit by a car twice, police have said. Officers rushed to Pope Road in Wolverhampton following the incident on Wednesday, July 2. Ambulance crews treated the man, who is in his 40s, at the roadside at around 2pm before taking him to hospital. The vehicle thought to have hit him was then found abandoned nearby. READ MORE: Midland motorway crash leaves one dead after 'report of injured person in road' Get breaking news on BirminghamLive WhatsApp, click the link to join Officers are now conducting enquiries as they investigate what happened. A spokesperson for West Midlands Police : "We are investigating after a man was struck by a car in Pope Road, Wolverhampton, on Wednesday (2 July). "Officers attended after being alerted by ambulance service colleagues to a man with injuries at around 2.15pm. "The man in his 40s was treated at the scene before being taken to hospital with injuries which are not believed to be life-threatening "It is believed the car struck the man twice before driving away. It was later found abandoned nearby and recovered by investigators." They continued: "Enquiries are on-going to establish the exact circumstances and to identify and trace those involved. "CCTV and doorbell footage is being retrieved and reviewed as the investigation continues with door-to-door enquiries also being carried out. "Anyone with information can contact us on 101, quoting crime reference 20/295245/25. "To pass on information anonymously call independent charity Crimestoppers on 0800 555 111." You can get all your favourite content from BirminghamLive on WhatsApp. Click here to sign up for breaking updates about the biggest stories in the region. If you prefer reading our stories on your phone, consider downloading the BirminghamLive app. You can get it from Apple here and for Android here. And finally, if there is a story you think our journalists should be looking into, we want to hear from you. Email us on newsdesk@
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Jeremy Clarkson blasts 'chinless losers with an aerosol can' at Brize Norton
Jeremy Clarkson has hit out at 'chinless losers with an aerosol can'. The journalist and Chipping Norton farmer has blasted Palestine Action following their alleged vandalism at RAF Brize Norton last month. Writing in his column for The Sun, the former Top Gear and Grand Tour Host criticised the decision to label the group a terrorist organisation. He wrote: 'One of the (many) mistakes George Bush made after the 9/11 attacks was describing the hijackers as 'terrorists'. 'This is something the British learned during the Troubles in Northern Ireland. Never refer to the bombers as terrorists. It makes them sound important. READ MORE: 'It's better to refer to them as 'criminals'. Which makes them sound like shoplifters. 'We seem to have forgotten this simple thing now, though, because the group that strolled into Brize Norton air base last week and spray-painted those jets are about to be listed as a terrorist organisation. 'No it isn't. It's just a bunch of chinless losers with an aerosol can. And that's a long way from the Red Brigade.' The ban Palestine Action has come into force from today, designating it as a terror group after a late-night legal bid to delay it failed. It makes membership of, or support for, the direct action group a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. The move to ban the organisation was announced after two Voyager aircraft were damaged at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire on June 20, an incident claimed by Palestine Action, which police said caused around £7 million worth of damage. In response to the ban, a group of around 20 people are set to gather and sit in front of the Gandhi statue in London's Parliament Square on Saturday afternoon, according to campaign group Defend Our Juries. Help support trusted local news Sign up for a digital subscription now: As a digital subscriber you will get: Unlimited access to the Oxford Mail website Advert-light access Reader rewards Full access to our app They will hold signs saying: 'I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action.' The newly proscribed group lost a late-night Court of Appeal challenge on Friday to temporarily stop it being banned, less than two hours before the move came into force at midnight. Earlier that day Huda Ammori, the group's co-founder, unsuccessfully asked the High Court to temporarily block the Government from designating the group as a terrorist organisation, before a potential legal challenge against the decision to proscribe it under the Terrorism Act 2000. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action on June 23, stating that the vandalism of the two planes was 'disgraceful' and that the group had a 'long history of unacceptable criminal damage'. MPs in the Commons voted 385 to 26, majority 359, in favour of proscribing the group on Wednesday, before the House of Lords backed the move without a vote on Thursday. Four people – Amy Gardiner-Gibson, 29, Jony Cink, 24, Daniel Jeronymides-Norie, 36, and Lewis Chiaramello, 22 – have all been charged in connection with the incident. They appeared at Westminster Magistrates' Court on Thursday after being charged with conspiracy to enter a prohibited place knowingly for a purpose prejudicial to the safety or interests of the United Kingdom, and conspiracy to commit criminal damage, under the Criminal Law Act 1977. Lawyers for Ms Ammori took her case to the Court of Appeal on Friday evening, and in a decision given at around 10.30pm, refused to grant the temporary block. Raza Husain KC, for Ms Ammori, made a bid to have the case certified as a 'point of general public importance' to allow a Supreme Court bid, but the Lady Chief Justice Baroness Carr said they would not get to the Supreme Court before midnight. The judge added that any application should be made before 4pm on Monday and refused a bid to pause the ban coming into effect pending any Supreme Court bid. In an 11-page written judgment, Baroness Carr, Lord Justice Lewis and Lord Justice Edis said: 'The role of the court is simply to interpret and apply the law. 'The merits of the underlying decision to proscribe a particular group is not a matter for the court…Similarly, it is not a matter for this court to express any views on whether or not the allegations or claims made by Palestine Action are right or wrong.' They also said: 'People may only be prosecuted and punished for acts they engaged in after the proscription came into force.' In his decision refusing the temporary block, High Court judge Mr Justice Chamberlain said: 'I have concluded that the harm which would ensue if interim relief is refused but the claim later succeeds is insufficient to outweigh the strong public interest in maintaining the order in force.' Blinne Ni Ghralaigh KC, for Ms Ammori, told the Court of Appeal that the judge wrongly decided the balance between the interests of her client and the Home Office when deciding whether to make the temporary block. She said: 'The balance of convenience on the evidence before him, in our respectful submission, fell in favour of the claimant having regard to all of the evidence, including the chilling effect on free speech, the fact that people would be criminalised and criminalised as terrorists for engaging in protest that was not violent, for the simple fact that they were associated with Palestine Action.' She also told the Court of Appeal that Mr Justice Chamberlain 'failed properly to consider' that banning the group 'would cause irreparable harm'. Ms Ni Ghralaigh said: 'There was significant evidence before him to demonstrate the chilling effect of the order because it was insufficiently clear.' She continued that the ban would mean 'a vast number of individuals who wished to continue protesting would fall foul of the proscription regime due to its lack of clarity'. Ben Watson KC, for the Home Office, told the Court of Appeal that Mr Justice Chamberlain gave a 'detailed and careful judgment' and that the judge was 'alive' to the possible impacts of the ban, including the potential 'chilling effect' on free speech.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Reveller took huge bite out of man's ear in random Pink nightclub attack
Reveller Thomas Cotterill bit off half of a man's ear in an unprovoked attack on a night out in Hanley. The 30-year-old was drinking in Pink nightclub, in Stafford Street, when he 'randomly' sunk his teeth into his victim's ear. The assault was captured on CCTV at 4am on March 31 last year. Stoke-on-Trent Crown Court heard the victim required surgery to try to repair the injury, although he was only left with half an ear. In a victim impact statement, the victim detailed how he's now riddled with anxiety, affecting his relationship with his children, friends and family members. READ MORE: 'I don't want to go to jail' - Hammer-wielding scaffolder pleads to avoid prison READ MORE: Five Guys to open first Stoke-on-Trent restaurant Barry White, prosecuting, said: 'The victim was in complete shock and couldn't remember what happened or why it happened. He had surgery and received a number of stitches to his ear and skin grafts.' Cotterill, of Victory Crescent, Cheadle, pleaded guilty to grievous bodily harm. Catherine O'Reilly, mitigating, said: 'The defendant is at a loss of what happened that night, he cannot put forward any explanation. "He was under the influence of alcohol and he has been transparent about that. Without analysing his behaviour which he accepts is shocking, he cannot put forward an explanation. "His behaviour worsens when in alcohol and believes this could be the reason for his manner, but that is speculation. He has a strong desire to make amends and has self referred himself to anger management. 'He rarely drinks or socialises and has made significant changes to his life to make sure he's not in a position where he might act like this again. He is incredibly highly thought of by a number of people.' Cotterill was sentenced to three years imprisonment. Judge Graeme Smith told him: 'You know why you are standing where you are today. At 4am on March 31 2024 an incident occurred which seems to have had no obvious provocation, which resulted in you biting off half of the victim's ear. Witnesses say the attack came from nowhere. 'We are at a loss of why this happened, firstly because you were intoxicated by alcohol and secondly, you were hypervigilant and seem to have forgotten what happened. This has had a physical and mental effect on the victim which we have heard in his personal impact statement.' Get all the latest news from court here A 30-year-old man has been sentenced at Stoke-on-Trent Crown Court after pleading guilty to grievous bodily harm. Thomas Cotterill, of Victory Crescent, bit off half of another man's ear on a night out. The Cheadle man was drinking in Pink nightclub, in Stafford Street, Hanley, when he randomly attacked his victim. The incident, which took place on March 31 last year, was caught on CCTV footage. The victim required surgery to somewhat repair his ear, although he was only left with half an ear. In a victim impact statement, the victim detailed how he's now riddled with anxiety, affecting his relationship with his children, friends and family members. Barry White, prosecuting the case, said: 'The victim was in complete shock and couldn't remember what happened or why it happened. He had surgery and received a number of stitches to his ear and skin grafts.' Catherine O'Reilly, mitigating, said: 'The defendant is at a loss of what happened that night, he cannot put forward any explanation. He was under the influence of alcohol and he has been transparent about that. Without analysing his behaviour which he accepts is shocking, he cannot put forward an explanation. '[His behaviour worsens when in alcohol and believes this could be the reason for his manner, but that is speculation. He has a strong desire to make amends and has self referred himself to anger management. 'He rarely drinks or socialises and has made significant changes to his life to make sure he's not in a position where he might act like this again. He is incredibly highly thought of by a number of people.' Cotterill was sentenced to three years imprisonment. His Honour Judge Graeme Smith said: 'You know why you are standing where you are today. At 4am on March 31 2024 an incident occurred which seems to have had no obvious provocation, which resulted in you biting off half of the victim's ear. Witnesses say the attack came from nowhere. 'We are at a loss of why this happened, firstly because you were intoxicated by alcohol and secondly, you were hypervigilant and seem to have forgotten what happened. This has had a physical and mental effect on the victim which we have heard in his personal impact statement.' Get all the latest news from court here