Reveller took huge bite out of man's ear in random Pink nightclub attack
The assault was captured on CCTV at 4am on March 31 last year. Stoke-on-Trent Crown Court heard the victim required surgery to try to repair the injury, although he was only left with half an ear.
In a victim impact statement, the victim detailed how he's now riddled with anxiety, affecting his relationship with his children, friends and family members.
READ MORE: 'I don't want to go to jail' - Hammer-wielding scaffolder pleads to avoid prison
READ MORE: Five Guys to open first Stoke-on-Trent restaurant
Barry White, prosecuting, said: 'The victim was in complete shock and couldn't remember what happened or why it happened. He had surgery and received a number of stitches to his ear and skin grafts.'
Cotterill, of Victory Crescent, Cheadle, pleaded guilty to grievous bodily harm. Catherine O'Reilly, mitigating, said: 'The defendant is at a loss of what happened that night, he cannot put forward any explanation.
"He was under the influence of alcohol and he has been transparent about that. Without analysing his behaviour which he accepts is shocking, he cannot put forward an explanation.
"His behaviour worsens when in alcohol and believes this could be the reason for his manner, but that is speculation. He has a strong desire to make amends and has self referred himself to anger management.
'He rarely drinks or socialises and has made significant changes to his life to make sure he's not in a position where he might act like this again. He is incredibly highly thought of by a number of people.'
Cotterill was sentenced to three years imprisonment. Judge Graeme Smith told him: 'You know why you are standing where you are today. At 4am on March 31 2024 an incident occurred which seems to have had no obvious provocation, which resulted in you biting off half of the victim's ear. Witnesses say the attack came from nowhere.
'We are at a loss of why this happened, firstly because you were intoxicated by alcohol and secondly, you were hypervigilant and seem to have forgotten what happened. This has had a physical and mental effect on the victim which we have heard in his personal impact statement.'
Get all the latest news from court here
A 30-year-old man has been sentenced at Stoke-on-Trent Crown Court after pleading guilty to grievous bodily harm. Thomas Cotterill, of Victory Crescent, bit off half of another man's ear on a night out.
The Cheadle man was drinking in Pink nightclub, in Stafford Street, Hanley, when he randomly attacked his victim. The incident, which took place on March 31 last year, was caught on CCTV footage.
The victim required surgery to somewhat repair his ear, although he was only left with half an ear. In a victim impact statement, the victim detailed how he's now riddled with anxiety, affecting his relationship with his children, friends and family members.
Barry White, prosecuting the case, said: 'The victim was in complete shock and couldn't remember what happened or why it happened. He had surgery and received a number of stitches to his ear and skin grafts.'
Catherine O'Reilly, mitigating, said: 'The defendant is at a loss of what happened that night, he cannot put forward any explanation. He was under the influence of alcohol and he has been transparent about that. Without analysing his behaviour which he accepts is shocking, he cannot put forward an explanation.
'[His behaviour worsens when in alcohol and believes this could be the reason for his manner, but that is speculation. He has a strong desire to make amends and has self referred himself to anger management.
'He rarely drinks or socialises and has made significant changes to his life to make sure he's not in a position where he might act like this again. He is incredibly highly thought of by a number of people.'
Cotterill was sentenced to three years imprisonment.
His Honour Judge Graeme Smith said: 'You know why you are standing where you are today. At 4am on March 31 2024 an incident occurred which seems to have had no obvious provocation, which resulted in you biting off half of the victim's ear. Witnesses say the attack came from nowhere.
'We are at a loss of why this happened, firstly because you were intoxicated by alcohol and secondly, you were hypervigilant and seem to have forgotten what happened. This has had a physical and mental effect on the victim which we have heard in his personal impact statement.'
Get all the latest news from court here
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
More than 500 people crossed Channel on Friday
More than 500 people arrived in the UK after crossing the Channel on Friday, as small boat crossings reached record levels. Overall, 517 people arrived in eight boats on Friday, taking the annual total to 21,117, an increase of 56% on the same point last year, according to analysis by the PA news agency. On Tuesday, the tally passed 20,000, the earliest point in the calendar year the figure has been reached since data was first collected in 2018, as ministers struggle with their pledge to 'smash the gangs' of people-smugglers who facilitate the journeys. It comes after reports on Friday that French police officers had used knives to puncture a boat off the French coast. The Government has repeatedly pushed for French authorities to do more to prevent boats leaving the shore, including changing existing rules to allow police officers to intervene when dinghies are in the water. Those changes have not yet come into effect, but reports on Friday suggested tougher action was already being taken. Meanwhile, the Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has announced a 'crackdown' on immigration enforcement targeting illegal working in the gig economy. Officers will carry out checks in hotspots across the country where they suspect asylum seekers are working as delivery riders without permission. It comes after Deliveroo, Uber Eats and Just Eat said they would ramp up facial verification and fraud checks over the coming months after conversations with ministers. Ms Cooper said: 'Illegal working undermines honest business and undercuts local wages. The British public will not stand for it, and neither will this Government. 'Often those travelling to the UK illegally are sold a lie by the people-smuggling gangs that they will be able to live and work freely in this country, when in reality they end up facing squalid living conditions, minimal pay and inhumane working hours. 'We are surging enforcement action against this pull factor, on top of returning 30,000 people with no right to be here and tightening the law through our plan for change.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Why I couldn't ban 'terrorists' Palestine Action
A Manchester MP has called the move to ban Palestine Action and designate them as a terror group as a 'blow against British values'. The direct action group has now been proscribed, making membership of, or support for, the organisation a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. MPs voted to proscribe the group on Wednesday (July 2) with just 26 voting against it. The ban has now come into force after a late-night legal bid asking the High Court to delay the move failed on Friday (July 4). READ MORE: Ex-Asda manager told 'you knew exactly what you were involving yourself in' READ MORE: Tragedy as two boys, both aged 16, found dead on railway tracks The move to ban the organisation was announced after two Voyager aircraft were damaged at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire on June 20, an incident that Palestine Action claimed responsibility for and which police said caused around £7m worth of damage. Nine Labour MPs voted against proscribing the group, while 114 did not vote at all, including 10 from Greater Manchester. Not all MPs who did not vote actively abstained, but Manchester Rusholme MP Afzal Khan has explained his reasons why. In a post on social media, he said he could not 'in good conscience' vote to ban the group alongside 'well-know and violent' neo-Nazis. The order to proscribe Palestine Action which MPs approved in Parliament this week also included a ban on the white supremacist, neo Nazi group Maniacs Murder Cult and the Russian Imperial Movement, a white supremacist, ethno-nationalist organisation. In the post on Bluesky, Mr Khan said: "I am abstaining from this vote, as today's vote also includes proscribing well-known & violent neo-Nazi groups. I can't in good conscience vote in a way that represents my and my constituents' views with these groups being voted on all together." The Labour MP also shared a letter which he has written to the Home Secretary, expressing his concerns about the move. In the letter, he wrote: "Many constituents in Manchester Rusholme have expressed deep concern about the recent decision, as well as concerns of the Government limiting legitimate freedom of protest. "The decision sets a dangerous precedent and, as Amnesty International has warned, risks unlawful interference with the fundamental rights to freedom of expression, association and peaceful assembly. "The right to protest has long been a part of British democracy. While criminal damage should be prosecuted through the propoer channels, misusing terrorism legislation in this context risks chilling legitimate dissent, a point raised by many experts and human rights organisations, like Liberty. "Such a blow against British values and freedoms will also damage our standing on the global stage where we have called against the instruments of the state being used to silence voices of opposition. "I urge this Labour Government not to extend the legacy of its Conservative predecessor which used executive powers to tighten protest restrictions in the UK." The Home Office has welcomed the ban on Palestine Action after the group failed to block its proscription with a late-night legal bid. The group lost a late-night Court of Appeal challenge on Friday evening (July 4), which sought to stop it being banned, less than two hours before the move came into force at midnight. A Home Office spokesperson said on Saturday (July 5): 'We welcome the Court's decision and Palestine Action are now a proscribed group. The Government will always take the strongest possible action to protect our national security and our priority remains maintaining the safety and security of our citizens.'
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Home Office welcomes Palestine Action ban as it comes into force
The Home Office has welcomed the ban on Palestine Action, after the group failed to block its proscription with a late-night legal bid. The designation as a terror group means that membership of or support for Palestine Action is a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. The group lost a late-night Court of Appeal challenge on Friday evening, which sought to stop it being banned, less than two hours before the move came into force at midnight. A Home Office spokesperson said on Saturday: 'We welcome the Court's decision and Palestine Action are now a proscribed group. 'The Government will always take the strongest possible action to protect our national security and our priority remains maintaining the safety and security of our citizens.' The move to ban the organisation was announced after two Voyager aircraft were damaged at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire on June 20, an incident claimed by Palestine Action, which police said caused around £7 million of damage. A group has said it is set to gather in Parliament Square on Saturday holding signs supporting Palestine Action, according to campaign group Defend Our Juries. A letter for the attention of @metpoliceuk and Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley: 'We would like to alert you to the fact we may be committing offences under the Terrorism Act tomorrow, Saturday 5 July, in Parliament Square at about 1pm.' Full letter: — Defend our Juries (@DefendourJuries) July 4, 2025 In a letter to the Home Secretary, protesters said: 'We do not wish to go to prison or to be branded with a terrorism conviction. But we refuse to be cowed into silence by your order.' Home Secretary Yvette Cooper announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action on June 23, stating that the vandalism of the two planes was 'disgraceful' and that the group had a 'long history of unacceptable criminal damage'. MPs in the Commons voted 385 to 26, majority 359, in favour of proscribing the group on Wednesday, before the House of Lords backed the move without a vote on Thursday. Four people – Amy Gardiner-Gibson, 29, Jony Cink, 24, Daniel Jeronymides-Norie, 36, and Lewis Chiaramello, 22 – have all been charged in connection with the incident at Brize Norton. They appeared at Westminster Magistrates' Court on Thursday after being charged with conspiracy to enter a prohibited place knowingly for a purpose prejudicial to the safety or interests of the United Kingdom, and conspiracy to commit criminal damage, under the Criminal Law Act 1977.
