Judge tells Derek Hatton not to chew in court during bribery hearing
The former leader of the Trotskyist group Militant was told by a judge not to chew in court during a bribery hearing.
Derek Hatton, who was deputy leader of Liverpool city council in the 1980s, was charged with bribery after a police investigation into the awarding of commercial and business contracts from Liverpool city council between 2010 and 2020.
The 77-year-old was also a well-known figure of Militant, a Left-wing group that infiltrated Labour from the 1960s through to the late 1980s.
Mr Hatton, of Aigburth, Liverpool, denied one count of bribery and one count of counselling or procuring misconduct in a public office at Preston magistrates' court.
Before he confirmed his name, age and address, District Judge Wendy Lloyd asked Mr Hatton not to chew in court.
Former mayor of Liverpool Joe Anderson, 67, also appeared in court accused of involvement in council corruption.
On Friday, he indicated not guilty pleas to charges of bribery, misconduct in a public office and conspiracy to commit misconduct in a public office.
On the misconduct charge, he is said to have sent and/or arranged to have sent 'threatening letters' to himself.
'Innocent of all charges'
The ex-social worker, of Knotty Ash in Liverpool, was elected mayor of the city from the time the role was created in 2012 until 2021.
Previously in a statement posted on social media site X, formerly Twitter, he said: 'I am innocent of charges and will fight to clear my name.'
His son David Anderson, 37, of Wavertree, faces a charge with conspiracy to commit misconduct in a public office, which he denies.
Hatton's wife, Sonjia Hatton, 49, of Aigburth, indicated a not guilty plea to one count of misconduct in a public office by providing and seeking confidential council information over matters of commercial and business use to Mr Hatton's contacts and to his business dealings.
Andrew Barr, formerly the council's assistant director of highways and planning, 51, of Ainsdale, Merseyside, is charged with conspiracy to commit misconduct in a public office and also faced a charge of bribery for which he indicated a not guilty plea.
Adam McClean, 54, of Woolton, also entered the dock on a charge of conspiracy to bribery, to which he entered no plea.
Appeared via video link
Other defendants appeared at court remotely via video link.
The council's former head of regeneration Nick Kavanagh, 56, of Mossley Hill, Liverpool, indicated not guilty pleas to two counts of bribery.
Phillipa Cook, 49, of the same address, also indicated not guilty pleas to two counts of bribery.
Alexander Croft, 30, of Aughton, Lancashire, indicated a not guilty plea to one count of bribery.
Julian Flanagan, 53, of Knowsley; Paul Flanagan, 71, of Knowsley; and James Shalliker, 38, of Downholland, Lancashire, are all charged with conspiracy to commit bribery and entered no pleas.
The Flanagan brothers founded construction business the Flanagan Group.
All 12 defendants were granted unconditional bail ahead of a plea and trial preparation hearing at Preston Crown Court on April 25.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
27 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
MPs on fence ahead of crunch welfare vote as 'costs facing disabled people soar'
Dozens of Labour MPs are still said to be on the fence about whether to support plans to reform the welfare system in a crunch vote on Tuesday, despite major concessions Disabled people could face extra costs of almost £15,000 a year by the end of the decade, grim research shows, as the row over the Government's welfare cuts drags on. Dozens of Labour MPs are still said to be on the fence about whether to support plans to reform the welfare system in a crunch vote on Tuesday. Many MPs spent the weekend mulling over a major package of concessions offered by Keir Starmer last week. In a dramatic climbdown on Thursday, the PM agreed to protect all existing claimants from losing Personal Independence Payments (PIP). Plans to tighten eligibility will now only apply to new claimants from November 2026, in a reprieve to around 370,000 people who were due to lose around £4,150-a-year. And existing recipients of the health element of Universal Credit will have their incomes protected in real terms. 'PIP reforms are unnerving' A teenager in remission from cancer said he has found the rows over welfare reforms 'unnerving' and 'worrying'. Daniel Evans, 19, who was diagnosed with stage four lymphoma when he was 17, is currently having his Personal Independence Payments reassessed. He should be assessed under the old system after the latest concessions but said he fears for those in the future if they do not qualify for PIP. Daniel said he is no longer able to do things he enjoys, including playing football. 'It's mainly my breathing, my heart, and tiredness. I'm just like a shadow of my former self,' he said. 'I think it's just the new reality. You have to come to terms with it.' PIP helps him pay for transport, such as taxis, or fuel for his mum to take him back and forth to appointments. Asked about the potential tightening of PIP eligibility rules, he said: 'It's a bit unnerving, because what I say is, for anyone who has had treatment and gone through it and are technically better, let's say in remission, just because someone is in remission, it doesn't mean they're instantly able to do a lot of things, like being able to go to work instantly. 'So they still have to get support. It's not like things get better and you can just go to work five days a week, things are still difficult.' Plans for a major review of PIP will also be set out today, which will be co-produced by disabled people, organisations who represent them and MPs. It is hoped that the terms of the review - which will place disabled people at the heart of it - will persuade nervy MPs that the legislation is now heading in the right direction. Meanwhile, research released by disability charity Scope has estimated the extra monthly costs related to a person's disability have now risen to £1,095. Even for those who receive benefits, there is an average shortfall of £630 every month, as the payments don't go far enough, Scope said. The Disability Price Tag report, which is released annually by Scope and does not take into account the welfare reforms, estimates this is set to rise to £1,224 by 2029/30, totalling almost £15,000 a year. It would mean those with a disability would see a £704 shortfall in their benefits income by 2029, the study said. The charity said the Government's concessions 'will just create a two-tier system, where huge numbers of disabled people face the disability price tag with little or no support from PIP'. Meanwhile Greater Manchester mayor Andy Burnham told an event at Glastonbury Festival that MPs should still vote against the welfare bill tomorrow. 'It's simply wrong and I will never, ever support what is being proposed,' he said. 'This reminds me why I left Westminster because the default mindset of the two parties is to be tough on benefits. That mentality creates a deficit model that is distrustful of people… a system I know many disabled people fear interacting with." Mr Starmer faced a humiliating defeat in the Commons after more than 120 Labour MPs signed an amendment to block his welfare plans last week. The Prime Minister this weekend said he wished he had reached a 'better position' with Labour MPs earlier over welfare cuts but was distracted by international affairs, which he admitted was not an 'excuse'. In an interview with the Sunday Times, he said: 'I'd have liked to get to a better position with colleagues sooner than we did — that's for sure. I'm putting this as context rather than excuse: I was heavily focused on what was happening with Nato and the Middle East all weekend. I turned my attention fully to it [the welfare bill] when I got back from Nato on Wednesday night.' Health Secretary Wes Streeting stopped short of saying he was confident the Government will win tomorrow's vote. But he said that the changes "have put us in a much better position". "As a result of the changes, it means anyone watching this morning who's in receipt of personal independence payments now has the peace of mind of knowing that their situation is protected," he said. Labour MP and former Cabinet minister Louise Haigh meanwhile said she planned to back the Bill but needed to see the full detail of the new plans today. She also said it was a moment for the Government to "reset'. "I think this is a moment and an opportunity to reset the Government's relationship with the British public and to move forward, to adopt a different approach to our economic policy and our political strategy," she told the BBC. But disabled Labour MP Olivia Blake said the proposed concessions had been "plucked from the air". Echoing Scope, she told The Guardian: "This could form an unethical two-tier system that treats two people with the exact same injury or illness differently.' Fresh details on the welfare reforms will be published on Monday, including the terms of reference for a review, led by Disability Minister Stephen Timms, of the PIP assessment. Alongside the review, draft regulations for the new Right to Try Guarantee will be laid in Parliament. It will enshrine in law the right for people receiving health and disability benefits to try work without fear of reassessment. The Department for Work and Pensions also said £300million will be brought forward over the next three years to help disabled people and those with health conditions get into work. It will mean the total employment support will have increased by £2.2billion over four years. Officials say that the Bill, while criticised for having tightened some benefits eligibility, will protect the most vulnerable by uprating of Universal Credit standard rate. Nearly four million households will see an income boost with the main rate of UC set to increase above inflation every year for the next four years - estimated to be worth £725 by 2029/30 for a single household. This is said to be the largest, permanent real-terms increase to basic out of work support since 1980, according to the IFS. James Taylor, executive director of strategy at Scope, said: 'Life costs an enormous amount more when you're disabled. Whether it's higher electricity bills because of medical equipment to power. Or higher heating bills because of health conditions affected by the cold. 'The concessions put forward by government will just create a two-tier system, where huge numbers of disabled people face the disability price tag with little or no support from PIP. The government must change course on these catastrophic cuts now, and properly co-produce with disabled people on how to reform our welfare system.' Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall said the changes were about 'delivering a fairer, more compassionate system'. 'We must build a welfare system that provides security for those who cannot work and the right support for those who can,' she said. 'Too often, disabled people feel trapped—worried that if they try to work, they could lose the support they depend on. 'That is why we are taking action to remove those barriers, support disabled people to live with dignity and independence, and open routes into employment for those who want to pursue it. 'This is about delivering a fairer, more compassionate system as part of our Plan for Change which supports people to thrive, whatever their circumstances.'
.jpeg%3Fwidth%3D1200%26height%3D800%26crop%3D1200%3A800&w=3840&q=100)
The Independent
31 minutes ago
- The Independent
Labour's planned PIP disability cuts are cruel, say two-thirds of UK
Some 75 per cent of the UK think the government's plan to remove Personal Independent Payments (PIP) from those with long-term disabilities is 'cruel', A new poll, commissioned by human rights charity Amnesty International UK, found the majority of people surveyed - 54 per cent - did not support the government's changes to restrict the number of people claiming PIP. Under plans in the controversial new welfare bill, a higher bar for eligibility will be introduced for PIP, the main disability benefit in England. PIP is given to support disabled people with extra costs, such as higher energy bills or mobility equipment. People who claim it are awarded points depending on their ability to do certain things, such as washing. New measures introduced in the welfare bill, which will be voted on on Tuesday (1 July), will require claimants to score a minimum of eight points across a range of tasks to qualify for the daily living allowance. In a concession to Labour MPs, Liz Kendall has exempted existing PIP claimants from these new requirements. A Savanta poll of 2,080 people, weighted by age and region, found that 69 per cent of respondents would prefer the UK government to tax the super-rich rather than cut social security. 59 per cent also said that cutting PIP would not help more people get into work. Those respondents living in the North West were the most likely to label the cuts as 'cruel' - with 82 per cent of people agreeing with the statement. This was closely followed by 80 per cent of people in the South East. The polling comes ahead of a crunch vote in parliament on Tuesday. The government has made concessions to rebel Labour MPs over the welfare bill after more than 120 MPs decided to vote against it. Jen Clark, from Amnesty International, said: 'The message from the public is clear: poverty is a political choice, and this government is dangerously close to choosing poverty and party politics over people's rights. 'Across every age group, background, and political belief, people agree that cutting PIP is cruel and they can see these proposals for what they are - unfair, unnecessary, and unjust.' Disability charity Scope has also criticised the planned changes, with executive director of strategy James Taylor accusing the government of subjecting disabled people to a 'two-tier system' where 'huge numbers' of people are still out of pocket. He added: 'The government must change course on these catastrophic cuts now'. A government spokesperson said: "We're delivering one of the biggest packages of welfare reforms in a generation - including scrapping the Work Capability Assessment, rebalancing Universal Credit, and investing in tailored employment support. "Protecting people is a principle we will never compromise on, which is why we're delivering long-lasting and meaningful change that puts the welfare system on sustainable footing so the safety net will always be there for those who need it.'
The Guardian
35 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Extra cost of being disabled in UK to rise by almost 12% in five years, says Scope report
The extra cost of being disabled is on course to rise by almost 12% to £14,688 in five years, according to a new estimate published on the eve of a controversial vote to restrict welfare payments for new claimants. A threatened rebellion by more than 120 Labour MPs forced the government into a last-minute climbdown on its welfare bill, by exempting claimants to planned cuts in personal independence payments (Pip), England's main disability payment. But about 50 of those rebels are still known to be concerned that this concession could create a two-tier system where existing and new claimants are treated differently. The new figures, produced by the disability equality charity Scope, will fuel fears of a growing disparity between these two sets of claimants as the cost of living rises. Its annual disability price tag report estimates that the extra cost facing disabled people currently stands at £1,095 per month, up from last year's price tag of £1,010. Based on the Family Resources Survey and forecasts from the Office for Budget Responsibility, the report estimates this monthly cost will climb to £1,224 by the financial year 2029-30. It means disabled people will be facing an effective annual surcharge of almost £15,000 by the end of the decade to live at the same standard as non-disabled people. The figures factor in the extra cost disabled people face, including higher electricity bills to power medical equipment or extra heating bills associated with health conditions affected by the cold. Scope points out that benefits cover less than half of these extra costs. With benefits the monthly shortfall is currently £630 and is set to rise to £704 in five years, the report estimates. James Taylor, the executive director of strategy at Scope, said the figures showed that government concessions on Pip must go further. He said: 'Life costs an enormous amount more when you're disabled. Our latest analysis finds the price tag of disability is now £1,095 a month. A figure only set to increase in the coming years unless action is taken. 'The concessions put forward by government will just create a two-tier system, where huge numbers of disabled people face the disability price tag with little or no support from Pip. The government must change course on these catastrophic cuts now, and properly co-produce with disabled people on how to reform our welfare system.' The government's original package, first presented in March, included restrictions on eligibility for Pip payments, as well as cutting the health-related element of universal credit (UC). While all of the universal credit and personal independence payment bill applies to England and Wales, only the UC changes apply to Scotland. The bill includes equivalent provisions to legislate for Northern Ireland. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion A government spokesperson said: 'We're delivering one of the biggest packages of welfare reforms in a generation – including scrapping the work capability assessment, rebalancing universal credit and investing in tailored employment support. 'Protecting people is a principle we will never compromise on, which is why we're delivering long-lasting and meaningful change that puts the welfare system on sustainable footing so the safety net will always be there for those who need it. 'We're restoring trust and fairness in the system, ensuring existing Pip claimants will be able to keep their award and putting the voice of sick or disabled people at the heart of our plans, whilst ramping up support to help them into work.'
