Musk Breaks with Trump, Unveils ‘America Party'
Musk, previously Trump's largest campaign financier and head of the 'Department of Government Efficiency', said that the bill, which adds approximately $3.4 trillion to the national deficit over ten years, will bankrupt the country. Following the announcement, Trump threatened to withdraw federal subsidies from Musk's firms, escalating their conflict. Investor apprehension surfaced immediately; Azoria Partners postponed its planned Tesla ETF due to uncertainty over Musk's political focus.
Musk emphasised that the new party will target the '80 % in the middle'—moderate voters disillusioned by both major parties—seeking to win two to three Senate seats and eight to ten House seats to wield decisive legislative influence. Drawing on historical analogies, he compared this approach to Epaminondas' tactical strike at Leuctra, aiming to concentrate resources strategically.
ADVERTISEMENT
Analysts, however, caution that the structural obstacles remain formidable. The U. S. Electoral College, winner‑take‑all elections, and complex ballot‑access regulations make it difficult for third parties to gain ground. Furthermore, the America Party lacks grassroots organisation and established infrastructure—essential components for electoral success—and echoes of Musk's past political efforts, such as his unsuccessful $20 million spending in a Wisconsin judicial race, highlight the limitations of funding without broader engagement.
The timing is politically charged. With mid‑term congressional elections approaching in 2026, Republicans fear that a Musk‑funded third party could siphon conservative votes, potentially undermining Republican majorities. Trump's approval ratings remain above 40%, providing him with a resilient support base even as he faces this high‑stakes challenge.
Despite lacking details on political infrastructure and campaign logistics, Musk has pledged to oppose lawmakers who backed the fiscal package and support rivals—including Republican Rep. Thomas Massie—who align with his fiscal conservatism. Yet experts suggest the America Party is more likely to serve as a spoiler in close contests rather than emerge as a lasting political force.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gulf Today
an hour ago
- Gulf Today
Federal judge blasts Trump team over deportation plans
Alex Woodward, The Independent The federal judge overseeing Kilmar Abrego Garcia's legal challenge over his arrest and removal from the United States is hauling Trump administration officials to court to get to the bottom of the government's plans for the wrongfully deported Salvadoran immigrant. Abrego Garcia, whose case has been at the center of Donald Trump's mass deportation agenda, is currently locked up in federal custody ahead of a trial on smuggling charges. If he's released from pretrial detention, immigration officials intend to arrest and deport him, again, before a trial even begins, according to the Department of Justice. After government lawyers and top Trump administration officials gave a series of conflicting statements about the fate of Abrego Garcia in recent weeks, District Judge Paula Xinis is ordering officials from the Department of Homeland Security to testify about their plans for his removal — answers that may reveal whether the criminal charges against him had anything to do with complying with court orders for his return. She scheduled a hearing on July 7. Abrego Garcia could be released from federal custody and turned over to Homeland Security as soon as July 16. During a hearing in Maryland on Monday, Justice Department lawyer Jonathan Guynn said the administration doesn't intend to hold Abrego Garcia in "limbo" with Immigration and Customs Enforcement while waiting for his criminal trial. "He will be removed, as would any other illegal alien in that process," he said. His remarks are the latest in a series of conflicting public statements from the administration after Abrego Garcia was abruptly returned to the United States from prisons in El Salvador. Abrego Garcia had been living in Maryland with his wife and child, both US citizens, along with two other children from a previous relationship, when he was arrested and deported to El Salvador on March 15 — what government lawyers admitted was an "administrative error" that defied an immigration judge's 2019 order preventing his removal. But the administration spent weeks battling court orders from federal judges and the Supreme Court to "facilitate" his return, claiming that they were powerless to return him while administration officials publicly asserted he would never again step foot in the United States. Last month, he was flown back to face a criminal indictment accusing him of illegally transporting immigrants across the country. He has pleaded not guilty. "Our plan is, he will be taken into ICE custody and removal proceedings will be initiated," Guynn said during a court hearing last week. But that same day, a spokesperson for the Justice Department told the Associated Press that the government will try Abrego Garcia on the charges against him before deporting him from the country. The White House also called the Justice Department's in-court statements "fake news." On Monday, Justice Department said they don't know where the government plans to deport him. "It's like trying to nail Jell-O to a wall trying to figure out what's going to happen," Judge Xinis said at one point on Monday. "For three months, your clients told the world they weren't going to do anything to bring him back," she said, pointing to statements from Attorney General Pam Bondi, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and the president himself. 'Am I really supposed to ignore all that?' she said. She also said she finds it 'highly problematic' that the Justice Department can't seem to answer whether government lawyers knew about the criminal investigation against him while battling in court over his wrongful removal. 'This time, Judge Xinis was not willing to let government lawyers say, 'We don't really know,'' Abrego Garcia's attorney Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg told reporters on Monday. "If they want to deport him to a third country, they need to name that country, and they need to describe the process by which they're going to give him due process," he said. The Supreme Court has paved the way for the Trump administration to deport immigrants to so-called third nations that aren't their home countries after a legal battle involving a group of deportees sent to war-torn South Sudan, where attorneys said the men face torture, abuse and death.
Gulf Today
an hour ago
- Gulf Today
Asian nations push for US tariff concessions
Powerhouse Asian economies Japan and South Korea said on Tuesday they would try to negotiate with the US to soften the impact of sharply higher tariffs that President Donald Trump now plans to impose from the start of August. Trump ramped up his trade war again on Monday, telling 14 nations that they would face tariffs ranging from 25% for countries including Japan and South Korea, to 40% for Laos and Myanmar. However, with the start date pushed back to August 1, those countries were focusing on the new three-week window to press for an easier ride. Stephen Miran, chairman of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, said he was optimistic that more trade deals could be struck before the end of the week. "However, it's incumbent upon the other countries to make the concessions that convince the president that the deals are worth taking for America," Miran told Fox News. Japan wants concessions for its large automobile industry, top trade negotiator Ryosei Akazawa said on Tuesday. Akazawa said he held a 40-minute phone call with US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick in which the two agreed to actively continue negotiations. However, he said he would not sacrifice Japan's agriculture sector - a powerful political lobby domestically - for the sake of an early deal. South Korea said it planned to intensify trade talks over the coming weeks "to reach a mutually beneficial result." Asked if the latest deadline was firm, Trump replied on Monday: "I would say firm but not 100% firm. If they call up and they say we'd like to do something a different way, we're going to be open to that." Global stocks were flat to marginally higher on Tuesday, as investors took in their stride the latest twist in the tariff saga, but the yen slid on the prospect of duties on Japanese goods. Economists warned that the long-running tariff disputes risked stunting growth and pushing up prices, causing headaches for policymakers. "The ongoing threat of higher tariffs intensifies stagflationary risks in the US and puts pressure on Europe to stimulate domestic demand further in order to offset headwinds in international trade," said David Kohl, chief economist at Swiss-based bank Julius Baer. The European Union, which is the largest bilateral trade partner of the US, aims to strike a deal before August 1 with negotiations focused on "rebalancing" and concessions for certain key export industries, a European source familiar with the negotiations said. However, German Finance Minister Lars Klingbeil warned that the EU was prepared to retaliate if necessary. "If we don't reach a fair trade deal with the US, the EU is ready to take counter measures," Klingbeil said on Tuesday, speaking in the lower house of parliament. Some EU sources had said late on Monday that the bloc was close to an agreement with the Trump administration. This could involve limited concessions to US baseline tariffs of 10% for aircraft and parts, some medical equipment and spirits. Only two deals have been struck so far, with Britain and Vietnam. Trump has also said a deal with India was close. Washington and Beijing agreed to a trade framework in June, but with many of the details still unclear, traders and investors are watching to see if it unravels before a separate, U.S.-imposed August 12 deadline or leads to a lasting detente. SPREADING THE PAIN Trump said the United States would impose tariffs of 25% on goods from Tunisia, Malaysia and Kazakhstan, with levies of 30% on South Africa, Bosnia and Herzegovina, climbing to 32% on Indonesia, 35% on Serbia and Bangladesh, 36% on Cambodia and Thailand and 40% on Laos and Myanmar. Cambodia, hit hard by levies imposed in April, on Tuesday hailed as a big success a reduction in the tariff rate from 49% to 36% and said it was seeking to negotiate a further cut. The tariffs have been an issue for Cambodia's garments and footwear sector, a major employer and the biggest driver of its economy. The US is also the main export market for Bangladesh's ready-made garments industry, which accounts for more than 80% of its export earnings and employs 4 million people. "This is absolutely shocking news for us," Mahmud Hasan Khan, president of Bangladesh Garment Manufacturers and Exporters Association, told Reuters on Tuesday. Reuters
Gulf Today
an hour ago
- Gulf Today
Supplemental funds: ICE doesn't need another $100 billion
Patricia Lopez, Tribune News Service One of the biggest spending items in the Republican budget bill has hardly gotten any attention: $170 billion for an unprecedented crackdown on immigration. By some calculations, it would make the annual budget of Immigration and Customs Enforcement larger than Israel's entire defense budget. The supplemental funds — to be spent over the next four years — would leave vital aspects of immigration reform unaddressed. But the funding is essential to President Donald Trump's mass deportation plans. Vice President JD Vance left little doubt of that when he posted on social media, 'Everything else — the (Congressional Budget Office) score, the proper baseline, the minutiae of the Medicaid policy — is immaterial compared to the ICE money and immigration enforcement provisions.' Yet according to Priorities USA, a progressive group that conducted polling on the bill in June, less than 2% of voters had heard of the tax bill's immigration provisions. The reality is that most Americans reject the harshness of mass deportations and support green cards and a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants who can meet the requirements. Trump has already succeeded in essentially sealing the border, with the lowest crossing levels in years. Nevertheless, this new round of funding would see the total budget for ICE skyrocket. Its current budget is about $10 billion a year; the tax bill would give it another $100 billion to spend by 2029. For comparison, the current annual budget for the entire Department of Homeland Security, of which ICE is just one part, is about $108 billion a year. David J. Bier, director of immigration studies at the conservative Cato Institute, told me, 'It's hard to overstate the magnitude of spending this bill would yield.' DHS, he said, would become the largest federal law enforcement agency in the country, with a budget and staffing that would dwarf those of the FBI and the Federal Bureau of Prisons. ICE's force of 6,000 agents would mushroom to 16,000. The amounts, Bier said, 'are so astronomical that they are going to be shoveling money out the door with very little oversight or checks on how it is to be spent. It's as good as a blank check.' ICE, with a previous budget of $3.43 billion for detention operations in 2024, would get $45 billion to create a 100,000-bed daily capacity. One potential model was just unveiled in Florida: the instantly notorious 'Alligator Alcatraz.' The 5,000-bed tent camp, deep in the Everglades, was slapped together in just eight days. Extra beds are a must if the administration is to hit its goals of 1 million deportations a year and 3,000 arrests per day. But when Trump says, as he did during his visit to the tent prison, that those beds would be filled with the 'worst of the worst,' the reality is that many will be farm hands, day laborers, construction workers, hotel maids and others who take the lowest-paying jobs in this economy. ICE agents have already become less particular about targets and rougher in their tactics. In June, most arrestees had no criminal records, their chief offense being crossing illegally. Then consider who will be at least nominally in charge of this potentially gargantuan scale-up: Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, whose previous job as South Dakota governor had her administering a budget of about $7 billion. Her track record does not inspire confidence. In June, ProPublica reported that as governor in 2023, Noem secretly accepted an $80,000 cut of the money she raised for a dark money group that promoted her political career and later failed to disclose it in federal filings. Every sign here points to disaster — and the makings of a police state. Whenever this country has done large-scale roundups of immigrants for removal, those here legally, including US citizens, can find themselves ensnared and must rely on due process to extricate themselves. Earlier this month Heidi Plummer, an attorney in Orange County, California, was strolling through a park when she happened upon a raid in progress. ICE agents arrested her along with others and she was briefly detained until she could prove her identity. 'I've been going to Centennial Park my entire life,' she said at the time. 'I was in utter shock and disbelief that this could happen to any US citizen.' Job Garcia, a US citizen and delivery driver, was tackled and thrown to the ground this month during a raid at a Home Depot in Los Angeles by ICE agents and held for 24 hours, sustaining some injuries. Agents later claimed he attempted to interfere with their operations, which he denies. A Government Accountability Office report found that between 2015 and 2020, ICE arrested 674 US citizens and detained 121. Now imagine an ICE force on steroids with quotas to meet. Meanwhile, the real work of comprehensive immigration reform, so desperately needed, will once again go undone despite this historic level of funding. The asylum system needs overhauling, along with the immigration court system. So do the quotas that cap the number of immigrants that can come from each country. The reality is that the US has both a labor shortage and an aging workforce. We must also shorten the amount of time it takes to become a citizen; perhaps if it didn't take a decade, immigrants would be less tempted to cross illegally.
