logo
Gadhafi's ‘Missing Billions' Stashed in US and Southern Africa, Officials Say

Gadhafi's ‘Missing Billions' Stashed in US and Southern Africa, Officials Say

Epoch Times26-05-2025

JOHANNESBURG—Billions of dollars stolen by former Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi are hidden in clandestine bank accounts and secret vaults in the United States and two southern African countries, say intelligence operatives and financial investigators.
The latest news was first
According to the report, Libya's Asset and Management Recovery Office says at least $50 billion in oil revenues pillaged by Gadhafi between 1994 until his murder in 2011 were invested in 'debt instruments'—including treasury bonds—using front companies, nominees, and banks that
Separately, intelligence agents and a former top government official in Pretoria told The Epoch Times about $20 billion stolen by Gadhafi is spread across banks in South Africa.
They added that $30 million in cash flown by Gadhafi to South Africa in the months before his execution by rebels is now hidden in Eswatini—the small kingdom neighboring South Africa and the continent's last absolute monarchy that was formerly called Swaziland.
The man leading the hunt for Libya's missing public funds, Asset and Management Recovery Office Director-General Mohammed al-Mensli, confirmed that hundreds of billions of dollars were stolen during Gadhafi's brutal military rule.
Related Stories
5/24/2025
5/24/2025
Gadhafi came to power in a coup in 1969 and began ruling Libya through fear, and plundering his country's vast natural resources.
As chairman of the Revolutionary Command Council and Brotherly Leader of the Great Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Gadhafi imprisoned, tortured, and murdered political opponents, and forged close links to global terrorist organizations.
Files lodged at the International Criminal Court detail the starvation of entire populations and the bombardment of towns and villages that were home to perceived political opponents.
Libyans look at war remnants, including the golden fist that was taken from Moammar Gadhafi's compound in Tripoli and transported to Misrata, displayed at a museum set up on Tripoli boulevard in Misrata on Feb.12, 2012.
Mahmud Turkia/AFP via Getty Images
In 2003, Gadhafi's regime accepted responsibility for the Pan Am Flight 103 bombing over Lockerbie, Scotland, in 1988, which killed 259 people, including 190 Americans.
He paid nearly $3 billion in compensation to the families of the victims.
Yet Gadhafi continued to be revered among left-wing nationalists in Africa as an anti-Western, anti-colonialist, and anti-Israel revolutionary.
The United States and its allies
Tripoli tried to evade the sanctions by illicitly channelling oil profits to secret locations across the world, al-Mensli told The Epoch Times.
He said information he uncovered during his investigation will be used by the Libyan government in Tripoli under Prime Minister Abdel Hamid Dubaiba 'to lodge legal claims in the U.S. to retrieve stolen public funds in interest-bearing accounts.'
Al-Mensli said recovery of the funds would be 'vital to rebuilding' the country, which devolved into another civil war in 2014 until an October 2020 U.N.-led cease-fire agreement.
A member of security forces stands behind a weapon, in Tripoli, Libya Feb. 1, 2021.
REUTERS/Ayman Al-Sahili
News Causing Stir in South Africa
News of al-Mensli's investigation has triggered interest in South Africa, where Gadhafi secretly financed the African National Congress (ANC), the party that came to power under Nelson Mandela in 1994 following decades of apartheid white minority rule.
One of Gadhafi's greatest admirers was former ANC leader and South African President Jacob Zuma, who is currently facing
In 2022, a commission of inquiry
Zuma, a Chinese Communist Party and Soviet trained former chief of intelligence for the ANC's armed wing, Umkhonto we Sizwe (Spear of the Nation), denies all charges and allegations.
In the months leading up to Gadhafi's ouster and murder, Zuma and the Libyan ruler met several times.
Initially, said Zuma's former top advisor and ANC treasurer Mathews Phosa, the brief for the then-president of Africa's largest economy was to convince Gadhafi to surrender power voluntarily to 'facilitate a peaceful democratic transition' in Libya.
But shortly after a meeting with Gadhafi in April 2011, six months before his death at the hands of rebel forces, Zuma 'inexplicably' changed tack, Phosa said.
'He suddenly began insisting that Colonel Gadhafi must remain in power,' Phosa told The Epoch Times.
Similar details are contained in Phosa's autobiography, 'Witness to Power,'
'Beginning in 2009, when Gadhafi began to get paranoid about being deposed, I accompanied President Zuma to a number of meetings in a luxury tent near Tripoli,' Phosa said. 'The Colonel promised to donate a lot of money to the ANC, and for Libya to sign military contracts with Mr. Zuma's associates.'
The meetings were held under the guise of Gadhafi's chairmanship of the African Union, which lasted from 2009 to 2010, said the ANC stalwart.
After civil war broke out in Libya in February 2011, Phosa and Zuma also met with rebel leaders to try to broker peace.
'Those leaders told me they would no longer cooperate in any way with Zuma because he had betrayed them by aligning with Gadhafi,' Phosa said.
Two serving and one former South African intelligence agents, speaking anonymously, told The Epoch Times that Zuma also met with Gadhafi a few months before the dictator was executed by rebels in the town of Sirte on Oct. 20, 2011.
'President Zuma offered to fly Colonel Gadhafi to safety in South Africa because the rebel troops were approaching fast,' said one of the operatives. 'Colonel Gadhafi refused and said, 'No; I will die in my own country. If I am captured or killed, please give this money to my loved ones.''
In the months that followed, 'many flights' carrying 'crates of dollars, gold, and diamonds' flew to several locations in South Africa, including a military base near Pretoria, another agent said.
'From there, the loot was transported to Mr. Zuma's compound and hidden in a place that was under the ground,' the agent added. 'Later, when things began to get hot for Mr. Zuma, I hear the cash, etcetera, was moved to Swaziland under the care of the King [Mswati].'
Spokespeople for both Zuma and Mswati denied knowledge of the Libyan cash and valuables.
South African investigative journalist, Jovial Rantao, has previously presented information similar to that provided by the intelligence operatives.
In the Sunday Independent in 2014, Rantao
According to the documents, about $30 million dollars in cash, hundreds of tons of gold, and about 6 million carats of diamonds were transported from Tripoli to South Africa in more than 60 flights.
'What could be the world's largest cash pile is stored in palettes at seven heavily guarded warehouses and bunkers in secret locations between Johannesburg and Pretoria,' Rantao wrote, adding that Gadhafi's treasure was guarded by former apartheid-era Special Forces members.
He said another 260 billion rands (now worth almost $14.4 billion) was deposited in four commercial banks in South Africa.
In April 2019, South Africa's Sunday Times reported that Mswati had confirmed to South African President Cyril Ramaphosa that Zuma had transported $30 million dollars to his country.
The president's spokesperson would not comment on Ramaphosa's meetings with Mswati.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Can You Go to Jail for Back Taxes? Clear Start Tax Explains Who's at Risk - and Who Isn't
Can You Go to Jail for Back Taxes? Clear Start Tax Explains Who's at Risk - and Who Isn't

Miami Herald

time35 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Can You Go to Jail for Back Taxes? Clear Start Tax Explains Who's at Risk - and Who Isn't

Clear Start Tax Explains Who the IRS Actually Sends to Jail - and Why Most Taxpayers Don't Need to Fear Prison Over Back Taxes IRVINE, CA / ACCESS Newswire / June 30, 2025 / With IRS enforcement ramping up in 2025, many Americans are asking a frightening question: "Can I go to jail for back taxes?" According to Clear Start Tax, the answer depends on one critical factor - intent. While jail time is rare, it becomes a risk in cases involving fraud, evasion, or willful concealment. "People hear horror stories about IRS arrests and panic unnecessarily," said the Head of Client Solutions at Clear Start Tax. "But the average taxpayer who's behind on payments or hasn't filed simply needs to resolve the issue, not fear handcuffs." When Jail Time Becomes a Real Possibility Not all tax problems lead to prison - in fact, most don't. But there are specific situations where the IRS may pursue criminal enforcement instead of civil penalties. Clear Start Tax outlines the key scenarios where jail time becomes a real risk: Criminal Tax Evasion - Intentionally underreporting income, falsifying records, or hiding money in unreported accounts can lead to federal charges and prison Returns - Filing returns with knowingly false information - including fake deductions or dependents - is considered or Refund Theft - Using someone else's information or filing fake returns to claim a refund is a federal Willful Non-Filing - Ignoring IRS notices and failing to file taxes for several years may be treated as willful neglect. "The IRS pursues criminal charges only when someone knowingly breaks the law," added the Head of Client Solutions. "But the vast majority of people with tax debt fall under civil enforcement, which means the IRS wants compliance, not incarceration." What Happens to Honest Taxpayers Who Owe? Most people with unpaid taxes or late filings fall under civil enforcement, not criminal investigation. While jail isn't on the table, there are still serious consequences for ignoring IRS notices. Here are some of the most common consequences faced by taxpayers who fall behind: IRS notices and penaltiesBank levies or wage garnishmentsTax liensLost refunds or passport restrictions But all of these are part of the civil process, and can be resolved without legal consequences when addressed early. Don't Panic - Get Help Instead Filing late or owing taxes isn't a crime, but ignoring the issue can lead to bigger problems. Clear Start Tax works with clients nationwide to resolve tax debt, file overdue returns, and set up realistic, affordable solutions that stop IRS enforcement before it escalates. By answering a few simple questions, taxpayers can find out if they're eligible for the IRS Fresh Start Program and take the first step toward resolving their tax debt. How Clear Start Tax Helps Taxpayers at Risk Whether you're behind on filings, facing collections, or simply unsure what the IRS will do next, Clear Start Tax offers expert support from start to finish. Their services include: Filing back tax returns accuratelyReviewing IRS transcripts and noticesPreventing or releasing wage garnishmentsApplying for Offers in Compromise or hardship statusManaging communication with the IRS from start to finish "Falling behind on taxes can leave people feeling stuck or overwhelmed," said the Head of Client Solutions at Clear Start Tax. "We help them move forward with clarity, confidence, and the right legal steps." About Clear Start Tax Clear Start Tax is a full-service tax liability resolution firm that serves taxpayers throughout the United States. The company specializes in assisting individuals and businesses with a wide range of IRS and state tax issues, including back taxes, wage garnishment relief, IRS appeals, and offers in compromise. Clear Start Tax helps taxpayers apply for the IRS Fresh Start Program, providing expert guidance in tax resolution. Fully accredited and A+ rated by the Better Business Bureau, the firm's unique approach and commitment to long-term client success distinguish it as a leader in the tax resolution industry. Need Help With Back Taxes? Click the link below: 710-3533 Contact Information Clear Start TaxCorporate Communications Departmentseo@ 535-1627 SOURCE: Clear Start Tax

Trump tariffs could dampen July Fourth fireworks for 2026
Trump tariffs could dampen July Fourth fireworks for 2026

Axios

time36 minutes ago

  • Axios

Trump tariffs could dampen July Fourth fireworks for 2026

As Americans prepare to light up the skies this Fourth of July, the fireworks industry is sounding the alarm: without tariff relief, the nation's 250th birthday celebration in 2026 could be in jeopardy. Why it matters: A looming tariff burden on Chinese imports is sparking fears of higher costs, supply shortages and even canceled shows. "If the tariff increases again back up to triple digits — let's say 145% — it will cripple this industry," Julie Heckman, executive director of the American Pyrotechnics Association, told Axios. The big picture: 99% of consumer fireworks and 90% of professional display fireworks used in the U.S. come from China, Heckman said. A 25% to 145% tariff imposed under a trade provision known as Section 301 is adding strain to the supply chain and pricing. China typically halts fireworks production during hot summer months due to safety risks, narrowing the window for U.S. importers to place and receive orders. Zoom in: Bruce Zoldan, CEO of Ohio-based Phantom Fireworks, told Axios that his 100 stores have seen a big surge in recent days. Over the weekend, Phantom also opened 1,600 seasonal stands and tents. "People are starting to buy now," he said, noting sales are almost 30% higher per day than last year. "If you wait until July 1st, 2nd, or 3rd, half the merchandise is sold out and the lines are long." Phantom — the nation's largest consumer-based retail fireworks company, supplying thousands of stores nationwide like Home Depot — received 85% of its inventory prior to tariffs, Zoldan said. "There could be a few minor changes, but for the most part, our prices are stable with the last year," he said. "Now, going into next year that's another story." State of play: Industry leaders say they need an exemption like the one President Trump granted in 2019 to move forward with planning for 2026 and beyond. "Thirty percent is not sustainable — not going into what we think will be the biggest celebration, consumption of fireworks ever on record," Heckman told Axios. "This isn't political for us," Heckman said. "We support the president 100%, and themajority of firework entities and their customers — the folks coming in to celebrate Independence Day — they are his base." The other side: The White House pushed back on the fireworks industry's plea for tariff relief. "Real prosperity and patriotism isn't celebrating the independence of our country with cheap foreign-made firecrackers and trinkets," White House spokesman Kush Desai said in a statement to Axios. "It's having a country with booming Main Streets, a thriving working class, and robust manufacturing." Yes, but: Heckman said moving fireworks production stateside is impossible, especially for 2026. "Even if we brought some manufacturing back to the U.S., it wouldn't be optimal," Heckman said, noting it's highly dangerous, labor-intensive and regulated. "We could never produce the volume the U.S. relies on for celebrating Independence Day." What's next: Heckman said her organization has been advocating on Capitol Hill and has a meeting in late July with the U.S. Trade Representative's office. "Right now, we're at a standstill," Zoldan said of the fireworks industry. "We're getting close to the point where we have to place our orders for next year, and they have to start manufacturing right after Labor Day." Zoldan said any delay past Labor Day for submitting orders means a certain percentage won't be manufactured in time to get to America.

EPA employees put names to 'declaration of dissent' over agency moves under Trump
EPA employees put names to 'declaration of dissent' over agency moves under Trump

San Francisco Chronicle​

time42 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

EPA employees put names to 'declaration of dissent' over agency moves under Trump

A group of Environmental Protection Agency employees on Monday published a declaration of dissent from the agency's policies under the Trump administration, saying they 'undermine the EPA mission of protecting human health and the environment.' More than 170 EPA employees put their names to the document, with about 100 more signing anonymously out of fear of retaliation, according to Jeremy Berg, a former editor-in-chief of Science magazine who is not an EPA employee but was among non-EPA scientists or academics to also sign. The latter figure includes over 70 Nobel laureates. The letter represents rare public criticism from agency employees who could face blowback for speaking out against a weakening of funding and federal support for climate, environmental and health science. Scientists at the National Institutes of Health made a similar move earlier in June. "Since the Agency's founding in 1970, EPA has accomplished (its) mission by leveraging science, funding, and expert staff in service to the American people. Today, we stand together in dissent against the current administration's focus on harmful deregulation, mischaracterization of previous EPA actions, and disregard for scientific expertise," the letter read. Agency spokespeople did not immediately respond Monday to messages seeking comment. Employees want the EPA get back to its mission 'I'm really sad. This agency, that was a superhero for me in my youth, we're not living up to our ideals under this administration. And I really want us to,' said Amelia Hertzberg, an environmental protection specialist at the EPA who has been on administrative leave since February from the Office of Environmental Justice and External Civil Rights, while the administration works to close down her department. Hertzberg's work focused on the most vulnerable groups impacted by pollution: pregnant and nursing people, young children and babies, the elderly, people with preexisting and chronic health conditions and people living in communities exposed to higher levels of pollution. That wasn't supposed to be controversial, but it's become so in this political climate, she said. 'Americans should be able to drink their water and breathe their air without being poisoned. And if they aren't, then our government is failing,' she said. Berg, who also directed the National Institute of General Medical Sciences at NIH from 2003-2011, said the dissent isn't motivated by partisan criticism. He said the employees hope it will help the EPA get back to the mission for which it was established — which 'only matters if you breathe air and drink water." The letter outlines what the EPA employees see as five main concerns: undermining public trust; ignoring scientific consensus to benefit polluters; reversing EPA's progress in America's most vulnerable communities; dismantling the Office of Research and Development; and promoting a culture of fear, forcing staff to choose between their livelihood and well-being. EPA has cut funding and rolled back federal regulations Under Administrator Lee Zeldin, EPA has cut funding for environmental improvements in minority communities, vowed to roll back federal regulations that lower air pollution in national parks and tribal reservations, wants to undo a ban on a type of asbestos and proposed repealing rules that limit planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions from power plants fueled by coal and natural gas. Zeldin began reorganizing the EPA's research and development office as part of his push to slash their budget and gut their study of climate change and environmental justice. And he's seeking to roll back pollution rules that an Associated Press examination found were estimated to save 30,000 lives and $275 billion every year. 'People are going to die,' said Carol Greider, a Nobel laureate and professor of molecular and cellular biology at the University of California, Santa Cruz, who also signed the letter. She described last week's East Coast heat wave as evidence of the ways people are feeling the effects of climate change. 'And if we don't have scientists at the EPA to understand how what we do that goes into the air affects our health, more people are going to die,' she added. Berg said the declarations of dissent from both the NIH and EPA employees are noteworthy because they represent scientists speaking out as their careers are on the line. Even non-agency employees have to consider whether the government will withdraw research funding. Greider, asked about fears of repercussions or retaliation, said she's 'living the repercussions of everything.' She regularly meets with graduate students who are worried about pursuing scientific careers as labs lose funding. It's a long-term problem if we aren't supporting the next generation of scientists, she said: "That's decades worth of loss.' ___ ___

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store