logo
His only 'crime' is being Venezuelan and having tattoos, says brother of man 'thrown to the lions' in El Salvador jail

His only 'crime' is being Venezuelan and having tattoos, says brother of man 'thrown to the lions' in El Salvador jail

Sky News07-04-2025
Until five weeks ago, Arturo Suarez was a professional singer, performing in the United States as he waited for his asylum claim to be processed.
Originally from Venezuela, he had entered the US through proper, legal channels.
But he is now imprisoned in a notorious jail in El Salvador, sent there by the Trump administration, despite seemingly never having faced trial or committed any crime. The White House claims he is a gang member but has not provided evidence to support this allegation.
His brother, Nelson Suarez, told Sky News he believes his brother's only "crime" is being Venezuelan and having tattoos.
"He is not a gang member," Nelson says, adamantly, "I've come to the conclusion that it has to be because of the tattoos. If you don't have a criminal record, you haven't committed any crime in the United States, what other reason could there be? Because you're Venezuelan?"
Arturo, 34, was recording a music video inside a house in March when he was arrested by immigration agents.
He was first taken to a deportation centre in El Paso, Texas, and then, it appears, put on to a military flight to El Salvador.
His family have not heard from him since. Lawyers and immigrant rights groups have been unable to make contact with any of the more than 200 Venezuelan men sent to the CECOT prison, which holds members of the MS-13 and Tren de Aragua gangs.
Tattoo clue to Arturo Suarez's whereabouts
Nelson learned his brother is - most likely - in CECOT only because of a photograph he spotted on a news website of a group of inmates, with their hands and feet cuffed, heads shaved and bodies shackled together.
"You can see the hummingbird tattoo on his neck," Nelson says, pointing to the picture. He says Arturo wanted a hummingbird in memory of their late mother. Arturo has 33 tattoos in total, including a piano, poems and verses from the Bible.
It could be that one, or more, of those tattoos landed him at the centre of President Trump's anti-immigration showpiece. Nelson shows me documents which indicate that Arturo did not have a criminal record in Venezuela, Chile, Colombia or the United States, the four countries he has lived in.
Sky News contacted the White House, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) for a response to Arturo's case but have not heard back.
In March, Donald Trump signed the Alien Enemies Act, a law from 1798 which has been invoked just three times before, in wartime.
It allows the president to detain and deport immigrants living legally in the US if they are from countries deemed "enemies" of the government. In this instance, Mr Trump claimed the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua had "infiltrated the United States" and was "conducting irregular warfare".
Gang symbol tattoos
Immigration officials have centred on certain tattoos being gang symbols. Immigration officers were provided with a document called the "Alien Enemy Validation Guide", according to a court filing from the American Civil Liberties Union. The document provides a point-based system to determine if an immigrant in custody "may be validated" as a gang member.
Migrants who score six points and higher may be designated as members of the Tren de Aragua gang, according to the document. Tattoos which fall under a "symbolism" category score four points and social media posts "displaying" gang symbols are two points. Tattoos considered suspicious, according to the document, include crowns, stars and the Michael Jordan Jumpman logo.
Jerce Reyes Barrios's story
Another of the men sent to CECOT prison is 36-year-old Jerce Reyes Barrios, who fled Venezuela last year after marching in anti-government protests. He is a former footballer and football coach.
His lawyer, Linette Tobin, told Sky News that Reyes Barrios entered the US legally after waiting in Mexico for four months for an immigration appointment and then presenting himself at the border.
She says he was detained in a maximum security prison in the US while awaiting his asylum appointment. But before that appointment happened, he was flown to the El Salvador prison.
Ms Tobin says the DHS deported Reyes Barrios because they designated him a Tren De Aragua gang member based on two pieces of evidence.
The first, she says, is a tattoo of the Real Madrid football team logo surrounded by rosary beads. She has since obtained a declaration from the tattoo artist stating that Reyes Barrios just wanted an image which depicted his favourite team.
The second piece of evidence, she says, is a photograph, which she shows me, of Reyes Barrios in a hot tub with friends when he was a college student 13 years ago.
He is making a gesture which could be interpreted as "rock and roll", but which she says has been interpreted as a gang symbol.
Distraught family in despair
Reyes Barrios has no criminal record in his home country. "I've never known anything like this," Ms Tobin says.
"My client was deported to a third country and we have no way of getting in touch with him. His family are distraught and in despair, they cry a lot, not knowing what is going on with him. We want him returned to the United States to have a hearing and due process."
Ms Tobin says she and other lawyers representing men sent to the El Salvador prison are trying to establish a UN working group on enforced disappearances to do a wellness check on them because the prison is completely "incommunicado".
1:10
Sky News contacted the DHS for comment about Reyes Barrios's case but did not receive a response. The DHS previously issued a statement declaring that "DHS intelligence assessments go well beyond just gang-affiliated tattoos. This man's own social media indicates he is a member of Tren de Aragua".
Reyes Barrios has an immigration hearing scheduled for 17 April, Ms Tobin says, which the Trump administration is trying to dismiss on the grounds that he is not in the US anymore.
In the meantime, children he used to coach football for in his hometown of Machiques in Venezuela have been holding a prayer vigil for him and calling for his release.
The secretary of the DHS, Kristi Noem, visited CECOT last month and posed for photos standing in front of inmates behind bars.
"Do not come to our country illegally," she said, "you will be removed, and you will be prosecuted." Donald Trump had promised during his election campaign to clamp down on immigration, railing against undocumented immigrants and claiming immigrants are "poisoning the blood of our country".
I ask Arturo Suarez's brother, Nelson, how he felt watching Ms Noem posing in the prison, knowing that his brother might be close by.
"I feel bad," he says, "I feel horrible, because in those images we only see criminals. With my brother, I feel it is more a political issue. They needed numbers, they said, these are the numbers, and now, let's throw them to the lions."
Kilmar Abrego Garcia's story
The Trump administration has admitted that at least one man sent to the El Salvador jail was sent by "administrative error". Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who was living in Maryland, was sent to CECOT despite a judge's earlier ruling in 2019 that granted him legal protection to stay in the US.
The White House has alleged Garcia is an MS-13 gang member, but his lawyers argued there is no evidence to prove this.
A federal judge has ordered Garcia must be returned to the US by Monday 7 April. In a post on X, White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller referred to the judge as a "Marxist", who "now thinks she's president of El Salvador".
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said: "We suggest the judge contact President Bukele because we are unaware of the judge having jurisdiction or authority over the country of El Salvador."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

GB News overtakes BBC for the first time
GB News overtakes BBC for the first time

Telegraph

time12 hours ago

  • Telegraph

GB News overtakes BBC for the first time

GB News has overtaken the BBC as Britain's most watched news channel for the first time. New figures from official ratings agency Barb show GB News beat both BBC News and Sky News during key time slots in July, in a major coup for the start-up broadcaster just after its fourth birthday. The latest data show GB News pulled in an average audience of 80,600 across each day in July. That was ahead of BBC News on 78,700 and 67,000 for Sky News. GB News also triumphed during the breakfast show and primetime weekday evenings, as well as during the Sunday morning political slot, which is hosted by Telegraph associate editor Camilla Tominey. Ben Briscoe, head of programming at GB News, said: 'This is a seismic moment, not just for us, but for British broadcasting. We are ending the dominance of the BBC News channel and Sky News.' Bosses said the channel will build on its success as it prepares to launch a new US show from Washington DC in September. The broadcaster's website is already the fastest-growing news platform in the US. Mick Booker, GB News editorial director, said: 'We're now firmly on track to achieve our ambition of becoming the UK's biggest news channel by 2028. 'GB News is winning because it is different, and because we place the community at the heart of everything we do. We focus on the stories that matter most to our audience and, as a result, our bold, fearless journalism is reaching more people than ever.' Fresh boost The rise of GB News comes against the backdrop of a declining market for traditional broadcast TV, as viewers increasingly switch to streaming. Figures released by Ofcom this week showed Britons spent 4pc less time watching broadcast TV in 2024 compared to the previous year. Nevertheless, the numbers will provide a fresh boost to GB News after the channel overtook Sky for the first time late last year – as viewers flocked to the channel for coverage of the farming protests. Surging viewing figures at GB News come even as the channel is locked in a bitter dispute with Ofcom over its use of politicians as presenters. GB News secured a major victory in the High Court earlier this year after a judge ruled the regulator was wrong to accuse Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg of breaching impartiality rules in two episodes of his show. The court quashed the verdicts and Ofcom subsequently dropped three further breach rulings. The legal tussle contributed to a surge in costs at the regulator, which spent £4.6m on external advisers last year. However, the row has been re-ignited after Ofcom outlined plans to further tighten rules around the use of politicians as presenters. Under its latest proposals, politicians would be blocked from presenting news segments, though they would still be allowed to helm current affairs shows. GB News has hit back against the plans, branding them 'irrational' and an 'unjustified interference with freedom of expression'. Despite its popularity with viewers, GB News is still struggling to achieve financial success as it battles an ongoing advertiser boycott. Even before its launch, GB News was targeted by campaign groups such as Stop Funding Hate – prompting brands including Ikea and Nivea to pull their campaigns. While some advertisers including Marks & Spencer have since returned to the channel, the boycott continues to hurt the company's bottom line. GB News has launched a paywall on its website in an effort to boost revenues from subscribers. GB News has lost more than £100m since its launch in 2021. Its owners – the hedge fund tycoon Sir Paul Marshall and Dubai investment firm Legatum – pumped a further £34m into the channel last year. In a speech earlier this year, Sir Paul accused Ofcom of unfairly targeting the broadcaster due to an 'onslaught' of complaints from pressure groups.

Doctors are utterly wrong, and also utterly right
Doctors are utterly wrong, and also utterly right

The Herald Scotland

time17 hours ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Doctors are utterly wrong, and also utterly right

The rationale behind these prohibitions is very simple, which is that their striking is deemed to place at risk the lives of members of the public. The rationale for banning doctors from striking would be exactly the same. To argue, as many strikers do, that lives are not at risk when doctors absent themselves from work is to argue that they do not save lives when they walk through the door of the hospital. I do not believe that, and given their high level of education it is impossible to accept that the striking doctors believe that either. Perhaps it just makes it easier for them to sleep at night. 'First, do no harm' are the four totemic words extrapolated from the Hippocratic Oath. Hippocrates would not have approved of today's doctors' principle of 'First, go on strike'. Read More: The unpalatable truth is that many of England's striking medics, qualified and accomplished as they are, have all the self awareness of a toddler. The typical path to becoming a doctor lends itself to a relatively accurate stereotype. The rigorous academic requirements mean that doctors will tend to have gone to a good school, which in turn means that they will tend to live in an affluent area, which in turn means that they will tend to have grown up in relatively comfortable circumstances. The youngest of the strikers will not have been exposed to what most of us would consider to be 'real life'. They go from school, to medical school, to the NHS, with little or no exposure to the outside world. They have no need to understand how the wealth creating private sector, which pays their salaries, works. They need not trouble themselves with the economic impact of low public sector productivity. They are unbothered by archaic systems and dismal outputs because they have never been exposed to anything else. They are cocooned; everything is seen through the prism of the NHS. It is hardly surprising, then, that they have been so easily manipulated and exploited by their trade union, which is one of the most fiercely politicised lobbying groups in the country. Not all pre-consultant doctors can be tarred with this brush. A thoughtful few risked ostracisation by speaking up, such as Dr Adam Boggan of the Royal London Hospital, who said: 'I was alarmed because a BMA representative had told a Sky News reporter that losing public support was a price that they were willing to pay. I am not willing to pay that price. My education was funded by the taxpayer … the relationship between the doctor and the patient is based on trust and based on confidence. If we do damage to that basic relationship, that's bad for everyone.' You may, at this point, be thinking two things. Firstly, that I have disdain for doctors. But nothing could be further from the truth; indeed, I am so keen on doctors that I married one. The second, for the eagle-eyed, is that I said two seemingly contradictory notions can be true at once, and I have not yet mentioned the second one. So here goes; doctors are grotesquely underpaid and should be remunerated to at least the degree they are demanding. There is little public understanding of what lies beneath the title. Unlike almost any other job, a doctor will have started making career choices at the age of 13. A school pupil, in S3, will have to choose a particular mix of subjects for their National 5 exams in order to ensure that being a doctor remains a viable career path. They'll need straight A's the following year, of course, and then again at Higher, which will generate only a conditional offer for a Scottish medical school. A good performance in S6 will be required, along with a series of extracurricular activities to elevate themselves above all the other kids who will be sitting a further aptitude examination which will give them the right to be interviewed for medical school. If they do get in, they have six years of university, followed by two years as a Foundation doctor and a further seven or eight as a registrar, often working debilitating hours. They will, in between treating patients, be paying to sit Royal College exams to allow them to continue their careers Ten years of flawless academic achievement followed by ten years of practice in the NHS, working for one of the most inflexible, unsympathetic and obstructive employers in the country, in a failing health system which creates even lower morale, offers a reward of something around £65,000. For context, a train driver, with no academic qualifications and after a three-year qualifying period, will earn £55,000, before overtime and other bonuses, to which doctors are not entitled. What would you be? There is a way around this. Public sector pay is the chaotic consequence of successive governments rewarding the trade union which causes the most trouble with the best pay settlements. We should, instead, create an independent public sector pay commission, staffed by private sector recruiters who understand how to evaluate market value based on education, difficulty, responsibility, demand and so on. They would identify a midline salary and apply a market value above or below for that job. Doctors in England behaved appalling this week, egged on by their trade union. They have articulated their complaint with a maturity that may match their age, but does not match their status. They have further corroded public trust and, ironically, prompted the ordinary person in the street to question the NHS, again. Fundamentally, though, their complaint is valid. Our health service is not facing an 'if you pay peanuts you get monkeys' scenario. It is facing an 'if you pay peanuts doctors will go and work somewhere else' scenario. Andy Maciver is Founding Director of Message Matters, and co-host of the Holyrood Sources podcast

US and Ecuador sign agreement to combat transnational crime
US and Ecuador sign agreement to combat transnational crime

The Independent

timea day ago

  • The Independent

US and Ecuador sign agreement to combat transnational crime

The United States and Ecuador on Thursday signed a bilateral agreement aimed at strengthening their collaboration against transnational criminal networks. The agreement, signed during a visit of U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem to the South American country, facilitates the exchange of information on suspected criminal offenders and risk assessments of cargo and travelers. Noem told reporters the efforts are 'crucial steps to improve security and ensure that migration is carried out within the framework of the law.' The deal with Ecuador comes as the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump seeks to bolster regional cooperation in its clampdown against immigration and transnational criminal groups, including Tren de Aragua, the Venezuelan gang designated as a foreign terrorist organization by the White House earlier this year. On Wednesday, Noem signed a similar agreement with Chile, which she visited as part of her latest tour of Latin America. That agreement allows Chilean officials to identify potentially dangerous migrants entering or exiting the country and share their fingerprints, iris scans and other biometric data with Homeland Security to prevent such individuals from traveling to the U.S. ____

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store