UNC Board of Governors names a familiar face to serve as NC State's next chancellor
Kevin Howell, UNC Health's Chief External Affairs Officer, has been selected to succeed Randy Woodson as North Carolina State University's next chancellor.
Howell will now lead the largest university in North Carolina, with nearly 39,000 students and a $2 billion budget.
He's no stranger to higher education. Howell has served previously as an NC State University's vice chancellor for external affairs, where he led efforts to support the university's role as a driver of the state economy.
UNC System President Peter Hans said in selecting its next chancellor, NC State needed to find a leader who not only believes in the transformational power of higher education, but has also lived it.
'Kevin is the personification of what makes NC State an extraordinary institution, the kind of place where a talented young man from Cleveland County can find a home, break ground as the first ever Black student body president, and then choose to devote his life to the upkeep and uplift of public education,' Hans said in presenting Howell's nomination to the UNC Board of Governor's on Tuesday.
Hans noted that Howell, a Shelby native, has served in various capacities in the governor's office, the UNC System, UNC Health, and on numerous civic and charitable boards in central North Carolina.
Howell will also be the first Black chancellor at NC State University, at a time when diversity, equity, and inclusion has drawn scorn from conservative state legislators and cutbacks and condemnation from the new Trump administration.
DEI was not mentioned in Tuesday's announcement. Rather Hans described Howell as a wonderful ambassador and fundraiser.
'He's got a great mind, a generous passion, and a profound love of this university,' Hans said. 'But don't let that genial exterior fool you. Kevin Howell is a competitor to his core, a former wrestler who hasn't lost the instinct for tackling, grappling, and coming out on top.'
Those skills and competitive drive are what is needed said Hans as NC State enters a 'transformative era.'
He takes over the leadership role at a time when many universities nationwide are experiencing declines in student enrollment.
Howell currently serves on the executive committee of myFutureNC which has actively been working to boost higher-ed enrollment in North Carolina. The nonprofit seeks to have two million North Carolinians hold a postsecondary degree or an industry credential by 2030.
In February, NC State's Executive Vice Chancellor and Provost, announced a hiring freeze due to the spike in uncertainty surrounding federal funding.
And Howell will also guide the university through the future of Poe Hall, and health concerns about a building contaminated with high levels of PCBs.
On Tuesday, Ed Weisiger, chair of the NC State Board of Trustees, chose to focus Howell's strengths.
'Kevin simply makes organizations better and healthier by working in them,' said Weisiger. 'We are so pleased to have him return to NC State.'
Howell earned a bachelor's degree in political science from NC State in 1988 and was the university's student body president his senior year. He earned a law degree from the UNC-Chapel Hill and later served as a law clerk on the N.C. Court of Appeals.
Following a five-month nationwide search, Howell will become the third NC State alumnus to serve as chancellor of the land-grant university.
He will take over the role May 5 with a salary of $600,000.
Woodson, the longest serving chancellor in the UNC system, has held the position for the last 15 years.
This report will be updated after Howell addresses the university community at 3:00 p.m. Tuesday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
Supreme Court raises the stakes in a Louisiana redistricting case
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Friday expanded the scope of a Louisiana congressional redistricting dispute that has been pending for months by ordering new briefing on a legal question that could further weaken the landmark Voting Rights Act. The court issued an order asking the lawyers to address whether, in seeking to comply with the 1965 law that protects minority voting rights, Louisiana violated the Constitution's 14th and 15th Amendments enacted after the Civil War to ensure Black people were treated equally under the law. If the court rules that the state did violate the Constitution, it would mean states cannot cite the need to comply with the Voting Rights Act if they use race as a consideration during the map-drawing process, as they currently can. Rick Hasen, an election law expert at the UCLA School of Law. wrote on his Election Law Blog that the order "appears to put the constitutionality of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act into question." That provision bars voting practices or rules that discriminate against minority groups. The Supreme Court's 6-3 conservative majority is often receptive to arguments that the Constitution is 'colorblind,' meaning no consideration of race can ever be lawful even if it is aimed at remedying past discrimination. In 2013, the court struck down a key provision of the Voting Rights Act in a case from Alabama and further weakened it in a 2021 case from Arizona. The justices heard arguments in the Louisiana case on more technical, less contentious questions in March and was originally expected to issue a ruling by the end of June. Even then, the constitutional issue loomed large. The new order did not indicate whether the court will hear another round of arguments before it issues a ruling in the case. The Louisiana map in question, which is currently in effect, includes two majority Black districts for the first time in years. The complicated case arose from litigation over an earlier map drawn by the state legislature after the 2020 census that included just one Black majority district out of the state's six districts. About a third of the state's population is Black. Civil rights groups, including the Legal Defense Fund, won a legal challenge, arguing that the Voting Rights Act required two majority Black districts. But after the new map was drawn, a group of self-identified 'non-African American' voters led by Phillip Callais and 11 other plaintiffs filed another lawsuit, saying the latest map violated the 14th Amendment. As recently as 2023, the Supreme Court reaffirmed the Voting Rights Act in a congressional redistricting case arising from Alabama. But conservatives raised questions about whether key elements of the law should ultimately be struck down.
Axios
2 hours ago
- Axios
Trump admin rescinds Carter‑era DEI mandates for federal hiring
The Trump administration said Friday it will end a court-imposed decree initiated by the Carter administration that eliminated a test for federal job applicants and imposed diversity hiring requirements for federal agencies. Why it matters: The move follows the administration's dramatic change to the government's interpretation of Civil Rights-era laws to focus on " anti-white racism" rather than discrimination against people of color. Driving the news: The Justice Department's Civil Rights Division said it will eliminate a decree from Luevano v. Ezell, a case brought on by Black and Hispanic job applicants alleging discrimination. The DOJ said that the decree "limited the hiring practices of the federal government based on flawed and outdated theories of diversity, equity, and inclusion." It said the decree entered in 1981 "imposed draconian test review and implementation procedures" on the Office of Personnel Management. What they're saying:"For over four decades, this decree has hampered the federal government from hiring the top talent of our nation," Assistant Attorney General Harmeet K. Dhillon said in a statement. "Today, the Justice Department removed that barrier and reopened federal employment opportunities based on merit—not race." U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro used the quote "by the content of their character" from the late Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. in a statement to justify the move. Reality check: The Luevano case sought to remedy decades of discrimination against Black and Hispanic job applicants who had been denied employment based on their racial background. The case ultimately settled in a 1981 consent decree, under which the federal government agreed to eliminate a test and establish two special hiring programs, Outstanding Scholar and Bilingual/Bicultural. The decree was in place for 45 years. Zoom out: The DOJ move comes days after it released new guidelines for recipients of federal funding and directed them not to be involved in Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion ("DEI") programs. The guidelines say that federal anti-discrimination laws apply to DEI programs and initiatives since they involve "discriminatory practices." The guidelines could have sweeping effects, possibly forcing universities to end ethnic studies programs, media companies to stop paying for staffers to attend journalists of color conferences or nonprofits to cease programs studying health disparities. Context: Since taking office, Trump has attempted to reverse many of the gains made during the Civil Rights Movement and unravel the late President Lyndon B. Johnson's civil rights legacy from six decades ago. Within hours of taking office, Trump revoked LBJ's 1965 executive order mandating "equal opportunity" for people of color and women in the recruitment, hiring and training of federal contractors. Between the lines: The moves fulfill a promise that Trump campaign allies told Axios about before the election: that the president would push to eliminate or upend programs in government and corporate America that are designed to counter racism against Black Americans and other people of color.
Miami Herald
6 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Perceptions on who faces discrimination in US have changed, poll finds. See how
Americans' perceptions of discrimination in the United States are different now than four years ago — with a new group being recognized as facing the most discrimination, a poll found. Immigrants without legal status are now being perceived by the public as experiencing more discrimination than any other group in the U.S., and the number of Americans who said Asian people and Black people are being discriminated against has decreased significantly since 2021, according to a July 31 Associated Press-NORC poll. The survey of 1,437 U.S. adults was taken July 10-14 and has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.6 percentage points. While the earlier poll came on the heels of the COVID-19 pandemic — a time when many were worried about incidents of violence against Asian Americans because of the pandemic's reported origin — and nearly a year after the death of George Floyd while communities were still holding sweeping demonstrations against racial inequality in the country, the recent poll comes as President Donald Trump's administration continues an aggressive immigration crackdown. More than 60,000 immigrants in the U.S. illegally, including some who do not have criminal records, were arrested within the first 100 days of Trump's second term, according to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement data. Immigrant advocacy groups have complained and filed lawsuits against the administration in cases involving the deportation of U.S. citizens or people married to U.S. citizens, along with the mass deportations, McClatchy News reported. A majority of Americans, 58%, said they think immigrants without legal status face 'a great deal' or 'quite a bit' of discrimination — a shift from four years ago when Black Americans were seen as the group experiencing the most discrimination, according to the poll. Twenty-six percent of respondents said immigrants living illegally in the U.S. face a 'moderate' amount of discrimination, while 15% said they face 'only a little' or 'none at all,' per the poll. A plurality of respondents, 42%, said immigrants living in the U.S. with legal status face a lot of discrimination, the poll found. Black people and Hispanic people were also seen by Americans as facing higher amounts of discrimination, with 45% and 44%, respectively, saying that was the case, according to the poll. However, the number of respondents who said Black people face a lot of discrimination dropped significantly: 15 percentage points since a previous poll in April 2021, researchers said. The number of people who said Asian Americans were experiencing a 'great deal of' discrimination also considerably decreased from 45% in 2021 to 32% in 2025, according to the poll. Perceptions of discrimination among Hispanic people and white people also saw a small drop since 2021, researchers said.
