logo
McGregor now faces autumn legal action by former close friend

McGregor now faces autumn legal action by former close friend

Extra.ie​2 days ago
A multi-million-euro legal action taken against MMA fighter Conor McGregor by his former sparring partner and friend is likely to be heard in the autumn, the High Court has heard.
Artem Lobov, 38, a retired MMA fighter known as 'The Russian Hammer', claims to have been the initial creator and co-founder of Mr McGregor's whiskey, which became known as Proper No. Twelve.
The Russian native has stated in legal documents before the court that he worked for free for two years to help set up the whiskey brand. Conor McGregor showing off his whiskey. Pic: Conor McGregor/Instagram
The former professional fighter, who has a Master's degree from DCU in finance and capital markets, claimed he came up with the idea after studying the liquor market at university.
Judge Nessa Cahill was told yesterday that final exchanges of documents have to be made, relating to the date on which Mr Lobov alleges that Mr McGregor offered to pay him 5% of the proceeds from the whiskey sales. A file image of Conor McGregor. Pic: Gilbert Carrasquillo/GC Images
He has said the promise was made while the pair were in a Dublin gym together. Mr Lobov has claimed Mr McGregor then reneged on that promise.
At a pre-trial hearing, Mr Lobov's barrister Liam Bell told the court his client had been 'muscled out by the parties and wasn't paid what he was due'.
Mr McGregor, who denies that any promise was made to Mr Lobov, is reputed to have been paid $130 million when he and two other shareholders sold their stakes in the whiskey in 2021 to Proximo Spirits, owners of Jose Cuervo tequila.
He later offered Mr Lobov €1million in a post on X, which was refused.
If Mr Lobov wins the High Court case, Mr McGregor could be ordered to pay him close to €6million.
The eight-day trial had been due to be heard earlier this year, but was delayed after Mr Lobov said he had found an old phone, enabling him to be more accurate about when the promise was made by Mr McGregor. Pic: Instagram/Conor McGregor
Having initially stated the offer was made in September 2017, he said he now believed it to have been made by Mr McGregor in October of that year.
Mr Lobov's barrister, Andrew Walker, said yesterday that disclosure in the case was being extended to include October 2017.
'It is self-evident that he has to cover all the documents evidencing the agreement of October 2017, and he will,' he said.
'If the defence requires anything further, they can let us know,' he added.
Mr Lobov will explain in a sworn statement why the existence of the old phone was only revealed late in the day, he said.
Mr Walker said Mr Lobov was anxious to get the case listed for a full hearing as soon as possible. A file image of Conor McGregor. Pic: Dave Benett/WireImage
Judge Cahill said she would list the case for mention over the coming weeks, with a view to it being heard during the next legal term, which begins in October.
In the meantime, Mr McGregor is awaiting a decision from the Court of Appeal to his challenge to the jury's verdict concerning Nikita Hand's claim that she was raped by him in a Dublin hotel.
The hair colourist and mother of one was awarded just under €250,000 in damages by a High Court jury last November. Nikita Hand arriving at the Court of Appeal in Dublin. Pic: Collins Courts
Mr McGregor will also learn if Ms Hand is found liable by the Court of Appeal for her legal costs in suing Mr McGregor's friend, James Lawrence, for rape.
She lost that claim, but the High Court ruled that Mr Lawrence must nevertheless pay his costs – which have been bankrolled by Mr McGregor.
The Court of Appeal heard his costs would be significantly higher than the damages she won.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Barrister who lost home after failing to pay legal bills is ‘not a victim', judge says
Barrister who lost home after failing to pay legal bills is ‘not a victim', judge says

Sunday World

time5 hours ago

  • Sunday World

Barrister who lost home after failing to pay legal bills is ‘not a victim', judge says

Eugenie Houston broke back into her home after a sheriff took possession of the property last year. The High Court has now granted an order restraining Eugenie Houston (above) from the property. She lost her home after failing to pay costs orders linked to a legal row with solicitor Wendy Doyle A lawyer who is currently trespassing in her former home after breaking back in when a sheriff took possession of the property last year is not 'a victim', as she claims to be, a High Court judge has said. Mr Justice Liam Kennedy made the comments in relation to barrister Eugenie Houston, who lost possession of her home following her failure to pay a series of costs orders after losing several cases in a bitter legal dispute with solicitor Wendy Doyle. Ms Doyle secured a vacant possession order for the house in Naas, Co Kildare, in 2023 and a sheriff took possession of the property on July 24 last year. However, Ms Houston re-entered the house later that evening and has remained living there ever since. The High Court has now granted an order sought by Ms Doyle restraining Ms Houston from the property and from interfering with its sale. Making the order, Mr Justice Kennedy said he presumed gardaí would assist Ms Doyle 'exercise her lawful entitlements' if necessary. The High Court has now granted an order restraining Eugenie Houston (above) from the property. She lost her home after failing to pay costs orders linked to a legal row with solicitor Wendy Doyle News in 90 Seconds - Saturday July 12 In a ruling published this week, the judge said Ms Houston had failed to establish a case for permitting her to remain in the property. She had unlawfully broken in to the house and was 'now a trespasser on the property, not the owner'. Ms Houston has indicated she will appeal. The judge put a stay on the order until July 18 and said it would be entirely a matter for the Court of Appeal as to whether that stay should be extended. The dispute between the two lawyers stretches back to 2014 and has its background in a defamation claim taken by Ms Houston against Ms Doyle. The case was settled, with costs awarded against Ms Houston. However, she did not pay those costs or further costs orders against her arising from subsequent unsuccessful legal applications she made. When the legal bills weren't paid, Ms Doyle obtained judgment mortgages against Ms Houston's house, and ultimately got orders for the possession and sale of the property. Mr Justice Kennedy acknowledged this was 'a disastrous outcome' from Ms Houston's perspective. The judge said it was 'unfortunate', but added that it was the result of Ms Houston's 'ill-fated litigation campaign'. 'I would not endorse her evident perception of herself as the victim of events,' he said. Mr Justice Kennedy said Ms Houston repeatedly instituted 'unjustified' legal proceedings and pursued 'meritless' appeals. 'As a barrister she must understand the legal consequences of such tactics,' he said. The judge also observed that although Ms Houston complained about the effect of the proceedings and various judgments on her reputation, she had 'cynically used the proceedings as a forum to ventilate allegations' against Ms Doyle and Ms Doyle's lawyers. The judge said that, in human terms, the litigation had been 'traumatic for all involved'. But he added that Ms Houston had exacerbated her legal and financial predicament by failing to comply with court orders and rulings and by delaying and obstructing Ms Doyle's attempts to enforce the recovery of costs awards. The ruling is the latest in a series of setbacks for Ms Houston. Earlier this year another judge, Mr Justice Mark Sanfey, barred her from suing judges, court registrars, the Justice Minister, Attorney General, the Courts Service and other legal professionals without prior permission from the President of the High Court. He did so after Ms Houston was found to have engaged in frivolous and vexatious litigation against Ms Justice Leonie Reynolds after that judge made a ruling she disagreed with.

What do you get the woman who has everything? A ratty-tatty EIGHT MILLION EURO Birkin bag of course
What do you get the woman who has everything? A ratty-tatty EIGHT MILLION EURO Birkin bag of course

Extra.ie​

time8 hours ago

  • Extra.ie​

What do you get the woman who has everything? A ratty-tatty EIGHT MILLION EURO Birkin bag of course

It's a question that has bamboozled men for centuries. What do you get the woman in your life who has everything? But even the world's richest man, Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, seems to have been defeated in getting his new-wife Lauren Sanchez her heart's desire – as he was reportedly outbid on acquiring the original Birkin bag which was sold at auction this week. Designed in 1984 for actress Jane Birkin, the original Hermes Birkin Bag, sold in Paris on Friday for a record €8.6 million, making it officially the most expensive handbag ever sold. The original Birkin bag has sold at auction. Pic:The sale happened during Sotheby's Fashion Icons auction, with the iconic auction house dubbing the arm candy the 'Mona Lisa' of handbags. The coveted luxury item was being eyed by none other than the newly married Lauren Sánchez Bezos, and Kris Jenner, the minted matriarch of the Kardashian dynasty, who herself has a dedicated Hermes closet reputed to be worth half-a-million dollars. Mrs Jenner was believed to be phone bidding for the holy grail of handbags. But, alas, despite being two of the richest women on the planet, Sanchez and Jenner were outbid in the 'battle of the bags'. The bag was sold for millions at auction for €7million — but the winner had to pay a further €1.6million in taxes. Pic:According to the Instagram account @stylenotcom, the bag went to an enthusiastic Japanese collector who emerged winner after a 13-minute battle of the bag. While it sold for €7 million, the buyer had to pay no less than the final price of the black Birkin which totted up to a whopping $10 million, including taxes. What makes Jane Birkin's very own handbag so special is that Hermès built a one-off in black Box calf, branded 'J.B.' under the lock. The bag sold for the insane amount earlier this week. Pic:Jane Birkin was the epitome of Parisian chic, and in her time she was regarded as one of the most stylish women of all time. Birkin's look of 'French girl chic'– white shirts, boyfriend jeans and ballet pumps – is as influential now as it ever was. And as for her original Birkin, it was as stylsih as Jane herself and she used her Birkin in a rather carefree fashion, often festooning her bag with stickers and other funky accessories.

Moment alleged Russian spy ‘drops off USB stick in bike seat to leak Grant Shapps's sensitive details'
Moment alleged Russian spy ‘drops off USB stick in bike seat to leak Grant Shapps's sensitive details'

The Irish Sun

time11 hours ago

  • The Irish Sun

Moment alleged Russian spy ‘drops off USB stick in bike seat to leak Grant Shapps's sensitive details'

THIS is the moment a man accused of being a Russian spy dropped off a USB stick - allegedly containing sensitive details about Grant Shapps - underneath a bike seat. A court has been shown photographs that allegedly see Howard Phillips, 65, delivering a secretive message for his "Russian handlers". Advertisement 6 Newly released pictures reveal the moment Mr Phillips allegedly dropped a USB stick containing private information about Grant Shapps inside a bike Credit: Solent 6 Mr Philips being arrested at a Black Sheep Coffee outlet in London Credit: Solent 6 Grant Shapps served as defence secretary from August 2023 to July 2024 Credit: AFP Mr Phillips is currently on trial accused of trying to spy for the Pictures shown to Winchester Crown Court allegedly show him following his handlers' instructions by dropping off a message inside a USB stick in the opened seat shaft of a bike. Prosecutors alleged that Mr Phillips wanted to "offer services" to Russian intelligence but unknowingly was corresponding with undercover British security service agents - whom he believed to be from the Kremlin. Another image shows the alleged spy, and previous insolvency worker, being arrested at a Black Sheep Coffee outlet in London. Advertisement Read More on UK News Other pictures display a phone and hotel rooms he allegedly bought on behalf of the Russian "agents". The court heard how the dad of four - who was due to start a job with UK Border Force - handed the operatives a bag containing a USB stick with Shapps' personal details. These included his home address, phone number, and the location of his private plane. Mr Phillips, from Harlow, Essex, denies engaging in conduct to assist a foreign intelligence service. Advertisement Most read in The Sun Prosecutors argue that the former insolvency worker boasted he could get government clearance, as a result of his new job with Border Force. The court heard how Mr Phillips said he wanted the "agents" and him to be like "family", adding they could all "help and look after each other". Moment ringleader of bed-hopping Russian spy ring is snared as cops storm UK guesthouse He also allegedly claimed to have been in Shapps' home and had met him several times. In one meeting with the "agents", Mr Phillips said: "I have something. I don't know if you want it or don't want it. Advertisement "What do you know about the Secretary of Defence in the UK? Because, I have personal information which may be useful." Jurors were shown a letter Mr Phillips was allegedly handed during that same meeting, which read: "Dear Howard, thank you for your continued cooperation. Moscow very pleased with ongoing progress." He reportedly asked that, going forward, the officers refer to Moscow as "mother" in their messages. It is alleged that after this point, Mr Phillips continued to assist the supposed agents and did not withdraw his Border Force job application, which prosecutors say would have provided him with further access to Government information. Advertisement A note that promised "100 per cent loyalty" to the 6 Mr Phillips is accused of engaging in conduct to assist a foreign intelligence service Credit: Facebook 6 A close-up of the moment Mr Phillips allegedly dropped off the USB Credit: Solent 6 The USB stick in Mr Phillips' posession Credit: Solent Advertisement It also claimed Mr Phillips could move "under the radar" if he gained a valid government security vetting pass. The trial had heard previously how the dad had applied for a job with the UK Border Force in October 2023. However, he was unemployed at the time of the alleged spying, with Jocelyn Ledward KC, prosecuting, saying his "financial struggles" contributed to his "eagerness and desire" to help the RIS. Messages between Mr Phillips and the "Russian spies" began in March 2024, starting first over email before moving to WhatsApp, and eventually Signal. Advertisement Shapps served as defence secretary from August 2023 to July 2024 and would have been involved in countless important communications with Ukranian President The trial continues.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store