Lebanese president urges pressure on Israel to halt attacks on Lebanon
"We call on our partners and allies to intensify pressure on Israel to halt its violations and fully commit to UN Security Council Resolution 1701," Aoun said, according to a statement released by Lebanon's presidency.
The president's remarks came during a meeting with British Foreign Secretary David Lammy.
Aoun emphasized Lebanon's appreciation for Britain's support, particularly at the UN, where he hopes London will continue to advocate for renewing the mandate of the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) amid mounting regional tensions, reported Xinhua news agency.
The Lebanese government submitted a request to extend the mandate of UNIFIL for an additional year, until August 31, 2026. The UN Security Council is expected to vote on the mandate renewal before its expiration at the end of August.
During the talks, Aoun warned that Israel's continued occupation of the Lebanese territory obstructed efforts to restore calm and stability along the border. He also condemned Israel's refusal to release Lebanese prisoners, as well as its persistent violations, including aerial and artillery strikes that have reached areas near Beirut's southern suburbs and major roads leading into the capital.
"These provocations prevent the Lebanese state from fully asserting its sovereignty, protecting its citizens, and enforcing decisions," Aoun said.
Calling for international intervention, Aoun urged Britain and other global powers to demand that Israel withdraw from the Lebanese territory and provide formal guarantees that future attacks will cease.
For his part, Lammy reaffirmed the strength of the Britain-Lebanon relationship and pledged Britain's ongoing support across multiple sectors, especially in defense and security cooperation. He noted that Britain is closely following developments in the country with "great interest and continued solidarity."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
US envoy says satisfied with Lebanese response on disarming of Hezbollah
Beirut: US envoy Thomas Barrack said Monday he was satisfied by the response of Lebanon's authorities to a request to disarm Hezbollah, warning Lebanon risked being left behind as change sweeps other countries in the region. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Lebanese leaders who took office in the aftermath of more than a year of hostilities between Israel and Hezbollah have vowed a state monopoly on bearing arms, while demanding Israel comply with a November ceasefire. Israel has kept up strikes on Lebanon and warned it will continue to do so until Hezbollah has been disarmed, while the movement's leader Naim Qassem said Sunday his group would not surrender or lay down its weapons in response to Israeli threats. "I'm unbelievably satisfied with the response," Barrack, Washington's ambassador to Turkey and special envoy to Syria, told a press conference after meeting President Joseph Aoun. "It's thoughtful, it's considered. We're creating a go-forward plan," he said. "Now what it takes is a... thrust to the details, which we're going to do. We're both committed to get to the details and get a resolution," he said, adding: "I'm very, very hopeful." Last month, Barrack asked Lebanese leaders to formally commit to disarming Hezbollah, the only group that retained its weapons after Lebanon's 1975-1990 civil war, doing so in the name of "resistance" against Israel which occupied southern Lebanon at the time. Hezbollah was heavily weakened in the latest conflict, with Israel battering the group's arsenal of missiles and rockets and killing senior commanders including longtime chief Hassan Nasrallah. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now - 'Future for them' - The presidency said on X that Aoun handed Barrack "ideas for a comprehensive solution". Parliament speaker Nabih Berri, a Hezbollah ally, said his own meeting with Barrack was constructive and "considered Lebanon's interest and sovereignty... and the demands of Hezbollah", according to a statement. Barrack said that Hezbollah "needs to see that there's a future for them, that that road is not harnessed just solely against them." He warned that "the rest of the region is moving at Mach speed, and you will be left behind", adding that "dialogue has started between Syria and Israel, just as the dialogue needs to be reinvented by Lebanon." On Friday, Syria said it was willing to cooperate with the United States to reimplement a 1974 disengagement agreement with Israel, nearly seven months after Islamists ousted longtime ruler Bashar al-Assad, a Hezbollah ally who was also backed by Iran. Syria has also admitted to holding indirect talks with Israel to reduce tensions. A Lebanese official told AFP on condition of anonymity that late last week, Beirut submitted an initial response to Washington, which requested modifications, then officials worked through the weekend to develop the final version. - Strikes - Under the ceasefire, Hezbollah was to pull its fighters back north of the Litani river, some 30 kilometres (20 miles) from the Israeli frontier. Israel was to withdraw its troops from Lebanon, but has kept them deployed in five areas that it deemed strategic. The truce was based on a United Nations Security Council resolution that says only Lebanese troops and UN peacekeepers should bear arms in south Lebanon, and calls for the disarmament of all non-state groups. Lebanese authorities say they have been dismantling Hezbollah's military infrastructure in the south near the Israeli border. Late Sunday, the Israeli military said raids in south and east Lebanon targeted Hezbollah military sites and weapons systems. Lebanon's health ministry said Monday those strikes wounded 10 people in the country's south. Hezbollah's Qassem said Sunday that Israel needed to abide by the ceasefire agreement, "withdraw from the occupied territories, stop its aggression... release the prisoners" detained during last year's war, and that reconstruction in Lebanon must begin. Only then "will we be ready for the second stage, which is to discuss the national security and defence strategy" which includes the issue of the group's disarmament, he added.
The Hindu
44 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Macron due in U.K. for state visit as London tries to balance ties with Europe, U.S.
French President Emmanuel Macron and First Lady Brigitte Macron are due to arrive in London on Tuesday (July 8, 2025) for a state visit, hosted by Britain's monarch Charles III and the Queen, Camilla. This is the first European head of state to be hosted by King Charles on a state visit and an indication that the ties between London and Paris, which were under strain due to Britain's departure from the EU, have thawed. The King and Queen were last hosted by the Macrons in Paris in September 2023. While business is transacted during state visits, the ceremonial aspects and state dinner are instruments of the host country's soft power and used to bolster culture ties between the countries. The three-day visit will culminate in a summit level meeting led by Mr. Macron and U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer on Thursday (July 10, 2025). The visit comes at a time when the U.K. is trying to balance its ties with the EU and the U.S., as U.S. President Donald Trump has overseen a downgrading of ties between the U.S. and E.U. Also Read | United Kingdom's Starmer convenes 'coalition of the willing' for second meeting to discuss Ukraine Anglo-French security and defence ties, which are governed by the Lancaster House treaties of 2010, will be updated during the summit, as per a statement by French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot in France's National Assembly. Mr. Barrot cited London and Paris cooperating on Ukraine's defence (by leading a group of mostly European countries called the 'Coalition of the Willing'). He also mentioned the two countries coordinating responses on Iran along with Germany, which, according to him, paved the way for negotiations (i.e., the June 20 negotiations in Geneva). Mr. Barrot also highlighted cooperation on the crisis in Sudan. The visit will also see politically sensitive issues discussed — such as fishing and migration. The U.K. and the EU recently concluded an agreement allowing reciprocal access to fishing waters until 2038. Also Read | European leaders consult Trump, then agree joint response to Russian foot-dragging in truce talks On Tuesday (July 8, 2025), the French first couple will be welcomed on arrival by the Prince William and Catherine Middleton, the Prince and Princess of Wales before being taken to Windsor Castle, just outside London, where they will be hosted by the King and Queen. The visit will include a carriage ride through the town of Windsor and a State dinner. Mr Macron is scheduled to address the U.K. Parliament on Wednesday (July 9, 2025). Mr. Trump, who has expressed a fondness for the British Royal Family, has also been invited to the U.K. on a state visit, his second such visit, since 2019, when he was hosted by Queen Elizabeth. Mr. Trump's second visit is expected in September, though no dates have been announced.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
The Crisis of the Welfare State in Profile
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer The crisis of the welfare state—fiscally unaffordable but politically unreformable—afflicts nearly every 21st-century Western democracy. And the revolt last week against British Prime Minister Keir Starmer's modest disability reforms shows how deeply the entitlement state mentality is entrenched. At issue were so-called personal independence payments for those who struggle with tasks like bathing, preparing food or managing finances owing to physical or mental infirmities. Sounds compassionate, but more Brits than ever are claiming anxiety and depression to qualify. As many as a thousand people each day are signing up for the allowance that can exceed $250 a week. Some 2.8 million jobless Brits are now classified as long-term ill, and the government says one in 10 working-age people now claim a sickness or disability benefit. Personal independence payment awards have more than doubled since the pandemic. British spending on working-age, health-related benefits has skyrocketed to £52 billion from £36 billion over the past five years, according to the London-based Institute for Fiscal Studies. Mr. Starmer sought to tighten eligibility requirements, but his own party revolted. More than 120 Labour MPs threatened to kill the reform bill outright. The government responded with concessions that shielded existing claimants from the changes, knocking billions off the total savings. That wasn't good enough for lawmakers like Labour's Rachael Maskell, who denounced the reforms as 'Dickensian.' The government retreated again, committing now only to consider whether to change the eligibility rules. It will complete a review next year. Gone are the immediate personal independence payment reforms that would have saved about £3.8 billion annually by fiscal year 2029-30. Last week's bill preserves cuts to a nearly $580 disability top-up to monthly benefits for low-income and jobless Brits. But for at least the next five years, these savings are largely offset by an increase in the baseline allowance. Without reforms, the cost will grow to some £66 billion by fiscal 2029/2030—about on par with the U.K.'s total 2024 defense spending. This is a political disaster for Mr. Starmer's government, which had been counting on the savings to create room for spending on defense and other priorities. The Times of London reports that Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, is now warning that the hole will have to be filled with tax increases, perhaps large ones. Yet the tax increases in her last budget are deeply unpopular and have failed to raise the anticipated revenue. But it's an even bigger problem for the country, which urgently needs to spend more to defend itself. Yet it finds itself with an ever-larger share of the population on the nonworking disability rolls. This is how nations decline. The Tories can hardly crow, since they failed to address the disability mess in their long recent hold on power. Americans also have no cause to boast as Republicans struggled to pass even modest reforms to Medicaid and food stamps. No wonder the Chinese Communists think they'll dominate the 21st century.
