IOC, International Federations consulted in drafting of National Sports Bill: Mansukh Mandaviya
Addressing the one-day 'Khelo Bharat Conclave', the minister reiterated his commitment to have the bill passed, for which he has even held discussions with former sports minister and Congress leader Ajay Maken.
The monsoon session of the Parliament will start on July 21.
'I did a series of consultations with NSFs, athletes, coaches, also got 600 inputs from the public when the draft was put online for suggestions. I also had a three-hour meeting with sports lawyers to understand their perspective,' Mandaviya stated in his address.
'The IOC was consulted as well, along with international sports federations. FIFA had a query, and I sent an officer to their headquarters to discuss things with them. The National Sports Bill is now read and will be in parliament during the monsoon session,' he added.
ALSO READ | National Sports Governance Bill will be tabled during monsoon session: Mandaviya
The bill seeks to make the country's sports administrators more accountable with the provision of a regulatory board which would have the power to grant recognition and decide funding to NSFs based on their adherence to provisions related to good governance.
The board will also be responsible for ensuring compliance with the highest governance, financial, and ethical standards.
In addition, the bill proposes the establishment of Ethics Commissions and Dispute Resolution Commissions to ensure transparency in governance.
It has been opposed by the IOA, which feels that a regulatory board would undermine its standing as the nodal body for all NSFs.
'I spoke to Ajay Maken too. He made a good effort to have this bill passed,' said Mandaviya, referring to Maken's aggressive push for cleaner sports governance during his eventful tenure that lasted a little over one year.
Governance reforms, which focus around timely elections, have been a thorny issue with prominent NSFs like the Boxing Federation of India (BFI) being accused of dragging their feet on polls that have been long due.
The minister avoided taking names but urged the administrators to rise above their personal interests.
' Main nahi hum (We, not I), that should be the way forward. We have to introspect whether it's enough to just grab the chair. We have to let go of ego. Give the seat to someone better if you see one,' he said.
'Reforms is a step-by-step process,' he asserted.
Related Topics
Mansukh Mandaviya
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
Justice Yashwant Varma moves Supreme Court against panel report
Sitting High Court judge, Justice Yashwant Varma, is reported to have approached the Supreme Court against the report of an in-house inquiry committee constituted by then Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna concluding that unaccounted cash was found in a gutted storeroom at his official residential premises after a blaze on March 14-15. Justice Varma has challenged a subsequent communication by Chief Justice Khanna (now retired) to the President and Prime Minister recommending his removal from the office of judge as unconstitutional. The May 3 report of the three-judge committee had been confidentially forwarded to the President and the Prime Minister by Chief Justice Khanna days before his retirement on May 13 after Justice Varma had refused to voluntarily resign from office. Justice Varma's case has not been numbered or listed for hearing in the Supreme Court, and is the first by a sitting High Court judge. It comes days before the Monsoon session of the Parliament, which may see the introduction of the removal motion. Justice Varma has contended that the formation of the committee was not based on any statute or the Constitution, thus had no legal basis to recommend his removal from a constitutional office. He contended that the reports were filled with inferences. The Judge said he was subject to intense media speculation and media trial. He was not given a fair hearing and an opportunity to respond to the allegations levelled by witnesses, amounting to a violation of the principles of natural justice. The Judge said key questions like the source of cash and what caused the fire were not addressed in the committee report. The judge argued that the letter for his removal was forwarded by the then CJI within hours of receiving the inquiry committee report and without having a personal interaction with him. The report of the committee, comprising Justices Sheel Nagu, G.S. Sandhawalia and Anu Sivaraman, concluded that Justice Varma and his family members were in 'covert or active control' of access into the storeroom where the stacks of half-burnt cash was found. It had noted that the currency notes 'seen and found during the process of dousing of fire' were 'highly suspicious items' and not of a small value. They could not have been placed in the storeroom without the tacit or active consent of Justice Varma or his family, the report had submitted. The inquiry committee had refused to accept the version of the judge that he was a target of a conspiracy. It said it would be 'well-nigh impossible' to 'plant' currency in a high security residential premises of a sitting judge, the panel had reasoned. The inquiry panel had said 'strong inferential evidence' established that the burnt currency was removed by Justice Varma's trusted staff from the storeroom during the early hours of March 15. The decision to form the three-judge fact-finding committee was based on a preliminary enquiry report submitted by the Delhi High Court Chief Justice DK Upadhyaya on March 21 recommending a 'deeper probe' into the allegations.
NDTV
2 hours ago
- NDTV
UK To Reduce Voting Age To 16, These Countries Have Already Done It
The United Kingdom has announced its plans to lower the voting age to 16, and the Labour Party-led government wants to do it before the next General Election. The proposal, which is likely to have a massive impact on the country's democratic system, comes months after the UK witnessed its lowest turnout in the 2024 national polls since 2001. The step is aimed at ensuring maximum participation in all elections once the proposed changes are written into law. The move will grant around 1.5 million 16 and 17-year-olds the right to vote when the country goes to the polls for the next general election in 2029, BBC reported. But not all parties supported the idea. While Prime Minister Keir Starmer said that young people should have the opportunity to say what they want their money spent on, Conservative MP Paul Holmes said the government's proposal was "hopelessly confused". Nigel Farage, the leader of Reform UK, said he didn't support lowering the voting age to 16 "even though we get lots of votes". Apart from the voting age, the government also plans to expand the purview of UK-issued bank cards, which will be treated as legitimate voter ID in Great Britain, but they must have the elector's name, according to reports. Not just that, once the changes come into effect, people will be able to apply for a postal vote at least 14 days before a poll. Earlier, the deadline was 11 days. This is to ensure people get their ballot in time. The proposed law will bring uniformity as far as the age of voting rights across Britain is concerned. In Scotland and Wales, youngsters could already vote to elect their representatives to the devolved Parliament, but not so for the British polls. Countries where the voting age is 16: In Europe, only Austria, Malta, the Isle of Man and the Channel Islands have granted voting rights to people who are at least 16 years old. Among other nations, Brazil, Argentina and Cuba, too, have voting age reduced to 16, according to The Guardian. Parts of Germany, Israel, and Estonia allow 16 and 17-year-olds to vote in some, if not all, elections. While 16-year-olds are allowed to vote in Nicaragua, the legal voting age in Indonesia, East Timor, Ethiopia, North Korea, and Sudan is 17.
New Indian Express
3 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Kavitha backs Telangana government on BC quota, slams BRS for opposing ordinance
HYDERABAD: BRS MLC and Telangana Jagruthi president K Kavitha on Thursday supported the state government on BC reservations while slamming her own party for opposing the move. During an informal chat with reporters, Kavitha said that the draft ordinance prepared by the state government for BC quota was 'absolutely correct' and the BRS leaders opposing it was 'wrong'. Kavitha went a step further and said that the BRS had no other option but to toe her line on BC reservations. 'The BRS leaders may take four days' time to accept it,' she said. 'Amending the 2018 Act and bringing the ordinance to provide 42 per cent reservations to BCs in local body elections was justified,' Kavitha added. 'I have supported the ordinance only after discussing it with legal experts,' she said. The former MP lamented that the BRS leaders did not respond to the derogatory comments made against her by MLC Ch Naveen Kumar alias Teenmaar Mallanna and added that she would leave it to the wisdom of the BRS leaders. Meanwhile, at a press conference, Kavitha demanded that Chief Minister A Revanth Reddy should lead an all-party delegation to Delhi, coinciding with the commencement of the Parliament session next week, to bring pressure on the Centre to protect the interests of Telangana regarding the Banakacherla project. The delegation should also make all possible efforts to ensure early clearance for the Bill on 42 per cent reservations for BCs in education, employment and public life, pending with the President.
