logo
N.J. Dem senators call for probe of grid operator as electric prices surge

N.J. Dem senators call for probe of grid operator as electric prices surge

Yahoo02-06-2025
Democratic senators want grid operator PJM investigated. Republicans say the Murphy administration is to blame for high electric prices. (Dana DiFilippo | New Jersey Monitor)
State senators sparred on the chamber's floor Monday over a resolution directing New Jersey energy regulators to launch an investigation of the state's grid operator, one day after steep electricity price hikes took effect.
The resolution, which passed in a 25-12 vote along party lines and must still be approved by the Assembly, calls on the Board of Public Utilities to investigate PJM Interconnection's capacity market auction, a price-setting auction that saw a nearly tenfold increase over the previous sale last July.
Democrats have sought to pin the blame on the rise in electricity bills on PJM, arguing it was too slow to connect renewable projects to its grid, thereby depressing supply and pushing prices upward. In some cases, they've outright claimed PJM's process was corrupt.
'The problem begins and ends with a grid that doesn't work. We are not investing enough money in this grid. The grid is held together by chewing gum, toothpicks, and bobby pins,' said Sen. Bob Smith (D-Middlesex), who chairs the chamber's energy panel. 'So now anyone who wants to enter the grid has to get an approval for a connection, and in the case of New Jersey, for the last two-and-a-half years, we've had 79 projects in the queue that PJM would not approve.'
Industry officials and experts have said electricity prices are rising because of an imbalance between supply and demand.
Demand, which had been roughly stable for decades, is surging amid growing electrification and the rise of power-hungry artificial intelligence data centers.
Meanwhile, New Jersey's own supply of electricity has fallen as the state shuttered fossil plants and renewable projects — chiefly offshore wind — struggled to get off the ground, leaving it more reliant on power imported through PJM's grid.
Republican members have charged Gov. Phil Murphy's renewable-heavy energy agenda and reliance on offshore wind projects are responsible for the price surge. The offshore wind projects have stalled because of rising costs and opposition by the Trump administration.
'Experts pointed to a whole host of sources and culprits that have brought us here today, a place that was foreseeable and predictable. And now we want to limit the investigation to PJM?' said Sen. Tony Bucco (R-Morris), the chamber's minority leader.
Some GOP members argued the Board of Public Utilities, which they charge is partly to blame for rising energy prices, was an inappropriate pick to conduct the probe. Sen. Bob Singer (R-Ocean) said there is some support for sunsetting the board.
'You've got to put the problem at the foot of those who created it. You've got to investigate those who created it, and you have to replace them if necessary,' Singer said.
The Board of Public Utilities is the regulatory body charged with approving utilities' requests for rate increases. New Jersey's regulated utilities do not profit from the sale of electricity itself, but they are permitted to recoup the costs of their investments and some other costs at a markup, typically around 9.6%.
PJM itself declined to comment on the resolution but said the current price spike was driven by a divergence between supply and demand.
'These higher prices are the result of a loss in electricity supply caused primarily by decarbonization policies that have led to an uptick in generator retirements, coupled with an unprecedented spike in electricity demand due largely to the advancement of data centers to power artificial intelligence, the electrification of vehicles and heating systems, and the onshoring of U.S. manufacturing,' said Dan Lockwood, a spokesperson for PJM.
The Republicans said a special committee that held hearings on rising energy prices earlier in the spring should conduct the investigation, which they said should include a probe of the Board of Public Utilities.
Democratic members argued the board has institutional and subject matter knowledge that would lend expertise to an investigation that might be absent under the special committee, though some said the panel should continue to play a role.
Still, Sen. Paul Sarlo (D-Bergen), the chamber's budget chairman, questioned the regulatory agency's future.
'We ultimately should be part of the long-term solution, and I'm not sure if BPU should be part of the long-term solution under the next governor,' Sarlo said.
Murphy leaves office in January.
The Senate approved separate legislation Monday that would require the Board of Public Utilities to study data centers' impact on electricity prices after tabling a Republican attempt to amend it. That bill, which passed the Senate unanimously, now goes to Murphy's desk.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Senate passes Trump's major policy bill with $150 billion for the DOD
Senate passes Trump's major policy bill with $150 billion for the DOD

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Senate passes Trump's major policy bill with $150 billion for the DOD

The Senate passed a massive party-line spending package Tuesday, including a one-time surge in defense spending the Pentagon is counting on for its upcoming fiscal year 2026 budget. By a vote of 51-50 — with Vice President JD Vance breaking the tie — the chamber advanced the vast tax, healthcare and border security bill President Donald Trump has championed as key to his legislative agenda. That 940-page 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' also features $150 billion in funding for the military, which would go toward shipbuilding, the Golden Dome homeland missile defense project, munitions and other key priorities. The bill next goes back to the House for final consideration. Trump has set a deadline of July 4 to pass the spending package out of that chamber, though some lawmakers in the House have already said they're unlikely to approve the bill before the end of the week. The Pentagon has argued this package should be counted as part of the DOD's overall defense budget plan for the coming year, and defense officials moved spending priorities usually reserved for its base spending plan into the one-time package. In its delayed spending request last week, the Defense Department issued an $848 million base budget request, which is a cut when accounting for inflation. That said, the Pentagon is counting on $113 billion in immediate funding from the supplemental spending bill in Congress, bringing the total for military spending closer to $960 billion. Still, many top Republicans and Democrats in Congress have argued that the unusual arrangement will cause unnecessary confusion for the Pentagon and the defense industry responsible for major weapons programs. In a briefing to describe the funding request, senior defense and military officials countered this argument, saying the immediate surge in funding may reassure some of these companies, which are accustomed to Congress starting the fiscal year on temporary spending plans known as continuing resolutions. One official, who like others spoke on the condition of anonymity, said the administration would likely keep military funding close to $1 trillion for next year as well, though it hasn't yet decided on an appropriate baseline. If not, the Defense Department will face extremely difficult choices when deciding how to factor the priorities included in the one-time spending package back into its yearly budget.

Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' Threatens Planned Parenthood Funds
Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' Threatens Planned Parenthood Funds

Time​ Magazine

time26 minutes ago

  • Time​ Magazine

Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' Threatens Planned Parenthood Funds

The funding Planned Parenthood receives for a variety of reproductive and preventive care services through Medicaid is under threat after the Supreme Court and Senate Parliamentarian both greenlit Republican efforts to strip the women's health organization of funds. The Senate version of President Donald Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' narrowly passed on Tuesday with a provision included that would prohibit federal Medicaid funding for any health care services provided by Planned Parenthood for one year, after Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough allowed the cuts to remain in the legislation. The provision initially sought to 'defund' Planned Parenthood for 10 years, but the timing was reduced to one year prior to MacDonough's ruling. The sweeping tax and spending package now returns to the House. The bill's Senate passage comes just days after the Supreme Court ruled that states can prohibit Medicaid funding for any health care services provided by Planned Parenthood, in a case stemming from a 2018 order by South Carolina Republican Gov. Henry McMaster that barred any clinic offering abortion services from the state's Medicaid program. Read More: South Carolina Wants to End Medicaid for Planned Parenthood The decisions are major victories for Republican lawmakers in their decades-long effort to strip Planned Parenthood, the nation's largest abortion provider, of government funding. The Hyde Amendment already bars federal dollars from being used for abortion. Medicaid—the state-federal program that provides health insurance coverage for more than 70 million people from low-income households—doesn't cover abortions, with very limited exceptions. But Medicaid covers other, non-abortion health care services that Planned Parenthood clinics provide, and many of the patients who visit the organization's locations are Medicaid recipients. Anti-abortion groups praised the Supreme Court's decision; Katie Daniel, director of legal affairs and policy counsel for the anti-abortion group Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America, said in a statement that the decision 'saves countless unborn babies from a violent death.' But Planned Parenthood, abortion-rights advocates, and health care providers condemned the court's ruling. Planned Parenthood has said that barring Medicaid coverage for the number of other health care services its clinics provide—such as birth control, STI testing and treatment, and cancer screenings—could lead to many patients not getting the health care they need. 'The Supreme Court once again sided with politicians who believe they know better than you, who want to block you from seeing your trusted health care provider and making your own health care decisions,' Alexis McGill Johnson, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, said in a statement. 'Patients need access to birth control, cancer screenings, STI testing and treatment, and more. And right now, lawmakers in Congress are trying to 'defund' Planned Parenthood as part of their long-term goal to shut down Planned Parenthood and ban abortion nationwide.' The provision targeting Planned Parenthood in Trump's tax and spending package would cost taxpayers an additional $52 million over 10 years, according to an estimate from the Congressional Budget Office. Planned Parenthood has said that if it is 'defunded,' nearly 200 health centers in 24 states would be at risk of closing and more than 1.1 million patients could lose access to their health care. Lawmakers and anti-abortion groups that have pushed to 'defund' Planned Parenthood have argued that patients can turn to federally qualified health centers instead of the women's health organization. But a recent report from the Guttmacher Institute, which researches and supports sexual and reproductive health and rights, concluded that federally qualified health centers wouldn't be able to readily replace Planned Parenthood's provider network. Abortion-rights advocates sounded the alarm on Tuesday, after the tax and spending package cleared the Senate with the provision targeting Planned Parenthood. 'If this bill passes, it will be the most devastating blow to women's health and bodily autonomy since the overturning of Roe,' Nancy Northup, president and CEO of the Center for Reproductive Rights, said in a statement. 'What we are seeing is a full-scale attack against the complete range of care that these clinics provide—abortion care, yes, but also so much more.' 'If this bill passes, many people will have nowhere else affordable to go for these services,' Northup continued. 'The U.S. health care system is already stretched thin—the majority in Congress should not be further limiting where people can get health care. Patients should have the freedom to pick their health care provider.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store