It's illegal in most states for private equity to buy a law firm. Lawyers have figured out a workaround.
MSOs are a workaround to allow nonlawyers, including private equity firms, to effectively invest.
Law firm owners can use the investors to scale, as well as for succession planning.
Real estate, airlines, fashion.
It might seem like private equity has climbed the mountain of the American economy, declaring everywhere the light touches as part of its kingdom.
But one corner remains in the shadowlands: Law firms.
Nearly every state has adopted a professional ethics rule from the American Bar Association forbidding lawyers from working for nonlawyer-owned firms.
Lawyers, of course, have figured out a way around it.
The loophole, known as a "managed services organization" — or MSO — allows non-lawyers to effectively own part of law firms through a second corporate entity.
Business Insider spoke to two attorneys who advise law firms on the arrangement, which they said is becoming increasingly common.
In June, Puerto Rico's high court allowed non-lawyer investment in law firms in order to spur economic development in the territory. Arizona, the only state that has done away with the ABA rule, in 2020, now has over 100 law firms that are open to outside investors, according to a recent Stanford Law School study. Large companies like KPMG and Rocket Lawyer now own law firms in the state outright.
The MSO model, which isn't limited to only Arizona, could appeal to law firm owners who want to retire or who don't want to hand their firms over to a law partner.
"We're in the midst of the largest rolling retirement of lawyers in history," said Lucian Pera, a legal ethics attorney at Adams & Reese who advises lawyers and businesses about setting up MSOs. "The baby boomers are getting old and retiring. And that's a real opportunity for some people."
Using an MSO can give private equity firms — or other kinds of companies — a chance to effectively buy a slice of legal practices. And it gives lawyers the chance to sell stakes of their companies for cold, hard cash.
It could also offer the chance to partner with a deep-pocketed company that could boost the firm and help scale it to new heights.
Traditionally, law firms have operated as partnerships among attorneys, where equity partners own shares in the firm and help manage it.
That's partly because of ethics rules designed to maintain attorney independence, such as ABA Model Rule 5.4(d), which largely prevents nonlawyers from owning law firms or from having the right to control the professional judgment of a lawyer.
The ABA's rules have made law practices distinct from many other white-collar professions, like finance or consulting, which may have robust ethical rules and norms but don't impose such stringent limits on ownership. There are plenty of publicly traded banks and consulting firms, but no publicly traded law firms.
As a workaround, the law firms can set themselves up as two corporate entities, Pera said. One is the law firm itself, composed exclusively of lawyers and owned only by lawyers. The second is the service organization, which can be owned by anyone and acts as a vendor for the law firm. It is essentially the back office, taking care of all non-lawyer tasks, including marketing, accounting, human resources, real estate leases, and employing paralegals. The two corporate entities enter into a long-term contract.
Under this MSO arrangement, non-lawyers can invest in the service corporation, though not the law firm itself. Presto! You have an ethically independent group of lawyers who are exclusively working with a company that can sell shares, Pera says.
According to Pera, no state bars have issued ethics opinions that expressly bless the MSO model, but no court or regulator has found a problem with it, either.
"The pieces fit well, and there's no regulatory approval required for a law firm to do it, just like there's no regulatory approval required for a law firm to take out a bank loan," Pera said.
A spokesperson for the American Bar Association said its Center for Professional Responsibility doesn't have any ethics opinions on non-lawyers investing in MSOs.
"Lawyers are not subject to the ABA Model Rules," the spokesperson said. "Instead, they are regulated by the state supreme courts in which they are licensed."
Tom Lenfestey is the founder and CEO of The Law Market Exchange, a sort of Craigslist for law firms.
He says private equity companies are typically interested in consumer-driven firms, like personal injury.
Investors might be able to introduce new efficiencies into those firms and get a steady stream of revenue in a larger portfolio, said Lenfestey, who also advises on law firm mergers and acquisitions.
Private equity companies might be warier of investing in Big Law firms, which typically service corporations and have fewer but bigger clients, he said. Lawyers could always jump ship and take clients with them, but consumer law firms tend to do steadier business, he said.
"Personal injury is brand-marketed — it's the billboards, it's the TV, it's the digital marketing," Lenfestey told Business Insider. "It's not attorney relationship-based."
Because law firms aren't required to disclose their use of service organizations, it's difficult to know how widespread the practice is.
Both Pera and Lenfestey declined to list the firms they've worked with using the structure, citing confidentiality obligations to their clients, but said it's becoming more common.
Pera said he knows of one firm that used the structure as far back as 2006. In more recent years, more law firms and investors have become interested in using MSOs, Pera and Lenfestey said.
"There are many more that are in process right now, and some of them are quite large," Pera said. "There's a fairly large insurance defense firm in this country that's looking at doing this. There's a fairly large AmLaw-ranked law firm that's looking at this. So there's a non-trivial number of these that are going on."
Lawyers who have built up their practices, and who want to cash out, can do so by effectively selling part of their firm to someone else to manage.
They can also help firms scale. Selling shares of an MSO could help finance lead generation or advertising.
Catalex Network, which launched earlier this year, is using the MSO model to invest in law firms with a longer time horizon. While a private equity firm might want to stick with a law firm for a few years before selling its stake, Catalex Network says it aims to form long-term partnerships with law firms by helping them establish MSOs, buying substantial stakes in them, combining their back-offices, and giving the firms the resources to compete with Big Law.
Catalex Network offers bread-and-butter services like IT, payroll, compliance management, and accounting. But also services that are more specific to the legal industry, like recruiting and sophisticated enterprise software that would be cost-prohibitive for smaller firms.
"I've seen kind of what big law resources are and I've seen what small law resources are," said Jeffrey Goldenhersh, a Catalex Network founding partner, who previously worked at the Big Law firm Skadden Arps before moving to a boutique firm.
For Catalex Network, the MSO structure offers a way for the company to grow with law firms. The American Bar Association's rules meant to preserve attorney independence, such as limits on fee-sharing with non-lawyers, are a non-issue.
And while Catalex Network handles the back office, the lawyers can do less managing and more lawyering, Goldenhersh says.
"There's a real consolidation going on at the top end of the legal market and some of these smaller, midsize, boutique-type firms are getting a little bit left behind," Jesse Hamilton, another Catalex founding partner, told BI. "So we're trying to help them catch up and be able to step into the ring with some of the larger firms that have consolidated, have the best technology, the best AI, the best back office staff, and have them be able to compete and stay relevant in the industry."
Read the original article on Business Insider
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
34 minutes ago
- Forbes
Inside The Bold Vision For America's First Cognitive City
An artist's rendering of Pista, a motorsports club, one of 14 districts in the proposed cognitive ... More city of ELISIUM. It may come as a surprise that the United States is only three percent urbanized and it's where 80 percent of Americans live. The country's vast space and rich resources make it ideal for building innovative new cities focused on economic opportunity, quality of life, and sustainability. Yet, except for a few minor developments over the past several decades, no new ambitious cities have broken ground. This may be about to change. A new project called ELISIUM is underway in Florida that could become a model for city development and it's betting big on an urban future of artificial intelligence (AI), data, and automation. Our Future Belongs To Cities After thousands of years of rural existence, today, humans largely live in an urban context. By 2100, the United Nations predicts that 85 percent of the world's population will live in cities. They are the powerhouses of GDP growth and opportunity. Existing urban areas continue to grow and the number of megacities—those that are larger than 10 million inhabitants--is now at 37, a number which is predicted to grow to 67 by 2050. And what about new cities? There's no shortage of ambitious global projects underway such as Masdar City in the UAE and Songdo in South Korea. Notable though is the relative absence of novel greenfield urbanization in the United States. The Concept Of A New American Cognitive City In early 2023, seeking a location to build a motorsports themed country club, a group of successful real estate developers led by Ed Miranda, a veteran of luxury resort construction, identified and secured roughly 4000 acres of land in Hendry County, Florida. It quickly became apparent that significant infrastructure would be required for housing workers, running utilities, and maintaining operations. Design concepts evolved rapidly, and the project began to look like a small city. Inspired by the possibility of creating a development more ambitious than the original intent, the team looked to the Middle East Gulf region and China for ideas. Saudi's NEOM region was particularly influential in their decision-making, and in fact, they recruited NEOM's chief technology officer, Himanshu Kaul, to be part of the founding team. Together, they were convinced, and rightly so, that the US was being left behind by impressive global urban developments, particularly the concept of cognitive cities, a version 2.0 of smart cities, where AI, data, and automation is being used to create more personalized, responsive and adaptable urban experiences. The team decided it was time to build a bold and progressive new sustainable microcity in the US and ELISIUM was born. The Scope Of The Cognitive City ELISIUM is impressive in its vision but modest in its scale. Its total size will eventually reach around 4000 acres when completed and house around 10,800 residents in 4400 homes. Around 20 percent of the development will be dedicated to business use. The development, scheduled to break ground in 2026, will be made up of 14 districts, each with a specific design and theme, including a state-of-the-art private airport, a Formula E quality racing track, and a uniquely designed golf course. An artist's rendering of Aeroville, a 432-acre private airport at ELISIUM. Already, the project has around 50 partners, including top-tier architects, commitments from retailers and technology companies. The estimated cost to build Elisium is $18 billion, which will be raised and spent over a 12-year period, the anticipated duration to complete the entire project. Funding will come from several sources including bonds, private investors, and the team's own funds. Along the way, as with many development projects, phases will open, including the initial sale of memberships and plots in mid-2026. The first residents will be able to move in by 2029. Cognitive Technologies At The Center Much of how the team is approaching ELISIUM is unique. In addition to a hyper-focus on sustainability, technologies such as AI, automation, and the Internet-of-Things (IoT) will play an outsized role in managing and maintaining the community. While thousands of people will be involved in building the microcity, they also intend to utilize robotics in a major way from a construction in the short-term to providing other forms of physical AI in the long-term. With a 12-year project plan, some of their vision for automation will only kick-in after several years as the anticipated technology catches up. Similar to how NEOM created an independent technology arm called Tonomous, ELISIUM has created COGNITIVE. This entity will be the technology provider to ELISIUM, which will use the community as a living lab to innovate and deploy solutions for their own use and then resell these products and services to other cities and developments around the world. Initially, core solutions will include a city operating system (CityOS), a building management system (BuildingAI), and an application called WooHoo for community end users. An AI agent called Verdant, their Chief AI Officer (CAIO), who even has a LinkedIn profile, will be responsible for running and managing complex AI tasks and services across the community. To quote David Grieshaber, ELISIUM's CIO, 'we're building a computer system with a city attached to it.' Why ELISIUM May Succeed Where Others Have Failed The idea of building new, technologically driven cities in the US isn't new, but sadly there's a long list of failed attempts. Reasons that success hasn't been forthcoming range from overly ambitious plans to poor governance, political resistance, and bureaucratic quagmire in dealing with federal, state, and other entities. To avoid these traps, the team behind ELISIUM aren't establishing a city with all the state regulations that come along with it. Instead, it will be designated as a private luxury resort community that will work closely with the county. The project also benefits from its modest scale. At approximately 4000 acres and 10,800 residents, it's significantly smaller, less complex, and more manageable than most new city initiatives. This is also a team that has vast experience having collectively been involved in over 100 projects around the world. They know what works and what doesn't and they're leveraging their experience and lessons learned to avoid many of the pitfalls. Notably, their risk register is over 1000 pages in length. They're aware, for example, of the privacy concerns that have made other smart city efforts receive show-stopping backlash. Finally, consistent with their prioritization of cognitive technologies, they're already using AI extensively for analysis, decision-making, and planning and design. Despite having many advantages, building a new city is extreme in the challenges the team will face and successfully executing their vision will be no cakewalk. The Time Is Right For Bold And Ambitious City Projects In addition to ELISIUM, other urban innovators including Telosa, which is notably more ambitious in scale, and the notional idea of Freedom Cities, indicate some momentum in this space. That said, the opportunity to build new cities in the US remains shockingly untapped. An artist's rendering of Telosa, Marc Lore's vision for a new, innovative and fully sustainable city ... More in the US Right now, the ELISIUM team might just have the vision and experience to deliver America's first cognitive city. While a small group of people will enjoy the luxuries of ELISIUM—and having a home there will come at a premium, one of the most important impacts it may ultimately have is as a sustainable model for all types of new communities in the future. As a trailblazer, ELISIUM could be just what is needed to inspire a new era of smart urbanization right here in the US.
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Consumer confidence rising as summer holiday season begins
The majority of UK households are feeling financially secure, with 70% of people confident enough to plan a summer holiday, according to a survey. The number of people feeling financially secure has risen this quarter by three percentage points to 58%, while confidence that the UK economy is improving has risen to 17% from one in 10 three months ago, the KPMG Consumer Pulse poll found. The survey of 3,000 UK adults, taken in early June, found 50% feel able to spend freely, although 14% say they are still having to actively cut their discretionary spending to pay for essentials, and 3% of are incurring debt to do so. Reflecting on their spending during the last three months compared to the previous quarter, consumers most commonly said they had spent less on eating out. Around a quarter (23%) said they had bought more promotional or discounted items when shopping, while just over a fifth (22%) said they used their loyalty cards more. Of the 70% who are planning a holiday, 34% say it will be in the UK, 21% are heading abroad and 15% are doing both. However 75% of those going on holiday are taking steps to reduce the cost of travel, such as going for fewer nights, self-catering or using a lower-cost airline. Some 33% say they will be taking children on holiday during term-time to cut costs, while one in five (20%) said their whole holiday would be taken during term-time. Despite the quarterly improvement in economic confidence, half of people (51%) feel that the economy is still worsening – although this is down from 58% in the previous quarter. Those saying that the economy is getting worse cite the cost of their groceries (79%), utilities (74%), and the general state of public services where they live (42%). Linda Ellett, head of consumer, retail and leisure at KPMG UK, said: 'Consumer confidence has rallied over the last quarter and only a fifth of consumers now feel insecure about their financial circumstance. 'Businesses will be hoping that this improvement brings about increased spending confidence during the summer months. 'But macroeconomic confidence still looms large, with half of consumers still to be convinced that the economy isn't worsening.' Ms Ellett added: 'Summer holiday demand looks very healthy, bringing direct and indirect benefit to the UK retail and leisure sectors. 'Many households have prioritised discretionary spend for their holiday but, considering both household essential costs and the price of travel have increased, it is little surprise to see three quarters of holidaymakers are still taking a variety of steps to get the cost of their break down where they can.' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How Trump's tariff chaos could reshape Asia's businesses
Tan Yew Kong, who works at one of the world's largest chipmakers, says his company is like a tailor's shop - it customises chips to meet client's needs. "We provide the fabric, we provide the cufflinks and everything. You tell us what you like, what design you like and we make it for you," says Mr Tan, who runs GlobalFoundries' operations in Singapore. Nowadays, the firm is also customising its future to accommodate US President Donald Trump's unpredictable tariff policy. Businesses and countries have been offering to appease Washington ahead of 9 July, when the 90-day pause on Trump's steep "Liberation Day" tariffs ends. And yet again, it's unclear what happens next. The president said on Friday that the US government is to start sending out letters with details of higher tariff rates that will take effect on 1 August. He said as many as 12 letters will be sent out over the coming days and the levies will range from "60% or 70% tariffs to 10 to 20% tariffs" but did not name the countries due to receive them. So far, semiconductors are exempt from tariffs but Trump has threatened levies on them several times, and that uncertainty is making it near impossible for businesses to plan for the future. Also last week Bloomberg reported the White House is planning to further tighten controls over artificial intelligence (AI) chips by restricting shipments to Malaysia and Thailand to crack down on suspected smuggling of the technology to China. The US Commerce Department did not immediately respond to a BBC request for comment. You cannot "flip the switch every other alternate week or day. That makes it very difficult for businesses to plan long term", Mr Tan says. US-headquartered GlobalFoundries is contracted by some of the world's biggest semiconductor designers and manufacturers - AMD, Broadcom, Qualcomm - to make their chips. Its factories are spread across the world, with many in Asia, from India to South Korea. It recently announced plans to increase its investments to $16bn (£11.7bn) as demand for artificial intelligence (AI) hardware skyrockets. To protect that sprawling footprint, the company has also pledged to work with the Trump administration to move parts of its chip manufacturing and supply chain to US soil. Chip manufacturers, textile producers and car industry suppliers - whose tightly-knit supply chains run through Asia - are rushing to fulfil orders, cut costs and find new customers as they navigate a market in turmoil. "Businesses need to rethink buffers, increasing their inventory and lead times to account for volatility," said Aparna Bharadwaj of Boston Consulting Group. She adds this could create new opportunities, but also impact their competitiveness and market share in certain countries. In other words, it's hard to say. "Uncertainty is the new normal." When Trump announced levies in April against much of the world, some of the steepest rates were aimed at Asian economies - from long-time allies Japan (24%) and South Korea (25%) to major trading partner Vietnam (46%). He then hit pause soon after, lowering tariffs on most countries to 10% for the next 90 days. Still the higher rates could return as early as Wednesday. Malaysia's prime minister has said tariffs will adversely affect many industries, including textiles, furniture, rubber and plastics. Singapore will be subject to a 10% levy despite having a free trade deal with the US - the prime minister said these are "not actions one does to a friend". South East Asian countries accounted for 7.2% of global GDP in 2024. So the extra costs that come with tariffs could have severe, long-lasting effects. In the region only Vietnam has managed to strike a deal so far - US imports from there will now face 20% tariffs, while US exports to Hanoi will face no levies. Japan and South Korea have been pursuing trade negotiations during the pause, although Trump has threatened Tokyo with an even higher rate - up to 35% - as the deadline looms. Japanese car makers could be amongst the worst hit. Companies including Mazda have said they are in survival mode because of the time and lengthy processes involved in changing suppliers and adapting their business. Australia, despite being a key security ally and importing more US goods than it exports, has said it has been telling Washington the rate on it "should be zero". Indonesia and Thailand have offered to buy more American products and reduce taxes on US imports. Poorer countries like Cambodia, which have limited bargaining power, face a staggering 49% tariff but cannot afford to buy more US goods. "Asian economies are reliant on both China and the US... they sort of sit at the heart of the global supply chain," said Pushan Dutt, professor of economics and political science at INSEAD. "If there are shifts in this global supply chain, if there are shifts in trading patterns, it is going to be much more difficult for them." He adds that countries with big domestic demand like India may be insulated from trade shocks, but economies that are more reliant on exports - like Singapore, Vietnam and even China - will see a major impact. In the years after Trump was first elected, Singapore and Malaysia invested in growth industries like chip manufacturing and data centres. It was partly about so-called friend-shoring – where companies make goods in countries that have good relations with the US. Asian economies also benefited from a "China + 1" supply chain strategy, which involved firms diversifying supply chains beyond China and Taiwan to South East Asian countries. All of this was to be able to continue reaching the US, which Ms Bharadwaj says is "a critical market for many". "No matter what happens with tariffs, the US remains an important customer for many Asian businesses," she adds. "It's the largest world economy and has a dynamic consumer base." Beyond the South East Asian producers, Trump's tariffs also raise costs for American companies that have been operating in the region for decades. The clothing and footwear industry stands to suffer - brands like Nike have long outsourced manufacturing to countries like Vietnam and Indonesia. Some US brands have already said they'll need to pass costs onto customers because tariffs make the price of imported goods significantly higher. Experts say foreign investments could shift from Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia to countries with lower tariffs, like the Philippines, Singapore, Malaysia and Indonesia. Businesses may also look for new customers - with the European Union, the Middle East and Latin America emerging as alternative markets. "We are no longer doing globalisation but more of a regionalisation," said Mr Tan of GlobalFoundries. "Find a place that we feel safe. We feel that the supply will be continued. And people will have to get used to the fact that it is not as cheap as it used to be." Just as Asia's trade alliances shift, the US has emerged as an increasingly unreliable partner. "This has actually created a massive opportunity for China to become, sort of, guardian of the world trading order," Prof Dutt says. The US-Vietnam deal is only the third announced so far, after agreements with the UK and China. Until more happen, businesses and economies in Asia may have to forge a new path. "As the US and others embrace increased protectionism, Asia is moving in the opposite direction, as pro-business governments are increasing trade openness," Ms Bharadwaj says. "Tariffs are accelerating two macro trends: slowing of trade between China and the West, and accelerating trade between China... and emerging Asian countries." Trump's policies have created trade turmoil that could transform the global economic order, and the US may not necessarily come out as the winner. Prof Dutt sums up what is happening in the words of an old proverb: "Bow to the ruler, and then go your own way." Trump's chips strategy: The US will struggle to take on Asia Trump's tariffs are a huge blow to Vietnam's economic ambitions Trump's tariffs leave China's neighbours with an impossible choice 'We don't care': A defiant China looks beyond Trump's America Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data