logo
An all-women brick unit to end gender inequality in real estate

An all-women brick unit to end gender inequality in real estate

Time of India24-04-2025
1
2
Lucknow: A group of 30 women in Lucknow's backyard are working hard to create UP's first all-woman unit that will manufacture high-strength
green concrete eco-bricks
.
The initiative, called Nirman by Women, is led by a private company named Ventura Prefab with the support of the State Rural Livelihood Mission (UPSRLM). It is also an effort to challenge gender inequality in India's real estate and construction sector.
This is significant considering that the presence of women in India's real estate and construction sector stands at an abysmal 12%, and that too in secondary roles with lower wages. However, in this pilot, women are being trained in primary jobs such as machine operation, batch mixing, and concrete moulding, among others, which were traditionally meant for men. Chief Secretary UP, Manoj Kumar Singh, along with senior officials from the UPSRLM, visited the factory on Thursday.
An interaction with the trainee women brought to the fore stories of grit and awe. Poonam Sharma, a woman in her mid-20s, carried her six-month-old daughter to start a new life, away from her alcohol-addict husband. "I am a victim of a patriarchal mindset and gender bias, but I don't want my daughter to inherit the same fate. This training came as an opportunity to me, and I availed it to carve my individual and independent identity," said the woman, whose aunt takes care of the baby when she is working in the factory.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Trade Bitcoin & Ethereum – No Wallet Needed!
IC Markets
Start Now
Undo
Manta Devi of Chak Prithvirajpur village rebelled against her husband and in-laws to learn the skill. "Work guarantees the flow of money, not lamentations," remarked the lean and thin woman. Kavita Bhatnagar, who is associated with the training, informed that it took a lot of effort to convince the women to join the programme. "There were all kinds of barriers. Many women had no confidence; others felt that they weren't as strong as men. Several interactions with the women through self-help group lead ladies helped to iron out the doubts," she recalled.
But there were women who saw the opportunity as a chance to chase their dream of financial self-reliance. Akanksha Singh, an 18-year-old girl awaiting her board result, is a case in point. "My father is a cancer patient. We sold off our land for his treatment. My financial independence is necessary to lessen the burden on my family," she said, hoping to launch a start-up of her own through various entrepreneurial schemes of the state govt.
Rajani Devi of Khasrawa village wants a better future for her children and is aware that the single income of her husband can never ensure the continuity of education. Avadheesh Srivastava, who holds a master's degree in civil engineering and is training these women, was both shocked and amazed upon meeting his 'students'. His first realisation was that they had very limited foundational understanding of science while their minds were full of questions that were never answered.
Machine handler and trainer Kuldeep said, "Women are naturally gritty, and this lot proved it to me. They were not scared to try anything. The moment they understood the science behind the machine, they took control of it and practised it till perfection." Mother of this initiative, Rashmi Sinha, who has worked closely on women's issues in various places, including the United Nations, said that the training would end in a few weeks, but the journey of change has just begun.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Inside the cockpit: ‘Why did you cut off ...?' What was the last conversation between AI 171 pilots
Inside the cockpit: ‘Why did you cut off ...?' What was the last conversation between AI 171 pilots

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Inside the cockpit: ‘Why did you cut off ...?' What was the last conversation between AI 171 pilots

Inside the cockpit: 'Why did you cut off ...?' What was the last conversation between AI 171 pilots NEW DELHI: The cockpit voice recorder from the London-bound Air India 787 that crashed in Ahmedabad has revealed the final conversation between the flight Captain Sumeet Sabharwal and first officer Clive Kunder. A 15-page preliminary report by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB), in its detailing, disclosed that after the fuel supply to both engines of the aircraft was cut off, one pilot was heard asking 'Why did you cutoff?' to which the other replied, 'I did not do so,' suggesting a potential technical malfunction or involuntary activation. The AAIB report, released a month after the June 12 crash, lists key details about the accident flight, the crew, and the final moments recorded in the cockpit. Flight AI171 was operated by a flight crew comprising a Pilot-in-Command (PIC) and a Co-pilot, along with ten cabin crew members. The report mentions that the operating crew had arrived in Ahmedabad a day earlier. Upon reaching the airport, the crew underwent a preflight breath analyser test at 06:25 UTC and were found 'fit to operate' the flight. The report also stated that both pilots had adequate rest before operating the June 12 flight. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Don't Pay Full Price for 2025's Top Games! Shop Now Undo Data from the aircraft's Enhanced Airborne Flight Recorder (EAFR) showed that the aircraft had reached its maximum recorded airspeed just before the engine 1 and engine 2 fuel control switches were shifted from 'RUN' to 'CUTOFF' — one after the other. Also read | Engine 1 and Engine 2 cut off within 1 second: What caused Air India plane crash? 10 key findings from probe report AAIB report reveals minutes before the aircraft was airborne. At 07:55:15 UTC (13:25:15 IST), the aircraft requested taxi clearance, which was granted by Air Traffic Control (ATC). The aircraft took off at 08:08:39 UTC (13:38:39 IST), and at 08:09:05 UTC (13:39:05 IST), one of the pilots transmitted a distress call: 'MAYDAY MAYDAY MAYDAY.' The air traffic controller (ATCO) responded by asking for the flight's call sign but received no reply, the report said. The report also stated that the aircraft's take-off weight was within allowable limits, and there were no dangerous goods listed onboard. Flight AI171, bound for London Gatwick, crashed into a medical hostel complex shortly after takeoff from Ahmedabad, killing 260 people, including 241 onboard.

Air India plane crash probe: ‘Why did you cut off?' pilot asked — Cockpit recording reveals final exchange
Air India plane crash probe: ‘Why did you cut off?' pilot asked — Cockpit recording reveals final exchange

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Air India plane crash probe: ‘Why did you cut off?' pilot asked — Cockpit recording reveals final exchange

Air India plane crash probe: 'Why did you cut off?' pilot asked — Cockpit recording reveals final exchange The cockpit voice recorder from the London-bound Air India 787 that crashed in Ahmedabad has revealed the final conversation between the flight Captain Sumeet Sabharwal and first officer Clive Kunder. A 15-page preliminary report by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB), in its detailing, disclosed that after the fuel supply to both engines of the aircraft was cut off, one pilot was heard asking 'Why did you cutoff?' to which the other replied, 'I did not do so,' suggesting a potential technical malfunction or involuntary activation. The AAIB report, released a month after the June 12 crash, lists key details about the accident flight, the crew, and the final moments recorded in the cockpit. Flight AI171 was operated by a flight crew comprising a Pilot-in-Command (PIC) and a Co-pilot, along with ten cabin crew members. The report mentions that the operating crew had arrived in Ahmedabad a day earlier. Upon reaching the airport, the crew underwent a preflight breath analyser test at 06:25 UTC and were found 'fit to operate' the flight. The report also stated that both pilots had adequate rest before operating the June 12 flight. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Vastu Compliant 3BHK @ Kalyani LivingTree, KIADB, Bagalur Kalyani Developers Learn More Undo Data from the aircraft's Enhanced Airborne Flight Recorder (EAFR) showed that the aircraft had reached its maximum recorded airspeed just before the engine 1 and engine 2 fuel control switches were shifted from 'RUN' to 'CUTOFF' — one after the other. AAIB report reveals minutes before the aircraft was airborne. At 07:55:15 UTC (13:25:15 IST), the aircraft requested taxi clearance, which was granted by Air Traffic Control (ATC). The aircraft took off at 08:08:39 UTC (13:38:39 IST), and at 08:09:05 UTC (13:39:05 IST), one of the pilots transmitted a distress call: 'MAYDAY MAYDAY MAYDAY.' The air traffic controller (ATCO) responded by asking for the flight's call sign but received no reply, the report said. The report also stated that the aircraft's take-off weight was within allowable limits, and there were no dangerous goods listed onboard. Flight AI171, bound for London Gatwick, crashed into a medical hostel complex shortly after takeoff from Ahmedabad, killing 260 people, including 241 onboard.

Air India crash report: The unanswered questions in govt's 15-page preliminary findings into AI-171 tragedy
Air India crash report: The unanswered questions in govt's 15-page preliminary findings into AI-171 tragedy

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

Air India crash report: The unanswered questions in govt's 15-page preliminary findings into AI-171 tragedy

A month after Air India flight AI171 crashed moments after take off from Ahmedabad, the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) has released its preliminary findings. The 15-page report provides a detailed timeline of the aircraft's final minutes, confirming that both engines shut down seconds after liftoff and that neither pilot acknowledged switching them off. But even with flight data, cockpit recordings, and engine analysis underway, investigators have yet to determine why the fuel cutoff switches for both engines moved to 'CUTOFF' in-flight, one after the other, and without any known command. The Boeing 787-8, flying from Ahmedabad to London, crashed just outside the airport perimeter on June 12, less than a minute after departure. 241 onboard, including ten crew members, were killed, and at least 30 on ground. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Sharp Design, Smoother Drives. Toyota Glanza Learn More Undo Here's what the AAIB report doesn't answer yet: What triggered the dual engine shutdown ? Live Events The most critical unknown is what led to both Engine 1 and Engine 2 shutting down at 08:08:42 UTC (1.38 PM IST). The pilots denied triggering the shutdown, and there is no evidence of bird strike, sabotage, or fuel contamination so far. Also Read: Air India plane crash report out; Both engines 'cut off' mid-air '01 second apart', pilots in cockpit left confused about cause The EAFR confirms the switches moved from 'RUN' to 'CUTOFF,' but the report does not explain whether this was a mechanical failure, an electrical issue, or a software anomaly. Basically, the preliminary report does not reveal how the switch could have flipped to the cutoff position. Was the stabilizer sensor issue linked to the engine cutoffs? The aircraft had earlier arrived from Delhi as flight AI423, and the previous crew had reported a fault code related to the stabilizer position sensor ('STAB POS XDCR'). Although Air India engineers addressed the issue and cleared the aircraft for its next flight, the investigation has not linked or ruled out any connection between this sensor fault and the subsequent failure. Also Read: Air India plane crash- Previous crew logged defect report related to flight's stabilizer sensor, reveals probe findings Is this possibly a case of human error, systemic failure, or broader design issue? This is the central question investigators are still examining. The AAIB has not ruled in or ruled out the possibility of crew error, aircraft system malfunction, or design-related fault. The crew had sufficient rest, cleared preflight checks, and followed procedures. However, the investigation is still reviewing cockpit actions, system inputs, and procedural adherence in the minutes before the crash. Furthermore, the flight data is still under analysis, and additional information from Boeing and GE is being sought. Was the aircraft's emergency power sequence fully functional? The RAT deployed and the APU began to auto-start, but the full effectiveness of the aircraft's emergency power systems, including their role in relight attempts and hydraulic recovery, has not been elaborated in the report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store