logo
Tariffs, rising costs take toll on confidence levels

Tariffs, rising costs take toll on confidence levels

Canterbury business owners are no longer oozing with confidence as shoppers and other consumers resist the buying urge.
Business sectors appear to be in different camps about trading prospects for the year ahead with some upbeat and others less hopeful because of delays to an expected lift in demand.
Hospitality and retail businesses are among those less optimistic with cash tills more muted through tough winter months and they are looking forward to the opening of new major city sporting facilities.
Lower interest rates should have given them reason for hope, but many businesses remain on fixed rates locked in over the last two years and shoppers in the same position are sticking to household necessities.
Some manufacturers are struggling to reach sales targets, while others in software, electronics and high-value food markets are investing in new machinery on the back of increased demand.
Exporters continue to be uneasy about the way United States President Donald Trump's tariffs will play out and concerned about the threat of overseas conflicts on trading.
Canterbury Business said confidence had not continued its upward trajectory this year as many had hoped, despite reaching a high point last December.
In its survey of 400 small and large businesses for the quarter year 53% expected the Canterbury economy to be stronger over the next year and 51% expected a stronger financial performance.
The survey revealed 82% were confident in their ability to deal with disruption.
Chief executive Leeann Watson said business trading was still heading in the right direction, but less quickly than owners would like.
"The levels of confidence that we saw in December are still heading up, but slowly. What's not necessarily being in line with that is consumer demand. That's much slower, but again still heading in the right direction."
Food and grocery retailers were in a business-as-usual position, while those selling clothing, sporting goods or other items such as cars and boats were tending to feel the pinch because of cautious spending on non-essentials.
Ms Watson said the business environment was in an overall holding pattern, but was expected to pick up at the tail end of the year.
Restructuring and redundancies had stabilised and businesses were investing in marketing for a growth phase, she said.
Business sectors varied in their confidence with some doing well and others cautiously optimistic about the future or conservatively holding back from investing in their businesses until interest rates kicked in. Those in recovery mode were often not yet ready to expand or struggling with challenging decisions about the future, she said.
Hospitality NZ Canterbury branch president Jeremy Stevens said owner operators were positive after a seasonally slow June following a strong May.
April trading was challenging as customers optimised their leave because Easter and Anzac Day holidays were so close together and venues such as Akaroa and Hanmer Springs did better than central city outlets, he said.
Mr Stevens said operators expected a "quite special" period over the next year.
"Having the metro sports centre open will bring a lot of people travelling around from New Zealand and also Australia in sports teams ... conferences being held at Te Pai and the stadium opening next year with the metro sports centre that's really going to help boost accommodation and central city trade."
He said discretionary spending was also expected to increase when lower interest rates flowed though.
"I think the biggest challenge for the industry is the continual increased cost of goods."
Hospitality closures were at normal levels and should not shadow success stories, he said.
Manufacturers coming off long term contracts are also facing significant increases in overheads including rising energy prices.
Ms Watson said a slower rebound than expected in consumer confidence and demand was taking its toll and continued geopolitical instability was creating challenges for business facing the other complications.
The survey tracked 59% of businesses expecting to hire staff within the next year and 60% planning to invest in property, plant and equipment — up marginally on 57% the previous quarter.
The big challenges continue to be consumer confidence and demand, productivity and growth, inflation and interest rates, cashflow and compliance costs.
tim.cronshaw@odt.co.nz
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The winners and losers of Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill'
The winners and losers of Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill'

RNZ News

timea day ago

  • RNZ News

The winners and losers of Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill'

By Matt Egan and Tami Luhby , CNN President Donald Trump in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on 26 March. Photo: Francis Chung/Politico/Getty Images via CNN Newsource Analysis - President Donald Trump has promised that the "big, beautiful bill" passed by Congress will be one of the most successful pieces of legislation in American history. Of course, the ultimate beauty of this sweeping legislation is very much in the eye of the beholder. The bill could end up boosting some workers and industries, while others may be left worse off. Corporate America Big business groups, including the US Chamber of Commerce and Business Roundtable, applauded the Senate's passage of the bill on Tuesday. Corporations are betting they will benefit from the legislation making permanent the tax breaks in the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. The package would restore a tax break from the 2017 tax package that allowed businesses to fully write off the cost of equipment in the first year it was purchased. The incentive has been phasing out since 2023. Also, the legislation would once again allow businesses to write off the cost of research and development in the year it was incurred. The TCJA required that companies deduct those expenses over five years, starting in 2022. Manufacturers Manufacturers are especially happy that the bill would make significant changes to how the US tax code treats the construction of new manufacturing facilities. Businesses will be allowed to fully and immediately deduct the cost of building new manufacturing facilities. This temporary provision is retroactive to 19 January, 2025 and continues for construction that begins before 1 January, 2029. And in a bid to incentivise more chipmaking in America, the legislation would enhance tax credits for semiconductor firms building manufacturing facilities in the United States. Small businesses and partnerships The National Federation of Independent Business, the leading small business lobbying group, praised the legislation for making permanent a special deduction for the owners of certain pass-through entities who pay businesses taxes on their individual tax returns. That deduction, which applies to small businesses and partnerships formed by lawyers, doctors and investors, would get increased in the House version of the bill from 20 percent to 23 percent. The Senate bill kept it at 20 percent. High-income Americans The net income for the top 20 percent of earners would increase by nearly US$13,000 per year, after taxes and transfers, according to an analysis of a near-final version of the Senate bill by Penn Wharton Budget Model. That amounts to a 3 percent average increase in income for those households. For the top 0.1 percent of earners, the average annual income gain would amount to more than US$290,000, according to Penn Wharton. Americans living in high-tax states should also benefit because the bill temporarily increases limits on deductions for state and local taxes for householders making up to US$500,000 annually to US$40,000 per year for five years. However, millionaires who lose their jobs will not be able to collect unemployment benefits, according to a recent provision added to the Senate bill. Workers who receive tips and overtime Certain workers will receive an extra tax break through 2028. Employees who work in jobs that traditionally receive tips could deduct up to US$25,000 in tip income from their federal income taxes, while workers who receive overtime could deduct up to US$12,500 of that extra pay. However, highly compensated individuals, who make more than US$160,000 in 2025, would not qualify. Low-income Americans Many people at the lowest end of the income ladder would be worse off because the package would enact historic cuts to the nation's safety net program, particularly Medicaid and food stamps. Among the many changes to these programs would be the addition of federally mandated work requirements to Medicaid for the first time in its 60-year history and the expansion of the work mandate in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, the formal name for food stamps. Parents of children ages 14 and up are among those who would have to work, volunteer, take classes or participate in job training to keep their benefits. Millions of low-income Americans are expected to lose their benefits because of the work requirements and the bill's other measures affecting Medicaid and food stamps. Notably, few of those dropped from Medicaid coverage would have access to job-based health insurance, according to a Congressional Budget Office report about the House version of the package. Those in the lowest-income group, earning less than US$18,000 a year, would see a US$165 reduction in their after-tax, after-transfer income, once the safety net cuts are taken into account, according to Penn Wharton. That's a 1.1 percent decrease. The next level, who earn between US$18,000 and US$53,000, would get a US$30 bump in income, or 0.1 percent. Middle-income households would see their income rise by US$1.430, or 1.8 percent. They earn between US$53,000 and US$96,000. The health provisions won't only hit low-income Americans. The Senate is also tightening verification requirements for the Affordable Care Act's federal premium subsidies, which could also leave some middle-income Americans uninsured. All told, the bill could result in more than 10 million more people being uninsured in 2034, according to a CNN analysis of the bill and CBO forecasts. Hospitals Hospitals are not happy with the health care provisions of the bill, which would reduce the support they receive from states to care for Medicaid enrollees and leave them with more uncompensated care costs for treating uninsured patients. "The real-life consequences of these nearly $1 trillion in Medicaid cuts - the largest ever proposed by Congress - will result in irreparable harm to our health care system, reducing access to care for all Americans and severely undermining the ability of hospitals and health systems to care for our most vulnerable patients," said Rick Pollack, chief executive of the American Hospital Association. The association said it is "deeply disappointed" with the bill, even though it contains a US$50 billion fund to help rural hospitals contend with the Medicaid cuts, which hospitals say is not nearly enough to make up for the shortfall. Clean energy and EVs The Senate removed a last-minute excise tax on wind and solar that experts warned would have been a "killer" for the clean energy industry. However, the Senate bill still strips tax incentives for wind, solar and other renewable energy projects by 2027 and gives developers stringent requirements to claim them. The American Clean Power Association slammed the legislation as a "step backward for American energy policy" that will eliminate jobs and raise electric bills. Electric vehicle makers could also be left worse off because the GOP bill ends EV tax credits of up to US$7500 at the end of September. Previously those tax credits were scheduled to last through 2032, providing a powerful incentive for car buyers. Deficit hawks The Senate version of the package would increase the deficit by about US$3.4 trillion over the next decade, according to CBO. Adding trillions to the debt risks lifting already elevated interest rates. That in turn will make it more expensive for Americans to finance the purchase of a car or a home and for businesses to borrow money to grow. Not only that, but higher rates would force the federal government to devote even greater resources to finance its own mountain of debt. The CBO expects US federal government interest costs to surpass US$1 trillion per year. US spending on interest has already more than tripled since 2017, surpassing what the federal government's entire defense budget. - CNN

After record Democratic speech, House Republicans begin final vote on Trump tax-cut bill
After record Democratic speech, House Republicans begin final vote on Trump tax-cut bill

RNZ News

timea day ago

  • RNZ News

After record Democratic speech, House Republicans begin final vote on Trump tax-cut bill

By Bo Erickson, Richard Cowan and David Morgan US House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) walks off the House floor after speaking for 8 hours and 45 minutes. Photo: AFP / Getty Images / Kevin Dietsch The Republican-controlled House of Representatives on Thursday (US time) launched a final yes-or-no vote on President Donald Trump's massive tax-cut and spending bill after the chamber's top Democrat delayed action with a record-breaking speech that lasted more than eight hours. Republicans called the vote after a marathon overnight session in which they cleared a procedural hurdle, setting the stage for final passage. If approved, the bill will go to Trump to sign into law. "Now we are finally ready to fulfill our promise to the American people," House Speaker Mike Johnson said on the House floor. Republicans control the chamber 220-212 and can afford to lose no more than three votes from their side. The bill would extend Trump's 2017 tax cuts, cut healthcare and food safety net programmes, fund the president's immigration crackdown, and eliminate many green-energy incentives. It also includes a $5 trillion increase in the nation's debt ceiling, which lawmakers must address in the coming months to avert a devastating default. Republicans broadly support the bill, which contains most of Trump's domestic priorities, saying it would spur economic growth and deliver tax breaks to Americans across the economic spectrum. Democrats are united in opposition to the bill but lack the votes to stop it. House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries blasted the bill as a giveaway to the wealthy in an eight-hour, 46-minute speech that set a new record for the chamber. "This disgusting abomination is not about improving the quality of life of the American people," he said. "The focus of this bill, the justification for all of the cuts that will hurt everyday Americans is to provide massive tax breaks for billionaires." Jeffries' speech recalled a record-setting April speech by Democratic Senator Cory Booker that accused Trump of "recklessly" challenging the nation's democratic institutions. The past two weeks have shown deep Republican divides on the bill, which would add $3.4 trillion to the nation's $36.2 trillion in debt. That debt has grown steadily over the past two decades regardless of which party was in control in Washington. The bill would also make major cuts to social programmes including Medicaid, ultimately leaving nearly 12 million Americans without health insurance. Rural hospitals have warned that could force them to scale back service, prompting Republicans to add $50 billion to help keep them afloat. A handful of Republican holdouts have objected to the bill. One, Senator Thom Tillis, opted not to seek re-election after voting against it. Nonetheless, Trump has succeeded in getting the votes to advance the legislation at each step of the way. The Senate passed the legislation by the narrowest possible margin on Tuesday. US House Speaker Mike Johnson, on the right, with President Donald Trump and Vice President J D Vance. Photo: WIN MCNAMEE Votes in the House were held open for hours on Wednesday during the day and overnight as House Speaker Mike Johnson and the White House talked with reluctant members. Republican leaders said Trump made late-night phone calls to win over wavering Republicans, but they predicted that some would still vote against it. "Nothing has been unanimous in this process, and that's going to hold true on the floor," Representative Steve Scalise, the No. 2 House Republican, told reporters. Trump kept up the pressure. "FOR REPUBLICANS, THIS SHOULD BE AN EASY YES VOTE. RIDICULOUS!!!" he wrote on social media. Any changes made by the House would require another Senate vote, which would make it all but impossible to meet Trump's self-imposed deadline of getting the legislation approved by the July 4 Independence Day holiday. Scalise said that delay would not happen. "What really got everybody to the finish line is the realisation, there aren't going to be any more changes to this bill. It's time to come together, make a decision," he said. -Reuters

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store