Ukraine urges investigation into alleged Russian chemical weapons use
A request to establish an investigation was submitted by Kyiv to the governing body of the organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW).
It followed Dutch and German intelligence agencies on Friday saying they had evidence of widespread use of illegal weapons by Russia along the frontline.
The OPCW created a similar team in 2018 to examine accusations of chemical weapons use in Syria. The Investigation and Identification Team found that Syrian government forces and Islamic State militants had used banned chemical weapons in the civil war that began in March 2011.
The United States first accused Russia in May last year of using chloropicrin, a chemical compound more toxic than riot control agents and first used by Germany during World War One.
The Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), a disarmament agency in The Hague with 193 member states, said last year that initial accusations levelled by both countries at each other were "insufficiently substantiated".
Both sides have denied using chemical weapons in the conflict, which escalated when Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022.
"Ukraine hereby requests the Director-General of the OPCW to take steps towards establishing an independent and impartial mechanism (to) investigate cases of alleged use of chemical weapons in Ukraine," a copy of the request shared with Reuters said.
It asked that the mechanism be empowered to "collect additional evidence and identify perpetrators, organisers, sponsors of such use."
It was submitted at the beginning of four days of closed-door meetings by the 41-country Executive Council of the OPCW. The disarmament body had no immediate comment on the request.
At least three Ukrainian deaths have been tied to chemical weapons use, the Dutch Military Intelligence Agency said, while more than 2,500 people injured on the battlefield reported chemical weapons-related symptoms to Ukrainian health authorities.
On Monday, Britain targeted two Russian individuals and one Russian entity as part of its chemical weapons sanctions regime, in its latest effort to punish Moscow for the war in Ukraine.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gulf Today
14 hours ago
- Gulf Today
France has become less attractive to foreign investors
Yoruk Bahceli and Leigh Thomas, Reuters France is missing out on the investor optimism that has defined Europe's markets this year, hamstrung by its strained public finances and political volatility that threatens to paralyse policy until at least 2027. Global investors and French executives cite the risk that budget negotiations could trigger another government collapse in the autumn, while pessimism among French households is dragging on consumer spending and economic growth. Centrist Prime Minister Francois Bayrou has faced eight no-confidence motions in parliament since taking office in December and his minority government is now struggling to find 40 billion euros ($47 billion) in spending cuts for the 2026 budget. The contrast with neighbouring Germany, whose new government is preparing to loosen historically tight purse strings and pump billions into the economy through defence and infrastructure spending, could hardly be starker. "While all the other highly indebted European countries — Greece, Portugal, Spain and Italy — have taken advantage of years of inflation to reduce their public debt ratio, France — whose deficit is now the highest in the euro zone — is increasingly diverging," said Pierre Moscovici, head of the Cour des Comptes public audit office and a former finance minister. To narrow the budget gap, Bayrou will have to convince opposition parties to stomach spending cuts only slightly smaller than those proposed in the 2025 budget that brought down his predecessor. Germany's historic embrace of looser fiscal policy and the impact of President Donald Trump's sometimes erratic policymaking on confidence in US assets have given a boost to European financial markets and other investments this year. A key beneficiary has been Italy, which has seen the risk premium paid on its 10-year debt compared to that of safe-haven Germany drop towards where it traded in 2010, before the euro zone debt crisis escalated. But the 10-year risk premium paid by French debt over German is still at 70 basis points, well above levels of around 50 bps seen before French President Emmanuel Macron called a shock snap election last summer. The French-Italian yield gap is meanwhile near all-time lows, even though Italy has a bigger debt pile. Candriam's chief investment officer Nicolas Forest said he favoured German, Italian and Spanish bonds and was underweight France, a situation he called "completely unusual". French stocks are missing out, too. The blue-chip CAC 40 index trades below where it was before the election was called and is lagging Europe's STOXX 600 aggregate. The Paris index has returned just 5% this year, four times less than Germany's DAX. Simon Blundell, co-head of fundamental European fixed income at BlackRock, the world's biggest investor, said he had no big positions in French debt and favoured Italian bonds, encouraged by political stability in Rome and declining volatility. Even if France's government survives the autumn, investors expect the budget squeeze to underwhelm as a fix for fiscal strains and so fail to increase the appeal of French assets. "Any compromise political parties find will be really temporary in terms of measures, and not great for debt reduction and deficit improvement," said Candriam's Forest. And even presidential and parliamentary elections in 2027 may not fully dispel the political uncertainty, if no party emerges dominant. To prod opposition parties to back Bayrou's budget, Public Finances Minister Amélie de Montchalin has suggested France could turn to an IMF bailout if it does not decisively grip its finances. Carrefour CEO Alexandre Bompard said such doomy talk only caused the French to save more, jeopardising a consumer spending recovery that he said was more fragile than in the supermarket giant's other European markets. "If we have 5 percentage points more savings than other European countries, it's because we have an extraordinarily high level of political and fiscal uncertainty," Bompard told an economics conference in Aix-en-Provence on Friday. With consumers hesitant to spend, French business activity has consistently lagged European peers this year, even though the private sector is less exposed to US trade tensions than Germany or Italy's more export-focused economies. Brushing aside any prospect of IMF intervention to prop up France's public finances, the Fund's French chief economist Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas insisted Paris could no longer put off getting its fiscal house in order. "France is not exempt from the laws of gravity, so we're going to have to adapt," Gourinchas said in Aix-en-Provence. "We can't fly, we're going to have to plan our landing and make spending cuts."
Middle East Eye
16 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Senior Saudi journalist urges 'coexistence' in landmark visit to Israeli parliament
A prominent Saudi journalist and a Syrian political activist visited Israel's parliament on Wednesday, where they discussed coexistence and potential deals to build open relations between Israel and Arab countries. Abdalaziz Alkhamis, a Saudi journalist and researcher specialising in the Middle East, and Shadi Martini, a Syrian businessman and activist, attended an event at the Knesset hosted by Israel's Lobby for Advancing a Regional Security Arrangement. Alkhamis told the event: 'Israel enjoys unprecedented military dominance after defeating Iran. 'However, power that is not used for peace is ineffective. The victory on the battlefield must be translated into a vision. This is what is required. You have an opportunity.' He added that the Abraham Accords, the name given to deals building open ties between Israel and four Arab countries in 2020, had 'failed to prevent the region from igniting'. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters US President Donald Trump spearheaded the deals, which Israel signed with the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Morocco and Sudan. 'A decentralised Palestinian state must be established, with a clear Israeli commitment not only to security but also to coexistence. These are not big demands; this is the minimum and a humanitarian requirement,' Alkhamis said. He said that Israel must 'translate' its regional power 'into a vision'. 'No state can expect to be impressed when our people next door are encaged and disenfranchised' - Abdalaziz Alkhamis, Saudi journalist 'Use your new strength to solve the problem, not to dominate. If Israel seizes this opportunity to deepen the occupation and humiliate Gaza, it will lose not only the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia but the entire Arab world,' he said. 'No state can expect to be impressed when our people next door are encaged and disenfranchised," he added. 'Normalisation from Saudi Arabia's perspective is not merely a dual agreement, but a regional realignment, and such realignment must include a credible and real path to Palestinian sovereignty.' Saudi Arabia has long maintained that it wouldn't normalise ties with Israel until Palestinians got their own state in line with the 1967 borders, with East Jerusalem as its capital. The lobby hosting the event was jointly founded by Israeli opposition MPs Ram Ben Barak, Gilad Kariv and Alon Schuster. 'Unique opportunity' Martini, who fled Syria in 2012 during the civil war, told the event that he had met Ahmed al-Sharaa, Syria's president, around two weeks ago. 'I was with two other colleagues, one is a priest, and one is a rabbi… We entered the presidential palace in Damascus. I really appreciated that meeting. It went on for two hours, and the topic of Israel was dominant,' Martini said. 'One thing that stuck with me that President al-Sharaa said was: 'We only have these opportunities one time every 100 years, it's a very unique opportunity - but the window will not always stay open.'' It's not clear what opportunity Sharaa was purportedly referring to in this conversation. In April, Republican congressman Cory Mills said Sharaa told him in a meeting that Syria is prepared to normalise ties with Israel and join the Abraham Accords under the 'right conditions'. Sharaa has not publicly confirmed such a position. Syrians fear Israel normalisation could plunge the country back into war Read More » Syrians told Middle East Eye earlier this week that they feared that a normalisation deal with Israel could plunge the country back into war. Israel and Syria have technically been at war since the first Arab-Israeli war in 1948. A state of heightened tension and deep enmity between the two countries accelerated during the 1967 war, which also drew in Egypt and Jordan, and Israel's subsequent occupation of the Syrian Golan Heights. Hassan Nifi, a Syrian writer, told MEE that Sharaa would struggle to get popular approval for a normalisation deal, but if he miraculously went ahead with it, it would push the country to the brink. 'Public reaction would be overwhelmingly negative, especially with what's happening in Gaza,' he said. 'Everyone knows this [normalisation] deal would be entirely in Israel's favour.' Yair Lapid, the Israeli opposition leader, was also at the event in Israel's parliament on Wednesday. He said that if Sharaa were to cede Syria's Golan Heights, an area occupied by Israel since 1967, then he intended for Israel to lead a regional effort to rebuild Syria. 'I told the Emiratis in Abu Dhabi: We will know how to build a complete regional coalition around [Sharaa] that will assist in the reconstruction of Syria if he takes the Golan Heights issue out of the equation,' Lapid said. Sharaa's family were displaced from the Golan Heights when Israel first occupied the raised plataeu.
Arabian Post
17 hours ago
- Arabian Post
US Ivy League University Hit With Russian Blacklisting
Moscow has formally placed Yale University on its 'undesirable organisations' list, citing the institution's alleged role in orchestrating anti-Russian activities and training opposition figures. Russian authorities accuse Yale's Jackson School of Global Affairs, particularly its International Leadership Center, of educating individuals who later joined the Anti‑Corruption Foundation founded by the late Alexei Navalny, using their acquired skills to fuel protest movements. The Prosecutor General's Office claims this threatens Russia's territorial integrity, supports an international blockade, and destabilises its socio‑economic and political systems. The designation prohibits Yale from any activities within Russia. Under federal law, association with a blacklisted group carries prison penalties—up to four years for Russian collaborators and six years for organisational leaders. Individuals linked to Yale face criminal charges; the measure forms part of a broader Kremlin strategy against foreign entities deemed threatening. ADVERTISEMENT This move adds Yale to a growing roster of Western organisations singled out since the 2015 'undesirable organisations' law. Prior additions include Amnesty International, Bard College, the British Council, and most recently Razom, a Ukrainian aid group. The law enables authorities to shut down foreign NGOs and media, often seen as a response to perceived threats to state sovereignty. Kremlin critics say the blacklist is politically motivated, aimed at curbing academic exchange and dissent. Yale's international stature and involvement in global affairs likely amplified its visibility during heightened Kremlin-West tensions over Ukraine. Moscow has previously targeted American academics such as Larry Samuelson and Jeffrey Sonnenfeld—both barred after vocally criticising the Russian government and advocating for redirected use of frozen Russian assets. Professor Sonnenfeld welcomed the ban as a 'badge of honour,' asserting that national interests aligned with academic freedom. The Russian Prosecutor General also accused Yale of aiding in justifying the seizure of frozen Russian assets to support Ukraine's military—a claim echoed by Xinhua news. Critics argue the blacklist damages intellectual cooperation and undermines global debate. Diplomatic observers note the move could isolate Russian scholars and block access to Western-minded discourse. Past blacklisted organisations include the National Democratic Institute, Open Society Foundations, and German Marshall Fund. Yale has not issued an official statement. Moscow officials emphasised that the action is legal and rooted in national security concerns, accusing the university of eroding Russia's constitutional foundations. Analysts suggest the designation is both a symbolic rebuke and a signal of Russian inflexibility toward institutional criticism. The intensification of the Kremlin's crackdown follows sustained geopolitical strain. Western nations have responded with further sanctions, freezing Russian assets abroad and limiting academic collaboration. The Kremlin's narrative frames foreign academic institutions as instruments of Western influence, legitimising domestic censorship. Experts highlight the broader implications. The country's academic environment faces growing isolation as more foreign universities are blacklisted. Graduate students, researchers, and educators involved with affected institutions risk surveillance, interrogation, and criminal charges. The chilling effect extends to independent thought and scholarly freedom. International academic bodies are reportedly reviewing the impact. Some warn Russian professionals risk professional ostracism if tied to forbidden organisations. The long-term prospect is a narrowing of Russian engagement with global research networks. European and North American universities have yet to comment officially. Some scholarly consortia may warn members about collaborative risks in Russia. For Yale, the designation represents a striking escalation in Russia's confrontation with Western academia.
