logo
US Ivy League University Hit With Russian Blacklisting

US Ivy League University Hit With Russian Blacklisting

Arabian Post3 days ago
Moscow has formally placed Yale University on its 'undesirable organisations' list, citing the institution's alleged role in orchestrating anti-Russian activities and training opposition figures.
Russian authorities accuse Yale's Jackson School of Global Affairs, particularly its International Leadership Center, of educating individuals who later joined the Anti‑Corruption Foundation founded by the late Alexei Navalny, using their acquired skills to fuel protest movements. The Prosecutor General's Office claims this threatens Russia's territorial integrity, supports an international blockade, and destabilises its socio‑economic and political systems.
The designation prohibits Yale from any activities within Russia. Under federal law, association with a blacklisted group carries prison penalties—up to four years for Russian collaborators and six years for organisational leaders. Individuals linked to Yale face criminal charges; the measure forms part of a broader Kremlin strategy against foreign entities deemed threatening.
ADVERTISEMENT
This move adds Yale to a growing roster of Western organisations singled out since the 2015 'undesirable organisations' law. Prior additions include Amnesty International, Bard College, the British Council, and most recently Razom, a Ukrainian aid group. The law enables authorities to shut down foreign NGOs and media, often seen as a response to perceived threats to state sovereignty.
Kremlin critics say the blacklist is politically motivated, aimed at curbing academic exchange and dissent. Yale's international stature and involvement in global affairs likely amplified its visibility during heightened Kremlin-West tensions over Ukraine. Moscow has previously targeted American academics such as Larry Samuelson and Jeffrey Sonnenfeld—both barred after vocally criticising the Russian government and advocating for redirected use of frozen Russian assets.
Professor Sonnenfeld welcomed the ban as a 'badge of honour,' asserting that national interests aligned with academic freedom. The Russian Prosecutor General also accused Yale of aiding in justifying the seizure of frozen Russian assets to support Ukraine's military—a claim echoed by Xinhua news.
Critics argue the blacklist damages intellectual cooperation and undermines global debate. Diplomatic observers note the move could isolate Russian scholars and block access to Western-minded discourse. Past blacklisted organisations include the National Democratic Institute, Open Society Foundations, and German Marshall Fund.
Yale has not issued an official statement. Moscow officials emphasised that the action is legal and rooted in national security concerns, accusing the university of eroding Russia's constitutional foundations. Analysts suggest the designation is both a symbolic rebuke and a signal of Russian inflexibility toward institutional criticism.
The intensification of the Kremlin's crackdown follows sustained geopolitical strain. Western nations have responded with further sanctions, freezing Russian assets abroad and limiting academic collaboration. The Kremlin's narrative frames foreign academic institutions as instruments of Western influence, legitimising domestic censorship.
Experts highlight the broader implications. The country's academic environment faces growing isolation as more foreign universities are blacklisted. Graduate students, researchers, and educators involved with affected institutions risk surveillance, interrogation, and criminal charges. The chilling effect extends to independent thought and scholarly freedom.
International academic bodies are reportedly reviewing the impact. Some warn Russian professionals risk professional ostracism if tied to forbidden organisations. The long-term prospect is a narrowing of Russian engagement with global research networks.
European and North American universities have yet to comment officially. Some scholarly consortia may warn members about collaborative risks in Russia. For Yale, the designation represents a striking escalation in Russia's confrontation with Western academia.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pro-Israel professor Shai Davidai leaves Columbia University after 'mutual agreement'
Pro-Israel professor Shai Davidai leaves Columbia University after 'mutual agreement'

Middle East Eye

time7 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

Pro-Israel professor Shai Davidai leaves Columbia University after 'mutual agreement'

An assistant professor who was accused of harassing pro-Palestinian students as well as staff at Columbia University has left the institution following a "mutual agreement" he will not return to teaching at the Ivy League school, according to a university official. Shai Davidai, a controversial pro-Israel advocate who taught at Columbia's business school, left the university on 8 July. His campus access had been restricted since October following the 'intimidation' of university employees. 'Assistant Professor of Business Shai Davidai has decided to depart Columbia, effective July 8, 2025,' a Columbia University spokesperson wrote in an email to Middle East Eye, adding: "Assistant Professor Davidai has chosen, by mutual agreement with the University, to not return to teaching at Columbia." 'The University thanks him for his service and wishes him the best in his future endeavors.' Davidai said in a post on X on Friday that he left the university because he did not trust 'the anti-Jewish, anti-Israel, and anti-American hate festering on [Columbia's] campus'. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters 'I didn't leave Columbia to 'pursue other endeavors', he said. 'I left because I no longer trust its so-called leadership to confront the anti-Jewish, anti-Israel, and anti-American hate festering on campus. During my six years there, I met plenty of well-paid bureaucrats - but not once did I meet a true leader.' Davidai has been a vocal critic of Columbia and other universities for their response to pro-Palestinian protest encampments on US campuses against the war in Gaza, while also being accused of threatening behaviour to students and faculty at the institution. Davidai had been under investigation by Columbia's Office of Institutional Equality (OIE) into allegations of harassment made against him in February 2024. Davidai shared in a post on X on Thursday that Columbia had 'tried to smear' his name and that he 'wouldn't let them', sharing a letter from Laura Kirschstein, vice-provost at OIE, saying: 'On July 8, OIE closed its investigations relating to you without issuing any findings or conclusions of wrongdoing, and without imposing any discipline or penalty on you.' A university official said that any OIE investigations normally terminate when an individual "is no longer employed at the University" and consequently the investigation into Davidai had closed 'without issuing any findings or conclusions of wrongdoing'. Katherine Franke, a former law professor who had taught at Columbia University, shared on Instagram on Thursday a video of her showing a letter from OIE sent to students who had made allegations against Davidai, which said that the 'OIE process has been terminated without any determination', meaning that Davidai had not been absolved of wrongdoing, just that a determination wasn't made before he had left. Columbia University has been criticised for capitulating to the Trump administration's demands over its allegations of antisemitism. Access denied In October, Columbia University issued a statement regarding Davidai's access to the institution being restricted, saying, 'Columbia…does not tolerate threats of intimidation, harassment, or other threatening behaviour by its employees'. The university also said it had "temporarily limited his access to campus while he [Davidai] undertakes appropriate training on our policies governing the behavior of our employees". After he was barred, he took to Instagram to criticise the decision, saying that it was 'because of October 7th [2023]. Because I was not afraid to stand up to the hateful mob. And because I was not afraid to expose Mr fucking Cas Holloway'. Holloway is the chief operating officer at Columbia. That video has since been taken down, but Davidai shared many social media posts harassing Holloway. It was the second time the non-tenured Israeli professor had been barred from the campus in a year. He had also been barred on 22 April for around a month for threatening to do a pro-Israeli sit-in on a pro-Palestinian encampment. Harassment Davidai in April 2024 called pro-Palestine students "the Hitler Youth" on X (his post has subsequently been taken down) and used his social media accounts, where he has over 108,000 followers, to repeatedly call for the US National Guard to be brought into the protest encampment at Columbia. More than 13,000 students signed a petition asking for him to be fired because he used his 'personal social media accounts to target, harass, and bully students, including Palestinian students who have lost family members in Gaza'. As well as students accusing him of harassing them both in person and on social media, critics said he also endangered staff, students and faculty. For example, he called on Secretary of State Marco Rubio on a post on X for Columbia graduate and Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil to be deported from the US. This happened two days before he was picked up by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents dressed in plain clothes. Khalil was subsequently freed on 8 March after 104 days at a detention centre in Jena, Louisiana. In another incident, he tagged former faculty member Mohamed Abdou in posts with the FBI and Homeland Security. Abdou subsequently discovered he was "terminated" from a faculty position while watching on CSPAN, Columbia's antisemitism congressional hearing in April 2024. Abdou said his 'doxxing" and 'termination' was "irreparable'.

US to sell defensive weapons to Ukraine
US to sell defensive weapons to Ukraine

Gulf Today

time10 hours ago

  • Gulf Today

US to sell defensive weapons to Ukraine

US President Donald Trump said on Monday, 'We're going to send some more weapons. We have to. They have to be able to defend themselves. They're getting hit very hard now. We're going to have to send more weapons, defensive weapons, primarily.' That is quite a big change in Trump's position on Ukraine. Ever since he began his second term as president, his position has been quite ambivalent towards Ukraine. First came his clash with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at the televised press conference in White House in February this year. His primary aim when he took over as president was to end the Russia-Ukraine war, and he was pressuring Zelensky to talk with Russian President Vladimir Putin. When Zelensky was reluctant saying that one cannot trust Putin, Trump and Vice President J.D. Vance exploded. Zelensky did not step back and that was an irritant for Trump. But nearly six months later, and with Russia having stepped up its military attacks on Ukraine, Trump seems to feel that he needs to support Ukraine militarily. He understands perhaps that if Ukraine were to lose the war, then he would have no role to play as mediator, and make his claim for the Nobel Peace Prize. The emphasis on defensive arms for Ukraine is curious. It implies that Trump would not want a Russian defeat. For some strange reason, he has a sneaking sympathy for Russia and he naturally wants to support Putin who he treats as friend. While the other NATO members are firmly opposed to Russia and support Ukraine on ideological and strategic reasons, Trump thinks of European balance of power differently. He does not believe in ideological divide. He has no concept of democracy and liberalism pitted against communism and totalitarian states. He has a unilateral view of the world, and that is the American view of the world. Trump's support for Ukraine also hinges on the mineral deal he has forced upon Ukraine. America needs rare earth elements in Ukraine for its AI and semi-conductor industry. He wants some kind of economic control over Ukraine. He has shown irritation with his friend Putin for not agreeing to a peace deal with Ukraine. Putin wants the peace deal on Russia's own terms, something that Zelensky had made clear was not acceptable to Ukraine. So, peace talks are not happening between Russia and Ukraine. And there is no sign of peace though Ukraine is anxious for a deal of some sort. But Zelensky does not want a peace deal which is a capitulation of Ukraine. Trump still advertises himself as a peacemaker. He has ordered the bombing of Iran's nuclear facilities because he said Israel did not have the capacity to destroy Iran's nuclear programme. It is of course not clear how much of Iran's ability to enrich Ukraine has been damaged. Experts suggest that Iran's nuclear programme might have been pushed back by around two years, and that Iran can rebuild its nuclear capacity. Now Trump says that Iran is willing to talk to America because of the 'bad drubbing' they have got. These are unilateral statements on the part of Trump. Iran has been resolute that it would not talk to America under threats and under pressure. That leaves a huge gap between what Trump says and the situation on the ground. Similarly, Trump had been claiming that he had mediated peace between India and Pakistan and ended the four-day clash between the two nuclear-weapon states, but India has consistently rejected Trump's claims as a mediator. He is not deterred by India's denial of his role in the ceasefire.

Russia blasts Kyiv with another missile and drone barrage, killing at least 2
Russia blasts Kyiv with another missile and drone barrage, killing at least 2

Gulf Today

time10 hours ago

  • Gulf Today

Russia blasts Kyiv with another missile and drone barrage, killing at least 2

Russia pounded Ukraine's capital with another major missile and drone attack overnight into Thursday, killing at least two people and causing fires across Kyiv a day after the heaviest drone attack so far in the more than three-year war, Ukrainian officials another tense and sleepless night for Kyiv residents, with many of them dashing in the dark with children, pets and blankets to the protection of subway stations, at least 22 people were wounded, according to Tymur Tkachenko, head of the Kyiv Regional Administration. The night was punctuated with the chilling whine of approaching drones that slammed into residential areas, exploded and sent balls of orange flames into the dark during the 10-hour barrage. Russia fired 397 Shahed and decoy drones as well as cruise and ballistic missiles at Kyiv and five other regions, authorities said."This is a clear escalation of Russian terror: hundreds of Shahed drones every night, constant missile strikes, massive attacks on Ukrainian cities,' President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said in a Telegram post. June brought the highest monthly civilian casualties of the past three years, with 232 people killed and 1,343 wounded, the UN human rights mission in Ukraine said Thursday, as Russia launched 10 times more drones and missiles than the same month last least 13,580 civilians, including 716 children, have been killed and more than 34,000 wounded since Russia's full-scale invasion of its neighbor began on Feb. 24, 2022, the UN rounds of direct peace talks between Russian and Ukrainian delegations have yielded no progress on stopping the fighting. Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said Thursday there is no date for a possible third round of negotiations. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Thursday that the US and Russia have exchanged new ideas for peace talks after he met with his Russian counterpart, Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, in Malaysia on has recently sought to overwhelm Ukraine's air defenses with major attacks that include increasing numbers of decoy drones. The previous night, it fired more than 700 attack and decoy drones, topping previous nightly barrages for the third time in two weeks."The continued increase in the size of strike packages is likely intended to support Russian efforts to degrade Ukrainian morale in the face of constant Russian aggression,' the Institute for the Study of War, a Washington-based think tank, said late Wednesday. In tandem with the bombardments, Russia's army has started a new drive to break through parts of the 1,000-kilometer (620-mile) front line, where short-handed Ukrainian forces are under heavy strain at what could prove to be a pivotal period of the war." At present, the rate of Russian advance is accelerating and Russia's summer offensive is likely to put the armed forces of Ukraine under intense pressure,' Jack Watling, a senior research fellow at military think tank RUSI, wrote in an assessment published Wednesday. Associated Press

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store