logo
Modi's tour of Africa, Caribbean and S. America: Key takeaways

Modi's tour of Africa, Caribbean and S. America: Key takeaways

The 3,900 km long trip, the longest undertaken by Prime Minister (PM) Narendra Modi, took him to five countries on two continents in seven days (July 2-9). The careful choice of destinations, the fine details of the VVIP programme, the range of issues discussed, and the flawless execution of highly complex arrangements involved in State and official visits are all indicative of the new sophistication and aspiration of India's diplomacy. What the unparalleled visit achieved needs a critical examination. PM Narendra Modi(X/ @narendramodi)
It was a tour with five phases. It began in Ghana in West Africa. Thereafter, Modi moved to Trinidad and Tobago in the Caribbean region. From there, he and his delegation went to the farthest point on their itinerary – Buenos Aires, the capital of Argentina. The fourth and central segment involved a stay in Rio de Janeiro and Brasilia for participation in the 17th BRICS summit and a state visit to Brazil. Finally, on the way home, the PM paid a State visit to Namibia.
It is notable that a visit by the Indian PM to Ghana took place after three decades, to Namibia after 27 years, and to Trinidad and Tobago after 26 years.
The three-fold goal was to exchange views and cement relations with important nations of the Global South, participate in the BRICS summit, and underline India's expanding worldview and the emerging global role.
Ghana, which played a founder's role during the time of Kwame Nkrumah in the creation of the Non-Aligned Movement, remains a significant player in West Africa. President John Dramani Mahama, who secured a landslide victory in January, played the gracious host for the State visit. While the dialogue between the two leaders was wide-ranging, it focused on expanding economic cooperation, especially as Ghana has been going through a deep economic restructuring process at present. Four bilateral agreements were signed on cultural cooperation, enhancing standardization, traditional medicine, and the establishment of a joint commission to institutionalise high-level dialogue. Defence and cooperation in critical minerals emerged as areas of mutual interest. While in Accra, the PM addressed the parliament.
The visit to Trinidad and Tobago coincided with the celebrations marking 180 years of the arrival of Indian immigrants to the country. By remarkable coincidence, both its President and PM are women, lawyers, and take pride in their Indian heritage.
The visit enabled both sides to review the entire range of relations and devise ways and means to expand the development partnership further. A close look was accorded to the growth of ties in areas such as pharma, tertiary care, renewable energy, and digital infrastructure. Six new agreements were signed, and the PM made nine announcements on forging closer cooperation. A joint statement was issued. PM Modi addressed the parliament, emphasising the connection between the history, democracy, and people of the two nations.
The visit to Argentina was PM Modi's second visit to the country. He was there earlier in 2018 for the G20 summit. Its significance lay in a series of indications given earlier that Argentina was keen to deepen cooperation with India. Information technology, digital healthcare, and energy cooperation emerged as having significant potential. Argentina holds the world's second-largest shale gas reserves and the largest shale oil reserves, besides substantial conventional oil and gas deposits. While bilateral trade has been on a stable trajectory, the two sides needed to work on the diversification of the trade basket. The two governments also discussed the expansion of the India-MERCOSUR Preferential Trade Agreement.
As a journalist put it, this visit was to the land of 'minerals and Maradona.' Modi noted in his departure statement, 'Argentina is a key economic partner in Latin America and a close collaborator in the G20.'
The stay in Brazil was the pièce de résistance, imbued with immense significance, both from the perspective of BRICS and bilateral India-Brazil relations.
In the absence of the presidents of China and Russia, media attention concentrated on the three leaders of the Global South at the BRICS summit – Brazil, India, and South Africa, as well as the president of the newly admitted member, Indonesia. Concerning the highlights of the summit's outcome, three points are notable.
One, the summit produced a detailed declaration reflecting consensus on key issues of the reform of global governance institutions, peace and security, economic cooperation, and the climate crisis. It demonstrated that, despite its internal divergences, BRICS is more united than the G7 today. Two, BRICS has emerged as the most visible platform for projecting the needs and concerns of the Global South. Three, Brazil as the present chair and India as the next chair, were working closely to guide this grouping to attain new heights.
PM Modi's State visit to Brazil was an honour for India. He visited Brazil earlier on three occasions in 2014, 2019, and 2024. The dialogue on this occasion with the Brazilian leadership focused on expanding bilateral partnership, covering trade and investment, agriculture, health, space, defense, and people-to-people relations. There was a joint decision to increase bilateral trade from the present level of $12 billion to $ 20 billion in the immediate future. The list of six bilateral agreements signed on terrorism and renewable energy, among others, was indicative of the areas where greater attention would be paid. A ministerial mechanism was set up for monitoring cooperation in trade, commerce, and investment. The joint statement entitled 'India and Brazil: Two Great Nations with Higher Purposes' revealed the full contours of a special transcontinental partnership.
A one-day sojourn in Windhoek, the capital of Namibia, was the cherry on the cake. It revealed India's serious interest in an important, friendly nation in Southern Africa. It enabled Modi to hold an in-depth dialogue with President Netumbo Nandi-Ndaitwah, who took office in March. Their discussion would certainly mould what the two governments do in the future to expand and diversify economic and development cooperation, as well as cooperation in information technology and the defense domain. As a resource-rich country, Namibia is of interest to industries that need critical minerals. The visit resulted in two agreements and three announcements, including on Namibia joining the Coalition for Disaster Resilient Infrastructure (CDRI) and the Global Biofuels Alliance.
During the entire tour, PM Modi received four highest civilian honours. He delivered addresses at three different parliaments. He enunciated India's perspective on terrorism and several other issues of global and regional importance. In addition, at least three takeaways may be mentioned here.
First, India's diplomacy has been moving in high gear in a fast, robust, but pragmatic manner. Developing countries perceive India as a natural partner, given its rising economy, technological progress, political stability, and charismatic leadership.
Second, India is no longer relying on advancing large credits to its external partners. Instead, the focus now is on sharing proven experience and expertise in specific areas where the Indian development model has achieved success.
Third, despite geopolitical conflicts and tensions, New Delhi remains confident of its ability to manage contradictions and balance its relationships with the North and the South. It sees no contradictions in India's membership of BRICS and Quad, and its presence as a regular guest at the G7. The government remains determined to dialogue with different groupings in the quest for finding an acceptable solution to global challenges, while promoting India's national interest.
In the end, the results of PM's ambitious tour would be measured by the ability of India and its interlocutors to ensure optimal implementation of the agreements signed and the understandings reached. A positive impression has been created all around, and now it is time to carry the decisions to their logical conclusion.
This article is authored by Rajiv Bhatia, Distinguished Fellow, Gateway House and former Indian ambassador.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Brahmos instrumental in Op Sindoor: Rajnath
Brahmos instrumental in Op Sindoor: Rajnath

Hans India

timean hour ago

  • Hans India

Brahmos instrumental in Op Sindoor: Rajnath

Lucknow: Defence Minister Rajnath Singh on Sunday said that the Brahmos missile proved instrumental in Operation Sindoor and since then, more than a dozen countries have expressed interest in it. Singh said this at an event in Lucknow where he unveiled a statue of former Uttar Pradesh chief minister Chandra Bhanu Gupta at the National PG College and released a postage stamp in tribute to him. "Just a few days ago, I inaugurated a Brahmos airspace integration and testing facility in Lucknow. You must have seen that in Operation Sindoor, Brahmos missile has done a miraculous job and not only this, after the miracle shown by Brahmos missile, about 14-15 countries of the world have demanded Brahmos missile from India," Singh said. "Brahmos missile will now be exported from Lucknow as well. I believe that this facility will strengthen our country's self-reliance in the defence sector, and at the same time, it will also create employment. My effort is that more industries should also come here so that, along with Lucknow, the state also develops rapidly," he said. The minister claimed that UP was attracting more and more industries on the back of strong law and order and infrastructural robustness. "Historical changes are taking place in infrastructure. Expressway, airport, metro, medical college, all these are presenting a new picture of development," he said. Singh, who is the Lok Sabha MP from Lucknow, also showered praise on Chandra Bhanu Gupta, who served as the chief minister of Uttar Pradesh for three terms. "Chandra Bhanu Gupta ji started as a simple worker in the freedom movement and made a place in the hearts of millions of people through his sacrifice, commitment and leadership. Chandra Bhanu Gupta's life tells us that power does not mean only position or authority, but responsibility, sacrifice and protecting the interests of the public. "His life also gives us the message that there may be differences in politics, but there should not be animosity," he said. Singh, who is also a former UP CM, said the postage stamp was not only a tribute to Chandra Bhanu Gupta, but also a tribute to his "high life values." "It is a message that service, simplicity and honesty have been important in Indian politics and will remain important in the future too," he said. Singh said Chandra Bhanu Gupta's vision and agenda were never regional, always nationalistic. "Chandra Bhanu ji was not in power for very long (time). But in the short time he was in power, he gave priority to public welfare works. He was always known for his integrity," he said. Lucknow Defence Minister Rajnath Singh on Sunday highlighted the significance of the newly inaugurated BrahMos Aerospace integration and testing facility in Lucknow, calling it a major step toward strengthening India's self-reliance in the defence sector. "Just a few days ago, I inaugurated the integration and testing facility of BrahMos Aerospace in Lucknow. This facility will strengthen our country's self-reliance in the defence sector and also create employment," Singh said at a public event in Lucknow. Singh commended Uttar Pradesh for the improved law and order situation, which he said is encouraging investments and industrial growth. "Historical changes are taking place in infrastructure. Expressway, airport, metro, medical college—all these are presenting a new picture of development," the Defence minister added. Singh also unveiled a statue of former Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Chandra Bhanu Gupta and also released a commemorative postage stamp in his honour. He praised Gupta's contributions to public life and his enduring legacy.

Hague ruling on Indus Waters Treaty revives legal debate. But trust cannot flow when terror does
Hague ruling on Indus Waters Treaty revives legal debate. But trust cannot flow when terror does

Indian Express

timean hour ago

  • Indian Express

Hague ruling on Indus Waters Treaty revives legal debate. But trust cannot flow when terror does

Rivers obey gravity, not flags. Yet, as the snow-fed waters of the Indus system flow silently across borders, the roar of geopolitics now echoes louder than ever. The supplemental award of the Court of Arbitration in The Hague on June 27 has again turned attention to the simmering challenges confronting the Indus Waters Treaty. The tribunal rejected India's suspension of the Treaty and reaffirmed its jurisdiction despite India's absence from the proceedings. India responded swiftly. It called the court illegal, the proceedings irrelevant, and reiterated that the Treaty stands in abeyance until Pakistan abjures cross-border terrorism. The simmering dispute over the Indus Waters Treaty is not just about water. It is about sovereignty, security, and a Treaty that has withstood conflicts for over six decades but now strains under the pressures of asymmetric warfare. The question before India is not only legal. It is strategic, too. What happens when a peace agreement becomes a shield for a party that wages proxy war? What happens when rivers meant to irrigate fields begin to flood battlefields of perception? The Indus Waters Treaty, brokered by the World Bank in 1960, was hailed as a triumph of cooperative diplomacy. It partitioned the rivers of the Indus basin between India and Pakistan, granting India full rights over the eastern rivers and limited use of the western ones. Despite wars and political breakdowns, the Treaty endured because it insulated water from politics. But terrorism has no insulation. And India, bleeding from attacks launched across the very rivers it shares, reached the limits of forbearance. The Hague tribunal's award may be procedurally valid. It reflects the logic of legal permanence. Pakistan, which initiated the proceedings, argued that disputes over interpretation should be addressed legally and stated that India's suspension was unjustified. The Treaty, the panel concluded, cannot be suspended unilaterally, and jurisdiction, once triggered, cannot be undone by later events. But the law cannot be blind to context. India did not act lightly. It placed the Treaty in abeyance after Pakistan-based terrorists killed dozens of Indians in a brazen attack in Pahalgam on April 22. When blood stains the snow of the Pir Panjal, the abstractions of international law ring hollow. India has not cut off water or violated Pakistan's share. Instead, it has frozen the instruments of cooperation as a wake-up call. The message is stark: Treaties are built on trust, and trust cannot flow when terror does. Water is often called the last soft commodity, and experts emphasise that it must remain above politics. But Pakistan politicised water by sheltering groups that target Indian soldiers and civilians. India's decision to place the Treaty in abeyance is not vengeance. It is a consequence. The old order of water-sharing, insulated from politics, is unlikely to survive unchanged. As India plans for the future, it faces a range of strategic choices beyond the purely legal. It can continue boycotting arbitration to deny it legitimacy. It can withdraw from the Treaty entirely, though this carries risks. It might also maximise its legal entitlements, including the neutral expert's forthcoming decision, and use structural advantages to pressure Pakistan without breaching the agreement. Another path is to offer conditional cooperation, using upstream geography as leverage, if Pakistan meets clear and verifiable conditions. A more cautious approach would involve keeping technical channels open while political tensions persist. Each course demands a careful balance of resolve and restraint that matches the stakes. Other river basins offer cautionary tales. In the past, Egypt has threatened to use force over Ethiopia's Grand Renaissance Dam. Thailand and Vietnam often complain about China's control of the Mekong. These flashpoints offer ample proof that there are no outright winners. While geography sets the opening bid, legitimacy and transparency determine whether power becomes a lasting advantage or an enduring grievance. India's choice must blend firmness with foresight. India should expand its infrastructure and fully utilise both its entitled share of the eastern rivers and its permissible use of the western ones under the Treaty. It must do so with transparency, precision, and speed. At the same time, India should craft a diplomatic path that links re-engagement to Pakistan's demonstrable action on terror. This is not a compromise. It is conditional justice. If Pakistan wants the benefits of the Indus water system, it must stop using terror as a tool. India must also speak to the world with clarity. It is not undermining peace. It is demanding that peace be real. It is not holding water hostage. It is refusing to be hostage to hypocrisy. If the international community wishes to preserve the Indus Waters Treaty, it must ensure Pakistan fulfils its obligations. That includes refraining from exporting violence under the cover of cooperative agreements. The Indus is a lifeline. For Pakistan, yes. But also for India, not just as a source of water, but as a symbol of resilience, restraint, and rights. India's policy must reflect that duality. It must be hard-headed in execution but clear-eyed in intention. It must signal that peace is not weakness and justice is not optional. In the end, regardless of choices, the Indus and its tributaries will flow. The question is whether the nations they nourish will choose harmony over hostility. India has drawn its line. Now, Pakistan must decide whether to treat the Indus system as rivers of peace or allow them to become torrents of tension. By choosing a firm but just path, India can prove that strength and responsibility can still flow together. The writer is former permanent representative of India to the United Nations, and dean, Kautilya School of Public Policy, Hyderabad

Forty years after Kanishka bombing, India stands firm in war on terror
Forty years after Kanishka bombing, India stands firm in war on terror

Indian Express

timean hour ago

  • Indian Express

Forty years after Kanishka bombing, India stands firm in war on terror

Written by Gurveer Singh Brar Standing by the windswept shores of Ahakista in Ireland, where the debris of Air India Flight 182 fell on June 23, 1985, I felt the weight of history and humanity converge. The Kanishka bombing, which stole 329 innocent lives, is not just a chapter in aviation history; it is a solemn reminder of how terrorism devastates families, communities, and nations alike. This year we marked the 40th anniversary of this tragedy in Ahakista. I was part of an official Indian delegation led by Minister Hardeep Singh Puri, supported seamlessly by the Ministry of External Affairs. This was to not merely observe a date, but to reaffirm our collective promise: India will always honour its people, no matter how far they are or how many years have passed, and will continue to seek justice until it is delivered. As I stood before the memorial, watching a local Irish resident place a white rose on the plaque, I was reminded that the power of shared grief transcends borders, turning remembrance into a bridge of empathy between nations. It was deeply moving to see how Ireland, despite not having a single citizen on that flight, built and continues to maintain this memorial. It is a reminder of the collective responsibility we share in standing against terrorism. During the commemoration, Ireland's Prime Minister Micheál Martin described the Kanishka bombing as a 'cruel and horrific' act of terror, reminding us that 'the passage of time does not dim the scale of this loss'. His words reflected how this tragedy has fostered a deepened bond between India, Ireland, and Canada in the collective fight against terrorism. Echoing this sentiment, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney described the Air India bombing as 'the deadliest terrorist attack in our country's history', reaffirming Canada's commitment to stand firmly against violent extremism. The Kanishka bombing was not an accident but a deliberate act of terrorism, carried out by extremist elements. It is a significant moment that Canada's intelligence agency, CSIS, now publicly recognises Canada-based Khalistani extremism as a real and growing national security threat and not merely a foreign concern. This acknowledgment aligns with India's longstanding position that terrorism must be confronted with unwavering resolve, wherever it arises. As Canada's UN envoy Bob Rae stated at the memorial, 'Canadians need to know that the bomb was placed in Canada, and this act of terror must be etched deeply into Canadian history.' His words underscore the shared responsibility of nations to transform remembrance into a call for accountability and collective action. As Minister Puri aptly stated during the commemoration, the Kanishka bombing was 'a crime against humanity'. This convergence of voices and acknowledgments strengthen India's call for global cooperation to dismantle terror networks and eliminate the support systems that sustain extremist violence. It transformed our presence in Ahakista from a solemn tribute to a clear stand for global justice and a shared commitment to preventing such tragedies in the future. As India moves forward under the New India vision of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, we remain steadfast in our commitment to treating terrorism as an act of war on humanity and leading with clarity and courage in dismantling its networks wherever they exist. The recent terror attack in Pahalgam serves as a stark reminder of the urgency of unified global action. The delegation to Ireland, with its strong Sikh representation, was a testament to the immense contributions of the Sikh community to India's strength, unity, and culture of 'sewa'. Sikhism has always stood for courage, equality, and service to humanity — from langars feeding millions globally, to serving in our armed forces, where Sikhs form over 12 per cent of the personnel despite being less than 2 per cent of the population, and leading humanitarian efforts worldwide. Those promoting separatism in the name of Sikhism do not represent the spirit of a community that has always chosen nation-building over division. As we move forward, we carry within us the vision of a New India — an India that is resilient, compassionate, and committed to peace, echoing the words of PM Modi that 'India will not tolerate terrorism, and will not spare those who support terror.' The remembrance of Kanishka is a reminder of the cost of silence and inaction, urging us to transform memory into resolve and to build a world where justice and humanity prevail, ensuring such tragedies are never repeated. The writer is a BJP MLA from Sadulshahar, Rajasthan

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store