Pre-contract agreements - why are they different in NI?
Deals made mid-season between clubs for the transfer of players nearing the end of their contracts at the end of the campaign have become commonplace across Europe.
Interestingly though the Irish League adopts rules that are not applied in some other major leagues including the Premier League, meaning that players can agree moves within the same jurisdiction, that is to other Irish League clubs.
BBC Sport NI assesses some of the issues surrounding pre-contracts and how they have affected the domestic game in Northern Ireland.
A pre-contract arrangement is when a player agrees to join a different club at the expiry of their current contract.
After the interested club provides written notice of their intent to do so, discussions can begin up to six months before the end of a player's current deal.
A player who is approaching the end of their contract can sign with another club without incurring any transfer fees.
The rule was established in accordance with the 1995 Bosman ruling concerning the freedom of movement rights of professional footballers.
The Irish FA has indicated that the rules followed in Northern Ireland reflect the guidelines set out by football's world governing body, Fifa, which allow negotiations to happen between a player and other clubs in the same league.
In the Premier League, the rules are somewhat different.
The FA regulations stipulate that players in the last six months of their contract can only speak to clubs in other nations.
They must wait until the final month of their contract before speaking to other domestic clubs.
One reason for this may be with sporting integrity in mind, ensuring that there is no conflict of interest between clubs working under their remit.
In response to a BBC Sport NI request about why the rules in Northern Ireland differed from the Premier League, an IFA statement read:
"Certain provisions within the Fifa Regulations and Status of Players (RSTP) regulation are binding at national level and must be included without modification in national association's regulations.
"This includes the following RSTP text in respect of special provisions relating to contracts between a professional player and clubs:
"A club intending to conclude a contract with a professional must inform the player's current club in writing before entering into negotiations with him.
"A professional shall only be free to conclude a contract with another club if his contract with his present club has expired or is due to expire within six months. Any breach of this provision shall be subject to appropriate sanctions."
The rules surrounding pre-contract agreements may have helped precipitate the transfers of former Larne players Levi Ives and Joe Thomson, plus ex-Cliftonville midfielder Ronan Doherty in recent weeks.
Ives and Doherty were both understood to have agreed pre-contract terms with Coleraine but ultimately deals were made to enable the players to move in January, with transfer fees reportedly involved.
A similar scenario led to Thomson's switch to Glentoran just two days after he played for Larne against his future club in the County Antrim Shield final and almost scored the winning goal.
Joel Cooper has signed a pre-contract deal to move to Coleraine on the expiry of his current deal with Linfield and while the Bannsiders appear understandably keen to add the forward to their squad this month, the Blues have so far resisted their overtures and manager David Healy has indicated that he will not imminently be leaving Windsor Park for Ballycastle Road.
Glentoran manager Declan Devine talking to BBC Sport NI: "It's a strange one for me because I've never experienced it before. In the leagues I've previously worked in there were no letters going in for players.
"But you have to trust your players. It is a bit strange but also you have to keep planning for the future. That's just the nature of the game here in Northern Ireland."
Larne boss Gary Haveron: "It's far from ideal. Other leagues have restrictions on that and they have their reasons for doing that. It's maybe something we want to look into.
"[With players facing clubs they have agreed to join in the summer], there's the whole thing of 'do they want to play', 'have they the right mindset, the right mentality going into the game'."
Former Carrick Rangers manager Stuart King paid tribute to the professionalism of players potentially involved in pre-contract deals in Northern Ireland but said the present situation did not sit easy with him.
"As a previous manager I would not like having a player [in my squad] knowing that he is not going to be there the following year," King told Sportsound on Saturday.
"I understand that there are certain examples, such as Joel Cooper at Linfield, where he is too important to the team, that he has to stay because they're potentially going to win the league because of Joel Cooper.
"Joe Thomson nearly scored the winner in injury-time in the County Antrim Shield final for Larne against Glentoran. Two days later he signs for Glentoran. He could have won the trophy for Larne in the last minute of the game.
"It doesn't sit right. It's uncomfortable for managers and staff. It's uncomfortable for players and most importantly it's really uncomfortable for the actual player involved."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
29 minutes ago
- Forbes
Brentford FC Will Implode If This Move Goes Wrong
Brentford manager Thomas Frank with Bryan Mbeumo and Yoane Wissa after the final whistle of the ... More Premier League match at the King Power Stadium, Leicester. Picture date: Friday February 21, 2025. (Photo by Mike Egerton/PA Images via Getty Images) At Brentford, there was always an acceptance that good things don't last. The club's secret weapon has been its willingness to sell its best players and successfully reinvest the earned sum. Over the past decade, this strategy has slowly transformed the West London side from an average League 1 outfit to an established Premier League team. Along the way, there have been many moments when the method of steady renewal might falter, especially when a seemingly irreplaceable part of the machine was lost. In the dugout, the exits of Mark Warburton and Dean Smith felt like knockout blows, but on each occasion, the Bees steadied themselves and hit new heights. Likewise, when Neal Maupay or Ollie Watkins were sold, it seemed unlikely that the club would uncover another prolific goalscorer. Yet every time a talisman departed, a player whom the Bees had steadily developed would come to the fore and replace them. This type of long-term strategic vision starkly contrasts with rivals, whose boom and bust investment in short-term fixes has not delivered the sustainable achievements that Matthew Benham's leadership has. But it's hard to imagine a summer of disruption to the Brentford model greater than this one. It began with the departure of coach Thomas Frank, the man who took Brentford to the promised land of the Premier League and established them as a force. It was only a matter of time before he'd be offered a more prestigious position, and this year, Tottenham Hotspur swooped in for the Dane. If he were the only major exit, that would be one thing, but he's part of a major exodus of talent from West London. Influential midfielder Christian Norgaard has gone to Arsenal and is set to be followed out the door by top scorer Bryan Mbeumo, who is Manchester United-bound. But that's not all, its next highest scorer, Yoane Wissa, is being pursued by a host of top-flight rivals and goalkeeper Mark Flekken is wanted by Bayer Leverkusen. As has been the Brentford way so successfully, Frank's replacement is a man without experience. Keith Andrews is far better known for pontificating from the analyst's chair as a TV pundit, but after a successful spell as the team's set-piece coach, he finds himself as the new coach. Thankfully, for a man losing the core of a very successful team, he is under no illusions about what's in store. '[I've been given] no assurances. I think the reality is that it's a football club that has been built in a certain way and we have ways to do things which aren't the norm," said the former Ireland international. 'The support Thomas had throughout his tenure was impeccable. The relations he built were very connected and aligned and I don't see that being any different.' Set-Piece Genius Or Armchair Expert? New Brentford manager Keith Andrews at the Gtech Community Stadium, London. Picture date: Monday ... More June 30, 2025. (Photo by Maja Smiejkowska/PA Images via Getty Images) Andrews comes to the role having overseen one of the most effective aspects of Brentford's game last season. Set-piece goals provided the platform for many victories and the side even managed the astonishing record of scoring from kick-off in four consecutive Premier League games. According to former Brentford set-piece analyst Marc Orti Esteban, this is evidence of Andrews' talent. "He deserves big credit for it," Esteban, who previously worked on routines and provided reports to the Irishman, told Sky Sports. "He knew it was an opportunity every game, maybe not to score a goal but to start on the front foot, and it's paid out really well. 'I don't think this is normal to score four or five goals from kick-offs. It's not easy to repeat, but there was a game plan for sure.' However, not everyone is so enthusiastic about the former pundit's prospects in West London. Andrews' former manager at the Republic of Ireland, Martin O'Neill, wished him well while simultaneously taking a dig at the man he managed. "Good luck to him. I hope he does get the job because he'll then realise what management is all about. It's not as easy to be just sitting in a pundit's chair and just criticising someone who, in all honesty, had a much better career than he had. He was dealing with the bottom end of it when I was winning the European Cup," O'Neill told Talksport. Everton's former CEO turned soccer consultant, Keith Wyness, was even more scathing on a Football Insider's Inside Track podcast episode. "I've just got concerns that the pressure could tell on him quickly and it won't be handled in quite the same way as Thomas Frank did," he said. "If you remember when Frank started, he lost eight out of his first 10 games. Frank fought through that early adversity, carried on persevering, and doing it but I think if that was to happen to Andrews, we'd see a different situation. "I just don't see him having the experience of managing, and I think that experience is so crucial in a smaller club like Brentford, where you're part of a much smaller group of decision makers and there's just no room for egos, volatility. "I hope I'm wrong and I do have a lot of trust in Matthew Benham and John Varney to make the right decision but I'm just saying that's the red flag in my mind and if I were a chief executive again, I would have been thinking differently about appointing him as the manager. 'He's part of the family at Brentford, I understand that. He knows everybody and they've had a chance to review much more than I have, so I take that point on board. However, it's just something in my gut feeling and my experience of having been in football and hired managers.' At this stage, few would bet against the long body of evidence favoring Brentford's strategy. But Andrews faces a task far harder than any of his predecessors. The club's faith in him will surely be tested, and it will be fascinating to see how it all plays out.
New York Times
29 minutes ago
- New York Times
How Manchester United signed Bryan Mbeumo: Low-ball offer to top-end price – and why it took so long
From the first bid to the third, Manchester United's pursuit of Bryan Mbeumo went on for 44 days, a timespan that allowed anxiety to grow among the fanbase but the club believe they had good reason to wait. Neatly, 44 is the number of Premier League goals United scored last season — and bringing in Mbeumo is seen within Old Trafford as a significant step to addressing that shortcoming for Ruben Amorim's first full campaign. Advertisement Ultimately, Mbeumo has become a United player in time for the club's tour of Chicago, New Jersey and Atlanta, giving him time to adjust to Amorim's methods and get to know his new team-mates. Amorim has nearly a month leading up to Arsenal's visit to Old Trafford on the opening weekend of the campaign to prepare with Mbeumo and Matheus Cunha, two forwards who scored 35 Premier League goals between them last term. Under the head coach, they are expected to operate behind a lone striker in the 'No 10' spots — Mbeumo to the right, Cunha to the left. Cunha's early arrival contributed to the delay on Mbeumo. United triggering Cunha's £62.5million ($84m) release from Wolverhampton Wanderers gave Brentford a yardstick for Mbeumo's price tag. Brentford were adamant Mbeumo was worth more and the Cameroonian did score 20 Premier League goals last season — but over their entire time in England's top division, their output has been similar. Mbeumo has 42 goals and 30 assists in 136 games, compared with Cunha's 29 goals and 13 assists in 82 games (both equating to a contribution every 1.9 games). United pressed the button on Cunha on June 1, as soon as the window opened, having progressed on personal terms with him in the belief they could also trigger the £30m clause in Liam Delap's Ipswich Town contract at the same time, negating any bidding wars. Delap chose Chelsea, however, with United informed of his intentions on May 29, and that brought negotiations into the equation after all. United immediately pivoted to Mbeumo — they had already done groundwork on what the deal might look like and knew the player's preference was to join them over other suitors, including Newcastle United, Tottenham Hotspur and Arsenal. People familiar with the situation, speaking anonymously like others in this article to discuss sensitive matters, claim that different clubs were told of Mbeumo's financial demands and that he would join whoever was prepared to meet them — but the appeal of Manchester United proved broader: a raised profile due to a huge fanbase, and a chance to be part of the team aiming to return the club to the days of winning top trophies. His salary at Old Trafford, which is incentivised based on performances, is comfortably within the club's pay structure. Advertisement Six days after learning Delap was turning them down, Manchester United submitted their first bid for Mbeumo of £45m plus £10m in add-ons — the start of the agitation in talks that would slow down progress. Brentford believed that United had been informed by intermediaries of a price that would get the deal done — United's initial offer fell below that figure and, in any case, Brentford's valuation did not tally up with the message the intermediaries had apparently communicated north. Reports emerged that Tottenham, now managed by Mbeumo's former manager Thomas Frank, had made a £70million proposal. Spurs denied bidding for Mbeumo, but Brentford insisted that figure represented another barometer for his value, and United would have to raise their bid significantly. United's second offer, as an overall package, matched the fee for Cunha at £55m plus £7.5m in add-ons. While the opening offer was a case of testing the waters, United believed that, following background conversations, this follow-up bid had a good chance of being accepted. That confidence led some at Old Trafford and Carrington to expect Mbeumo's impending arrival at the end of June. But Brentford again turned United down. Whether that was Brentford moving the goalposts or United being misinformed depends on your perspective, each theory has been mentioned by people connected to the deal. The wrangles continued. Some people involved in the deal say Brentford applied pressure on Mbeumo to accept moves to suitors who had offered a higher fee, such as Newcastle. Tottenham were also aware of how much a deal would cost to do. Mbeumo's preference was to join United but it did not mean that Brentford were prepared to let him leave for less than rivals were willing to pay. There was also a sense that United going lower than anticipated on the first bid had left Brentford, including owner Matthew Benham, unimpressed. Later, people familiar with the process say Brentford suggested Mbeumo could accept a lower salary at United to facilitate a higher transfer fee. Advertisement That never came to pass and in the end it was Brentford, who have cemented their place in the Premier League off the back of impressive player trading with fellow clubs, who compromised on their desired price to get a deal done. After a sequence of different figures, the final asking price United received, in writing, was £70million plus £7m in add-ons. Last summer, Brentford sold Ivan Toney and they were never going to allow Mbeumo to leave in the same window. They accepted it would be difficult to keep Mbeumo for more than another year but projected a productive season could raise his value to £80m. Club talks mainly ran through sporting director Phil Giles, United's director of negotiations, Matt Hargreaves, and their director of football Jason Wilcox, who knows Giles well as his son Max played for Brentford B up until this summer. Benham, a physics graduate of the University of Oxford who made his money through betting businesses with mathematical modelling, has used the same analytics to raise Brentford from the third tier to become an established member of the Premier League, and he influenced his side's approach in this transfer. He has been spotted wearing a Cameroon shirt several times, so there was a personal element in his appreciation of Mbeumo too. At United, Sir Jim Ratcliffe set the parameters and wanted his executives to emerge with a good deal. There was an element of competition, as well as trying to be financially responsible amid cutbacks from minority owner INEOS. Joel and Avram Glazer were also across the spending, and one consideration was that, after Cunha, Mbeumo's fee represented a second large outlay for a player who would be 26 by the time the season started. Both players go into United's top 10 most expensive transfers. The issue for United was that Brentford knew how much they wanted Mbeumo, especially after missing out on Delap. Ratcliffe, Amorim, chief executive Omar Berrada, and Wilcox made a unified choice to target signings with proven Premier League records, and Mbeumo was only outscored by Mohamed Salah, Alexander Isak and Erling Haaland last season. Extended to the last three seasons and only Ollie Watkins joins that list, with Mbeumo ranking seventh in Premier League goal contributions in that period. United's leverage came from Mbeumo only having 12 months left on his contract. Brentford had an option to extend a year to 2027 but this summer represented their last opportunity to extract maximum value. They had previously allowed David Raya and Toney to enter the final 12 months of their deals, impacting the fees they received, and were keen to avoid a repeat. Mbeumo had made it clear after the 2023-24 campaign that he would not sign a new contract and wanted to move. Dressing-room sources, who have been kept anonymous to protect relationships, were adamant at the end of last season that he would depart. Advertisement United also felt that Brentford's model for buying and selling players meant they eventually had to allow Mbeumo to leave or it would undermine that strategy. Agreeing a deal would benefit their pitches to future signings. It was at this point, following the second bid, that Mbeumo told Brentford, and Tottenham, he only wanted United. Brentford pulled their own lever. Giles went public to say Mbeumo would stay if the deal was not right for his club. 'There's no harm in keeping your best players,' said Giles. United stepped back, sensing that sometimes in negotiations, silence draws the opposite party to return to the table. Three weeks went by with no real progress, much to the frustration of United's fanbase. Amorim expressed a degree of restlessness, too. Observers with sharper tongues suggested United were at least saving money on wages by not getting in Mbeumo earlier. United held talks on other targets, including several strikers, but Mbeumo was the focus rather than efforts to find alternatives to generate leverage. Brentford knew United's desire to sign Mbeumo and waited. A figurative deadline of July 7, United's first day back in pre-season, came and went. Instead, it was Brentford's return to training a week later that provoked movement. Mbeumo reported for duty on July 14 and acted professionally — but also made clear to Brentford officials he wanted to join United. He did not though take part in outdoor sessions, instead working in the gym before being given time away to complete his move, which means he will need to get up to speed first with United. Brentford's aggressive pursuit of Ipswich's Omari Hutchinson — they made multiple offers last week for the left-footed winger who plays on the right, like Mbeumo — was another hint the saga was drawing to a close. Advertisement The reality of trying to keep a player who had psychologically moved on was apparent and, with United's tour to the United States looming, club executives held renewed face-to-face talks to determine the path ahead. The location of this breakthrough summit was unusual: the stand-off thawed in Iceland. Ratcliffe, using his private jet, frequently travels all over the world and last week was scheduled to be in Egilsstadir, in the north east of the country, where he likes to go fly fishing and has invested in environmental scheme Six Rivers. Berrada and Wilcox flew to Iceland last Wednesday to be with United's co-owner for a few days and go over United business. The transfer window was prime among discussions, with Mbeumo top of the agenda. Ratcliffe likes to talk in person when making important calls and subsequently sanctioned United returning with a third bid of £65million plus £5m in add-ons, reaching that £70m price point pitched by the contested Spurs offer, albeit lower than the £77m package proposed by Brentford. Brentford gave the impression that package would be sufficient for broad agreement and by Thursday night, all that remained was figuring out the add-ons. Eventually, Brentford squeezed a further £1m from United, who will spread out the payments for the guaranteed amount over four years. Brentford have doubled their previous club-record sale from Toney's £33.6m move to Saudi Pro League side Al Ahli last August. United insiders feel Brentford would not have accepted £65m plus £6m any earlier in the process. The bonuses are based on a mix of team an individual achievements. Mbeumo was given permission to travel to Manchester, where he arrived at Old Trafford's international suite just before midday on Saturday — around the same time Brentford flew out to Portugal for their pre-season training camp. He was at Carrington on Sunday, across the weekend doing his medical, media, and signing paperwork. Despite living in England since 2019, United also had to arrange a new work visa, putting club staff on a clock to get him ready for Tuesday's team flight to Chicago. Mbeumo's agent, Jeremy Ramalingam, carried out the work on the player side. Advertisement Some people close to United privately accept that the club have paid at the top end of Mbeumo's value, possibly over it, but when set against Amorim's need for immediate impact and the general market for Premier League forwards, the outlay is seen as being worthwhile. This summer, clubs have agreed to pay more than £50million, in some cases £60m, for a host of players without Mbeumo's record, including Noni Madueke, Anthony Elanga, Joao Pedro, Jamie Gittens, Mohammed Kudus and Morgan Gibbs-White. Rather than splash the cash for a player from Europe who might turn into an elite talent, as United have tried in recent years, they are accepting a premium to bring in an established performer. Now the question is whether Mbeumo can translate his ability to the stage, and scrutiny, of United.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Manchester United: Bryan Mbeumo shirt number confirmed after £71m transfer is announced
Manchester United have confirmed the shirt number that has been allocated to summer signing Bryan Mbeumo. The Cameroon international joins Man United from fellow Premier League outfit Brentford for an initial £65million fee, with a further £6m in add-ons, meaning the deal could end up being worth £71m. Mbeumo becomes United's fourth signing of the summer transfer window and will bolster the attacking depth at Old Trafford that already includes fellow new recruit Matheus Cunha, Joshua Zirkzee, Amad Diallo and Rasmus Hojlund. As expected, Mbeumo has been handed the No19 shirt at the 'Theatre of Dreams'. This squad number had been vacant since the departure of defender Raphael Varane at the end of the 2023/24 season. Amad, Marcus Rashford, James Wilson, Danny Welbeck and Dwight Yorke are the previous forwards to have worn No19 for Man Utd in the Premier League era. Significantly perhaps, the 25-year-old gets the same shirt number as the only other Cameroonian outfielder to represent the club, Eric Djemba-Djemba. Mbeumo had worn No19 throughout his time at Brentford but has mixed between No19 and No20 since making his international debut in September 2022. Speaking on the move, he said: 'As soon as I knew there was a chance to join Manchester United, I had to take the opportunity to sign for the club of my dreams; the team whose shirt I wore growing up. 'My mentality is to always be better than I was yesterday. I know that I have the spirit and character to reach another level here learning from Ruben Amorim and playing alongside world-class players. 'Everybody told me about the environment that is being created here and how exciting the plans are for the future. This is a massive club, with an incredible stadium and amazing fans, we are all really determined to challenge for the biggest trophies.'
