
Hungary's failure to tackle high-level corruption a concern, EU report says
Hungary
to tackle cases of high-level corruption remains a 'concern' for the
European Union
, a new report has said.
Hungary's far-right government, led by populist prime minister
Viktor Orban
, was criticised for overseeing a 'deteriorating environment' for civil-society organisations in the central European country.
A report assessing the rule of law across the EU said judges in Hungary faced 'undue pressure' and people believed there was a high level of corruption in the public sector.
EU commissioner for justice
Michael McGrath
said it was 'deeply disappointing' that the situation in Hungary had not improved over the last year.
READ MORE
The recent attempt to
ban the LGBT+ Pride parade in Budapest
was a further example that Hungary had slipped backwards, he said.
The EU's annual rule of law report said the number of people convicted in Hungary over corruption charges had decreased, though the number of initial indictments remained high.
The risk of 'political influence and undue interference' on police investigators and prosecutors was worrying, the report said.
The lack of investigations into alleged corruption by high-ranking Hungarian officials and those in their close circles 'remain areas of concern', the report said. It also raised fears about 'clientelism, favouritism and nepotism' in the Hungarian public administration.
Ongoing concerns about the government undermining the rule of law and civil society has led to €18 billion of EU funding due to Hungary being frozen by the
European Commission
, the union's executive arm that proposes and enforces EU laws.
'Concerns related to the absence of procedural safeguards and effective oversight in case of secret surveillance measures outside criminal proceedings have not been addressed,' the report said.
The commission's report criticised prime minister
Robert Fico
's populist government in
Slovakia
for putting further pressure on civil-society groups and making it more difficult for independent journalists to work.
There had been no progress made to improve the investigation and prosecution of cases involving high-level corruption, the report said. The power of a prosecutor general in Slovakia to annul the final decisions of lower-level prosecutors was concerning, it added.
Speaking in Strasbourg, Mr McGrath said work to improve the rule of law had picked 'the low-hanging fruit' over recent years. Progress national capitals were being asked to make on other recommendations for 'deeper, more structural' reforms would take longer.
The EU report said large publicly-funded contracts and infrastructure projects were sectors vulnerable to corruption in Spain. It noted that a previous survey had found many companies felt corruption had prevented them from winning public contracts in the last three years.
There had been 'limited progress' bringing in comprehensive rules governing political lobbying in Italy, the report said. There were similar shortcomings in Bulgaria's effort to ensure a higher standard of integrity across government.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Examiner
3 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Pádraic Fogarty: U-turn shows Government is unwilling to protect Ireland's sea creatures
At last month's United Nations Ocean Conference, held in Nice, France, the Spanish government announced that it would be creating seven new marine protected areas (MPAs) which will bring its total network to 25.7% of its territorial waters. Spain is hardly a great champion for marine protection, it is currently in court for allowing bottom trawling in its MPAs and has virtually nowhere that is 'strictly protected', that is, off limits to all kinds of fishing or extractive activities. Nevertheless, it can credibly say that it is on track to achieve protection of 30% of its waters by 2030, an international benchmark that many countries, including Ireland, have signed up to. Taoiseach Micheál Martin was also in Nice for the summit but, unlike the Spanish, announced no initiatives on MPAs. In a speech he said that 'Ireland understands the need to protect our marine environment', which may be true, but this is scarcely reflected in the apathy and inaction from him and his government on this topic. Unlike nearly every other European country, Ireland lacks even the basic legislation for the creation of MPAs, something that we agreed to pass back in 2008 with the adoption of the EU's Marine Strategy Framework Directive. It took 13 years before a Fine Gael-led government commissioned an expert report on the issue, which appeared in 2021. In 2022 there was a public consultation which, in the government's own words, demonstrated 'strong support' for MPAs and which received an impressive 2,311 submissions, mostly from ordinary people. A draft bill was published at the end of that year while the Joint Oireachtas Committee published its report on this early in 2023. Last year the bill came within a hair's breadth of being approved by the government but was pulled at the last minute for reasons that have not been explained publicly. As recently as the run-up to the last election, Micheál Martin wrote to the campaign group Fair Seas assuring them that upon a return to office the MPA bill would be passed 'as soon as possible.' However, last weekend it was reported that the Taoiseach is doing a full U-turn on this policy. A report in the Sunday Business Post said that the bill would now be dropped, and that they were looking at ways to shoehorn MPAs into existing legislation. Padraic Fogarty: 'There is huge popular support for taking action. People love the sea.' There are those who will say that it makes little difference whether the provision for MPAs lies within standalone legislation or not. Theoretically they might be correct, but the reality of what has happened points to something far more worrying. Creating the foundations for an MPA network that will actually deliver the recovery of marine life requires a substantial level of detail to be nailed down in law. There is work by scientists to identify where the best places for MPAs should be but drawing the lines on maps is the easy part. How will they be monitored? Who will enforce the rules? Where will strictly protected areas be located? Of critical importance are the details on how they will be managed on a day-to-day basis; where will responsibility lie and how will local communities be able to participate? We know these questions are important because the existing network of protected conservation areas, which were designated as part of the EU's Habitats and Birds directives, has failed miserably in achieving its aims and has only served to anger local people and distance them from our most precious nature sites. It is an approach that has landed us, repeatedly, in the European Court of Justice and is a leading reason why the scale of the biodiversity crisis in Ireland is much greater than it might have otherwise been. Micheál Martin's backflip on the MPA bill signals that they don't have the willingness to go through with this. Much easier is adding a few clauses to an existing bill to allow for the nominal designation of MPAs and the creation of more 'paper parks', something that will allow the government to claim that it has met international commitments, but which delivers nothing in the water for biodiversity. Fishing industry This is not only about recovering the rich marine life that is currently a shadow of its former self due to decades of fishing activity, pollution and, more recently, warming waters. The fishing communities that rely on healthy seas have dwindled away also. The situation has become so dire that whatever fish are left are far out to sea being hoovered up by industrial factory boats leaving lobsters as the only reliable catch for the guys in small boats. On the other hand, the director of the National Inshore Fisheries Forum told a conference in Cork in 2022 that 'MPAs could be the saviour of the inshore industry'. It is not just the MPAs that highlights the Taoiseach's inaction. His government has also failed to legislate for the exclusion of large trawlers from coastal waters, something that was promised a decade ago. Lack of food has seen the large whales abandon the south coast, something which this year prompted long-time boatman Colin Barnes to close up his whale watching business in Union Hall. In 2022, when the EU asked member states to stop bottom trawling in existing protected areas, the Irish government just shrugged its shoulders and carried on. It is perfectly allowable for someone to drag a dredger, a long iron bar with outward teeth that dig into the seafloor, through one of these so-called 'special areas of conservation'. Frustration with Government inaction Why is the government seemingly so incapable of taking any action? How is it willing to stand like a frightened bunny and watch ecosystems and fishing communities collapse and do nothing about it? Ireland is a dynamic place. We had a successful Citizens' Assembly on Biodiversity Loss which clearly outlined the action that needs to be taken. There is no shortage of community groups, businesses, NGOs and fishermen who are willing, eager even, to roll up their sleeves and start the task of restoration. There is huge popular support for taking action. People love the sea. Yet the lack of action, the reneging of promises, the endless, meaningless speeches are sapping motivation. This was demonstrated in a recent Climate Conversations survey which showed that public anxiety on environmental issues is rising due to government inaction. 'Frustration was the main feeling reported,' according to pollsters. Our politicians are the only ones who can pass laws, without which change where it matters cannot happen. I have seen this first hand in my work as an advocate for nature for over 20 years. The government should not be allowed backslide on its duty to pass a standalone law for MPAs, like it promised, like the people of this country want. Read More Anja Murray: Radical changes required to let the oceans recover

The Journal
4 hours ago
- The Journal
EU commissioner and delegation ordered to leave Libya just after arriving in Benghazi
THE AUTHORITIES IN eastern Libya told an EU commissioner and three ministers from member states to leave immediately today after they arrived in the main city Benghazi for planned talks. Accusing the bloc's delegation of a 'flagrant breach of diplomatic norms', the authorities who hold sway over eastern Libya said they had cancelled the visit and told the EU officials to 'leave Libyan territory immediately'. The EU commissioner for internal affairs and migration, Magnus Brunner, said on X that 'the meetings planned in Benghazi could not take place in the end'. 'There was a breach of protocol which is unfortunate,' an EU official said, blaming it on 'a big misunderstanding' over which Libyan authorities they were due to meet. The delegation had flown in from the Libyan capital Tripoli, where it held talks with the UN-backed Government of National Unity of Prime Minister Abdelhamid Dbeibah, which controls the west of the country. Besides Brunner, the delegation also included the interior ministers of Italy and Malta, Matteo Piantedosi and Byron Camilleri, and Greek Migration Minister Thanos Plevris. Straight after their arrival in Benghazi, the head of the eastern administration, Osama Hammad, declared all four men persona non grata. He called on all diplomats and representatives of non-governmental organisations to 'respect the sovereignty of the Libyan state', without elaborating. Libya has been gripped by conflict since the 2011 overthrow and killing of longtime ruler Moamer Kadhafi in a NATO-backed uprising. The country remains split between Dbeibah's government based in Tripoli and Hammad's rival administration based in the east. Advertisement Libya is a common point of departure for people seeking to cross the central Mediterranean and reach Europe. Those asylum seekers come from many countries but mostly from east African states like Etritrea, Sudan and Somalia. As it does with other North African states like Tunisia, the EU has agreements with Libyan authorities that effectively outsource the policing of the bloc's sea border. Libyan Coastguard agencies prevent crossings and intercept boats – which they then bring back – in exchange for funding, equipment and training. The Libyan coastguard has been accused of frequent human rights violations and other crimes. People stopped by the coastguard are usually returned to detention centres in Libya where detainees are often mistreated and in some cases tortured. So far this year, 550 people have been reported dead or missing along the central Mediterranean route, the deadliest migration route in the world. - © AFP 2025 With reporting from David Mac Redmond Need more clarity and context on how migration is being discussed in Ireland? Check out our FactCheck Knowledge Bank for essential reads and guides to finding good information online. Visit Knowledge Bank

The Journal
6 hours ago
- The Journal
Irish sovereign wealth fund pumped millions into companies contracted by Israel Defence Forces
IRELAND'S SOVEREIGN WEALTH fund, the Irish Strategic Investment Fund (ISIF), still has holdings in companies with links to Israeli settlements in occupied Palestinian territory. In 2024, then-Minister for Finance Michael McGrath announced that the fund had divested from five companies that are linked to settlement activity that is considered illegal under international law. But the ISIF continues to invest in eight other companies named on a United Nations database - a key document that highlights businesses and parent companies whose subsidiaries enable the continued existence of Israeli settlements. By the end of 2023, the total value of these investments was more than €10 million. As part of a new investigation, The Journal Investigates looked at how much Ireland is investing in these companies and how they are linked to illegal settler activity in Palestine. Many of these investments are in multinationals, but two in particular are in companies that hold contracts with the Israel Defence Forces (IDF): Delek Group and Motorola Solutions Inc. The value of the ISIF's investments in these two companies alone was almost €5 million -roughly the same amount as the State's sovereign wealth fund invested in the other six companies combined. — Investigations like this don't happen without your support… Impactful investigative reporting is powered by people like you. Support The Journal Investigates Advertisement IDF vehicles Out of the eight companies that the ISIF invests in, just one is based solely in Israel: Delek Group, the owner of a chain of petrol stations that was founded in the country in the early 1950s. The ISIF's investment in the company is indirect, which means that it did not directly buy shares or provide capital to Delek, but instead invested in it through an intermediary such as a fund or financial institution that handles investment decisions on Ireland's behalf. As of 2023, the State indirectly invested around €214,000 in Delek, which is best-known in Israel as the operator of a chain of filling stations and convenience stores. A search of Google Maps shows that it operates a handful of these petrol stations in the occupied West Bank, East Jerusalem and the Golan Heights. Google Maps Google Maps However, the company is also linked to the activities of the Israel Defence Forces (IDF): under a contract agreed in 2020, the IDF listed Delek as one of two companies whose petrol stations are allowed to be used by military vehicles to refuel. Delek also reportedly holds other contracts with the Israeli defence industry, according to WhoProfits , an independent group dedicated to 'exposing the role of the private sector in the Israeli occupation economy' through a database. The database has been consulted by the international BDS movement, and WhoProfits has been repeatedly highlighted by the United Nations, including in a report last week by the current Special Rapporteur for Palestine Francesca Albanese. The Journal Investigates contacted Delek Group for comment, but no response was received by the time of publication, and no other recent statements on the company's position about its activities in occupied Palestinian territories could be found. Surveillance systems and checkpoints US-based technology firm Motorola Solutions and its subsidiary, Motorola Solutions Israel, are among just six companies that appear on the UN database for supplying security. The Irish government holds millions in both direct and indirect investments in the parent company. It should not be confused with the telecoms company of the same name, from whom it split in 2011, Motorola Solutions specialises in security products and systems such as video equipment and command centre technology. Sign up The Journal Investigates is dedicated to lifting the lid on how Ireland works. Our newsletter gives you an inside look at how we do this. Sign up here... Sign up .spinner{transform-origin:center;animation:spinner .75s infinite linear}@keyframes spinner{100%{transform:rotate(360deg)}} You are now signed up It holds contracts worth hundreds of millions of Euro with Israel's government and military, and its systems are used extensively throughout the occupied territories, along the separation wall in the West Bank, and at Israeli military bases. The company provides everything from surveillance systems, radar detectors, and mobile communications systems to Israelis living in illegal settlements and the Israel Defence Forces. In a 2012 UN Special Rapporteur for Palestine Richard Falk, named Motorola Solutions Israel as 'sustaining the settlements' and limiting 'the Palestinians' freedom of movement within their territory'. Like Delek Group, the company's activities have also been extensively detailed by WhoProfits. Motorola Solutions has been named as 'the sole supplier of the 4G cellular network for the Israeli military' as well as the sole supplier of Israeli military smartphones after it was given a contract worth $100 million to do so. Human rights groups have also highlighted how the company's MotoEagle Wide Area Surveillance System – which uses radars and cameras to detect movements - has been used as a 'virtual fence system' in dozens of illegal settlements. In addition, Motorola has longstanding contracts with the Israel Prison Service and the country's Population and Immigration Authority – including communications equipment at prisons like Ofer in the West Bank, where Palestinians are held in military detention. As of 2023, the Irish government directly invested around €700,000 and held €3.9 million worth of indirect investments in the company. The Journal Investigates contacted Motorola Solutions for comment, but no response was received by the time of publication. The company has previously told a number of outlets that it supports 'efforts in the region to find a peaceful resolution to the conflict'. The Journal Investigates Reporter: Stephen McDermott • Investigation Editor: Sinead O'Carroll • The Journal Investigates Editor: Maria Delaney • Social Media: Cliodhna Travers • Main Image Design: Lorcan O'Reilly Investigations like this don't happen without your support... Impactful investigative reporting is powered by people like you. Over 5,000 readers have already supported our mission with a monthly or one-off payment. Join them here: Support The Journal