Tesla is much more reliant on Musk than Apple was on Jobs
James Moore,
The Independent
Tesla is starting to look like an EV which has run out of charge in the middle of a motorway. Help! Call the AA! Elon Musk's electric vehicle maker has reported its fifth consecutive monthly decline in sales across Europe, per ACEA, the European Automobile Manufacturers Association. This comes at a time when the trade body's figures show EVs are on the charge (sorry, couldn't resist the pun) across the EU, with new registrations rising by more than a quarter (26.1 per cent) year to date and a still robust 25 per cent in May. Including the UK and other non-EU nations, Europe-wide sales of battery-powered vehicles rose by 27.2 per cent in May and 27.8 per cent year to date.
By contrast, Tesla's sales have been zapped. Year to date, new EU registrations fell by 45.2 per cent over five months and by 40.5 per cent in May. Europe-wide, those figures were 37.1 per cent and 27.9 per cent respectively. Slumping sales in a rising market? Not a good look. I once wrote that Elon Musk's baby was the Audi, BMW or Mercedes of the EV world. The status car. The 'Look at me, I have a Tesla' symbol for people with money. How times change. Yes, yes, we've heard about the need to freshen up Tesla's dated models and the cheapie rivals coming out of China, which pose a very real threat. But the high-profile CEO's divisiveness has also poured toxic sludge over the Tesla logo. There have even been incidents of Teslas being vandalised. That is contemptible. Angry about what he's said and done? Far better to hit him in the pocket, which is what more sensible Europeans appear to be doing by abandoning the brand in droves.
Even the UK has started to slip, despite the regard that fleet managers have for the company. Year to date, sales fell by 7.8 per cent here, but they tanked in May (36 per cent decline).
Can the slide be arrested? Musk's checking out of the Trump administration was a good first step. But if I were Musk's strategic comms advisor, I'd advise him to hide in his office and to stay off X. I know, I know, probably not going to work. Musk can't help himself. So, how about this: Stay out of politics and content yourself with showing off about SpaceX, that other Musk business. Sure, it has had the odd issue with rockets crashing, but it is still doing stuff that makes sci-fi nerds like me drool despite ourselves. Perhaps throw in a bit of apolitical philanthropy to compensate for the USAID cuts and dodgy salutes? Lots of billionaires like to make a fuss about 'giving back'. Just a thought.
But what if the slippage continues? Could Musk step down? It seems unthinkable, and I think it highly unlikely. But earlier this year, the Wall Street Journal, a reliable source on business matters, did report that Tesla board members had been sounding out recruiters about potential successors. The report was swiftly and vehemently denied, but the speculation continues, and there is some logic to it. Musk is a disruptor. It is what drives him, and it has been a feature of his business career. Through building up Tesla from his initial investment in 2004, he disrupted the auto industry, helping to catalyse the progress electric vehicles have made while driving competitors to innovate. But Tesla is now part of the establishment, and for its medium to long-term future, it could arguably use a more conventional CEO. Someone a bit more boring.
Names in the frame? JB Straubel, a Musk confidant who these days runs battery recycling startup Redwood Materials, is often mentioned, and he holds a place on the Tesla board. Internally, right-hand man Omear Ashfar is seen as one to watch, as is Tom Zhu, who's been running things in China. Chief financial officer Vaibhav Taneja is another possibility, although the transition from CFO to CEO doesn't always work so well. At longer odds, but still worth considering, would be Gwynne Shotwell, the president and chief operating officer at SpaceX.
The trouble for any of them would be how deeply intertwined Musk is with Tesla. The shadow he casts over the business is as long as Chile. The group's shareholders have endured a rocky ride of late. At just over $340, the stock is a long way from the $480 peak reached in December, when Trump was preparing to take office and Musk was the presidential BFF. However, if you'd invested this time last year, your $100 would still be worth $184. That's a tasty return. The shares are propped up by a legion of fanboy investors, including fund managers at big institutions with billions under management. They still expect Musk to wave his magic wand and rediscover Tesla's turbocharged growth. Stranger things have happened. You might dislike the man, but only a fool would underestimate him.
The closest comparator for Musk stepping down might be Steve Jobs leaving Apple. The untimely death of the tech giant's founder led to the elevation of Tim Cook, who has proved himself a successful successor. But the first time he departed, things didn't go so well, and Jobs ended up riding to the rescue. Needless to say, Tesla is much more dependent on Musk than Apple was on Jobs, even at the height of the latter's power.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arabian Post
11 hours ago
- Arabian Post
Kenya Dominates East Africa–Europe Trade Surge
Trade between the European Union and the East African Community reached €7.7 billion in 2024, marking a robust surge in economic engagement. Data from the EAC Secretariat and the European Commission reveal that Kenya led this growth, accounting for 43 per cent of total EAC trade with Europe. Kenya's ascent to prominence has been propelled by its position as the region's primary link to European markets. Under the Economic Partnership Agreement initiated in July 2024, it became the first EAC member to implement the pact, which offers immediate tariff- and quota-free access for its exports into the EU, while Kenya gradually opens its market. The results are distinctly visible: Kenya accounts for nearly half of all EAC–EU trade and for 45 per cent of investments within the bloc. An analysis of trade flows underlines the shift. In 2023, Kenyan exports to Europe—including cut flowers, fruits and vegetables—totalled €1.2 billion, while EU exports of mineral and chemical products, machinery and appliances to Kenya reached €1.7 billion. This balance reflects the mutual benefits of the agreement and deepening bilateral ties. Kenya ranks as the EU's seventh‑largest African trade partner, with total trade climbing to €3 billion in 2023, a 16 per cent rise since 2018. ADVERTISEMENT Beyond Kenya, the broader EAC has also seen shifts. Collective trade grew 28.4 per cent to $8.86 billion, driven largely by the Kenya–EU EPA. Within the EAC, intra-bloc trade also grew by 13.1 per cent to $12.1 billion in 2023, representing 15 per cent of total EAC trade. Country-specific performance underscores varying trajectories. Uganda registered a remarkable 77 per cent surge in exports to global markets, reaching $6.34 billion in 2023. Tanzania and Rwanda, while showing moderate gains, still lagged behind Kenya's growth pattern. Burundi, South Sudan and Rwanda, classified as Least Developed Countries, continue to rely on the EU's Everything-but-Arms scheme, which offers duty-free entry for all goods except arms. The EPA's emphasis on sustainability and inclusivity adds a strategic layer to the agreement. It includes clauses on environmental conservation, labour rights and gender equality—portions unprecedented in prior EU agreements with developing economies. EU officials have indicated that Kenya's stability and regional influence underpinned its leading role in the EPA, which is intended to serve as a model for other EAC members. Trade analysts suggest that Kenya's rise reflects both domestic reforms and stronger supply-chain integration. Kenyan firms have adapted to the EAC's Common External Tariff and aligned export capacities with EU demand, particularly in horticulture and floriculture. According to agricultural sector experts, Kenyan producers have expanded certification and quality compliance to meet EU standards, enabling higher-priced access to premium markets. Nonetheless, challenges persist. Kenya continues to record a trade deficit with the EU—approximately €500 million in 2023—raising concerns about long-term sustainability. While exports of flowers, tea and vegetables are strong, reliance on imports of machinery and chemicals remains substantial. Furthermore, other EAC partners have yet to ratify the EPA, delaying full regional integration under the agreement. Policy experts argue that widening Kenya's success across the EAC will require infrastructure upgrades, logistical harmonisation and expanded value‑addition processes. They caution that without broader regional participation, Kenya could be left exposed to external market volatility and uneven benefits. European trade officials maintain that the Kenya–EAC partnership is central to the EU's Africa policy, dovetailing with commitments on democratic governance and green growth. The EU‑Kenya EPA, integrated into a broader strategic dialogue launched in June 2021, represents the most ambitious EU trade pact with a developing country to date. Kenya's achievement as the dominant node of East African trade with Europe reflects a blend of diplomatic foresight, institutional readiness and export agility. As the agreement matures and other EAC nations contemplate accession, the potential for a reconfigured regional economic landscape grows—but so do the complexities of harmonising economic strategies across six sovereign states.
The National
14 hours ago
- The National
UK Space Command rises to meet the challenges on the frontier beyond planet Earth
The bright yellow track of the missile ocean launch streaks upwards from Earth on a near-vertical trajectory towards space. Instantly a warning appears across the bank of computer screens in the crucible-like operations room of UK Space Command. 'Missile in flight,' says one of the operators at UK Space Command. There is a question that they need to very rapidly answer: is this going to threaten a major UK or allied satellite? It becomes rapidly apparent that this is not a rocket fired in anger from the Ukraine conflict or by Iran. Instead its line of travel is heading unflinchingly towards the heavens, an anti-satellite (Asat) weapon released to hunt its prey more than hundreds of kilometres above Earth. The stakes are high. In geostationary orbit 35,000km above Earth is one of the four Skynet 5 satellites, a $5.4 billion communications system that serves all of Britain's highly sensitive government communications, from special forces, spies in the field to the prime minister giving commands to nuclear submarines. If it is destroyed it will create a major vulnerability in UK defences. The Asat's yellow streak surges upwards gathering speed but now giving a strong indication of what its target might be, as within 10 minutes it has breached Earth's atmosphere. The computer readout indicates about 20 satellites in the missile's path, giving their nationalities as Russian, Chinese, American, Australian and British. As the weapon soars upwards, the number of satellites on an elliptic course narrow down to just five: two Russian, two Chinese and the UK's Skynet 5. The staff at Space Command have about 15 minutes to notify the operators to begin evasive manoeuvres and carry out defensive actions. 'The first shot in the next war going to be in space,' says one of the officers, as the scenario played out at the 24/7 operations centres comes to an end, after The National had been put in the hot seat to make the decisions on whether or not the Asat was a threat. But we were not given the options on defensive measures that, beyond rapid manoeuvring, could be taken – they remain classified. Space wars The last decade has made it became apparent that space will be another dimension in future war and the military personnel at the centre have been deployed to the furthest frontier the armed forces patrol. When Britain's military realised it had to have much better 'situational awareness', it set up Space Command in 2021. It has since grown to a force of more than 600 personnel, three quarters from the RAF, based at former Bomber Command headquarters near High Wycombe, housed in a series of unremarkable 1930s redbrick buildings that had been designed to resemble a village to put off German bombers in the Second World War. As in the Second World War, behind these walls a hub of specialists are assembled to observe the sky far above for any threats to Britain or its allies. To date there has never been an aggressive Asat launch, although Russia, the US, China and India have all shot down their own satellites to demonstrate their capabilities. That threat is evident in the low-key offices of Space Command, where personnel know that one consequence of a satellite being destroyed is that the timing signal for financial transactions would result in a loss of £1 billion a day, and that 18 per cent of the UK's economy dependent on space. Protect and Defend In what was the first time it had opened its doors to the press, the UK Space Operations Centre demonstrates a template for those countries operating in space – more than 80 currently – on how they can, as Space Command's logo urges, to 'protect and defend' the 811 UK vehicles in orbit. 'From a national security point of view, space is a contested, congested and competitive domain and we need to make sure as our adversaries advance their capabilities that we're able to deal with what that throws up,' said Maria Eagle, the Minister for Defence Procurement, as she officially opened the operations centre. With the global space economy projected to grow to $1.8 trillion by 2035, the dimension is about to get a lot more congested and competitive. Asteroid alert The British government is putting cash alongside its words with £13 million of funding for a constellation of new telescopes that will be arrayed across most of Britain's 14 independent overseas territories. They will be on hand to enhance the constant looking-towards-the-heavens operation of the space officers on duty who spotted the 876 'uncontrolled re-entries' of last year, or the nearly 30,000 collision risks to UK satellites, of which 20 resulted in an official alert. It is not only foreign powers but space itself that throws up many hazards, with 3,206 'close approach asteroids' reported and one actual 'asteroid alert' that ultimately came to nothing. The centre also monitors for space weather alerts, including the coronal mass ejections from the Sun which could wipe out power grids and satellites, particularly during a 'solar maximum' period, which Earth is currently experiencing. Given the 12,000 or so satellites currently orbiting Earth, space command is one of many now monitoring the skies to avoid a collision that could lead to a cascade of crashes causing the Kessler Effect, which could take out all orbiters, with catastrophic consequences. Satellite grabbers Ultimately it appears that the nations racing to colonise space will present the biggest dangers, and not just from their weapons. Space junk caused by the debris of obliterated satellites still presents hazards, including that from 2007, when China shot down one of its own older weather satellites, and 2021, when Russia conducted a similar exercise. But nations are also developing elaborate space weapons that could pose dangers to Earth and in the cosmos, with a 'satellite grabber' device being among the most feared. 'The National Space Operations Centre does vital work in monitoring and protecting our interests,' Ms Eagle told The National. 'It's a recognition of the fact that our adversaries are active there, and we need to know what's going on.'
Gulf Today
14 hours ago
- Gulf Today
Europe placates Trump with Nato vows
In their rush to retain Donald Trump's support for Nato, the alliance's European members have promised to more than double the amount of wealth they set aside for military spending. The snag is that most can ill-afford to spend 5% of output on defence — so while there will be some unpalatable sacrifices in national budgets, there will also be some creative accounting to divert existing spending to the effort, reported Reuters. 'They will not get there,' Guntram Wolff, senior fellow of the Bruegel think-tank, said of the 5% goal. 'If you are a highly indebted country you can't issue more debt, it means very difficult budgetary choices,' he said of the hefty tax hikes or spending cuts that it would require. As a piece of political theatre, the Hague summit at least won over its intended audience: Trump himself. Amid concerns about his commitment to Nato's mutual defence clause, he said the United States stood with its European allies 'all the way'. While few dispute that Europe needs to do more to ensure its own security as tensions with Russia rise, the fixation on the 5% target cut short a separate debate about how it could be using its existing military budgets more efficiently, for example with national governments agreeing on joint procurement. Now it has saddled itself with pledges which — with the notable exception of Germany, whose finances are solid after years of fiscal frugality — most members will find hard to keep, Reuters reported. To hit the 5% threshold, European Union countries, whose debt pile already tops 80% of output, would between them have to nearly triple the 325 billion euros ($377 billion) they spent on defence last year to more than 900 billion. Non-EU Britain — whose debt is 100% of output and which already pays more in debt servicing than for every spending item apart from health — would need an extra 30 billion pounds ($41 billion). 'The potential losers are not just future generations saddled with huge debts, but today's societies,' said Nick Witney at the European Council on Foreign Relations. 'Disgruntled populations, whose sense of economic wellbeing has never recovered from the global economic crash of 2008, will likely become even easier prey for populist or nationalist politicians gathering strength across Europe.' To be sure, the closer a country sits next to Russia, the less domestic angst there is about finding the extra cash - Poland, the Baltics and Finland are all cases in point. Years of rivalry with neighbouring Turkey have meanwhile attuned Greek public opinion to accept higher defence spending. But Spain's Socialist Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez — whose country is alone in not expressly signing up to the new target — voiced the concerns of others when he said the goal was 'incompatible with our welfare state'. Slovakia, one of the central European countries whose budgets face the greatest strains from the defence build-up, has also baulked at the target, arguing that raising living standards and cutting its borrowing were equally important. Bruegel's Wolff said it remained to be seen whether countries increase their defence quotas by shaving the odd billion here and there off other areas, or whether big-ticket areas such as pensions take a sizeable hit. 'But keep it in proportion — there will still be a welfare state but perhaps less generous,' he said of social protections across Europe that can account for anything up to 30% of the economy. As leaders depart the Hague summit venue, the national conversations on defence will sound strikingly different to those that were had in the run-up to the gathering.
