Operation Midnight Hammer: Were Iran's Nuclear Facilities Damaged?

Scoop

5 hours ago

The aftermath of Operation Midnight Hammer, a strike by the US Air Force on three nuclear facilities in Iran authorised by President Donald Trump on June 22, was raucous and triumphant. But that depended on what company you were keeping. The mission involved the bombing of the Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant, the uranium-enrichment facility at Natanz, and the uranium-conversion facility in Isfahan. The Israeli Air Force had already attacked the last two facilities, sparing Fordow for the singular weaponry available for the USAF.
The Fordow site was of particular interest, located some eighty to a hundred metres underground and cocooned by protective concrete. For its purported destruction, B-2 Spirit stealth bombers were used to drop GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator 'bunker buster' bombs. All in all, approximately 75 precision guided weapons were used in the operation, along with 125 aircraft and a guided missile submarine.
Trump was never going to be anything other than optimistic about the result. 'Monumental Damage was done to all Nuclear sites in Iran, as shown by satellite images,' he blustered. 'Obliteration is an accurate term!'
At the Pentagon press conference following the attack, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth bubbled with enthusiasm. 'The order we received from our commander in chief was focused, it was powerful, and it was clear. We devastated the Iranian nuclear program.' The US Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Air Force Gen. Dan Caine was confident that the facilities had been subjected to severe punishment. 'Initial battle damage assessments indicate that all three sites sustained extremely severe damage and destruction.' Adding to Caine's remarks, Hegseth stated that, 'The battle damage assessment is ongoing, but our initial assessment, as the Chairman said, is that all of our precision munitions struck where we wanted them to strike and had the desired effect.'
Resort to satellite imagery was always going to take place, and Maxar Technologies willingly supplied the material. 'A layer of grey-blue ash caused by the airstrikes [on Fordow] is seen across a large swathe of the area,' the company noted in a statement. 'Additionally, several of the tunnel entrances that lead into the underground facility are blocked with dirt following the airstrikes.'
The director of the Central Intelligence Agency, John Ratcliffe, also added his voice to the merry chorus that the damage had been significant. 'CIA can confirm that a body of credible intelligence indicates Iran's Nuclear Program has been severely damaged by the recent, targeted airstrikes.' The assessment included 'new intelligence from a historically reliable and accurate source/method that several key Iranian nuclear facilities were destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the course of years.'
Israeli sources were also quick to stroke Trump's already outsized ego. The Israel Atomic Energy Commission opined that the strikes, combined with Israel's own efforts, had 'set back Iran's ability to develop nuclear weapons by many years.' IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir's view was that the damage to the nuclear program was sufficient to have 'set it back by years, I repeat, years.'
The chief of the increasingly discredited International Atomic Energy Agency, Rafael Grossi, flirted with some initial speculation, but was mindful of necessary caveats. In a statement to an emergency meeting of the IAEA's 35-nation Board of Governors, he warned that, 'At this time, no one, including the IAEA, is in a position to have fully assessed the underground damage at Fordow.' Cue the speculation: 'Given the explosive payload utilised and extreme(ly) vibration-sensitive nature of centrifuges, very significant damage is expected to have occurred.'
This was a parade begging to be rained on. CNN and The New York Times supplied it. Referring to preliminary classified findings in a Defense Intelligence Agency assessment running for five pages, the paper reported that the bombing of the three sites had 'set back the country's nuclear program by only a few months'. The entrances to two of the facilities had been sealed off by the strikes but were not successful in precipitating a collapse of the underground buildings. Sceptical expertise murmured through the report: to destroy the facility at Fordow would require 'waves of airstrikes, with days or even weeks of pounding the same spots.'
Then came the issue of the nuclear material in question, which Iran still retained control over. The fate of over 400 kg of uranium that had been enriched up to 60% of purity is unclear, as are the number of surviving or hidden centrifuges. Iran had already informed the IAEA on June 13 that 'special measures' would be taken to protect nuclear materials and equipment under IAEA safeguards, a feature provided under the Non-Proliferation Treaty. Any transfer of nuclear material from a safeguarded facility to another location, however, would have to be declared to the agency, something bound to be increasingly unlikely given the proposed suspension of cooperation with the IAEA by Iran's parliament.
After mulling over the attacks over the course of a week, Grossi revisited the matter. The attacks on the facilities had caused severe though 'not total' damage. 'Frankly speaking, one cannot claim that everything has disappeared and there is nothing there.' Tehran could 'in a matter of months' have 'a few cascades of centrifuges spinning and producing enriched uranium.' Iran still had the 'industrial and technological' means to recommence the process.
Efforts to question the effacing thoroughness of Operation Midnight Hammer did not sit well with the Trump administration. White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt worked herself into a state on any cautionary reporting, treating it as a libellous blemish. 'The leaking of this alleged report is a clear attempt to demean President Trump and discredit the brave fighter pilots who conducted a perfectly executed mission to obliterate Iran's nuclear program,' she fumed in a statement. 'Everyone knows what happens when you drop 14 30,000-pound bombs perfectly on their targets.'
Hegseth similarly raged against the importance placed on the DIA report. In a press conference on June 26, he bemoaned the tendency of the press corps to 'cheer against Trump so hard, it's like in your DNA and in your blood'. The scribblers had to 'cheer against the efficacy of these strikes' with 'half-truths, spun information, leaked information'. Trump, for his part, returned to familiar ground, attacking any questioning narrative as 'Fake News'. CNN, he seethed, had some of the dumbest anchors in the business. With malicious glee, he claimed knowledge of rumours that reporters from both CNN and The New York Times were going to be sacked for making up those 'FAKE stories on the Iran Nuclear sites because they got it so wrong.'
A postmodern nonsense has descended on the damage assessments regarding Iran's nuclear program, leaving the way clear for over remunerated soothsayers. But there was nothing postmodern in the incalculable damage done to the law of nations, a body of acknowledged rules rendered brittle and breakable before the rapacious legislators of the jungle.