Michael Douglas says he has ‘no real intentions' of acting again: ‘I had to stop'
Speaking at the Karlovy Vary international film festival in the Czech Republic for the 50th anniversary of One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest – which Douglas co-produced – the 80-year-old actor and producer told a press conference that unless 'something special came up' for him, he would not act again.
His last role was playing Benjamin Franklin in the Apple TV+ series Franklin, which was filmed in 2022 and released in 2024.
'I've had a very busy career. Now, I have not worked since 2022, purposely, because I realised I had to stop,' he said.
'I'd been working pretty hard for almost 60 years, and I did not want to be one of those people who dropped dead on the set,' he added.
'I'm very happy with taking the time off. I have no real intentions. But I say I'm not retired, because if something special came up, I'd go back. But otherwise, I'm quite happy. I just like to watch my wife [actor Catherine Zeta-Jones] work.'
He added that he was 'trying to get a good script out' of a ''little independent movie', but joked: 'I'm not pursuing work. My golf game is getting better.'
In 2010 Douglas underwent chemotherapy and radiation for stage four throat cancer. At Karlovy Vary, he said he was 'fortunate' to avoid surgery, which 'would have meant not being able to talk and removing part of my jaw … that would have been limiting as an actor'.
Douglas also addressed the current state of US politics, saying that he felt his country is 'flirting with autocracy'.
'I look at it generally as the fact of how precious democracy is, of how vulnerable it is and how it always has to be protected,' he said. 'I hope that what we're struggling with right now is a reminder of all the hard work the Czechs did in gaining their freedom and independence. Politics now seem to be for profit. Money has entered democracy as a profit centre. People are going into politics now to make money. We maintained an ideal, an idealism in the US, which does not exist now.'
However, he added that he would 'not to go into too much detail' as 'the news speaks for itself'.
'I myself am worried, I am nervous, and I think it's all of our responsibility to look out for ourselves,' he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
23 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Labour refuses to shield state pension from ‘retirement tax'
Labour has rejected a petition calling for the personal allowance to be raised to protect state pensioners from income tax. The Treasury said the tax-free personal allowance would not be raised for retirees – a move campaigners have called a 'betrayal' of the elderly. Millions of Britain's poorest retirees face being dragged into the tax net when the state pension breaches the £12,570 tax-free threshold in a move which has been dubbed the 'retirement tax'. Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, has committed to keeping income tax thresholds frozen until at least 2028, a policy introduced under the Tories. Last week she refused to rule out extending the freeze beyond this date. However, the new 'full' state pension of £11,973 a year, paid to 12.9 million people aged 66 and over, is set to breach as early as next year. The triple lock ensures that the state pension rises each April by the highest of inflation, average earnings or 2.5pc. If average earnings continue to grow at their current rate of 5.2pc, then the state pension will exceed the tax-free allowance for the first time next year. This will mean pensioners – many of whom rely solely on the state pension for their income – will be taxed at 20pc on the portion above £12,570. In March, the Silver Voices campaign group submitted a petition with 125,000 signatures to Number 10 and the Chancellor calling on the Government to lift the personal allowance threshold for pensioners and to commit to raising it in line with future triple lock rises. However, the Treasury last week rejected the idea of 'exempting the state pension and other benefits' from income tax as doing so would 'add complexity to the tax system'. Dennis Reed, director of Silver Voices, said the 'inadequate' response had 'stuck two fingers up' at pensioners who felt 'insulted and betrayed' by the Government. He added: 'The British state pension isn't a king's ransom and it's very difficult to survive on at the moment, even without getting taxed on it. 'Keeping thresholds frozen is a backhanded way of taxing the state pension and triple lock, which is often people's only source of income. 'Extending the freeze to 2030 will make the situation even worse.' The threshold freeze helped to push an extra 2.5 million pensioners into the tax net under the Tories' 14 years in power. Ahead of the general election last year, the Conservatives proposed raising the personal allowance in line with the triple lock for pensioners to shield them from a 'retirement tax'. Analysis by wealth manager Quilter suggests that an extra one million low-income pensioners would be taxed on their state pension if Labour were to extend the freeze until 2030. 'Giving with one hand and taking with the other' Baroness Altmann, a former Tory pensions minister, said: 'Inevitably, if the state pension keeps going up and the threshold doesn't, more and more pensioners are going to pass the threshold with their state pension income alone. 'Those with no other income are increasingly going to find that the Government is giving with one hand and taking with the other. There's likely to be a lot of upset. 'Also, if you only have the state pension, an increase is only going to take you slightly over the threshold by a few pounds, the cost of administering it could well be more than the amount of tax they will collect.' It comes as the former Labour leader Lord Kinnock said the Party is 'willing to explore' a new wealth tax of 2pc on assets over £10m. In its response to the campaign, a Treasury spokesman said: 'Exempting the state pension and other benefits from income tax would add complexity to the tax system and those paying higher rates of tax would receive the greatest benefit. 'Individuals earning above the higher rate threshold would benefit more than those with incomes below, and those earning below the personal allowance would not benefit at all. 'It would also be expensive at a time when the Government has inherited a very challenging set of fiscal circumstances.'
The Guardian
25 minutes ago
- The Guardian
‘Shorts and flip-flops are not allowed': La Scala enforces opera dress code ban
Opera-goers have been warned they will be banned from entering Milan's prestigious La Scala theatre if they turn up wearing shorts, tank tops or flip-flops. Kimonos, however, are acceptable. The venue's management team reminded people how not to dress for an opera after complaints that some spectators were donning attire more suitable for the beach. A 'rules of conduct' sign has been placed at La Scala's entrance urging its audience to 'choose clothing in keeping with the decorum of the theatre', adding that 'spectators wearing tank tops, shorts and flip-flops are not allowed'. Those who arrive inappropriately dressed will not be given a refund. The message has also been placed on tickets and the opera house's website. The anti-beachwear dress code was introduced in 2015, the year Milan hosted the World Expo and La Scala stayed open for the entire summer, as a way to stop people from turning up in swimming costumes. But until now it has never been strictly enforced, partly because of calls for more tolerance over attire by La Scala's former French director, Dominique Meyer, who in his youth was criticised by fellow spectators at Paris Opera productions for his 'worker's look'. Meyer later became the general director of the opera company. 'The rules now need to be reinforced, especially due to the heat we've been experiencing,' said a spokesperson for La Scala. 'Some spectators were getting annoyed after seeing others not dress appropriately, for example in flip-flops, especially in a theatre where people are sitting shoulder-to-shoulder.' The tank top ban does not prohibit women from wearing sleeveless blouses or dresses, and, according to the Corriere della Sera newspaper, the flip-flop ban does not prevent 'Japanese spectators with kimonos and traditional footwear' from entering. Before 2015, there was a message on La Scala tickets recommending a 'jacket and tie', although the formal dress code was not obligatory. However, there is an unspoken rule that people should at least be elegantly clothed. 'It is incorrect to tell people how to dress, but they do need to be dressed,' the spokesperson said. The dress code reminder is part of a broader overhaul on etiquette rules at La Scala. Spectators are banned from bringing their own food and drink and from taking photos and filming during performances. In addition, opera-goers must not place their mobile phones on the balustrade of balcony boxes after one fell off and hit a spectator seated below.
Daily Mail
29 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Panic over Labour 'wealth tax' to fill £30bn black hole in government finances - with warning millionaires have ALREADY moved huge amounts of cash out of UK
has been warned that a wealth tax would make her situation even worse as Labour 's Left demands more spending. The prospect of a charge on the assets of the well-off has been mooted as the Chancellor scrambles to fill a potential £30billion black hole in the public finances. Lord Kinnock, who led Labour between 1983 and 1992, fueled speculation yesterday by suggesting ministers were looking at a two per cent levy on assets worth more than £10million. He said the move could raise up to £11billion a year and be popular with a 'great majority of the general public'. Left-wingers and unions have lined up behind the idea, as they knock back tentative efforts to curb spiralling benefits costs. However, the Tories warned that there was already an alarming exodus of wealth-creators from Britain thanks to Labour's policies - saying the only people who would suffer from the raid would be the least well-off. Tories warned that there was already an alarming exodus of wealth-creators from Britain thanks to Labour's policies - saying the only people who would suffer from the raid would be the least well-off. Ms Reeves seems to be backed into a corner as she is adamant about sticking to her strict fiscal rules on borrowing. She has also said Labour will keep the manifesto pledge not to hike taxes on income tax, employee national insurance or VAT. But experts have suggested that the stalling economy together with spending pressures could mean she has a £31billion funding gap to fill at the Autumn Budget. The respected IFS has warned the tax increases might even need to be on a similar scale to the record £41billion hike in the burden imposed last year. Speaking to Sky News yesterday, Lord Kinnock said there was now an appearance the Government was being 'bogged down by their own imposed limitations'. But he added there are 'ways around that', such as the introduction of a wealth tax when Ms Reeves presents her next Budget in the Autumn. 'There are ways around that, ways out of it, pathways that I think people are willing to explore and actually, would commend themselves to the great majority of the general public,' the peer said. 'They include, for instance, asset taxes in a period in which - for the last 20-odd years in the UK, like quite a lot of other Western economies - earned incomes have stagnated in real terms while asset values have zoomed. 'They've just gone through the roof.' He added: 'You wouldn't have to touch assets of under £6million or £7million. So people's houses would be secure obviously. 'But even by going for an imposition of 2 per cent on asset values above £10million, say, which is very big fortune, the Government would be in a position to collect £10billion or £11 billion a year. But Tory shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride condemned a tax on assets over £10million as 'the worst thing to do'. He said Labour's tax hikes had already seen around 10,000 to 15,000 high net worth individuals leave Britain. 'Some people, the socialists, might say 'well, who cares about that?', he added. 'Well, the problem is that the amount of tax that those people have been paying requires about a third of a million people on average earnings to cover that lost tax that's just gone straight out of the door. 'So the last thing we want to be doing now is piling further taxes on the wealth creators. 'We need to be, if anything, getting those taxes down, and empowering them to go out and do what they do best, which is creating jobs, and, you know, creating wealth and prosperity for our country.'
