China and US Ally in Maritime Confrontation Near Disputed Territory
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
China and the Philippines have traded salvos over a confrontation near the contested Scarborough Shoal in the South China Sea.
Newsweek reached out to the Chinese Foreign Ministry and the Philippine Coast Guard for comment outside of office hours.
Why It Matters
China claims sovereignty over nearly all islands and reefs in the South China Sea, citing historical rights. These claims overlap with those of several other countries in the region, including the United States' defense treaty ally, the Philippines.
Scarborough Shoal, known in the Philippines as Bajo de Masinloc and in China as Huangyan Island, is a rich fishing ground and a flashpoint in a territorial dispute that has intensified since 2023, as the administration of President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. has challenged the expanding Chinese patrols within the Philippines' exclusive economic zone.
Clashes have seen the Chinese side engage in ramming and deploying water cannons that damaged Philippine vessels and caused injuries.
A Chinese coast guard ship shadows the Philippine BRP Datu Tamblot near the Scarborough Shoal on February 15, 2024.
A Chinese coast guard ship shadows the Philippine BRP Datu Tamblot near the Scarborough Shoal on February 15, 2024.
Ted Aljibe/AFP via Getty Images
What To Know
Yuyuan Tantian, a social media account run by state broadcaster China Central Television, released footage on Wednesday showing a confrontation between the coast guards of the two countries at Scarborough Shoal the previous day.
The video accused the Philippine vessel, the BRP Teresa Magbanua, of "deliberately and dangerously" approaching its two Chinese counterparts, CCG-21550 and CCG-5009, and cutting across their bows at distances as close as 100 meters (328 feet).
"The Philippine vessel repeatedly made sharp turns at close range and sped up. Such provocative behavior was even more frequent this time than in the past," the video claimed, accusing the Southeast Asian nation of violating maritime law.
On July 15, PCG vessel BRP Teresa Magbanua, operating in the waters near the Scarborough Shoal in the South China Sea, deliberately provoked the CCG vesels that were conducting rights protection and law enforcement operations in the area. pic.twitter.com/FhziRQomvk — SCS Probing Initiative (@SCS_PI) July 16, 2025
Philippine Coast Guard spokesperson Jay Tarriela refuted China's account of the incident on Thursday.
"BRP Teresa Magbanua was lawfully conducting a maritime patrol within the Philippines' exclusive economic zone, as established by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and the 2016 arbitral award, to safeguard Filipino fishermen and uphold our sovereign rights in this part of the West Philippine Sea," Tarriela said, using Manila's term for the swath of South China Sea lying within the zone.
"In contrast, the China Coast Guard vessels were operating unlawfully in these waters, aggressively obstructing our navigation route by speeding up and dangerously crossing close to our vessel in an attempt to intimidate and harass our personnel," he added.
The official called the actions of the Chinese side "part of a recurring pattern of coercion."
The 2016 award he referenced was a Hague-based arbitral tribunal's decision that rejected China's sweeping South China Sea claims. Beijing refused to participate in the proceedings and maintains the award is invalid.
Scarborough Shoal lies about 140 miles west of the Philippines' populous Luzon Island and nearly 700 miles from China's southernmost province, Hainan. China seized effective control over the waters around the shoal in 2012, following a standoff after Philippine forces attempted to arrest Chinese fishermen.
What People Are Saying
The Center for Strategic and International Studies think tank's Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative, in a June report: "Remote sensing data from the past ten months shows that China's presence has expanded to include additional patrols east of the feature aimed at intercepting Philippine ships, leading to frequent encounters between the two countries' law enforcement vessels."
What Happens Next
China is likely to continue sending its coast guard and naval ships into the Philippines' exclusive economic zone, in what analysts describe as an effort to gradually normalize its presence there.
The Marcos administration is expected to persist in shadowing Chinese vessels within the zone and publicizing their movements. The president has pledged not to cede "one square inch" of Philippine territory.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
36 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump's Approval Rating on Key Issue Goes Underwater—Poll
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump was dealt a new blow to a key administrative pillar, as a poll released Friday by Emerson College showed his approval rating down regarding his handling of immigration. Why It Matters Immigration remains a cornerstone of Trump's presidency and a defining issue of his administration. Trump campaigned on the promise of mass deportations and an expanded border infrastructure. His administration's actions, which include a marked increase in Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids and substantial emphasis on detention facilities, have underscored this focus. When Trump returned to the White House in January, he arrived with high overall approval ratings. However, the president's numbers began to dip after months marked by economic strife and criticism over other policies, including his handling of immigration and his recently passed tax legislation, which he dubbed the "big, beautiful bill." The up-and-down nature of approval rating polling can paint a picture of the landscape heading into the 2026 midterm elections, where Democrats hope to regain control of the House and the Senate. President Donald Trump speaks to reporters as he departs the White House on July 15, 2025. President Donald Trump speaks to reporters as he departs the White House on July 15, To Know In the Emerson College poll, the president received an approval rating of 45 percent on immigration versus a 46 percent disapproval rating. This is the first time the president's approval rating on the issue has been negative with the pollster during his second term in office. The poll surveyed 1,400 U.S. voters from July 21 to July 22 with a margin of error of 2.5 percent. In an April poll, the president had a 45 percent approval rating on the issue with a 44 percent disapproval rating. In March, the president had a 48 percent approval rating on the issue versus a 40 percent disapproval rating, the pollster says. Earlier this month, Trump also hit a record low on the issue in another poll by CNN. What People Are Saying Political analyst Craig Agranoff previously told Newsweek about the president losing ground on the issue: "The decline underscores a notable erosion of support on what has long been one of his defining issues. This shift likely stems from increasing public discomfort with the administration's aggressive deportation policies and proposals for massive new detention centers, which polls show a majority of Americans oppose as going too far. It is indeed concerning, as sustained low approval here could weaken his leverage on other priorities and signal vulnerabilities for Republicans in future races." Agranoff concluded, "Regarding whether Trump cares about this drop, his history suggests he tends to downplay polls that contradict his narrative, prioritizing the enthusiasm of his base over chasing broader consensus on immigration." What Happens Next Trump's deteriorating approval numbers on immigration could threaten one of his principal campaign pillars and could shape the political climate as attention turns to the 2026 midterm elections, analysts have said.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Tariffs will drive up U.S. prices even with Trump trade deals, experts say
The new normal for U.S. tariffs on foreign goods starts at 15%. Even as President Trump seeks to forge new terms of trade with Japan, the European Union and other global economic partners, he is raising the floor for tariffs to their highest level in decades. Speaking at an AI summit on Wednesday, Mr. Trump said "we'll have a straight, simple tariff of anywhere between 15% and 50%," conditioning the lower rate on countries opening their economies to the U.S. The White House has said sharply higher tariffs could take effect on dozens of countries as soon as Aug. 1 unless they ink new trade deals. The Trump administration has a separate negotiating timeline with China, which faces an Aug. 12 deadline for an agreement. As these new rules of international commerce take shape, companies across a range of industries are emphasizing that higher tariffs translate into higher operational costs — and higher prices for consumers. For example, Nestlé on Thursday said it was considering hiking prices for candy bars and other products as tariffs threaten to eat into the food company's profit margins. The same day, Italian fashion brand Moncler said it has already hiked prices for its apparel to offset additional tariff-related costs. And General Electric said this week that proposed U.S. tariffs, should they take effect, would cost the company around $500 million in 2025, noting that it would move to offset those taxes through "cost controls and pricing actions." Orange juice importer Johanna Foods has gone a step further, this week filing a lawsuit against the Trump administration over its proposed 50% tariff on Brazil, which the New Jersey company said would seriously hurt its business and force it to hike product prices by up to 25%. The White House disputes that higher U.S. tariffs will drive up costs for businesses and consumers. "The administration has consistently maintained that the cost of tariffs will be borne by foreign exporters who rely on access to the American economy, the world's biggest and best consumer market," White House spokesman Kush Desai told CBS MoneyWatch in a statement. Desai also pointed to a recent analysis by the White House's Council of Economic Advisers that he said shows import prices falling this year. Price hikes not "instantaneous" Economists warn that consumers should brace for higher prices on a range of goods, from leather products and clothing to electronics and automobiles, later this year. "Up to now there has been only limited passthrough from tariffs into final consumer prices, but we still expect the impact to gradually mount in the second half of this year," Paul Ashworth, chief North America economist with Capital Economics, told investors in a research note. "Now that the Trump administration is concluding deals that would see the tariff rate facing most trading partners settling at between 15% and 20%, with even higher rates levied on Chinese imports, we suspect retailers will be forced to finally raise the prices paid by consumers." Inflation in the early part of 2025 remained fairly contained. That's because many companies and consumers accelerated their purchases of imported goods to avoid the risk of paying more if, or when, steep new tariffs take effect. Meanwhile, in the short-term, sharply higher prices are unlikely across the board, according to trade experts. "When you open up the hood of that, it's not going to be even across all categories of spending," Ernie Tedeschi, director of economics at the Budget Lab at Yale, told CBS MoneyWatch. "It's categories of spending where we import more that are going to be more sensitive to tariffs." But over the longer term, an increased baseline tariff, coupled wtih higher levies on individual countries, is projected to drive up U.S. prices by 2% over the next two years, according to an analysis from the Yale Budget Lab. "This isn't an instantaneous, 'We wake up the next morning and the world is different,'" Tedeschi added. But as the new U.S. tariff regime becomes embedded in global supply chains, some import-heavy product categories could see especially sharp price increases, he said. Specifically, foreign-made leather shoes and handbags, along with apparel, could see prices spike by at least 40%, while the cost of electronics could jump more than 20%, according to the Yale Budget Lab. Johnson says Jeffrey Epstein files controversy is not a hoax Idaho murders documents released after Bryan Kohberger is sentenced to life in prison The Sentencing of Bryan Kohberger | "48 Hours" Podcast
an hour ago
Is Elon Musk to blame for Tesla's struggles? Experts weigh in
Tesla, the electric carmaker led by Elon Musk, suffered a sharp drop in profits over a recent three-month period as car sales slowed and tariffs hiked costs, the company said this week. Shareholders envisioned a different outcome when Tesla stock surged more than 50% in the aftermath of the November 2024 election of President Donald Trump, then a close ally of Musk. Since a recent peak in December, the majority of those gains have been erased. Musk, the company's chief executive and the world's richest person, draws attention due in part to his outspoken presence on social media and divisive stint in the White House. The recent struggles at Tesla have coincided with increased competition in the electric vehicle (EV) industry, posing a question for analysts: Is Musk partially to blame? Experts who spoke to ABC News acknowledged the surge of EV competition and credited Musk with pushing the company into potential growth areas like humanoid robots and self-driving taxis, the latter of which are being tested in Austin, Texas. The company's downturn in part reflects a transition from EVs to those new products, which have yet to generate meaningful revenue, they added. Still, the experts said, Musk bears some of the blame for the company's difficulty fending off other EV makers as well as a delayed rollout of alternate products. They also pointed to losses suffered as result of some of Trump's policies, which Musk struggled to mitigate while serving in the administration. "Musk is CEO -- the buck stops with him. As a CEO in a competitive environment, he's the one who has to have the vision and lead the troops," David Meier, a senior investment analyst at The Motley Fool, told ABC News. "But there's a lot going on in the world that impacts Tesla's business." Tesla did not immediately respond to ABC News' request for comment. Speaking on an earnings call on Wednesday, Musk said the company faces "a few rough quarters ahead." He added that, ultimately, humanoid robots and driverless taxis would make Tesla "the most valuable company in the world by far." The company's profits fell 16% over a three-month period ending in June that overlapped with the end of Musk's tenure in the White House and his ensuing public clash with Trump, an earnings release on Wednesday showed. Total revenue decreased by 12% from one year earlier, to $22.4 billion, while revenue derived from car sales dropped 16% over the second quarter of 2025 compared to a year ago, the earnings showed. In a statement, Tesla touted a "strong balance sheet," but acknowledged a "sustained uncertain macroeconomic environment resulting from shifting tariffs." The company also faces "unclear impacts from changes to fiscal policy and political sentiment," Tesla said. The company has faced heightened competition from domestic and foreign carmakers rolling out electric vehicles. Chinese EV-maker BYD outperformed Tesla in total car sales for the first time ever last year. BYD vehicles are essentially unavailable in the U.S. due to sky-high tariffs on Chinese EVs. "Part of it is outside of Tesla's control," Seth Goldstein, an analyst who studies the EV sector at research firm Morningstar, told ABC News. Goldstein cited an apparent dropoff in sales earlier this year among consumers awaiting a refresh of the company's popular Model Y. However, Goldstein added, the company has been slow to release an affordable EV model in response to a flurry of low-cost options among its rivals, which include China's BYD and traditional carmakers like Nissan and Hyundai. "Looking at Elon Musk, he's the leader of Tesla. It's fair to wonder if he was a little distracted with his political action in the first half of the year and that caused some production to slip, including production of an affordable model," Goldstein said. Musk's position at the White House, which ended in May, appeared to yield few benefits for Tesla. The company faces a pinch from several Trump policies, including the end of tax credits for EV buyers, the nixing of regulatory credits purchased from Tesla by other firms, as well as tariffs on cars and car parts. The CEO's political role also set off demonstrations at Tesla dealerships worldwide in protest of his effort to slash government spending as leader of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). "It was a dark chapter and investors are glad to put it in the rear-view mirror," Dan Ives, a managing director of equity research at the investment firm Wedbush and a longtime Tesla bull, told ABC News. As car sales have slowed, Musk has touted a future autonomous car service, dubbed robotaxis, as a growth area for the business. Last month, Tesla launched a limited version of what it claimed is a self-driving taxi service in Austin, Texas. The rollout marked a milestone for the company's self-driving taxi aspirations, but limitations placed on the vehicles and a series of apparent miscues suggest the technology remains far from wide adoption, some analysts previously told ABC News. Musk has also touted humanoid robots as a future growth area for Tesla. While the product remains in an early phase, Musk expects the company to eventually produce more than a million robots each year, he said on this week's earnings call. Goldstein, of Morningstar, applauded Musk's effort to move Tesla away from the highly competitive auto market toward nascent tech sectors. "Musk's long-term goal is to transition from an automaker to an AI robotics company -- that's still on track and making progress," Goldstein said. "That's where it has greater opportunities to grow a competitive advantage." The ultimate outcome for Tesla's forthcoming products remains unclear but Musk has earned the benefit of the doubt, according to some analysts.
