Cost of raising a child soars 60% in past decade, new research claims
The research from Laya Life looked at the cost of supporting a child from birth to college age, with costs for everything from nappies and food to rent support climbing.
The survey, which questioned 1,000 parents as part of the Cradle to College Cost Index, found the most financially demanding years for parents were the first year of a child's life and their teenage years.
Among the major cost increases for parents were food, which has seen a 61 per cent increase in the past decade, while spending on baby formula has also risen sharply.
READ MORE
Families are also paying out more in pocket money to children, which has increased by 86 per cent, while rent support for older children has risen by 37 per cent.
The average cost for raising a child per year, has climbed almost 40 per cent to €15,324.20 in the past decade.
However, spending on discretionary items was lower, with holiday spending down 35 per cent compared with a year ago.
Spending on gifts for life events such as communions was also lower, and spending on third-level education had also fallen, with 16 per cent less spent by households.
Future planning has improved, with one in two parents making a savings plan to cover future costs associated with supporting their children. That was up from one in three in the last index, Laya said.
'This increase in the cost of raising a child over the past decade reinforces the value of financial planning for Irish parents,' said head of Laya Life, JP Hughes. 'Understanding long-term financial security is key, and families need to consider how they can best protect themselves against future uncertainties.'
More than half of Irish parents said they planned to help out with their child's future purchase of their home, with 30 per cent expecting to support their children until they are 25 or older.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
St Stephen's Green shopping centre plan is shot down by planning appeals board
A €100 million plan to redevelop St Stephen's Green Shopping Centre in Dublin has been turned down by An Coimisiún Pleanála . The refusal overturns a grant of permission owners DTDL Ltd secured from Dublin City Council in December 2023. An Coimisiún Pleanála said the proposed scheme 'lacks a strong sense of original aesthetic and would not achieve a sufficiently high standard of placemaking, urban design and architecture at this key city centre location'. It concluded the scheme would be contrary to a number of policies in the area of high quality architecture, architectural design and brownfield, regeneration sites and large scale development of the Dublin City Development Plan 2022-28. An Coimisiún Pleanála noted these policies 'aim to encourage innovative, high quality urban design and architectural detail in all new development proposals, that positively contribute to the city's built and natural environment and incorporate exemplar standards of high-quality, sustainable and inclusive urban design and architecture befitting the city's environment and heritage'. The planning appeals board concluded that the proposed development would be contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area. The largest component of the new scheme was to be 35,043 sq metres of offices and ancillary spaces. The applicants also increased the level of retail and food and beverage space after the Council expressed concerns. An Coimisiún Pleanála upheld a recommendation by its own inspector in the case to refuse planning permission. However, it said it did not share the view expressed by the inspector that the existing shopping centre represents an exemplar twentieth century building. Opening the door for a future application, the board concluded that replacing the existing facade, including the existing external trellis detailing and dome, would not contravene the city's development plan, subject to an appropriately high quality 'design solution for this key city centre location'. Appeals by An Taisce, shopping centre trader Emmett Rogers and activist Frank had seen the plan come before the appeals board. The An Taisce appeal – jointly signed off by Dublin City Planning Officer, Kevin Duff and Heritage Officer, Ian Lumley – stated that what was predominantly a large office development 'lacks architectural sensitivity towards St Stephen's Green and results in the loss of an impressive naturally lit space'. Mr Rogers, who has been operating the Tribe outlet at the shopping centre since 1992, said if the redevelopment proceeded, 'I see Dublin losing another bit of its unique identity to developers'. Mr McDonald said the proposal was 'simply not good enough and does not qualify as a building of 'exceptional design and outstanding architectural quality' '. The redevelopment plan was first lodged in January 2023. In an architectural design statement, BKD architects said that, since opening in 1988, the centre had faced many difficulties attracting sustainable retailers for reasons including that most unit sizes were too small with units at the upper levels trading poorly and operating only on short-term leases. Planning consultants for the scheme, John Spain & Associates, told Dublin City Council that the existing building 'has become outdated'. It said the proposal sought to enhance a high quality shopping centre and office facility on a centrally located site.
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Tariffs: as new regime kicks in, what does it mean for Europe and for Ireland?
US president Donald Trump 's August 1st tariff deadline has been hanging over the global trading system and Europe's transatlantic trade with the US for months. The deal struck by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and US President Donald Trump last weekend puts an end to a lot, but unfortunately not all, of the speculation. Much of the detail has yet to be ironed out and there is still confusion over how certain parts will work in practice. For example, a 'fact sheet' published by the White House seems to suggest the tariffs on pharmaceuticals and semiconductors will be paid by the EU when in fact they will be borne by US businesses and consumers. Is there something in this deal for both sides? READ MORE On paper and despite the positive spin coming from Brussels about 'trade certainty', it's a very a one-sided deal in favour of the US. It imposes, from Friday, a baseline 15 per cent tariff on most EU exports into the US, including approximately €70 billion worth goods exported from Ireland, while committing the bloc to major purchases of US energy and armaments. The EU, for its part, has reduced its tariffs on most US imports, in some cases to zero, giving US exporters much greater access to Europe's 450 million-strong consumer market. This is far cry from the zero-for-zero deal initially offered by Brussels. Based on last year's trade figures, the deal might be expected to net the US government roughly $90 billion in tariff revenue. What will it mean for the Irish economy? For a small, export-led economy that relies heavily on trade with the US, it's undoubtedly a negative. But Government ministers are playing up the fact that it avoids the 30 per cent tariff rate initially threatened by Mr Trump, keeps the trade doors open and avoids a mutually destructive trade war. Critics will say the EU gave in too easily and that it failed, as gatekeeper to the most lucrative consumer market in the world, to wield its economic might. According to one estimate, the tariff deal will knock 0.5 per cent off EU GDP (gross domestic product). What has been the reaction from Irish business? 'Irish exporters and importers will not have to operate under cumbersome and very expensive WTO [World Trade Organisation] rules. However, there will still be changes and increased costs to trade,' the chief executive of the Irish Exporters Association, Simon McKeever, says. Employers' group Ibec says a 15 per cent tariff represents 'a substantial burden for many industries' and has called on Government to consider providing supports to vulnerable businesses similar to those rolled out during Brexit. Does that mean an economic slowdown here? On the basis of a 10 per cent tariff on EU goods exports to the US with an exemption for pharmaceuticals, the Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI) had forecast the economy here would grow, in modified domestic demand terms, at a slower rate of 2.3 per cent this year, down from 3 per cent previously. Now that the actual deal involves pharma and a higher baseline tariff rate, the slowdown in headline growth is expected to be larger though not enough to trigger a recession. The Government's budgetary numbers, which are also based around a 10 per cent tariff rate, may also have to be scaled back. Does the different tariff rate in Northern Ireland present a problem? The divergence in tariff treatment between the EU and the UK (15 per cent versus 10 per cent) will also create cost differentials and other issues on the island of Ireland, between Northern Ireland and the Republic, particularly in areas like food and drink which will play out in way we perhaps can't see at this stage. Will the deal damage inward investment here? The nightmare scenario for Ireland would be for an Apple or an Intel to up sticks and leave in the face of Trump's protectionist agenda. There's no way of telling how these policies are influencing decision-making in the boardrooms of these companies. Like everyone else, they are probably adopting a wait-and-see approach. The Government will hope that the increased cost of trading with the US (from Ireland) doesn't outweigh the attraction of the Irish economy for US business. What else? Of course, the big question surrounding Trump's protectionist trade agenda is how will it impact the US economy. A major slide in performance there – with tariffs expected to lead to higher prices for US consumers – and the global economy (including Irish exports) could suffer. Trump is already hounding Federal Reserve boss Jay Powell to reduce interest rates to cushion any impact of tariffs but with inflation ticking up, that's unlikely. And, as always, there will be continued uncertainty over whether the US president will stick by this accord or decide that other action is needed.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Landlord Marc Godart must wait until September for ruling on taking over Dublin pub licence
Landlord Marc Godart is to learn in September if a city fire officer will sign off on him taking over a Dublin pub's licence. The Luxembourg businessman, now based in Latvia, brought a transfer application to Dublin District Court two weeks ago, but still had to complete some outstanding work and needed the council official's findings. His firm's barrister, Dorothy Collins, updated the court on Wednesday that the case could be further adjourned and it will resume on September 3rd. She had said earlier that the application was in order but was subject to the fire officer's consent and report. READ MORE In past unrelated proceedings at the District Court, firms linked to the businessman have faced multiple legal issues over property lettings in Dublin. In his licensing case, he sought a certificate of transfer of the licence for Cleary's Pub, Sarsfield Road in Inchicore. Inchicore Parkview Residence Limited made the application, and Mr Godart gave evidence on July 16th in his capacity as a director. At the previous hearing of the application, Ms Collins had asked Judge Máire Conneely to hear the evidence and then to defer ruling on the basis that the fire officer had 'requested that there are certain works to be done' and needed to provide a report. The judge heard then that Mr Godart had travelled from abroad and would only be in Dublin for a day. Counsel had said there had been 'a lot of negotiation with the fire officer who has inspected the premises and required certain works to be done'. She added that paperwork had to be completed and the proceedings ought to be postponed to satisfy the council official. Inchicore Parkview Residence Limited's barrister presented the judge with a booklet of documents, including the previous licensee's certificate, an advertisement published in a national newspaper, a certificate of incorporation, and the deed of transfer. The judge heard that the pub licence had expired last year, but an application could still be made for a late certificate of transfer. In evidence, Mr Godart had agreed with Ms Collins that he had been negotiating with the fire officer. He had engaged a consultant to do whatever was necessary to satisfy the official. Asked if he had any experience running a public house, he said he had managed the building for six months. He clarified 'that's correct' when put to him that he did not intend to run the pub, the application was to preserve the licence, and concurred that he had 'a tenant lined up, but they won't take it over unless there is a licence.' Mr Godart said it had been vacant since closing at the beginning of this year. Judge Conneely noted from the company's report that Mr Godart resided in Latvia and that he did not intend to live in the pub itself, which he confirmed while in the witness box.
