Driver rescued from fiery highway crash in Wisconsin
A group of Good Samaritans rushed to the scene of a fiery highway crash to rescue a driver in Wisconsin.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
7 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Tesla's Robotaxi Hype Fuels Bullish Price Targets to $500
Considering how much pain investors of Tesla Inc (NASDAQ: TSLA) had to endure during the first quarter of the year, there are perhaps not many on Wall Street who thought they'd manage to gain the better part of 50% in less than three months. However, that's exactly what they've done, largely thanks to CEO Elon Musk's stepping back from White House duties, increased hype around their Robotaxi launch, and a sense that the worst-case scenario has already been priced into the stock. As they continue to consolidate with mostly sideways action since the first week of June, it's a good time to take stock of what the summer might look like for the shares of the automotive giant. While the stock has undoubtedly received its fair share of negative headlines in recent weeks, there are still many reasons to like Tesla for the long term. Getting Involved in Tesla For investors on the sidelines weighing up an entry or an exit, two very interesting and unusual things took place last week that should be closely watched: Tesla received both a pair of Sell ratings and a pair of Buy ratings. For a stock that the bulls and the bears have closely fought over, this hardly clarifies things for investors trying to make a call. But upon close examination, there's actually a pretty solid opportunity opening up here, and these calls might even make it easier. Let's jump in and take a closer look. Bears Reiterate Their Case Starting with the bearish updates, which came first at the start of last week, we saw the teams from both Guggenheim and UBS Group reiterate their Sell ratings on the stock. Unconvinced by Tesla's nearly 50% gain in just a few weeks, the analysts there were happy to overlook the potential upside from the company's much-awaited Robotaxi launch, which took place on Monday. With its price-to-earnings ratio around the 175 mark, Guggenheim's Ronald Jewsikow also sounded the alarm on Tesla's valuation, which has repeatedly been flagged as a reason to be cautious. Potential 50% Downside Even though Tesla's shares have always shown signs of not caring about the underlying PE, Jewsikow's price target of $175 must have raised a few eyebrows. Considering that Tesla closed out last week trading just above $320, it implies that a loss of close to 50% is around the corner. This would result in shares trading back at 52-week lows, which is an extreme forecast for someone who didn't provide much justification beyond stating that the company's fundamentals are "deteriorating at an alarming rate." It's true that Tesla's post-April recovery seems to have run out of steam, and it might well be worrying that shares have failed to kick on since their peak in late May, but the stock has still been setting higher highs throughout June, all in the face of their most recent earnings report which was indeed one of their worst updates to their fundamentals in quite some time. But the fact that the stock has remained consistently higher since then suggests the market doesn't care quite as much about that as the bears might want it to. Bulls See Big Upside On the other hand, by the end of last week, Tesla had received two fresh bullish updates: one from Canaccord Genuity Group and one from Benchmark. The latter boosted its price target to $475, just marginally below Tesla's street-high price target of $500, which came from Wedbush earlier this month. The teams were unanimous in their optimism around the company's Robotaxi launch, which they see as a key milestone in Tesla's journey to offer the most cost-effective driverless cars. Echoing much of what his peers have shared in recent months, Benchmark's Mickey Legg wrote that "in our view, the company is undergoing an evolution from a trailblazing vehicle OEM to a high-tech automation and robotics company with unmatched domestic manufacturing scale." As Tesla stock has shown time and again, it has a stronger tendency to be bought for these kinds of reasons than to be sold due to valuation concerns, as flagged by Guggenheim. The fact that the stock is up close to 50% since missing analyst expectations in its May earnings report by a wide margin tells you a lot about how Tesla investors view the longer-term opportunity. As July approaches, it's expected that Tesla will keep generating mixed opinions, as it has historically. However, the ticker tells the story, and so far, at least, it's telling us that the stock wants to, and will, go higher. Where Should You Invest $1,000 Right Now? Before you make your next trade, you'll want to hear this. MarketBeat keeps track of Wall Street's top-rated and best performing research analysts and the stocks they recommend to their clients on a daily basis. Our team has identified the five stocks that top analysts are quietly whispering to their clients to buy now before the broader market catches on... and none of the big name stocks were on the list. They believe these five stocks are the five best companies for investors to buy now...
Globe and Mail
29 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Brooklyn Car Accident Lawyer Samantha Kucher Explains the Legal Risks of Brake Checking in New York
Brake checking, a driving behavior that involves suddenly hitting the brakes to confront or retaliate against another driver, presents serious legal and safety risks in New York. Brooklyn car accident lawyer Samantha Kucher ( provides detailed insight into the legality and consequences of this act in her recent blog post, 'Is Brake Checking Illegal in NY?', The article, published by Kucher Law Group, underscores how brake checking, while not directly named in New York statutes, can still be penalized under reckless driving laws. Brooklyn car accident lawyer Samantha Kucher outlines how New York Vehicle and Traffic Law (VTL) § 1212 broadly defines reckless driving as any conduct that interferes with public road use or endangers others. Brake checking, although not specifically named in legislation, qualifies under this rule due to the deliberate, unnecessary braking it involves, which can lead to rear-end collisions or multi-car pileups. 'The legal implications of brake checking are significant,' the article states, highlighting how courts can interpret such actions as intentional and dangerous. Kucher emphasizes that brake checking frequently occurs during moments of road rage or frustration, especially in dense urban traffic common in areas like Brooklyn. Brooklyn car accident lawyer Samantha Kucher identifies common motivations for brake checking, including retaliation against tailgating, attempts to assert road dominance, or in some cases, deliberate setups for insurance fraud. Each of these motivations, she points out, creates unsafe conditions that can have lasting legal consequences for the driver involved. The dangers of brake checking extend beyond legal issues. Samantha Kucher details how this behavior contributes to rear-end crashes, chain-reaction accidents in heavy traffic, and escalating road rage between drivers. Victims of brake checking often face physical injuries like whiplash, head trauma, and spinal damage, adding medical complications to their legal concerns. Brake checking can trigger an accident that spirals into multiple collisions, amplifying both the human and financial cost. Kucher explains that proving brake checking in a crash investigation is possible but often challenging. Evidence such as dashcam recordings, surveillance videos, witness statements, and police reports all play a crucial role in supporting claims. Dashcams can capture the crucial seconds before a collision, showing the lead driver's abrupt stop. Witnesses may corroborate aggressive behavior, while police officers on the scene can observe signs like skid marks or the lack thereof. 'Dashcam footage is one of the most effective tools for proving brake checking,' the article notes, emphasizing the role of visual evidence in these cases. For those affected, Brooklyn car accident lawyer Samantha Kucher lays out a clear path forward. After a brake checking incident, drivers are advised to prioritize safety, call emergency services, gather evidence, and obtain medical evaluations. The blog also explains New York's statute of limitations: victims generally have three years from the date of the incident to file a personal injury lawsuit, or two years in wrongful death cases. Timely legal action is essential to protect a claim and secure financial compensation. Legal liability for brake checking doesn't stop at traffic citations. Criminal charges may follow if the behavior results in serious injuries or fatalities. Additionally, civil lawsuits can hold the driver financially responsible for medical expenses, vehicle repairs, and other losses. Kucher makes it clear that reckless driving behaviors like brake checking will not be excused under New York law, even if provoked by another driver's conduct. The article concludes with reassurance that legal support is available for victims. Kucher Law Group offers legal guidance for those injured in brake checking incidents, working to collect necessary evidence and build strong cases on behalf of their clients. 'Our team of skilled Brooklyn car accident lawyers is dedicated to providing strong legal representation,' the article states, emphasizing the firm's role in helping victims navigate New York's legal system. Taking early action after an accident is key. With mounting medical bills, emotional stress, and vehicle damage, understanding the law and available remedies can ease some of the burden. Victims who take immediate legal steps may improve their chances of receiving compensation and avoiding prolonged disputes with insurance providers. Kucher Law Group continues to inform Brooklyn residents about risks on the road and the importance of safe driving habits. Brake checking remains a dangerous and illegal maneuver that can cause more than just damage; it can permanently alter lives. About Kucher Law Group: Kucher Law Group is a legal practice serving individuals involved in motor vehicle accidents across New York. The firm focuses on helping victims navigate the legal aftermath of serious incidents such as brake checking and reckless driving. Founded on the principles of legal advocacy and client support, the firm is committed to seeking fair outcomes for those affected by dangerous road behaviors. Embeds: Youtube Video: GMB: Email and website Email: contact@ Website: Media Contact Company Name: Kucher Law Group Contact Person: Samantha Kucher Email: Send Email Phone: (929) 563-6780 Address: 463 Pulaski St #1c City: Brooklyn State: New York 11221 Country: United States Website:
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
New Jersey Gun Crime Lawyer Adam M. Lustberg Discusses Unlawful Firearm Training
New Jersey gun crime lawyer Adam M. Lustberg ( is drawing attention to a significant but often overlooked state law, N.J.S.A. 2C:39-14, which outlines strict criminal penalties for unlawful firearm training. The statute targets individuals who instruct or train others in the use of firearms, explosives, or similar devices when the purpose is to support or facilitate criminal acts. Even if a crime has not yet occurred, the law imposes harsh penalties on those involved in such training activities with unlawful intent. Lustberg, who represents clients across New Jersey as a gun crime lawyer at Lustberg Law Offices, LLC, notes that violations of this law can carry serious consequences, including second-degree felony charges. The statute's reach is broad, covering not only direct instruction but also group training sessions that mimic paramilitary activities. As a New Jersey gun crime lawyer, Lustberg warns that the consequences can extend well beyond prison time, potentially affecting future employment, housing, and immigration status. Adam M. Lustberg, a New Jersey gun crime lawyer, highlights that the law is rooted in preventing organized violence or terroristic plots. "The legislative intent of N.J.S.A. 2C:39-14 is to prevent the formation and operation of private groups preparing for violent or terroristic acts," Lustberg explains. Originally enacted in 1983 and later amended in 1988, the statute aligns with New Jersey's broader efforts to keep military power in check under civilian authority. This legal framework targets behavior not addressed by general conspiracy laws—specifically the act of training others to commit crimes involving weapons. N.J.S.A. 2C:39-14 criminalizes both individual and group activities. Individuals who knowingly or intentionally instruct someone in using or constructing firearms or explosives for criminal purposes face second-degree charges. Similarly, assembling with others to drill or train in tactics intended for unlawful use is also prosecutable under this statute. According to Lustberg, the law particularly focuses on gatherings that resemble private militias or extremist groups, which law enforcement views as public safety threats. It is important to note that the law does not prohibit lawful firearms training. Activities like gun safety classes, recreational shooting, and martial arts remain legal provided there is no intent to use the instruction for unlawful acts. The intent requirement is central to this statute. Lustberg points out that teaching someone to shoot for sport or helping a homeowner with firearm safety is fully permissible, but that same training could become illegal if it's clear that the knowledge will be used for a crime. Penalties for violating N.J.S.A. 2C:39-14 are severe. As a second-degree felony, it carries five to ten years in prison, fines up to $150,000, and a presumption of incarceration—even for first-time offenders. The law falls under the Graves Act, New Jersey's stringent firearm sentencing legislation, which mandates minimum parole ineligibility terms and restricts bail and early release options. These sentencing structures significantly limit judicial discretion, making it difficult for defendants to avoid prison time if convicted. Beyond incarceration, the long-term impact of a conviction is extensive. A felony record under this statute can lead to loss of gun ownership rights, employment difficulties, and trouble with professional licensing or housing. For non-citizens, it may be classified as an aggravated felony under federal immigration laws, potentially leading to deportation or barring access to legal relief options. Lustberg emphasizes that N.J.S.A. 2C:39-14 is distinct from other New Jersey weapons laws. Unlike statutes focused on unlawful possession or direct use of weapons, this law targets instructional and preparatory conduct. For example, someone lawfully possessing a firearm could still face charges under 2C:39-14 if they train someone for illegal purposes. It also differs from trafficking laws, which center on the sale and distribution of firearms rather than instruction or preparation. There are legal defenses available to those charged under this statute. One primary defense strategy involves challenging the intent element—prosecutors must prove the defendant knowingly trained someone for criminal purposes. According to Lustberg, demonstrating that a defendant believed the training was for lawful self-defense or sport can be an effective argument. Other defenses might question whether actual instruction took place or assert constitutional protections such as free speech or freedom of association. In some cases, defendants may also argue entrapment, particularly if law enforcement played a significant role in initiating the activity. When legal defenses are limited, negotiated resolutions may offer a path to reduced charges or sentencing. Lustberg notes that prosecutors may be open to plea deals in cases with weak evidence of criminal intent. In rare situations, defendants may even qualify for Pre-Trial Intervention, which could allow them to avoid incarceration entirely if no actual harm occurred. Facing charges under N.J.S.A. 2C:39-14 carries serious risks that demand strong legal representation. Adam M. Lustberg of Lustberg Law Offices, LLC has handled numerous firearm-related cases and works to protect clients from the harsh penalties imposed by this statute. As Lustberg explains, even lawful gun owners can find themselves in legal jeopardy if their actions are misinterpreted as criminal training efforts. Laws like 2C:39-14 reflect New Jersey's strict approach to gun control and public safety. The consequences for those accused under this statute can be severe and long-lasting. For anyone facing investigation or charges related to unlawful firearm training, understanding the law and acting quickly is essential. About Lustberg Law Offices, LLC: Lustberg Law Offices, LLC represents clients throughout New Jersey in criminal defense matters. Led by attorney Adam M. Lustberg, the firm handles a range of legal issues including gun crime charges, with a commitment to defending client rights and seeking favorable outcomes in cases. Embeds: GMB: Email and website Email: alustberg@ Website: Media Contact Company Name: Lustberg Law Offices, LLC Contact Person: Adam M. Lustberg Email: Send Email Phone: (201) 880-5311 Address: One University Plaza Dr Suite 212 City: Hackensack State: New Jersey 07601 Country: United States Website:
