Oklahoma Sooners among The Athletic's top 5 football programs since 2000
However, Stoops was really the hopeful replacement for the legendary Barry Switzer, who had resigned after the 1988 season. There were ten dark years in Norman, as the program shuffled through head coaches Gary Gibbs, Howard Schnellenberger, and Blake from 1989 to 1998, losing an unacceptable number of games in the process and fading from the national spotlight. None of those coaches was a suitable heir to Switzer, who had been OU's head coach from 1973 to 1988 and won three national championships. Switzer had been at OU since 1966, serving as the offensive coordinator before his promotion to head coach.
Castiglione and the Sooners believed they had their next successful head coach in Stoops, and they were more than right. What has followed is 26 years where Oklahoma has been back in the spotlight, typically among the nation's elite teams from 1999 to 2021. Although Stoops retired after the 2016 season, the success he set in motion has positioned OU at the forefront of the sport.
The Athletic took on the daunting task of ranking the best college football programs of the 21st century last week, and obviously, the Sooners were very high on the list. Oklahoma was ranked third, falling behind only Alabama and Ohio State. Though the list doesn't include Stoops' first year at the helm, it includes the rest of his head coaching career, and that of Lincoln Riley and Brent Venables.
Stoops led the Sooners to the first national championship of the 21st century, with a perfect season in 2000. The year concluded with a win over Florida State in the title game, giving Oklahoma a total of seven national championships.
Although Oklahoma hasn't won it all since then, it has been among the top-performing programs in America over the last quarter-century. The Sooners have played for three more national titles and made four trips to the four-team College Football Playoff. The program won four Heisman Trophies and had four other players finish as finalists for the award. OU won 14 conference championships, and a bevy of All-Americans put the Sooners as a no-doubt top-five program since 2000.
The standard was set in Norman well before Stoops arrived. Coaches such as Bennie Owen, Bud Wilkinson, Chuck Fairbanks, and Switzer defined what it meant to win in college football and at OU.
However, after one of the worst decades of Oklahoma Football in the 90s, it was Stoops who quickly showed that he and the program could meet that standard again. Oklahoma Football is still feeling the effects of his excellence over a quarter of a century later.
Yes, the program has had some tough times lately. The handoff from Stoops to Riley looked so good for so many years, but the program was quietly slipping under Riley's watch. When he bolted to Southern California, Venables was hired to take the reins. It's been a rough go under Venables at times, with the only two losing seasons since the Blake era happening under his watch. But Venables had no easy task taking over for Riley, and he's doing his best to get the program back to its Stoops-era winning ways.
He has the defense ready to contend, but the offense took a hit in 2024 with a bevy of injuries limiting the team's potential. But Venables and his staff have positioned themselves to be much better in 2025.
It's a big year for Venables and a big year for this program in 2025. Though the straits aren't as dire as they were when Stoops took over in 1999, Oklahoma's backs are against the wall this season. However, the blueprint is there for the fourth-year head coach, who leads a program that has defied the odds plenty of times before, and is clearly one of the elite programs in all of college football.
Contact/Follow us @SoonersWire on X, and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Oklahoma news, notes, and opinions. You can also follow Aaron on X @Aaron_Gelvin.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
21 minutes ago
- USA Today
Penn State takes top spot in USA TODAY Sports Big Ten power rankings
There is no denying that Penn State is preparing for one of the more anticipated seasons in program history after making a run to the College Football Playoff semifinal last season. The bar has been raised by many for the Nittany Lions, and the hype train continues to be roaring at full steam heading into the 2025 season. That hype continued to rise with the Nittany Lions landing on top of the Big Ten preseason power rankings from USA TODAY Sports college football writer Paul Myerberg. Yes, Penn State comes out ahead of the defending national champion Ohio State Buckeyes and the defending Big Ten champion Oregon Ducks, respectively. That has been the fairly common belief by those around the college football media circles this offseason in part due to a roster returning many key players on each side of the ball, despite losing first-round draft picks in Abdul Carter and Tyler Warren, and adding key transfers to help plug the void at the wide receiver position. The addition of Trebor Pena from Syracuse is considered a major upgrade for an offense that already added a pair of other talented wide receivers in the offseason. Penn State's rise to the top of the Big Ten power rankings is focused largely on the expectations for the offense. The return of Drew Allar at quarterback and both star running backs Nicholas Singleton and Kaytron Allen gives Penn State as solid a returning backfield as we may see this season in all of college football. Penn State's schedule is also moderately favorable, with the biggest challenge coming with a road trip to Ohio State and getting Oregon at home for a primetime whiteout game highlighting the home schedule. According to the power rankings from Myerberg, Penn State will face five of the Big Ten's top-10 teams this season. Three of those games will come at home (Oregon, Indiana, and Nebraska), and the other two will be on the road (at Ohio State and at Iowa). You can see the full Big Ten power rankings from Myerberg via USA TODAY Sports to see how the whole conference looks in 2025. Follow Kevin McGuire on Threads, Bluesky, Instagram, TikTok, and Facebook. Follow Nittany Lions Wire on X, Facebook, and Threads.
Fox Sports
4 hours ago
- Fox Sports
Curt Cignetti's Viral Quote Captures Overarching Message at Big Ten Media Days
LAS VEGAS — On this same stage at this same event last summer, only a few months into his tenure as Indiana's new head coach, Curt Cignetti announced himself to the college football world with an impassioned opening statement that dripped with jaw-dropping confidence for someone leading a power-conference program for the first time. Cignetti admonished the media members in attendance for picking the Hoosiers to finish 17th in the newly expanded Big Ten. And five months later, after rolling through the greatest regular season in program history, Cignetti proved he could walk the walk by leading Indiana to the College Football Playoff. One year and one hefty contract extension later, Cignetti opened Big Ten Media Days with another headline-making display, firing a shot across the SEC's bow when asked why the Hoosiers recently agreed to pay $500,000 to extricate themselves from a home-and-home scheduling agreement with Virginia and replace those games with likely blowouts against Kennesaw State in 2027 and Austin Peay in 2028. More than five years will pass between now and the next time Indiana kicks off against a high-level, non-conference opponent. "We figured we would just adopt SEC scheduling philosophy, you know?" Cignetti said on Tuesday afternoon. "Some people don't like it. I'm more focused on those nine conference games. Not only do we want to play nine conference games, OK, and have the [revised] playoff format [with automatic qualifiers], we want to have play-in games to decide who plays in those playoffs." Though wrapped around an obvious barb in the ongoing power struggle between the Big Ten and the SEC, college football's preeminent conferences, Cignetti's whip-like rebuttal accurately captured the overarching message from commissioner Tony Petitti and the first wave of head coaches to address the media at this year's preseason gathering, where potential changes to the CFP format — changes that would kick in next year — and the accompanying concerns about scheduling were among the leading topics of conversation. The league rallied around Petitti's preference for a 4-4-2-2-1 model that relies far more heavily on automatic qualifiers than at-large berths, and in doing so, it challenged the SEC to adopt a regular-season schedule that would match the Big Ten's commitment to nine conference games, leveling the playing field to ease comparisons during playoff selection. What type of tone Petitti would employ during his opening remarks on Tuesday was of widespread interest to the sport's powerbrokers amid an offseason that has seen the other three power conferences — the SEC, the Big 12 and the ACC — coalesce around a different proposed playoff format, the "5+11" model, which features more than twice as many at-large berths as automatic qualifiers. Though long preferred by the Big 12 and the ACC, two leagues struggling to keep pace atop the sport, the "5+11" framework only recently emerged as the SEC's choice, with outspoken commissioner Greg Sankey beating that drum at his league's media days event in Atlanta earlier this month. Sankey and the SEC's coaches believe their conference's depth and strength of schedule project favorably onto a model with more at-large spots up for grabs. Such a worldview clashes with the automatic qualifier system preferred by Petitti and his constituents. The 4-4-2-2-1 model would allocate four bids each to the Big Ten and SEC, two apiece to the Big 12 and ACC, and one for the highest-ranked Group of Six champion, with three at-large berths left over in a proposed 16-team field. As a corollary, Petitti has also proposed that the Big Ten play league-specific play-in games over championship weekend that would pit teams from outside the top two in the conference standings against each other for an automatic spot in the playoff, an idea his coaches seem to widely endorse — even if the SEC disagrees. "We're obviously not in the same place on these discussions," Petitti said when asked about the impasse between the Big Ten and the SEC, two leagues that have the right to control changes to the CFP format and selection committee process moving forward. "I think there's lots of ideas. I think the goal would be to bring people back together, have a conversation of what we think works and kind of go from there. I will say, every time we've come together with the two leagues — we still have our presidents and advisory group meeting — good things have happened." One of the reasons Petitti favors a model heavy on automatic qualifiers is because he feels it would offset the scheduling discrepancy between the Big Ten, which plays nine conference games each year, and the SEC, which only plays eight. The added difficulty of an extra conference opponent, Petitti believes, could leave Big Ten teams exposed during the selection process for a playoff rich with at-large bids. This is especially true if the SEC continues racking up victories against lower-level opponents in exchange for playing one less league game. Many SEC schools schedule an FCS opponent late in the season to break up the grueling conference grind, all but assuring themselves of a lopsided win in the process. This year's slate includes Ole Miss hosting The Citadel on Nov. 8, Kentucky hosting Tennessee Tech on Nov. 15 and Alabama hosting Eastern Illinois on Nov. 22, among others, which gave Cignetti ammunition for his quip about Indiana copying the SEC's scheduling philosophy by adding games against lesser opponents. "We need to standardize the schedule across the board if we want to have objective criteria for who should be in the playoffs and who shouldn't," Cignetti said. "And we need to take the decision-making off the committee to some degree." "I feel like until there's continuity between conferences," Ohio State head coach Ryan Day said, "if you're in the Big Ten, it would make no sense to have anything other than a case to have four [automatic] qualifiers and have an expanded pool of teams. Because when you play nine conference games, it's not the same as somebody who plays eight conference games. And so, if you're going to be compared against that, then it's just not the same." "I just think all the leagues should play the same amount of conference games," Nebraska head coach Matt Rhule said. All of which distills into a veritable chicken-or-the-egg discussion for Petitti, who believes the issues of conference scheduling and CFP selection process "go hand in hand." He doesn't want to commit to a playoff format without knowing how many conference games each league is playing. And he is adamant that the number of conference games each league is playing should influence the selection committee's criteria for inclusion in the playoff field. That's why Petitti and the Big Ten coaches will continue to dig their heels in regarding automatic qualifiers unless or until the SEC adds a ninth conference game. So for now, and perhaps a good while longer, the stalemate between college football's two best conferences has strengthened into a high-stakes standoff. "Each league," Petitti said, "will decide what they think the best conference schedule is for them." Michael Cohen covers college football and college basketball for FOX Sports. Follow him at @Michael_Cohen13. Want great stories delivered right to your inbox? Create or log in to your FOX Sports account , and follow leagues, teams and players to receive a personalized newsletter daily! recommended Item 1 of 3 Get more from the College Football Follow your favorites to get information about games, news and more
USA Today
7 hours ago
- USA Today
College football expert believes the Oklahoma Sooners need John Mateer to be great in 2025
The Oklahoma Sooners need a bounce-back season in 2025. OU went 6-7 overall in head coach Brent Venables' third season last year, which included a 2-6 league record in their first season in the Southeastern Conference. They've retooled the offensive side of the ball to go with what was a strong defense in 2024. Although they were picked to finish 10th in the SEC, there are a number of analysts, like Josh Pate, who believe they are a top-10 caliber team. Now, the Sooners enter Venables' fourth year and their second year in the SEC, needing to prove the naysayers wrong after the disappointment of 2024. They'll face a challenging schedule that includes home games against Illinois State, Michigan, Auburn, Kent State, Ole Miss, Missouri, and LSU, as well as road games against Temple, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Alabama. Of course, Oklahoma's schedule also includes the annual Red River Rivalry matchup against Texas and the neutral-site Cotton Bowl in Dallas. OU has to deal with one of the toughest schedules in the country this year, but the Sooners have made plenty of moves this offseason to improve on the product they put on the field last season. J.D. PicKell, who covers college football for On3 Sports, has been vocal in his opinion this offseason that Oklahoma will be much improved in 2025. However, he said this week on "The Hard Count with J.D. PicKell" that he believes OU needs a few things to go right this year to have the kind of success Sooner Nation is used to. PicKell's biggest need for the Sooners this year is for new starting quarterback John Mateer to have an excellent season. PicKell has reason to believe that will happen, given Mateer's relationship with new offensive coordinator/quarterbacks coach Ben Arbuckle. It's night and day different when it comes to how stable they are and and what you can actually look at from playing games in the college football world on Saturdays and how you feel about it. You're not forecasting. You're forecasting to the SEC to a degree, but you're not forecasting if John Mateer can play D1 FBS football or not. You were a year ago with Jackson Arnold. You were a year ago with your offensive line and your offensive coordinator. You're not right now. You know Arbuckle and Mateer work well together. - PicKell, - The Hard Count PicKell went on to elaborate that Mateer, who was brought in by Venables and his staff to be the difference offensively, has to, in fact, be the difference-maker at the QB position they hope he is. The Sooners didn't have anything near that at QB in 2024, which is a big part of the reason why Mateer now resides in Norman. PicKell stated that Mateer has to be able to make the plays that win Oklahoma games in the fourth quarter in the SEC. Another "need" that PicKell outlined for the Sooners this year was a top-tier season from their defensive front-seven, especially on the defensive line. He believes that OU needs that group to be at their best in the biggest moments, just like Mateer needs to be for the offense. With bringing back the majority of your defensive line, that has to show itself in the biggest spots against those teams. Like, in the 'big dogs' tier of college football, you've got to have the big boys on the defensive side; and they do, but I want to see them play like it in those spots. - PicKell, The Hard Count Although the Sooners lost plenty of veteran talent, leadership and production on defense this year, especially in the front seven, they returned and retained plenty of good players as well. Guys like R Mason Thomas, Gracen Halton, Kobie McKinzie and Kip Lewis will now be counted upon to be the building blocks of the Venables defense in 2025. PicKell also stated that the 2025 Sooners must understand and embrace the weight of what it means to be playing football at the University of Oklahoma, something he thinks may not have been extremely present in 2024. Because at a place like Oklahoma, a 6-7 season isn't going to cut it. The expectation is to compete for championships. PicKell believes this year's team may have a better understanding of what it means to play at the University of Oklahoma. PicKell believes this year's team has an extra confidence and swagger to them that might have been lacking a year ago in Norman. He also feels strongly that Oklahoma will be far better this season than they were last season. Sooner fans are hoping he's right. Contact/Follow us @SoonersWire on X, and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Oklahoma news, notes, and opinions. You can also follow Aaron on X @Aaron_Gelvin.
